Measurement Performance of a Computer Assisted Vertebral Motion Analysis System

The reliability of video fluoroscopy, ultrasound imaging, magnetic resonance imaging and radiography for measurements of lumbar spine segmental range of motion in-vivo: A review

BACKGROUND

Lower back pain (LBP) is a principal cause of disability worldwide and is associated with a variety of spinal conditions. Individuals presenting with LBP may display changes in spinal motion. Despite this, the ability to measure lumbar segmental range of motion (ROM) non-invasively remains a challenge.

OBJECTIVE

To review the reliability of four non-invasive modalities: Video Fluoroscopy (VF), Ultrasound imaging (US), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Radiography used for measuring segmental ROM in the lumbar spine in-vivo.

METHODS

The methodological quality of seventeen eligible studies, identified through a systematic literature search, were appraised.

RESULTS

The intra-rater reliability for VF is excellent in recumbent and upright positions but errors are larger for intra-rater repeated movements and inter-rater reliability shows larger variation. Excellent results for intra- and inter-rater reliability are seen in US studies and there is good reliability within- and between-day. There is a large degree of heterogeneity in MRI and radiography methodologies but reliable results are seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Excellent reliability is seen across all modalities. However, VF and radiography are limited by radiation exposure and MRI is expensive. US offers a non-invasive, risk free method but further research must determine whether it yields truly consistent measurements.

Robot for Ligament Tensioning and Assessment of Spinal Stability

STUDY DESIGN

An in vitro human cadaveric biomechanics study.

OBJECTIVE

A proof-of-concept study to quantify whether or not differences in segmental mobility associated with spinal instability could be detected by a robotic distraction system.

METHODS

Testing was performed in fresh human cadaveric tissue. A prototype Robotic Middle Column Distractor was attached unilaterally to the pedicles of L3-4. Distraction forces up to 150 N were applied first in the intact state, and following discectomy of L3-4. Motions were recorded by time-indexed visual and fluoroscopic images, and analyzed to measure actual motions achieved. Functions of the robot unit were monitored during the procedure and evaluated qualitatively.

RESULTS

A difference of 2.5 mm in z-axis motion was detected at 150 N load between the intact and post-discectomy states. The robot coupled with the image analysis method was able to clearly detect the difference between the intact ("stable") and post-discectomy ("unstable") spine. Data analysis of fluoroscopic images taken during the procedure showed greater motion than perceived by the investigators from qualitative review of visual data. All monitored robot functions performed within design parameters without error.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates the feasibility and utility of utilizing an intraoperative robotic distractor to measure the amount of spinal mobility present at a level. This could lead to an important clinical tool for both diagnostic functions as well as operative assist functions.

Research progress of diagnosing methodology for lumbar segmental instability: A narrative review

OBJECTIVE

Lumbar segmental instability (LSI) is due to a pathologic movement of the vertebral body on the vertebra below and often causes clinical symptoms. The study was to achieve the research progress of diagnosing methodology for lumbar segmental instability and help clinicians make treatment choices.

METHODS

The data for this study were collected from the MEDLINE, Springer, Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Evidence Based Medicine Reviews, VIP, and CNKI. The search terms were integrated as follows: "(∗lumbar instability∗ OR ∗lumbar spondylolisthesis∗) and (∗image∗ or ∗diagnosis∗)". Studies without clear radiographic instable criteria, case reports, letter, and basic research were excluded.

RESULT

In total, 39 articles published met our inclusion criteria. The various modalities were used to diagnosis LSI in these studies included radiographs, facet joint degeneration and physical examination tests.

CONCLUSION

Overall, there have been a variety of researches to develop the diagnosing methodology for LSI, and many have been successful, although no consensus has been reached yet. However, it is believed that the diagnosis of LSI will become easier and more accurate in the near future.

