Toward acquisition protocol standardization for estimating liver fat content using ultrasound attenuation coefficient imaging

Diagnostic performance of shear wave measurement in the detection of hepatic fibrosis: A multicenter prospective study

AIM

This study aimed to establish the shear wave measurement (SWM) cut-off value for each fibrosis stage using magnetic resonance (MR) elastography values as a reference standard.

METHODS

We prospectively analyzed 594 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent SWM and MR elastography. Correlation coefficients (were analyzed, and the diagnostic value was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Liver stiffness was categorized by MR elastography as F0 (<2.61 kPa), F1 (≥2.61 kPa, <2.97 kPa, any fibrosis), F2 (≥2.97 kPa, <3.62 kPa, significant fibrosis), F3 (≥3.62 kPa, <4.62 kPa, advanced fibrosis), or F4 (≥4.62 kPa, cirrhosis).

RESULTS

The median SWM values increased significantly with increasing fibrosis stage (p < 0.001). The correlation coefficient between SWM and MR elastography values was 0.793 (95% confidence interval 0.761-0.821). The correlation coefficients between SWM and MR elastography values significantly decreased with increasing body mass index and skin-capsular distance; skin-capsular distance values were associated with significant differences in sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, or positive predictive value, whereas body mass index values were not. The best cut-off values for any fibrosis, significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis were 6.18, 7.09, 8.05, and 10.89 kPa, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter study in a large number of patients established SWM cut-off values for different degrees of fibrosis in chronic liver diseases using MR elastography as a reference standard. It is expected that these cut-off values will be applied to liver diseases in the future.

Associations Between Multiparametric US-Based Indicators and Pathological Status in Patients with Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease

OBJECTIVE

Noninvasive evaluation of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) using ultrasonography holds significant clinical value. The associations between ultrasound (US)-based parameters and the pathological spectra remain unclear and controversial. This study aims to investigate the associations thoroughly.

METHODS

The participants with MAFLD undergoing liver biopsy and multiparametric ultrasonography were prospectively recruited from December 2020 to September 2022. Three US-based parameters, namely attenuation coefficient (AC), liver stiffness (LS) and dispersion slope (DS) were obtained. The relationship between these parameters and steatosis grades, inflammation grades and fibrosis stages was examined.

RESULTS

In this study with 116 participants, AC values significantly differed across distinct steatosis grades (p < 0.001), while DS and LS values varied among inflammation grades (p < 0.001) and fibrosis stages (p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of AC ranged from 0.82 to 0.84 for differentiating steatosis grades, while AUCs of LS ranged from 0.62 to 0.76 for distinguishing inflammation grades and 0.83-0.95 for discerning fibrosis stages. AUCs for DS ranged from 0.79 to 0.81 in discriminating inflammation grades and 0.80-0.88 for differentiating fibrosis stages. Subgroup analysis revealed that LS demonstrated different trends in inflammation grade but consistent trends in fibrosis stage across subgroups, whereas DS showed consistent trends for both inflammation grade and fibrosis stage across all subgroups.

CONCLUSION

AC values indicate the degree of hepatic steatosis but not inflammation or fibrosis. LS values are determined only by fibrosis stage and are not associated with inflammation grades. DS values are associated with both fibrosis and inflammation grades.

WFUMB Guidelines/Guidance on Liver Multiparametric Ultrasound. Part 2: Guidance on Liver Fat Quantification

The World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) has promoted the development of this document on multiparametric ultrasound. Part 2 is a guidance on the use of the available tools for the quantification of liver fat content with ultrasound. These are attenuation coefficient, backscatter coefficient, and speed of sound. All of them use the raw data of the ultrasound beam to estimate liver fat content. This guidance has the aim of helping the reader in understanding how they work and interpret the results. Confounding factors are discussed and a standardized protocol for measurement acquisition is suggested to mitigate them. The recommendations were based on published studies and experts' opinion but were not formally graded because the body of evidence remained low at the time of drafting this document.

Does Meal or Water Intake Affect Ultrasound Attenuation Coefficient Estimate?

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether meal or water intake may affect the measurement of the ultrasound (US) attenuation coefficient (AC) imaging, a parameter that is directly related to liver fat content.

METHODS

The study was performed in two centers (Italy and USA). AC was obtained using the ATI algorithm implemented in the Aplio i-series US systems (Canon Medical Systems, Japan) by one operator at each center. Measurements were performed at baseline and 5, 15, 30, 45 minutes after drinking 500 mL of water (group 1), or 30, 45, 60, 90, 120 minutes after eating a meal of about 600 kcal (group 2). Multilevel generalized estimating equations for repeated measures were used for the statistical analysis to consider the clustered nature of the data.

