1
|
Gautom P, Rosales AG, Petrik AF, Thompson JH, Slaughter MT, Mosso L, Hussain SA, Jimenez R, Coronado GD. Evaluating the Reach of a Patient Navigation Program for Follow-up Colonoscopy in a Large Federally Qualified Health Center. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2024; 17:325-333. [PMID: 38641422 PMCID: PMC11219256 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-23-0498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
Patient navigation (PN) has been shown to improve participation in cancer screening, including colorectal cancer screening, and is now a recommended practice by the Community Preventive Services Task Force. Despite the effectiveness of PN programs, little is known about the number of contacts needed to successfully reach patients or about the demographic and healthcare utilization factors associated with reach. PRECISE was an individual randomized study of PN versus usual care conducted as a partnership between two large health systems in the Pacific Northwest. The navigation program was a six-topic area telephonic program designed to support patients with an abnormal fecal test result to obtain a follow-up colonoscopy. We report the number of contact attempts needed to successfully reach navigated patients. We used logistic regression to report the demographic and healthcare utilization characteristics associated with patients allocated to PN who were successfully reached. We identified 1,200 patients with an abnormal fecal immunochemical test result, of whom 970 were randomized into the study (45.7% were female, 17.5% were Spanish-speaking, and the mean age was 60.8 years). Of the 479 patients allocated to the PN intervention, 382 (79.7%) were reached within 18 call attempts, and nearly all (n = 356; 93.2%) were reached within six contact attempts. Patient characteristics associated with reach were race, county of residence, and body mass index. Our findings can guide future efforts to optimize the reach of PN programs. Prevention Relevance: The findings from this large study can inform clinic-level implementation of future PN programs in Federally Qualified Health Centers to improve the reach of patients needing cancer screenings, optimize staff resources, and ultimately increase cancer screenings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priyanka Gautom
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research 3800 N. Interstate Ave. Portland, OR 97227
- OHSU-PSU School of Public Health 1810 SW 5th Ave Portland, OR 97201
| | - Ana Gabriela Rosales
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research 3800 N. Interstate Ave. Portland, OR 97227
| | - Amanda F. Petrik
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research 3800 N. Interstate Ave. Portland, OR 97227
| | - Jamie H. Thompson
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research 3800 N. Interstate Ave. Portland, OR 97227
| | - Matthew T. Slaughter
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research 3800 N. Interstate Ave. Portland, OR 97227
| | - Leslie Mosso
- Sea Mar Community Health Centers 1040 S. Henderson St. Seattle, WA 98108
| | - Syed Akmal Hussain
- Sea Mar Community Health Centers 1040 S. Henderson St. Seattle, WA 98108
| | - Ricardo Jimenez
- Sea Mar Community Health Centers 1040 S. Henderson St. Seattle, WA 98108
| | - Gloria D. Coronado
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research 3800 N. Interstate Ave. Portland, OR 97227
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shim HG, Gupta A, Fu A, Flores R, Simmons R, Steinberg J, Guerson-Gil A, Liao Y, Yang J, LaComb JF, D'Souza LS, Monzur F, Li E, Guillaume A. A Quality Improvement Study on Colonoscopy Wait Times in Underinsured Patients Following the COVID-19 Pandemic. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2024:01720094-990000000-00270. [PMID: 38916225 DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic limited access to colonoscopy. To advance colorectal cancer health equity, we conducted a quality improvement study on colonoscopy wait times in 2019-2023 for underinsured (Medicaid, uninsured) compared with insured patients at an academic medical center providing colonoscopy for surrounding Federally Qualified Health Centers. METHODS Retrospective chart reviews were performed on adult outpatient colonoscopies in the preintervention period (2019-2021). In 2022, an institutional grant funded bilingual patient navigation to reduce colonoscopy wait times. Postintervention data were collected prospectively from May 2022 to May 2023 in 2 phases. Multivariable regression analyses were conducted for colonoscopy wait times as a primary outcome. RESULTS Analysis of 3,403 screening/surveillance and 1,896 diagnostic colonoscopies revealed significantly longer colonoscopy wait times for underinsured compared with insured patients after 2019. For screening/surveillance colonoscopies, wait time differences between underinsured and insured patients in the second postintervention phase were reduced by 34.21 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.07-57.35) compared with the postpandemic period and by 56.36 days (95% CI: 34.16-78.55) compared with the first postintervention phase. For diagnostic colonoscopies, wait time differences in the second postintervention phase were reduced by 27.57 days (95% CI: 9.96-45.19) compared with the postpandemic period and by 20.40 days (95% CI: 1.02-39.77) compared with the first postintervention phase. DISCUSSION Colonoscopy wait times were significantly longer for underinsured compared with insured patients following the COVID-19 pandemic. This disparity was partially ameliorated by patient navigation. Monitoring outpatient colonoscopy wait times in underinsured patients is important for advancing health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Gi Shim
