Circulating Cell-Free DNA Correlates with Body Integral Dose and Radiation Modality in Prostate Cancer

Radiation Biological Toximetry Using Circulating Cell-Free DNA (cfDNA) for Rapid Radiation/Nuclear Triage

Optimal triage biodosimetry would include risk stratification within minutes, and it would provide useful triage despite heterogeneous dosimetry, cytokine therapy, mixed radiation quality, race, and age. For regulatory approval, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Biodosimetry Guidance requires suitability for purpose and a validated species-independent mechanism. Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) concentration assays may provide such triage information. To test this hypothesis, cfDNA concentrations were measured in unprocessed monkey plasma using a branched DNA (bDNA) technique with a laboratory developed test. The cfDNA levels, along with hematopoietic parameters, were measured over a 7-day period in Rhesus macaques receiving total body radiation doses ranging from 1 to 6.5 Gy. Low-dose irradiation (0-2 Gy) was easily distinguished from high-dose whole-body exposures (5.5 and 6.5 Gy). Fold changes in cfDNA in the monkey model were comparable to those measured in a bone marrow transplant patient receiving a supralethal radiation dose, suggesting that the lethal threshold of cfDNA concentrations may be similar across species. Average cfDNA levels were 50 ± 40 ng/mL [±1 standard deviation (SD)] pre-irradiation, 120 ± 13 ng/mL at 1 Gy; 242 ± 71 ng/mL at 2 Gy; 607 ± 54 at 5.5 Gy; and 1585 ± 351 at 6.5 Gy (±1 SD). There was an exponential increase in cfDNA concentration with radiation dose. Comparison of the monkey model with the mouse model and the Guskova model, developed using Chernobyl responder data, further demonstrated correlation across species, supporting a similar mechanism of action. The test is available commercially in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) ready form in the U.S. and the European Union. The remaining challenges include developing methods for further simplification of specimen processing and assay evaluation, as well as more accurate calibration of the triage category with cfDNA concentration cutoffs.

Measuring Radiation Toxicity Using Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Prostate Cancer Patients

Background

After radiation therapy (RT), circulating plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) released in response to RT damage to tissue can be measured within hours. We examined for a correlation between cfDNA measured during the first week of therapy and early and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity.

Material and Methods

Patients were eligible for enrollment if they planned to receive proton or photon RT for nonmetastatic prostate cancer in the setting of an intact prostate or after prostatectomy. Blood was collected before treatment and on sequential treatment days for the first full week of therapy. Toxicity assessments were performed at baseline, weekly during RT, and 6 months and 12 months after RT. Data were analyzed to examine correlations among patient-reported GI and GU toxicities.

Results

Fifty-four patients were evaluable for this study. Four (7%) and 3 (6%) patients experienced acute and late grade 2 GI toxicity, respectively. Twenty-two (41%) and 18 (35%) patients experienced acute and late grade 2 GU toxicity, respectively. No patients developed grade 3 or higher toxicity. Grade 2 acute GI toxicity, but not grade 2 acute GU toxicity, was significantly correlated with pre-RT cfDNA levels and on all days 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of RT (P < .005). Grade 2 late GI toxicity, but not GU toxicity, was significantly correlated with pre-RT cfDNA levels (P = .021).

Conclusions

Based on this preliminary study, cfDNA levels can potentially predict the subset of patients destined to develop GI toxicity during prostate cancer treatment. Given that the toxicity profiles of the various fractionations and modalities are highly similar, the data support the expectation that cfDNA could provide a biological estimate to complement the dose-volume histogram. A test of this hypothesis is under evaluation in a National Cancer Institute–funded multi-institutional study.