RESULTS

Twenty-six individuals were enrolled: 11 (10 females; age, 43.7 ± 12.5 years) in Italy and 15 (10 females; age, 60.7 ± 6.3 years) in USA. At B-mode US, 10 (38.5%) had liver steatosis. The baseline AC values, in decibel/centimeter/megahertz, were 0.64 (0.12) in group 1 and 0.66 (0.13) in group 2. There was not any significant difference in AC values at every time-point after water or meal intake either in group 1 or group 2. This result did not change including sex, age, and skin-to-liver capsule into the models.

CONCLUSIONS

The measurement of the AC, which is a biomarker of liver steatosis, does not require a fasting state and drinking water does not affect the result.

Ultrasound backscatter coefficient for fat quantification is affected by the measurement depth

PURPOSE

It has been reported that the estimate of ultrasound attenuation coefficient (AC) is affected by depth of measurement, with linear decrease of values with depth. It is unknown whether backscatter coefficient (BSC) has similar behavior.

METHODS

This retrospective study was performed with Sequoia US system equipped with ultrasound derived fat fraction (UDFF) algorithm (Siemens Healthineers, Issaquah, WA, USA) that combines BSC with AC. UDFF was obtained positioning upper edge of the region of interest at 1.5,2,3,4,5 cm below liver capsule. BSC data were extracted from UDFF offline. A fractional polynomial regression, which selects the best model considering the polynomial development of the variables of interest, was used. Covariates included were age, sex, skin-to-liver-capsule distance, stiffness. Distance was included as linear factor or with a power ranging from - 2 to 3, and the best fitting model was chosen according to partial F test. Body mass index (BMI) was not included because of collinearity with skin-to-liver capsule distance.

RESULTS

104 individuals (56 females; age: 57.9 ± 13.0 years; BMI: 29.0 ± 6.5 kg/m2; skin-to-liver-capsule distance: 2.3 ± 0.7 cm; liver stiffness: 7.5 ± 5.5 kiloPascal) were studied. Best fitting model for BSC included a combination of depth as linear factor and square root. BSC showed a decrease of - 13.98 dB/cm-steradian for each logarithmic increase of 1 cm depth (coefficient: - 13.98; 95% CI: - 21.016; - 5.379; p = .001). Skin-to-liver-capsule distance and stiffness also were independent predictors of BSC.

CONCLUSIONS

The estimation of the BSC in the liver exhibits a depth dependence that significantly affects results. A standardized acquisition protocol is needed to compare results and reliably assess changes over time.

Diagnostic performance of quantitative ultrasonography for hepatic steatosis in a health screening program: a prospective single-center study

PURPOSE

This study compared the diagnostic performance of quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) with that of conventional ultrasonography (US) in assessing hepatic steatosis among individuals undergoing health screening using magnetic resonance imaging-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) as the reference standard.

METHODS

This single-center prospective study enrolled 427 participants who underwent abdominal MRI and US. Measurements included the attenuation coefficient in tissue attenuation imaging (TAI) and the scatter-distribution coefficient in tissue scatter-distribution imaging (TSI). The correlation between QUS and MRI-PDFF was evaluated. The diagnostic capabilities of QUS, conventional B-mode US, and their combined models for detecting hepatic fat content of ≥5% (MRI-PDFF ≥5%) and ≥10% (MRI-PDFF ≥10%) were compared by analyzing the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves. Additionally, clinical risk factors influencing the diagnostic performance of QUS were identified using multivariate linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

TAI and TSI were strongly correlated with MRI-PDFF (r=0.759 and r=0.802, respectively; both P<0.001) and demonstrated good diagnostic performance in detecting and grading hepatic steatosis. The combination of QUS and B-mode US resulted in the highest areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) (0.947 and 0.975 for detecting hepatic fat content of ≥5% and ≥10%, respectively; both P<0.05), compared to TAI, TSI, or B-mode US alone (AUCs: 0.887, 0.910, 0.878 for ≥5% and 0.951, 0.922, 0.875 for ≥10%, respectively). The independent determinants of QUS included skinliver capsule distance (β=7.134), hepatic fibrosis (β=4.808), alanine aminotransferase (β=0.202), triglyceride levels (β=0.027), and diabetes mellitus (β=3.710).