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Anuj Gupta
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Andrew Fu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Ricardo Flores
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Robert Simmons
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Jonathan Steinberg
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Arcelia Guerson-Gil
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Yunhan Liao
- Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Jie Yang
- Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Joseph F LaComb
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Lionel S D'Souza
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Farah Monzur
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Ellen Li
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Alexandra Guillaume
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hahn EE, Munoz-Plaza CE, Jensen CD, Ghai NR, Pak K, Amundsen BI, Contreras R, Cannizzaro N, Chubak J, Green BB, Skinner CS, Halm EA, Schottinger JE, Levin TR. Patterns of Care Following a Positive Fecal Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer: A Mixed Methods Study. J Gen Intern Med 2024:10.1007/s11606-024-08764-0. [PMID: 38771535 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08764-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE Multilevel barriers to colonoscopy after a positive fecal blood test for colorectal cancer (CRC) are well-documented. A less-explored barrier to appropriate follow-up is repeat fecal testing after a positive test. We investigated this phenomenon using mixed methods. DESIGN This sequential mixed methods study included quantitative data from a large cohort of patients 50-89 years from four healthcare systems with a positive fecal test 2010-2018 and qualitative data from interviews with physicians and patients. MAIN MEASURES Logistic regression was used to evaluate whether repeat testing was associated with failure to complete subsequent colonoscopy and to identify factors associated with repeat testing. Interviews were coded and analyzed to explore reasons for repeat testing. KEY RESULTS A total of 316,443 patients had a positive fecal test. Within 1 year, 76.3% received a colonoscopy without repeat fecal testing, 3% repeated testing and then received a colonoscopy, 4.4% repeated testing without colonoscopy, and 16.3% did nothing. Among repeat testers (7.4% of total cohort, N = 23,312), 59% did not receive a colonoscopy within 1 year. In adjusted models, those with an initial positive test followed by a negative second test were significantly less likely to receive colonoscopy than those with two successive positive tests (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.35-0.40). Older age (65-75 vs. 50-64 years: OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.33-1.41) and higher comorbidity score (≥ 4 vs. 0: OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.67-1.83) were significantly associated with repeat testing compared to those who received colonoscopy without repeat tests. Qualitative interview data revealed reasons underlying repeat testing, including colonoscopy avoidance, bargaining, and disbelief of positive results. CONCLUSIONS Among patients in this cohort, 7.4% repeated fecal testing after an initial positive test. Of those, over half did not go on to receive a colonoscopy within 1 year. Efforts to improve CRC screening must address repeat fecal testing after a positive test as a barrier to completing colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin E Hahn
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA.
- Department of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA.
| | - Corrine E Munoz-Plaza
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | | | - Nirupa R Ghai
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Katherine Pak
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Britta I Amundsen
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Richard Contreras
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Nancy Cannizzaro
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Jessica Chubak
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Beverly B Green
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Celette Sugg Skinner
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Ethan A Halm
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Joanne E Schottinger
- Department of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Theodore R Levin
- Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, CA, USA
- Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moyal-Smith R, Elam M, Boulanger J, Balaban R, Cox JE, Cunningham R, Folcarelli P, Germak MC, O'Reilly K, Parkerton M, Samuels NW, Unsworth F, Sato L, Benjamin E. Reducing the Risk of Delayed Colorectal Cancer Diagnoses Through an Ambulatory Safety Net Collaborative. