Keeping Children Safe at Home: Parent Perspectives to Firearms Safety Education Delivered by Pediatric Providers

"Your son needs help … and we're gonna help him": A qualitative study of the experiences of gun-owning caregivers of adolescents receiving lethal means counseling in the emergency department

Suicide attempts in adolescents are often transient and unpredictable, making preventative approaches crucial in reducing suicide deaths. One important approach is lethal means counseling (LMC), in which clinicians counsel caregivers to reduce access to methods used in suicide, specifically firearms and medications. Research on LMC has increasingly encouraged the use of the shared decision-making (SDM) model, which emphasizes information exchange, collaborative deliberation, and joint planning between caregivers and clinicians. We examine caregivers' experiences with LMC, using the SDM model as our analytic framework. We conducted qualitative interviews with 21 firearm-owning caregivers of adolescents who came to emergency departments (EDs) in Colorado for a behavioral health complaint. The implementation of LMC at these institutions had three central components: training for clinicians, materials (e.g., lockboxes and pamphlets) to support LMC, and the protocolization of LMC at the institution. Our semi-structured, hour-long interviews examined participants' reflections on and reactions to LMC provided in the ED and how that related to changes in their understanding of their medication and gun storage practices. We analyzed interviews using a phenomenological approach, focusing on experiences with LMC and informed by the tenets of the SDM model. Our analysis revealed that caregivers were receptive to the idea of LMC in the pediatric emergency care setting. Caregivers' engagement in LMC was reinforced by experiences with clinicians who sought to understand the circumstances of their household, shared the motivation behind LMC, and facilitated conversation around a shared concern for the child's safety. In contrast, counseling delivered mechanically and without considering the household context was tied to caregivers' confusion and alienation, both for LMC and their consideration of changes to home storage practices. These findings provide insight into adolescent caregivers' experiences with LMC implemented in EDs and how LMC may best be approached.

Firearm locking device preferences among firearm owners in the USA: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Preventing firearm-involved injuries is a critical public health priority. Firearm locking devices can prevent firearm injuries, such as suicide and unintentional shootings, as well as theft. Various firearm locking devices exist; however, little is known about firearm owners' preferred locking devices for secure firearm storage. In this systematic review, we examined existing literature on preferred locking devices for secure storage of personal firearms among United States (US) firearm owners with the purpose of understanding practical implications and needs for future research.

METHODS

We searched 8 major databases, as well as the grey literature, for English-language sources published on or before January 24, 2023, that empirically examined firearm locking device preferences. Following PRISMA guidelines, coders independently screened and reviewed 797 sources using pre-determined criteria. Overall, 38 records met inclusion criteria and were included in this review.

RESULTS

The majority of studies measure and report on participant use of various types of locking devices, but few go on to measure preference between device options and the attributes and features that may contribute to an individual's preference. Included studies suggest that a preference for larger devices, such as lockboxes and gun safes, may exist among US firearm owners.

CONCLUSIONS

Review of included studies suggests that current prevention efforts may not be aligned with firearm owners' preferences. Additionally, findings from this systematic review emphasize the need for additional methodological rigorous research to understand firearm locking device preferences. Expanded knowledge in this area will result in actionable data and foundational best practices for programming that encourages behavior change concerning secure storage of personal firearms to prevent injury and death.

The construction and practice path of safety education mechanism in colleges and universities integrating the psychological characteristics of students in the new era

Background

With the rapid development of higher education in China, the scale of colleges and universities is expanding, and the phenomenon of campus socialization is becoming more and more obvious. In particular, the campus and its surrounding environment are becoming more and more complex, which brings many hidden dangers in university life.

Objective

In order to improve the effectiveness of safety education in colleges and universities and maintain the long-term effectiveness of college students' safety awareness, the paper proposes the construction and practice path of college safety education mechanism that integrates the psychological characteristics of students in the new era.

Methods

Security issues facing universities at home, this track identifies the relationship between campus security incidents and security education and advocacy. Eight solutions to prevent and reduce incidents in schools. The paper proposes to give importance to the study of the security of college students, to create an awareness of security questions in the bank based on the recommendation algorithm, and to create to have online learning and testing for safety awareness.

Results

The passing rate of 10 majors such as humanities, composition and theory of composition technology was 100%, accounting for 12% of the 83 enrolled majors, and the passing rate of 54 majors such as clinical medicine was over 90%.

Conclusion

The safety online learning and testing system of college students' safety education is lively in form and highly accepted by students. The development of college students' safety education starts from the time of receiving the university admission notice, making full use of the "golden time," so as to effectively prevent and reduce the occurrence of campus safety accidents.

Physician-driven or self-directed safe firearm storage guidance: Which one is best?

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Access to firearms is a preventable cause of unintentional injury and suicide in children. Pediatric physicians provide injury prevention guidance, but firearm safety may not routinely be included. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the effectiveness of firearm safety guidance (FSG) provided by a physician.