CONCLUSION

QUS is a useful and effective screening tool for detecting and grading hepatic steatosis during health checkups.

Ultrasound-Derived Fat Fraction for Hepatic Steatosis Assessment: Prospective Study of Agreement With MRI PDFF and Sources of Variability in a Heterogeneous Population

BACKGROUND. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease is a growing global public health concern. Quantitative ultrasound measurements, such as ultrasound-derived fat fraction (UDFF), could provide noninvasive, cost-effective, and portable steatosis evaluation. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to evaluate utility of UDFF for steatosis assessment using proton density fat fraction (PDFF) as reference in patients undergoing liver MRI for heterogeneous indications and to assess UDFF variability. METHODS. This prospective study included a primary analysis of 187 patients (mean age, 53.8 years; 112 men, 75 women) who underwent 3-T liver MRI for any clinical indication from December 2020 to July 2021. Patients underwent investigational PDFF measurement, including determination of PDFFwhole-liver (mean PDFF of entire liver), and PDFFvoxel (PDFF in single voxel within right lobe, measured by MR spectroscopy), as well as investigational ultrasound with UDFF calculation (mean of five inter-costal measurements) within 1 hour after MRI. In a subanalysis, 21 of these patients underwent additional UDFF measurements 1, 3, and 5 hours after meal consumption. The study also included repeatability and reproducibility analysis of 30 patients (mean age, 26.3 years; 10 men, 20 women) who underwent clinical abdominal ultrasound between November 2022 and January 2023; in these patients, three operators sequentially performed UDFF measurements. RESULTS. In primary analysis, UDFF and PDFFwhole-liver measurements showed intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.79. In Bland-Altman analysis, UDFF and PDFFvoxel measurements showed mean difference of 1.5% (95% CI, 0.6-2.4%), with 95% limits of agreement from -11.0% to 14.0%. UDFF measurements exhibited AUC for detecting PDFFvoxel at historic thresholds of 6.5% and greater, 17.4% and greater, and 22.1% and greater of 0.90, 0.95, and 0.95, respectively. In subanalysis, mean UDFF was not significantly different across time points with respect to meal consumption (p = .21). In repeatability and reproducibility analysis, ICC for intraoperator repeatability ranged from 0.98 to 0.99 and for interoperator reproducibility from 0.90 to 0.96. Visual assessment of patient-level data plots indicated increasing variability of mean UDFF measurements across operators and of intercostal measurements within individual patients with increasing steatosis. CONCLUSION. UDFF showed robust agreement with PDFF, diagnostic performance for steatosis grades, and intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility. Nonetheless, UDFF exhibited bias toward slightly larger values versus PDFF; intraoperator and interoperator variation increased with increasing steatosis. CLINICAL IMPACT. UDFF shows promise for steatosis assessment across diverse populations, although continued optimization remains warranted.

Advanced fibrosis leads to overestimation of steatosis with quantitative ultrasound in individuals without hepatic steatosis

PURPOSE

The effect of hepatic fibrosis stage on quantitative ultrasound based on the attenuation coefficient (AC) for liver lipid quantification is controversial. The objective of this study was to determine how the degree of fibrosis assessed by magnetic resonance (MR) elastography affects AC based on the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter according to the grade of hepatic steatosis, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived proton density fat fraction (MRIderived PDFF) as the reference standard.

METHODS

Between February 2020 and April 2021, 982 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent AC and MRI-derived PDFF measurement as well as MR elastography were enrolled. Multiple regression was used to investigate whether AC was affected by the degree of liver stiffness.

RESULTS

AC increased as liver stiffness progressed in 344 patients without hepatic steatosis (P=0.009). In multivariable analysis, AC was positively correlated with skin-capsule distance (P<0.001), MR elastography value (P=0.037), and MRI-derived PDFF (P<0.001) in patients without hepatic steatosis. In 52 of 982 patients (5%), the correlation between AC and MRIderived PDFF fell outside the 95% confidence interval for the regression line slope. Patients with MRI-derived PDFF lower than their AC (n=36) had higher fibrosis-4 scores, albumin-bilirubin scores, and MR elastography values than patients with MRI-derived PDFF greater than their AC (n=16; P=0.018, P=0.001, and P=0.011, respectively).

CONCLUSION

AC is affected by liver fibrosis (MR elastography value ≥6.7 kPa) only in patients without hepatic steatosis (MRI-derived PDFF <5.2%). These values should be interpreted with caution in patients with advanced liver fibrosis.