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2024:S1553-7250(24)00121-1. [PMID: 38763793 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An estimated 12 million adults in the United States experience delayed diagnoses and other diagnostic errors annually. Ambulatory safety nets (ASNs) are an intervention to reduce delayed diagnoses by identifying patients with abnormal results overdue for follow-up using registries, workflow redesign, and patient navigation. The authors sought to co-design a collaborative and implement colorectal cancer (CRC) ASNs across various health care settings. METHODS A working group was convened to co-design implementation guidance, measures, and the collaborative model. Collaborative sites were recruited through a medical professional liability insurance program and chose to begin with developing an ASN for positive at-home CRC screening or overdue surveillance colonoscopy. The 18-month Breakthrough Series Collaborative ran from January 2022 to July 2023, with sites continuing to collect data while sustaining their ASNs. Data were collected from sites monthly on patients in the ASN, including the proportion that was successfully contacted, scheduled, and completed a follow-up colonoscopy. RESULTS Six sites participated; four had an operational ASN at the end of the Breakthrough Series, with the remaining sites launching three months later. From October 2022 through February 2024, the Collaborative ASNs collectively identified 5,165 patients from the registry as needing outreach. Among patients needing outreach, 3,555 (68.8%) were successfully contacted, 2,060 (39.9%) were scheduled for a colonoscopy, and 1,504 (29.1%) completed their colonoscopy. CONCLUSION The Collaborative successfully identified patients with previously abnormal CRC screening and facilitated completion of follow-up testing. The CRC ASN Implementation Guide offers a comprehensive road map for health care leaders interested in implementing CRC ASNs.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ramalingam N, Coury J, Barnes C, Kenzie ES, Petrik AF, Mummadi RR, Coronado G, Davis MM. Provision of colonoscopy in rural settings: A qualitative assessment of provider context, barriers, facilitators, and capacity. J Rural Health 2024; 40:272-281. [PMID: 37676061 PMCID: PMC10918036 DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Colonoscopy can prevent morbidity and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) and is the most commonly used screening method in the United States. Barriers to colonoscopy at multiple levels can contribute to disparities. Yet, in rural settings, little is known about who delivers colonoscopy and facilitators and barriers to colonoscopy access through screening completion. METHODS We conducted a qualitative study with providers in rural Oregon who worked in endoscopy centers or primary care clinics. Semistructured interviews, conducted in July and August, 2021, focused on clinician experiences providing colonoscopy to rural Medicaid patients, including workflows, barriers, and access. We used thematic analysis, through immersion crystallization, to analyze interview transcripts and develop emergent themes. FINDINGS We interviewed 19 providers. We found two categories of colonoscopy providers: primary care providers (PCPs) doing colonoscopy on their own patients (n = 9; 47%) and general surgeons providing colonoscopy to patients referred to their services (n = 10; 53%). Providers described barriers to colonoscopy at the provider, community, and patient levels and suggested patient supports could help overcome them. Providers found current colonoscopy capacity sufficient, but noted PCPs trained to perform colonoscopy would be key to continued accessibility. Finally, providers shared concerns about the shrinking number of PCP endoscopists, especially with anticipated increased screening demand related to the CRC screening guideline shift. CONCLUSIONS These themes reflect opportunities to address multilevel barriers to improve access, colonoscopy capacity, and patient education approaches. Our results highlight that PCPs are an essential part of the workforce that provides colonoscopy in rural areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- NithyaPriya Ramalingam
- Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3030 S Moody Avenue, Suite 160, Portland, OR 97201
| | - Jennifer Coury
- Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3030 S Moody Avenue, Suite 160, Portland, OR 97201
| | - Chrystal Barnes
- Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3030 S Moody Avenue, Suite 160, Portland, OR 97201
| | - Erin S. Kenzie
- Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3030 S Moody Avenue, Suite 160, Portland, OR 97201
- Department of Family Medicine & School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239-3098
| | - Amanda F. Petrik
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227
| | - Rajasekhara R Mummadi
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227
| | - Gloria Coronado
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97227
| | - Melinda M. Davis
- Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, 3030 S Moody Avenue, Suite 160, Portland, OR 97201
- Department of Family Medicine & School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239-3098
