Impact of Community Referral on Colonoscopy Quality Metrics in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Comparing Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Colectomy at Veteran Affairs Hospitals and Non-Veteran Affairs Hospitals: A Multiinstitutional Study

INTRODUCTION

The Veteran Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) are large databases designed to measure surgical outcomes for their respective populations. We sought to compare surgical outcomes in patients undergoing colectomies at Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals versus non-VA hospitals.

METHODS

After institutional review baord approval, records for 271,523 colectomies from NSQIP and 11,597 from VASQIP between the years 2015 and 2019 were compiled. Demographics, comorbidity, 30-d mortality, and other outcomes were examined using Chi-squared, analysis of variance, Mann Whitney U, and Fisher's Exact Test within SPSS version 26.

RESULTS

VASQIP patients were more likely to be male (94.3% versus 48.4%, P < 0.001) and older (median 63, 52-72 versus 67, 60-72 P < 0.001). Veterans were also more likely to have diabetes (25.3% versus 15.8%, P < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (15.4% versus 5.5%, P < 0.001), and congestive heart failure (17.0% versus 1.3%, P < 0.001). Veterans had slightly better 30-d mortality (2.4% versus 2.8%, P = 0.003), less organ space infections (2.8% versus 5.8%, P < 0.001), or postoperative sepsis (3.4% versus 5.3%). Non-VA patients were more likely to be having emergent surgery (13.4% versus 9.6%, P < 0.001) or undergo a laparoscopic approach (57.9% versus 50.2%, P < 0.001). Non-VA patients had shorter postoperative length of stay (5.99 d versus 7.32 d, P < 0.001) and were less likely to return to the operating room (5.3% versus 8.4%, P < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: Despite increased comorbidity, VA hospitals and hospitals enrolled in NSQIP have managed to achieve markedly similar rates of 30-d mortality following colectomy. Further study is needed to better understand the differences between both the populations and surgical outcomes between VA hospitals and non-VA hospitals.

Veterans Health Administration (VA) vs. Non-VA Healthcare Quality: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The Veterans Health Administration (VA) serves Veterans in the nation's largest integrated healthcare system. VA seeks to provide high quality of healthcare to Veterans, but due to the VA Choice and MISSION Acts, VA increasingly pays for care outside of its system in the community. This systematic review compares care provided in VA and non-VA settings, and includes published studies from 2015 to 2023, updating 2 prior systematic reviews on this topic.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and PsychINFO from 2015 to 2023 for published literature comparing VA and non-VA care, including VA-paid community care. Records were included at the abstract or full-text level if they compared VA medical care with care provided in other healthcare systems, and included clinical quality, safety, access, patient experience, efficiency (cost), or equity outcomes. Data from included studies was abstracted by two independent reviewers, with disagreements resolved by consensus. Results were synthesized narratively and via graphical evidence maps.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven studies were included after screening 2415 titles. Twelve studies compared VA and VA-paid community care. Most studies assessed clinical quality and safety, and studies of access were second most common. Only six studies assessed patient experience and six assessed cost or efficiency. Clinical quality and safety of VA care was better than or equal to non-VA care in most studies. Patient experience in VA care was better than or equal to experience in non-VA care in all studies, but access and cost/efficiency outcomes were mixed.

DISCUSSION

VA care is consistently as good as or better than non-VA care in terms of clinical quality and safety. Access, cost/efficiency, and patient experience between the two systems are not well studied. Further research is needed on these outcomes and on services widely used by Veterans in VA-paid community care, like physical medicine and rehabilitation.

Higher Quality Colonoscopy: Worth the Wait?

ABSTRACT

To meet the high demand for colonoscopy, the Veterans Health Administration often refers veterans to community practices. Petros et al. compared colonoscopy quality at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center with that of local community practices. Although community providers performed more timely colonoscopy than the Veterans Affairs medical center (mean 25 days earlier), colonoscopy quality was significantly lower for other important quality metrics, including adenoma detection, advanced adenoma detection, adenomas per colonoscopy, and appropriate surveillance recommendations. This study highlights the need for continued efforts to assure high-quality colonoscopy in all settings.