Development of a novel radiographic measure of lumbar instability and validation using the facet fluid sign

Early Clinical Results of Intervertebral Joint Stabilization by Injectable Load-Sharing Polymers

Background

Genipin is a polymer-forming collagen bonding substance that can be dissolved in a buffered carrier and injected into disc annulus tissues. Therapeutic benefit is derived from the mechanical support provided by a large number of genipin polymers attached to collagen fibers in a degraded disc.

Study Design/Setting

IRB-approved prospective, multi-site, single-arm, 12-month feasibility studies were undertaken in two countries to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the genipin-based implant for treating discogenic chronic low back pain (CLBP).

Patient Sample

Twenty CLBP patients with symptomatic discs at one or two levels were enrolled in the study.

Outcome Measures

The primary safety endpoint was serious adverse events at 1 month, and the primary efficacy endpoint was reduction of pain and disability at 3 months. Secondary efficacy endpoints included reduction of pain and disability at 2 weeks, 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months; reduction of flexion-extension instability; increase in segmental lordosis and rotation; and patient satisfaction.

Methods

Fluoroscopic image-guidance was used to deliver two posterolateral injections of buffered genipin to each symptomatic disc. Flexion-extension radiographs were used to quantify joint kinematics at three time-points.

Results

Clinically meaningful improvements in pain and disability scores were reported in 80% or more of patients from 2 weeks to 1 year post-treatment. For the more severely unstable joints, treatment significantly reduced the instability score from a pre-treatment level of 2.4 standard deviations above the mean for an asymptomatic population to the asymptomatic mean at the 3-month follow-up.

Conclusion

These initial clinical data demonstrate the safety and efficacy of a genipin-based collagen tethering device capable of improving spinal joint stability while successfully addressing CLBP. This work merits additional randomized clinical studies.

Lumbar Facet Joint Effusion on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Do Different Joint Effusion Images Have Different Clinical Values?

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to explore the significance of the distribution of lumbar facet joint effusion (unilateral or bilateral) and the amount of joint effusion in the process of lumbar degeneration.

METHODS

A total of 142 patients with L4-5 lumbar facet joint effusion in our hospital from December 2020 to December 2021 were analyzed retrospectively, including 69 cases of unilateral facet joint effusion and 73 cases of bilateral facet joint effusion. The correlation between joint effusion width, effusion area and lumbar stability, facet joint degeneration grade, lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration index, and lumbosacral angle (LSA) was analyzed. To study the significance of the distribution of joint effusion, the patients were divided into unilateral and bilateral effusion groups.

RESULTS

The size of the LSA in the bilateral effusion group was significantly larger than that in the unilateral effusion group (t = 3.6634, P < 0.05). There was a significant difference in the proportion of stability between both groups (P < 0.05). The width of the joint effusion was positively correlated with lumbar stability and the LSA. When the width of the joint effusion was 2 mm, the probability of lumbar instability was 58.1%. The area of joint effusion was positively correlated with lumbar stability and the LSA. When the area of effusion was 0.2 cm2, the probability of lumbar instability was 58.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

A bilateral effusion signal is more likely to indicate lumbar instability than a unilateral effusion signal. The distribution width and area of effusion were positively correlated with lumbar stability and LSA.

Modifications in lumbar facet joint are associated with spondylolisthesis in the degenerative spine diseases: a comparative analysis

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is important in the assessment of degenerative spine disease. However, its role is limited in the identification of spinal instability; therefore, weight-bearing and dynamic studies like X-rays are required. The supine position eliminates the gravitational pull, corrects the vertebral slippage, and opens the facet joints leading to the collection of the synovial fluid into the joint space, which is detected on the MRI and can serve as a marker for instability. We aim to compare the facet fluid, facet hypertrophy, facet angle, and disc degenerative changes among the patients presenting with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) and those without.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review for all the patients treated at our institution from January 2015 to December 2016. Facet Fluid Index (FFI) (ratio of facet fluid width and facet joint width) was calculated to assess the joint fluid. The percentage of spondylolisthesis was measured on X-rays. Each radiological parameter was compared between the two groups, i.e., patients with DS and patients without DS. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

In total, 61 patients, 28 with DS and 33 without DS, were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups (p > 0.05). The average values of FFI, facet fluid width, and the difference between the superior and inferior facet were significantly higher in the group with instability (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated a 4.44 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.03-5.365) times increase in the odds of instability with a unit increase in FFI, p < 0.0001.