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shareef F, Bharti B, Garcia-Bigley F, Hernandez M, Nodora J, Liu J, Ramers C, Nery JD, Marquez J, Moyano K, Rojas S, Arredondo E, Gupta S. Abnormal Colorectal Cancer Test Follow-Up: A Quality Improvement Initiative at a Federally Qualified Health Center. J Prim Care Community Health 2024; 15:21501319241242571. [PMID: 38554066 PMCID: PMC10981848 DOI: 10.1177/21501319241242571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES Colonoscopy completion rates after an abnormal fecal immunochemical test (FIT) are suboptimal, resulting in missed opportunities for early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer. Patient navigation and structured follow-up may improve colonoscopy completion, but implementation of these strategies is not widespread. METHODS We conducted a quality improvement study using a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model to increase colonoscopy completion after abnormal FIT in a large federally qualified health center serving a diverse and low-income population. Intervention components included patient navigation, and a checklist to promote completion of key steps required for abnormal FIT follow-up. Primary outcome was proportion of patients achieving colonoscopy completion within 6 months of abnormal FIT, assessed at baseline for 156 patients pre-intervention, and compared to 208 patients during the intervention period from April 2017 to December 2019. Drop offs at each step in the follow-up process were assessed. RESULTS Colonoscopy completion improved from 21% among 156 patients with abnormal FIT pre-intervention, to 38% among 208 patients with abnormal FIT during the intervention (P < .001; absolute increase: 17%, 95% CI: 6.9%-25.2%). Among the 130 non-completers during the intervention period, lack of completion was attributable to absence of colonoscopy referral for 7.7%; inability to schedule a pre-colonoscopy specialist visit for 71.5%; failure to complete a pre-colonoscopy visit for 2.3%; the absence of colonoscopy scheduling for 9.2%; failure to show for a scheduled colonoscopy for 9.2%. CONCLUSIONS Patient navigation and structured follow-up appear to improve colonoscopy completion after abnormal FIT. Additional strategies are needed to achieve optimal rates of completion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faizah Shareef
- University of California San Diego (Internal Medicine), La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Balambal Bharti
- University of California San Diego (Internal Medicine), La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Jesse Nodora
- University of California San Diego (Radiation Medicine), La Jolla, CA, USA
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Jie Liu
- Shang Consulting LLC, San Diego CA, USA
| | - Christian Ramers
- Family Health Centers of San Diego (Graduate Medical Education), San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Karina Moyano
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Samir Gupta
- University of California San Diego (Internal Medicine), La Jolla, CA, USA
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lin OM, Paine D, Gramling E, Menon M. Disparities in Time to Diagnosis Among Patients With Multiple Myeloma. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA, MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2023; 23:e379-e385. [PMID: 37612207 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple myeloma (MM) is one of the most diagnosed hematologic malignancies in the United States. Despite improvements in therapy, health disparities persist among patients with MM. Here, we aim to determine whether there are disparities in time to diagnosis (TTD) among MM patients with regard to income, race/ethnicity, and gender. PATIENTS Patients with a monoclonal protein detected in the serum and/or urine and a subsequent bone marrow biopsy confirmed diagnosis of MM were included in the study. METHODS We extracted data on patients with MM and assessed whether the predictor variables were associated with the primary outcome of TTD, which we define as the time between detection of a monoclonal protein in the serum or urine and bone marrow biopsy diagnosis of MM. RESULTS Compared to patients with commercial insurance, patients receiving Medicaid (HR: 0.408, 95% CI: 0.206-0.808; P = .010) and patients without insurance (HR: 0.428, 95% CI: 0.207-0.885; P = .022) were significantly more likely to have delayed TTD. TTD was also prolonged if the provider who ordered the testing for the detection of a monoclonal protein was not a hematologist (HR: 0.435, 95% CI: 0.284-0.668; P < .0001). No disparities were found with regard to race/ethnicity or gender. CONCLUSION This study suggests there may be socioeconomic disparities in TTD among patients with MM. Interventions such as patient navigation may be useful to reduce TTD among socioeconomically disadvantaged patient populations. Further studies need to be conducted to elucidate reasons for delays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia M Lin
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
| | - Dana Paine
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Esther Gramling
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Manoj Menon
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
O'Leary MC, Reuland DS, Randolph C, Ferrari RM, Brenner AT, Wheeler SB, Farr DE, Newcomer MK, Crockett SD. Reach and effectiveness of a centralized navigation program for patients with positive fecal immunochemical tests requiring follow-up colonoscopy. Prev Med Rep 2023; 34:102211. [PMID: 37214164 PMCID: PMC10196769 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Completion rates for follow-up colonoscopies after an abnormal fecal immunochemical test (FIT) are suboptimal in federally qualified health center (FQHC) settings. We implemented a screening intervention that included mailed FIT outreach to North Carolina FQHC patients from June 2020 to September 2021 and centralized patient navigation to support patients with abnormal FITs in completing follow-up colonoscopy. We evaluated the reach and effectiveness of navigation using electronic medical record data and navigator call logs detailing interactions with patients. Reach assessments included the proportion of patients successfully contacted by phone and who agreed to participate in navigation, intensity of navigation provided (including types of barriers to colonoscopy identified