Extended Volumetric Follow-up of Juvenile Pilocytic Astrocytomas Treated with Proton Beam Therapy

Proton Therapy and Gliomas: A Systematic Review

Background: Gliomas are primary cerebral tumors. Radiation therapy plays a key role in their treatment but with a risk of toxicity associated with the dose to and volume of normal tissue that is irradiated. With its precision properties allowing for the increased sparing of healthy tissue, proton therapy could be an interesting option for this pathology. Methods: Two reviewers performed a systematic review of original papers published between 2010 and July 2021 following PRISMA guidelines. We analyzed disease outcomes, toxicity outcomes, or dosimetry data in four separate groups: children/adults and individuals with low-/high-grade gliomas. Results: Among 15 studies, 11 concerned clinical and toxicity outcomes, and 4 reported dosimetry data. Proton therapy showed similar disease outcomes with greater tolerance than conventional radiation therapy, partly due to the better dosimetry plans. Conclusions: This review suggests that proton therapy is a promising technique for glioma treatment. However, studies with a high level of evidence are still needed to validate this finding.

[Stereotactic irradiation in the complex treatment of patients with intracranial pilocytic astrocytoma]

Complex management of patients with intracranial pilocytic astrocytoma (PA) consists of surgical treatment, drug therapy (mainly in young children) and radiotherapy. For many years, radiotherapy (RT) has been a standard for residual tumors, recurrence or continued growth of PA. Currently, stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy are preferred for PA, because these procedures are characterized by high conformity and selectivity, precise irradiation of tumor with minimal damage to surrounding intact tissues. Stereotaxic approach is very important since PAs are localized near functionally significant and radiosensitive brain structures in most cases. There is significant experience of single-center studies devoted to radiotherapy of patients with PA at the Department of Neuroradiosurgery of the Burdenko Neurosurgery Center. In this research, the authors analyzed the results of stereotactic irradiation of 430 patients with PA for the period from 2005 to 2018.

[Pseudoprogression of intracranial pilocytic astrocytomas and other low-grade gliomas. Literature review and case report]

Tumor pseudoprogression is characterized by temporary tumor enlargement following radiotherapy with subsequent stabilization or regression without additional treatment. This phenomenon has been comprehensively described in patients with malignant gliomas. However, this phenomenon has not been sufficiently studied in patients with low-grade gliomas including pilocytic astrocytomas. In recent years, more and more researches devoted to this problem have appeared in the literature. It seems relevant to conduct a meta-analysis of these data in the modern literature.

Increased risk of pseudoprogression among pediatric low-grade glioma patients treated with proton versus photon radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Pseudoprogression (PsP) is a recognized phenomenon after radiotherapy (RT) for high-grade glioma but is poorly characterized for low-grade glioma (LGG). We sought to characterize PsP for pediatric LGG patients treated with RT, with particular focus on the role of RT modality using photon-based intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) or proton beam therapy (PBT).

METHODS

Serial MRI scans from 83 pediatric LGG patients managed at 2 institutions between 1998 and 2017 were evaluated. PsP was scored when a progressive lesion subsequently decreased or stabilized for at least a year without therapy.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (39%) were treated with IMRT, and 51 (61%) were treated with PBT. Median RT dose for the cohort was 50.4 Gy(RBE) (range, 45-59.4 Gy[RBE]). PsP was identified in 31 patients (37%), including 8/32 IMRT patients (25%) and 23/51 PBT patients (45%). PBT patients were significantly more likely to have post-RT enlargement (hazard ratio [HR] 2.15, 95% CI: 1.06-4.38, P = 0.048). RT dose >50.4 Gy(RBE) similarly predicted higher rates of PsP (HR 2.61, 95% CI: 1.20-5.68, P = 0.016). Multivariable analysis confirmed the independent effects of RT modality (P = 0.03) and RT dose (P = 0.01) on PsP incidence. Local progression occurred in 10 patients: 7 IMRT patients (22%) and 3 PBT patients (6%), with a trend toward improved local control for PBT patients (HR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.10-1.18, P = 0.099).

CONCLUSIONS

These data highlight substantial rates of PsP among pediatric LGG patients, particularly those treated with PBT. PsP should be considered when assessing response to RT in LGG patients within the first year after RT.

Outcomes Following Proton Therapy for Pediatric Low-Grade Glioma

PURPOSE

Dosimetric studies show that proton therapy can reduce the low/intermediate radiation dose to uninvolved tissue in children with low-grade glioma (LGG). For this reason, LGG is the fourth most common pediatric tumor treated with proton therapy, yet clinical outcome data on efficacy and toxicity are limited.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We reviewed the medical records of 174 children (≤21 years old) with nonmetastatic LGG enrolled on a prospective protocol and treated with proton therapy between 2007 and 2017. We assessed clinical outcomes and toxicity and analyzed patient, tumor, and treatment-related variables.

RESULTS

The median age was 10.2 years (range, 2-21). Fifty-eight percent of tumors were World Health Organization grade 1 and 30% were grade 2; 12% were diagnosed on imaging characteristics alone. The most common histology was pilocytic astrocytoma (47%). The most common tumor subsites were diencephalon/optic pathway (52%), caudal brainstem (16%), and cerebellum (13%). Forty-two percent received chemotherapy before radiation therapy. The median follow-up was 4.4 years. The 5-year actuarial rates of local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78%-90%), 84% (95% CI, 77%-89%), and 92% (95% CI, 85%-95%), respectively. On univariate analysis, brainstem/spinal cord tumor location (62% vs 90% elsewhere) and dose <54 GyRBE (67% vs 91% for 54 GyRBE) were associated with inferior local control (P < .01 for both). Twenty-two patients (12.6%) experienced acute nausea or vomiting requiring ondansetron; 2 patients (1.1%) required corticosteroids. Serious toxicities (4% of patients) included brainstem necrosis requiring corticosteroids (n = 2), symptomatic vasculopathy (n = 2), radiation retinopathy (n = 1), epilepsy (n = 1), and death from radiation-induced high-grade glioma (n = 1). Thirty-nine patients (22%) developed new-onset central hormone deficiency. Pseudoprogression was observed in 32.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with modern photon series, proton therapy reduces the radiation dose to developing brain tissue, diminishing acute toxicities without compromising disease control.