1
|
Verbunt EJ, Newman G, Creagh NS, Milley KM, Emery JD, Kelaher MA, Rankin NM, Nightingale CE. Primary care practice-based interventions and their effect on participation in population-based cancer screening programs: a systematic narrative review. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2024; 25:e12. [PMID: 38345096 PMCID: PMC10894721 DOI: 10.1017/s1463423623000713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
AIM To provide a systematic synthesis of primary care practice-based interventions and their effect on participation in population-based cancer screening programs. BACKGROUND Globally, population-based cancer screening programs (bowel, breast, and cervical) have sub-optimal participation rates. Primary healthcare workers (PHCWs) have an important role in facilitating a patient's decision to screen; however, barriers exist to their engagement. It remains unclear how to best optimize the role of PHCWs to increase screening participation. METHODS A comprehensive search was conducted from January 2010 until November 2023 in the following databases: Medline (OVID), EMBASE, and CINAHL. Data extraction, quality assessment, and synthesis were conducted. Studies were separated by whether they assessed the effect of a single-component or multi-component intervention and study type. FINDINGS Forty-nine studies were identified, of which 36 originated from the USA. Fifteen studies were investigations of single-component interventions, and 34 studies were of multi-component interventions. Interventions with a positive effect on screening participation were predominantly multi-component, and most included combinations of audit and feedback, provider reminders, practice-facilitated assessment and improvement, and patient education across all screening programs. Regarding bowel screening, provision of screening kits at point-of-care was an effective strategy to increase participation. Taking a 'whole-of-practice approach' and identifying a 'practice champion' were found to be contextual factors of effective interventions.The findings suggest that complex interventions comprised of practitioner-focused and patient-focused components are required to increase cancer screening participation in primary care settings. This study provides novel understanding as to what components and contextual factors should be included in primary care practice-based interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ebony J Verbunt
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Grace Newman
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nicola S Creagh
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Kristi M Milley
- Centre for Cancer Research and Department of General Practice, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jon D Emery
- Centre for Cancer Research and Department of General Practice, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Margaret A Kelaher
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Nicole M Rankin
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Claire E Nightingale
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McDonald CE, Voutier C, Govil D, D’Souza AN, Truong D, Abo S, Remedios LJ, Granger CL. Do health service waiting areas contribute to the health literacy of consumers? A scoping review. Health Promot Int 2023; 38:daad046. [PMID: 37440256 PMCID: PMC10340083 DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daad046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Health service waiting areas commonly provide health information, resources and supports for consumers; however, the effect on health literacy and related outcomes remains unclear. This scoping review of the literature aimed to explore the use of waiting areas as a place to contribute to the health literacy and related outcomes of consumers attending health appointments. Articles were included if they focussed on health literacy or health literacy responsiveness (concept) in outpatient or primary care health service waiting areas (context) for adult consumers (population) and were published after 2010. Ten bibliographic databases, one full-text archive, dissertation repositories and web sources were searched. The search yielded 5095 records. After duplicate removal, 3942 title/abstract records were screened and 360 full-text records assessed. Data were charted into a standardized data extraction tool. A total of 116 unique articles (published empirical and grey literature) were included. Most articles were set in primary and community care (49%) waiting areas. A diverse range of health topics and resource types were available, but results demonstrated they were not always used by consumers. Outcomes measured in intervention studies were health knowledge, intentions and other psychological factors, self-reported and observed behaviours, clinical outcomes and health service utilization. Intervention studies overall demonstrated positive trends in health literacy-related outcomes, although the benefit declined after 3-6 months. Research on using waiting areas for health literacy purposes is increasing globally. Future research investigating the needs of consumers to inform optimal intervention design is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cassie E McDonald
- Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- Allied Health - Physiotherapy, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Allied Health, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Catherine Voutier
- Health Sciences Library, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Dhruv Govil
- Department of Business Intelligence and Reporting, Bass Coast Health, Wonthaggi, VIC 3995, Australia
| | - Aruska N D’Souza
- Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- Allied Health - Physiotherapy, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Dominic Truong
- Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Shaza Abo
- Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- Allied Health - Physiotherapy, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Louisa J Remedios
- Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- Department of Physiotherapy, Federation University, Churchill, VIC 3842, Australia
| | - Catherine L Granger
- Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- Allied Health - Physiotherapy, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jones RT, Schott M, Leverence R, Cancino RS. Practice Transformation to Improve Cancer Screening Outcomes at an Academic Medical Center. Am J Med Qual 2022; 37:361-368. [PMID: 35285460 DOI: 10.1097/jmq.0000000000000045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
In 2011, Texas received federal approval of the 1115 Healthcare Transformation waiver, which went to support the Texas Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment Program (DSRIP) incentivizing the transformation of service delivery practices which included expanded coverage of preventive cancer screenings. There is limited evidence that quality improvement initiatives stemming from DSRIP improve cancer screening outcomes for the Medicaid, low-income, and uninsured (MLIU) patient population. The present the results of a quality initiative to improve breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening rates for MLIU patients receiving primary care at an academic medical center. The initiative included engaging multidisciplinary primary care teams, health information technology (IT), and quality departments to standardize workflows. We found significantly improved rates of cervical and colorectal cancer screening among patients eligible to receive one or more screenings. Aligning primary care, IT, and quality processes resulted in significant improvement in cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca T Jones
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Institute for Health Promotion Research, UT Health San Antonio, Joe R. & Teresa Lozano Long School of Medicine, San Antonio, TX
| | - Mysti Schott
- Clinical Excellence Division, CHRISTUS Health, San Antonio, TX
| | | | - Ramon S Cancino
- Department of Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, Joe R. & Teresa Lozano Long School of Medicine, San Antonio, TX
| |
Collapse
|