and total navigation time), and differences in these measures by socio-demographic characteristics. Effectiveness outcomes included colonoscopy completion, timeliness of follow-up colonoscopy (i.e., within 9 months), and bowel prep adequacy. Among 514 patients who completed a mailed FIT, 38 patients had an abnormal result and were eligible for navigation. Of these, 26 (68%) accepted navigation, 7 (18%) declined, and 5 (13%) could not be contacted. Among navigated patients, 81% had informational needs, 38% had emotional barriers, 35% had financial barriers, 12% had transportation barriers, and 42% had multiple barriers to colonoscopy. Median navigation time was 48.5 min (range: 24-277 min). Colonoscopy completion differed across groups - 92% of those accepting navigation completed colonoscopy within 9 months, versus 43% for those declining navigation. We found that centralized navigation was widely accepted in FQHC patients with abnormal FIT, and was an effective strategy, resulting in high colonoscopy completion rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan C. O'Leary
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Daniel S. Reuland
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Connor Randolph
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Renée M. Ferrari
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Alison T. Brenner
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Stephanie B. Wheeler
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Deeonna E. Farr
- College of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
| | | | - Seth D. Crockett
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mohl JT, Ciemins EL, Miller-Wilson LA, Gillen A, Luo R, Colangelo F. Rates of Follow-up Colonoscopy After a Positive Stool-Based Screening Test Result for Colorectal Cancer Among Health Care Organizations in the US, 2017-2020. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2251384. [PMID: 36652246 PMCID: PMC9856942 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.51384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Noninvasive stool-based screening tests (SBTs) are effective alternatives to colonoscopy. However, a positive SBT result requires timely follow-up colonoscopy (FU-CY) to complete the colorectal cancer screening paradigm. OBJECTIVES To evaluate FU-CY rates after a positive SBT result and to assess the association of the early COVID-19 pandemic with FU-CY rates. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This mixed-methods cohort study included retrospective analysis of deidentified administrative claims and electronic health records data between June 1, 2015, and June 30, 2021, from the Optum Labs Data Warehouse and qualitative, semistructured interviews with clinicians from 5 health care organizations (HCOs). The study population included data from average-risk primary care patients aged 50 to 75 years with a positive SBT result between January 1, 2017, and June 30, 2020, at 39 HCOs. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the FU-CY rate within 1 year of a positive SBT result according to patient age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance type, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and prior SBT use. RESULTS This cohort study included 32 769 individuals (16 929 [51.7%] female; mean [SD] age, 63.1 [7.1] years; 2092 [6.4%] of Black and 28 832 [88.0%] of White race; and 825 [2.5%] of Hispanic ethnicity). The FU-CY rates were 43.3% within 90 days of the positive SBT result, 51.4% within 180 days, and 56.1% within 360 days (n = 32 769). In interviews, clinicians were uniformly surprised by the low FU-CY rates. Rates varied by race, ethnicity, insurance type, presence of comorbidities, and SBT used. In the Cox proportional hazards regression model, the strongest positive association was with multitarget stool DNA use (hazard ratio, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.57-1.68] relative to fecal immunochemical tests; P < .001), and the strongest negative association was with the presence of comorbidities (hazard ratio, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.59-0.71] for a CCI of >4 relative to 0; P < .001). The early COVID-19 pandemic was associated with lower FU-CY rates. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study found that FU-CY rates after a positive SBT result for colorectal cancer screening were low among an average-risk population, with the median HCO achieving a 53.4% FU-CY rate within 1 year. Socioeconomic factors and the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with lower FU-CY rates, presenting opportunities for targeted intervention by clinicians and health care systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeff T. Mohl
- American Medical Group Association, Alexandria, Virginia
| | | | | | - Abbie Gillen
- American Medical Group Association, Alexandria, Virginia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Issaka RB, Bell-Brown A, Kao J, Snyder C, Atkins DL, Chew LD, Weiner BJ, Strate L, Inadomi JM, Ramsey SD. Barriers Associated with Inadequate Follow-up of Abnormal Fecal Immunochemical Test Results in a Safety-Net System: A Mixed-Methods Analysis. Prev Med Rep 2022; 28:101831. [PMID: 35637893 PMCID: PMC9144348 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Less than 50% of patients with an abnormal FIT result had a documented reason. Patient-level (e.g., declined colonoscopy) reasons were most frequently documented. Interviews revealed discordance in documented and patient-reported reasons. Mixed-methods analyses are needed to improve colonoscopy after abnormal FIT results.
