Team-Based Learning Activities for First-Year Medical Students: Perception of the Learners

Equivalent Performance of Exam Items Associated with Case-Based Learning, Flipped Classroom, and Lecture in a Pre-clerkship Medical Curriculum

The purpose of our study was to determine if knowledge acquisition, as measured by exam item performance, differed for active or passive learning activities in our medical curriculum. Additionally, we looked for differences in exam item performance in one second-year course that varies the method of an active learning activity, case-based collaborative learning (CBCL). Finally, we assessed whether item performance was impacted when small group activities were conducted online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Exam item difficulty values were collected for several years of lectures, flipped classroom, and CBCL. Statistical analysis and modeling of data were performed to identify differences in difficulty of exam items that assess content delivered by different learning activities. Our analysis revealed no differences in difficulty of exam items that assess content delivered by different learning activities. Similarly, we determined that varying the execution of CBCL in one course did not impact exam item performance. Finally, moving CBCL small group sessions online did not impact exam item difficulty. However, we did detect a minor reduction in overall exam scores for the period of online instruction. Our results indicate that knowledge acquisition, as assessed by our multiple-choice summative exams, was equivalent regardless of learning activity modality.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-023-01842-8.

"I really liked the chance to talk about it": Students' Reflections on the Process of Completing Paper Puzzles, a Novel Active Learning Activity

INTRODUCTION

Research shows active learning is an effective teaching method. However, few qualitative studies explore medical student perceptions of the active learning process. The present study explored what students thought about while completing paper puzzles, an active learning tool used at the University of Utah School of Medicine, to understand what and how medical students think while engaged in active learning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To investigate second-year medical students' attitudes toward these active learning exercises, three Zoom-based focused groups were held and recorded throughout the course. Recordings were transcribed and coded using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Students reported that peer interactions were of high value, and that while some interactions and thought processes were action-oriented, others were more metacognitive. Other benefits of the activity included promotion of learning, provision of structure, and designation of high-yield concepts. Challenges included feelings of confusion, problems with timing or difficulty of the tasks, and low utility without adequate preparation.

DISCUSSION

These findings reflect student-acknowledged pros and cons of active learning described in education literature and add further insight into the thoughts and conversations students have during active learning activities. These include practicing metacognitive skills, triaging information, and learning from peers.

CONCLUSIONS

These data further elucidate student perceptions of active learning activities in medical education. Though focused on a specific activity, the data can help medical educators understand what students appreciate about active learning and what they think about while engaged in such activities.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-022-01682-y.

Evaluation of Veterinary Medical Student Retention of Pre-clinical Concepts with Various Experiential Learning Methods

Many veterinary medical colleges have undergone curricular changes that have moved away from traditional lecture-based teaching in favor of evidence-based, experiential methods of instruction. Such a curricular reinvention occurred in 2018 at Michigan State University's College of Veterinary Medicine, with individual courses using numerous instructional and learning methods. In the present study, three courses were assessed, two of which used a method of experiential learning, and the other utilizing a traditional lecture approach. The purpose of this study was to determine if the method of instruction impacted exam grades, content retention, and student perspective. Methods of teaching and learning were quantified for each course using the Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM. Following completion of each course, participants (n = 27) retook the same final examination and participated in a survey to evaluate their perspective 5 weeks later. Mean scores on the initial examinations in the experiential learning courses were significantly higher than the mean score of the traditional lecture course (p = .01). However, mean retake examination scores were similar for all courses (p = .76). Students reported more confidence with course materials and examinations in courses that incorporated active learning strategies. Although true retention is difficult to assess in veterinary medicine, evaluation of student perspectives suggests the use of experiential learning methods primarily or in combination with lecture-based material to support student learning of pre-clinical concepts. Future controlled studies are needed to evaluate veterinary students' short- and long-term learning and retention.

Impact of Team-Based Learning Versus Lecture-Based Learning on Chinese Radiology Education: A Scoping Review and Meta-Analysis

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of team-based learning in radiology education. Data sources and selection criteria Databases were searched from inception up to August 2019 and included Pubmed, Medline, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Wanfang Database, and Chinese VIP. Randomized trials comparing teaching approaches for medical imaging of which provide the outcomes of theoretical scores and/or practical scores were included. Data were extracted independently by two authors and double-checked for accuracy. Outcomes included knowledge scores and practical scores. We pooled data using random-effects meta-analysis. Twelve trials involving 1,371 participants were included. Team-based learning teaching method had positive impacts on theoretical scores compared with the lecture-based learning or traditional teaching method (SMD = 1.07, 95% CI [0.50, 1.63]) and it positively improved skill scores (SMD = 0.68, 95% CI [0.19, 1.17]). Team-based learning could not only improve theoretical and skill scores in medical imaging courses but also encourage students to learn by themselves. Participants believed team-based learning raised their learning interest, team cooperation ability, and interpersonal communication skills. The heterogeneity of the included studies must be noticed and large well-designed and well-conducted trials are urgently needed.