METHODS

Prospective, randomized-controlled, trial assessing physician-delivered FSG at two pediatric clinics in Houston, Texas. Firearm-owning parents were randomized to physician guidance (PG) versus control (CG) groups. The CG received a handout with firearm safety facts and a free cable lock. The PG additionally received FSG by a physician. Pre- and post-intervention surveys were conducted. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi square analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-two families participated; most (70%) were satisfied with the guidance. Pre-intervention safe firearm storage was high in both groups, and the intervention did not lead to improved habits in either group [PG: Pre 93% vs. Post 89%, p = 0.7 and CG: Pre 82% vs. 78%, p = 0.7].There was no difference in use of the free cable lock among groups (44% vs. 22%, p = 0.9). The PG demonstrated improved knowledge of the state child access protection law (PG: Pre 60% vs. Post 100% vs. CG: Pre 29% vs. Post 67%; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

For firearm-owning parents, physician-delivered safe storage guidance may not be more effective than self-directed guidance provided by a handout. A larger trial is underway to confirm the findings of this pilot study.

Pediatric Providers' Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, and Barriers to Firearms Safety Counseling

OBJECTIVES

Firearms-related injuries and deaths are a leading cause of death in children and young adults ages 5 to 24 years. This study evaluated the counseling practices and barriers to providing safe firearms storage education by pediatricians and advance practice providers.

METHODS

An online survey was sent to 296 pediatric outpatient providers in Houston, Texas. Pediatric providers were asked about demographics, knowledge, attitudes, and current practices regarding firearms safety counseling. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Survey respondents (N = 76) were 86% women and 87% physicians. Most (86%) agree that they should discuss firearms safety with parents, whereas only 32% report routine counseling. The most frequent barrier to providing education was insufficient time (63%), followed by unfamiliarity with guns (26%).

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric providers are interested in firearms safety counseling, but few incorporate it into their practice. Addressing barriers of time and comfort level around firearms are potential first steps to curbing a leading cause of injury death among children. Further research is needed to develop counseling methods that are time efficient and culturally competent for the pediatric office.

A Randomized Controlled Trial for Parents of Hospitalized Children: Keeping Kids Safe From Guns

OBJECTIVES

To assess an educational intervention (BeSMART) for parents of hospitalized children on behaviors, beliefs, and knowledge about firearm safety.

METHODS

A randomized controlled, 3-arm preintervention and postintervention study compared BeSMART video and handout interventions (with and without physician review) to tobacco smoke videos and handouts (control) on parental behaviors, beliefs, and knowledge. Eligibility criteria included parents and/or guardians residing with hospitalized children aged <20 years. The primary outcome was a change in parent-reported frequency of asking about guns in homes visited by their children preintervention to 1 month after intervention. Secondary outcomes were parent-reported likelihood of asking about guns in others' homes immediately postintervention and change in firearm safety beliefs and/or knowledge in the intervention versus control group, analyzed with analysis of variance. McNemar's and paired t tests compared changes within groups, and generalized estimating equations compared change between groups for the primary outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 225 participants enrolled. Both intervention and control groups revealed significant increase mean in parent-reported Likert score of frequency of asking about guns within groups preintervention to 1 month after intervention (BeSMART: 1.5 to 2.3, P = .04; BeSMART + physician review: 1.4 to 1.9, P = .03; control: 1.4 to 2.3, P = .01). Change between groups was not significant (P = .81). Immediately postintervention, intervention groups reported higher likelihood of asking about guns (P < .001). Study groups revealed no significant differences in beliefs. Firearm safety knowledge increased significantly in the intervention groups.

CONCLUSIONS

BeSMART firearm injury prevention intervention in a hospital setting increased parental knowledge regarding firearm safety. Immediately postintervention, BeSMART groups reported higher likelihood of asking about guns in others' homes compared with controls. At 1 month after intervention, all groups reported increased frequency asking about guns. Future investigations are needed to understand the duration of intervention impact.

Adapting Safety Check as a Universal Suicide Prevention Strategy in Pediatric Primary Care

OBJECTIVE

The presence of unlocked firearms in the home is associated with increased risk of suicide and unintentional injury in youth. We adapted an evidence-based program for promoting safe firearm storage, Safety Check, to enhance its acceptability as a universal suicide prevention strategy in pediatric primary care.

METHODS

We applied ADAPT-ITT, an established adaptation framework, to guide iterative program adaptation with ongoing input from key stakeholders. The present study describes 2 phases of ADAPT-ITT: the Production phase (generating adaptations) and the Topical Experts phase (gathering stakeholder feedback on adaptations). After generating proposed program adaptations based on 3 inputs (stakeholder feedback collected in a prior study, the behavioral science literature, and best practices in pediatric medicine), we elicited feedback from stakeholders with firearm expertise. The adaptations included changes such as clarifying firearm ownership will not be documented in the medical record and offering follow-up reminders. We also crowdsourced feedback from 337 parents to select a new name and program logo.

RESULTS

Saturation was reached with 9 stakeholders. Feedback confirmed the value of adaptations that: 1) considered context (eg, reason for ownership), 2) promoted parent autonomy in decision-making, and 3) ensured privacy. The most preferred program name was Suicide and Accident prevention through Family Education (SAFE) Firearm.

CONCLUSIONS

Guided by an established adaptation framework that prioritized multistage stakeholder feedback, adaptations to the original Safety Check were deemed acceptable. We plan to test the SAFE Firearm program as a universal suicide prevention strategy in pediatric primary care via a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.