CONCLUSIONS

We report a positive linear correlation between the facet joint effusion and facet hypertrophy on MRI and the percentage of vertebral translation on X-ray. Prospective studies will determine if these markers can play a role in predicting spinal instability.

Analysis of translation and angular motion in loaded and unloaded positions in the lumbar spine

Background Context

Abnormalities in intervertebral rotation and translation are important to diagnosis and treatment planning for common spinal disorders. Tests that do not sufficiently load the spine can result in mis-diagnosed motion abnormalities. Upright flexion and extension x-rays are commonly used despite known limitations. Additional evidence is needed in support of preliminary studies suggesting that the change from standing to supine may sufficiently stress the spine to diagnose motion abnormalities.

Purpose

Compare intervertebral translation between flexion and extension to translation between upright and supine positions in a representative clinical population.

Study Design/Setting

Prospective analysis of images retrospectively collected from routine clinical practices.

Methods

After obtaining IRB approval for analysis of previously obtained images, patients were identified via chart reviews where a neutral-lateral x-ray and an MRI or CT exam were obtained for diagnosis of a spinal disorder and where flexion-extension x-rays had been obtained to help diagnose abnormal intervertebral motion. The mid-sagittal slice from the MRI or CT exam was paired with the neutral-lateral radiograph. Intervertebral translation at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels between supine and standing and between flexion and extension were measured from the images using previously validated methods. The translations were classified as normal or abnormal with reference to a previously obtained database of intervertebral motion in radiographically normal and asymptomatic volunteers.

Results

At the L5-S1 level in particular, there tended to be greater translation between the supine and standing than between upright flexion and extension. On average, translations were below that found in asymptomatic volunteers. No abnormal translations were detected from flexion-extension radiographs whereas approximately 7% of levels had abnormal translations between supine and upright positions.

Conclusions

Intervertebral translations between supine and standing, measured using the mid-sagittal slice from a MRI or CT exam and a lateral x-ray with the patient standing can help to identify abnormal motion. This would be particularly valuable for patients with limited flexion and extension. This study thereby adds to the evidence in support of measuring intervertebral motion between the supine and upright positions to detect abnormal intervertebral motion.

Advantages and disadvantages of posterolateral approach for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is one of the less invasive treatments for lumbar disc herniation (LDH), and has 3 different operative approaches. This study focused on the posterolateral approach (PLA) and investigated the appropriate operative indication.

METHODS

PLA was performed in 29 patients with foraminal and extraforaminal LDH. The height and width of the foramen, LDH type, and positional relationship between LDH and the foramen were radiologically evaluated. Foraminoplasty was also performed in 12 cases including those combined with intra-canal LDH or osseous foraminal stenosis. Pre- and postoperative status was evaluated using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores.

RESULTS

Patient mean age was 56.8 years; there was single-level involvement at L3/4 (13 cases) and at L4/5 (13 cases). The mean pre- and postoperative NRS scores were 6.1 and 1.8, respectively. Early recurrence developed in a patient who was found to have local scoliosis at the corresponding vertebral level.

CONCLUSIONS

PLA can be safely used to treat foraminal and extraforaminal LDH with foraminal height ≥13 mm and foraminal width ≥7 mm. The procedure is effective for preserving the facet joint; however, we should carefully consider the indications when local scoliosis and/or instability are present.