Middle-Column Gap Balancing and Middle-Column Mismatch in Spinal Reconstructive Surgery

Background

Middle-column gap balancing (MCGB) is a reference measurement of the path of the posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL), which is reconstructed under tension and balanced by the combined height of the posterior one-third of the vertebral bodies and the posterior one-third of the disks, including any intervening load-sharing spacers. This measurement allows for a comparison of the ligamentous component of the middle column (PLL) with the load-sharing components (posterior one-third vertebral body + disk ). This difference gives rise to a "middle-column mismatch," which provides a linear measurement of the redundancy of the ligaments and neural elements, which relates to the correct cage, spacer, or load-bearing height, which is optimized.

Methods

For phase 1 measurement testing, 24 consecutive patients underwent reliable flexion, extension, and neutral lateral radiographic studies with a calibrated marker. The anterior, middle, and posterior columns were measured using a custom software program capable of measuring the length of curved lines specifically written for this purpose. For phase 2 measurement testing, 21 consecutive patients undergoing surgery with multilevel deformities for cervical, thoracic, and lumbar procedures had MCGB height pre- and postoperatively measured by 3 blinded observers. The preoperative and postoperative measurements were compared using a linear regression analysis and Pearson product-moment correlation.

Results

In phase 1 measurement testing the flexion, extension, and neutral bending radiographs of spinal segments not containing deformities showed that the middle column had the most reliable measurements of spinal axial height both in the actual measurements of change from flexion to extension (mm) and in percentage of change. In phase 2 measurement testing, a Pearson product-moment correlation was run between each individual's pre- and postoperative middle-column measurements. There was a strong positive correlation between preoperative and postoperative measurements, which was statistically significant (r = 0.983, n = 21, P < .01).

Conclusions

This consecutive series of 21 deformity patients demonstrated the utility of measuring the preoperative middle-column length in predicting the optimal height of the spacers and intervertebral disks, and posterior vertebral body height, simultaneously restoring sagittal and coronal plane alignment. Key points of this study include the following: (1) Spinal balance requires optimizing spinal height, which is a curved line in order to accommodate cervical lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, and lumbar lordosis. (2) Software programs can allow measurement of the preoperative curved circuitous course of the PLL and vertebral body misalignment; this curved length is predictive of the optimal postoperative middle-column height after spinal osteotomies and intervertebral spacer insertion. (3) All 3 dimensions are important to optimize in deformity correction: sagittal plane, coronal plane, and axial spinal height.

From the international space station to the clinic: how prolonged unloading may disrupt lumbar spine stability

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Prolonged microgravity exposure is associated with localized low back pain and an elevated risk of post-flight disc herniation. Although the mechanisms by which microgravity impairs the spine are unclear, they should be foundational for developing in-flight countermeasures for maintaining astronaut spine health. Because human spine anatomy has adapted to upright posture on Earth, observations of how spaceflight affects the spine should also provide new and potentially important information on spine biomechanics that benefit the general population.

PURPOSE

This study compares quantitative measures of lumbar spine anatomy, health, and biomechanics in astronauts before and after 6 months of microgravity exposure on board the International Space Station (ISS).

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective longitudinal study.

SAMPLE

Six astronaut crewmember volunteers from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) with 6-month missions aboard the ISS comprised our study sample.

OUTCOME MEASURES

For multifidus and erector spinae at L3-L4, measures include cross-sectional area (CSA), functional cross-sectional area (FCSA), and FCSA/CSA. Other measures include supine lumbar lordosis (L1-S1), active (standing) and passive (lying) flexion-extension range of motion (FE ROM) for each lumbar disc segment, disc water content from T2-weighted intensity, Pfirrmann grade, vertebral end plate pathology, and subject-reported incidence of chronic low back pain or disc injuries at 1-year follow-up.

METHODS

3T magnetic resonance imaging and dynamic fluoroscopy of the lumbar spine were collected for each subject at two time points: approximately 30 days before launch (pre-flight) and 1 day following 6 months spaceflight on the ISS (post-flight). Outcome measures were compared between time points using paired t tests and regression analyses.