In safety-net healthcare systems, colonoscopy completion within 1-year of an abnormal fecal immunochemical test (FIT) result rarely exceeds 50%. Understanding how electronic health records (EHR) documented reasons for missed colonoscopy match or differ from patient-reported reasons, is critical to optimize effective interventions to address this challenge. We conducted a convergent mixed-methods study which included a retrospective analysis of EHR data and semi-structured interviews of adults 50–75 years old, with abnormal FIT results between 2014 and 2020 in a large safety-net healthcare system. Of the 299 patients identified, 59.2% (n = 177) did not complete a colonoscopy within one year of their abnormal result. EHR abstraction revealed a documented reason for lack of follow-up colonoscopy in 49.2% (n = 87/177); patient-level (e.g., declined colonoscopy; 51.5%) and multi-factorial reasons (e.g., lost to follow-up; 37.9%) were most common. In 18 patient interviews, patient (e.g., fear of colonoscopy), provider (e.g., lack of result awareness), and system-level reasons (e.g., scheduling challenges) were most common. Only three reasons for lack of colonoscopy overlapped between EHR data and patient interviews (competing health issues, lack of transportation, and abnormal FIT result attributed to another cause). In a cohort of safety-net patients with abnormal FIT results, the most common reasons for lack of follow-up were patient-related. Our analysis revealed a discordance between EHR documented and patient-reported reasons for lack of colonoscopy after an abnormal FIT result. Mixed-methods analyses, as in the present study, may give us the greatest insight into modifiable determinants to develop effective interventions beyond quantitative and qualitative data analysis alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel B. Issaka
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
- Corresponding author at: 1100 Fairview Ave. N., M/S: M3-B232, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Ari Bell-Brown
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jason Kao
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Division of Medical Oncology, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Cyndy Snyder
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Dana L. Atkins
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lisa D. Chew
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Bryan J. Weiner
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lisa Strate
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - John M. Inadomi
- Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Scott D. Ramsey
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Issaka RB, Bell-Brown A, Snyder C, Atkins DL, Chew L, Weiner BJ, Strate L, Inadomi JM, Ramsey SD. Perceptions on Barriers and Facilitators to Colonoscopy Completion After Abnormal Fecal Immunochemical Test Results in a Safety Net System. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2120159. [PMID: 34374771 PMCID: PMC8356069 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The effectiveness of stool-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, including fecal immunochemical tests (FITs), relies on colonoscopy completion among patients with abnormal results, but in safety net systems and federally qualified health centers, in which FIT is frequently used, colonoscopy completion within 1 year of an abnormal result rarely exceeds 50%. Clinician-identified factors in follow-up of abnormal FIT results are understudied and could lead to more effective interventions to address this issue. OBJECTIVE To describe clinician-identified barriers and facilitators to colonoscopy completion among patients with abnormal FIT results in a safety net health care system. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This qualitative study was conducted using semistructured key informant interviews with primary care physicians (PCPs) and staff members in a large safety net health care system in Washington state. Eligible clinicians were recruited through all-staff meetings and clinic medical directors. Interviews were conducted from February to December 2020 through face-to-face interactions or digital meeting platforms. Interview transcripts were analyzed deductively and inductively using a content analysis approach. Data were analyzed from September through December 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Barriers and facilitators to colonoscopy completion after an abnormal FIT result were identified by PCPs and staff members. RESULTS Among 21 participants, there were 10 PCPs and 11 staff members; 20 participants provided demographic information. The median (interquartile range) age was 38.5 (33.0-51.5) years, 17 (85.0%) were women, and 9 participants (45.0%) spent more than 75% of their working time engaging in patient care. All participants identified social determinants of health, organizational factors, and patient cognitive factors as barriers to colonoscopy completion. Participants suggested that existing resources that addressed these factors facilitated colonoscopy completion but were insufficient to meet national follow-up colonoscopy goals. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this qualitative study, responses of interviewed PCPs and staff members suggested that the barriers to colonoscopy completion in a safety net health system may be modifiable. These findings suggest that interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal FIT results should be informed by clinician-identified factors to address multilevel challenges to colonoscopy completion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel B. Issaka
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
| | - Ari Bell-Brown
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Cyndy Snyder
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
| | - Dana L. Atkins
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Lisa Chew
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
| | - Bryan J. Weiner
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle
| | - Lisa Strate
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
| | - John M. Inadomi
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City
| | - Scott D. Ramsey
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|