RESULTS

Supine lumbar lordosis decreased (flattened) by an average of 11% (p=.019). Active FE ROM decreased for the middle three lumbar discs (L2-L3: -22.1%, p=.049; L3-L4: -17.3%, p=.016; L4-L5: -30.3%, p=.004). By contrast, no significant passive FE ROM changes in these discs were observed (p>.05). Disc water content did not differ systematically from pre- to post-flight. Multifidus and erector spinae changed variably between subjects, with five of six subjects experiencing an average decrease 20% for FCSA and 8%-9% for CSA in both muscles. For all subjects, changes in multifidus FCSA strongly correlated with changes in lordosis (r²=0.86, p=.008) and active FE ROM at L4-L5 (r²=0.94, p=.007). Additionally, changes in multifidus FCSA/CSA correlated with changes in lordosis (r²=0.69, p=.03). Although multifidus-associated changes in lordosis and ROM were present among all subjects, only those with severe, pre-flight end plate irregularities (two of six subjects) had post-flight lumbar symptoms (including chronic low back pain or disc herniation).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed that multifidus atrophy, rather than intervertebral disc swelling, associated strongly with lumbar flattening and increased stiffness. Because these changes have been previously linked with detrimental spine biomechanics and pain in terrestrial populations, when combined with evidence of pre-flight vertebral end plate insufficiency, they may elevate injury risk for astronauts upon return to gravity loading. Our results also have implications for deconditioned spines on Earth. We anticipate that our results will inform new astronaut countermeasures that target the multifidus muscles, and research on the role of muscular stability in relation to chronic low back pain and disc injury.

Variability in Flexion Extension Radiographs of the Lumbar Spine: A Comparison of Uncontrolled and Controlled Bending

BACKGROUND

While low back pain is one of the most prevalent, if not the most prevalent reasons for visits to physicians, a majority of patients with low back pain cannot be given a definitive diagnosis. While there have been substantial advances in imaging technologies over the past 30 years, relatively little has changed in the methodologies for evaluating functionality of the lumbar spine. The current standard of care for function assessment of the lumbar spine focuses on uncontrolled patient directed motion which results in increased inter-patient variability. Recent advancements in functional lumbar spine testing utilize controlled bending and computerized imaging evaluation.

PURPOSE

To compare the measurement variability of lumbar spine motion when diagnosed using measurements of intervertebral motion taken from standard bending flexion/extension radiographs (FE) between uncontrolled and controlled motion.

STUDY DESIGN

One-hundred nine patients (57 asymptomatic, 52 symptomatic) were consented in the prospective investigation. The research was designed to compare studies involving FE to controlled motion bending radiographs using the Vertebral Motion Analysis (VMA), (Ortho Kinematics, Inc) within the same patient. Each patient agreed to undergo fluoroscopic still imaging to capture FE data and to undergo cine fluoroscopic imaging to capture VMA data.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Measurement variability was determined by the mean and standard deviation of intervertebral rotation when evaluated by 5 independent observers evaluating each of the 109 patients FE and VMA. The resulting standard deviation of the intervertebral rotation determinations was used as the measure of variability.

METHODS

The VMA measurements for assessing intervertebral motion were characterized by the use of: (1) a handling device that assists patients through a standard arc of lumbar bending in both an upright and recumbent posture (70 degree flexion/extension arcs; 60 degree left/right bending arcs); (2) video fluoroscopy imaging of the lumbar spine during bending (capturing images at 8 frames per second); and (3) image processing software capable of automatic frame-to-frame registration and tracking of vertebral bodies across the sequence of video-fluoroscopic images to derive measurements of intervertebral rotation and translation. The FE data were assessed from voluntary bending by the patient.

RESULTS

There was statistical greater measurement variability in intervertebral rotation in FE when compared to VMA (both standing and lying). When comparing measurement variability between FE and VMA, results indicate between a 26% to 46% decrease in measurement variability under VMA compared to FE. These findings are consistent across asymptomatic and symptomatic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The current standard of care for functional testing of the lumbar spine utilizes uncontrolled FE with a manual data evaluation process. Recent developments in using computerized imaging processes has improved, however there remains variability in patient bending due to the self-selected rate and position of the bending. VMA results in a significant reduction in measurement variability of intervertebral rotation measurements.