Successful Endoscopic Surgery for L5 Radiculopathy Caused by Far-Lateral Disc Herniation at L5-S1 and L5 Isthmic Grade 2 Spondylolisthesis in a Professional Baseball Player

Enhancing endoscopic foraminal decompression in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: the potential influence of lateral recess isthmic spur and our case series of an innovative craniocaudal interlaminar approach via unilateral biportal endoscopic spinal surgery

BACKGROUND

The NASS guideline cannot recommend any of the surgical treatment options toward adult isthmic spondylolisthesis (AIS) since 2014. After the introduction of endoscopic decompression, instead of treating the spondylolysis itself, treatment can specifically target the refractory radicular pain developed during the degeneration progress without devastating the peripheral soft tissue. However, we noticed that endoscopic transforaminal decompression seems to be less effective in AIS compared to other types of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Thus, we came up with a novel craniocaudal interlaminar approach, utilizing the proximal adjacent interlaminar space to perform bilateral decompression and observed the pathoanatomy of pars defect directly and tried to identify the cause of decompression failure.

METHODS

From January 2022 to June 2022, 13 patients with AIS underwent endoscopic decompression via the endoscopic craniocaudal interlaminar approach and were followed up for at least 6 months. Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry Disability Index and MacNab scores were recorded to monitor patients' clinical recovery. All endoscopic procedures were recorded and reviewed to illustrate the pathoanatomy.

RESULTS

Four patients required minor revision via the same technique. One of them required it due to incomplete isthmic spur resection, two due to neglected disc protrusion, and the other due to root subpedicular kinking in higher grade anterolisthesis. All patients' clinical condition improved significantly subsequently. After reviewing the endoscopic video, we have observed that the hook-like, ragged spur originating from the isthmic defect extends beyond the region around the foramen. Instead, it extends proximally into the adjacent lateral recess, resulting in impingement along the fracture edge above the index foramen and, in some cases, even in the extraforaminal area.

CONCLUSIONS

The broad spanning isthmic spur extending to the proximal adjacent lateral recess might be the reason why the transforaminal approach yielded less satisfactory results due to the incomplete decompression result from approach related restriction. Our study demonstrated an optimistic outcome by applying decompression from the upper level. Therefore, we propose that the craniocaudal interlaminar approach might be a better route for decompression in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy for Foraminal Stenosis in Spondylolisthesis: Two-Year Follow-Up Results

Full-endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (FELF) under local anesthesia has been developed as a minimally invasive alternative for lumbar foraminal stenosis. Some authors have described this technique for treating various lumbar spondylolisthesis. However, few studies have reported the outcomes of FELF for foraminal stenosis in patients with stable spondylolisthesis. This study aimed to demonstrate the specific technique and clinical outcomes of FELF for foraminal stenosis in patients with spondylolisthesis. Twenty-three consecutive patients with foraminal stenosis and stable spondylolisthesis were treated with FELF. Among them, 21 patients were followed up for 2 years. Full-endoscopic foraminal decompression via the transforaminal approach was performed by a senior surgeon. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog pain score (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and modified MacNab criteria. The VAS and ODI scores significantly improved at the two-year follow-up. The global effects were excellent in six patients (28.6%), good in 13 (61.9%), and fair in two (9.5%). Therefore, all patients showed clinical improvement, with a success (excellent/good) rate of 90.5%. No significant surgical complications or signs of further instability were observed. FELF can be used for foraminal stenosis in patients with stable spondylolisthesis. A specialized surgical technique is required for foraminal decompression of spondylolisthesis.

Endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy for foraminal stenosis in stable spondylolisthesis

BACKGROUND

Open decompression with fusion is the gold-standard surgical technique for spondylolisthesis. However, it may be too extensive for patients with foraminal stenosis with stable spondylolisthesis. The endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (ELF) technique was developed as a minimally invasive surgical option for foraminal stenosis. Some authors have reported the outcomes of ELF for various spondylolistheses. However, few studies have demonstrated foraminal stenosis in advanced stable spondylolisthesis. This study aimed to describe the surgical technique and results of ELF for radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis in patients with stable spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

Consecutive 22 patients who suffered from radiculopathy with spondylolisthesis underwent ELF. The inclusion criterion was unilateral radicular leg pain due to foraminal stenosis in stable spondylolisthesis. After the percutaneous transforaminal approach, foraminal decompression was performed using various surgical devices under endoscopic visualization. Surgical outcomes were measured using the visual analog pain score, Oswestry disability index, and modified MacNab criteria.

RESULTS

Pain scores and functional outcomes improved significantly during the 12-month follow-up periods. The rate of clinical improvement was 95.5% (21 of 22 patients). One patient experienced a dural tear and subsequent open surgery.

CONCLUSION

ELF can be effective in foraminal stenosis in stable spondylolisthesis. Technical points specializing in foraminal decompression in spondylolisthesis are required for clinical success.

Implementation of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy in Competitive Elite Athletes With Lumbar Disc Herniation: Original Study and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) represents a frequent clinical entity in athletes. Surgical treatment of LDH with endoscopic spine surgical techniques has been proposed as a feasible alternative in these patients.

PURPOSE

To study the particular outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) in competitive elite athletes with surgically treatable LDH.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A total of 55 competitive elite athletes with diagnosed LDH based on clinical and radiologic criteria were enrolled in this prospectively designed study. All patients underwent successful PTED. Clinical evaluation was conducted with the well-established visual analog scale for lower limb and low back pain separately. The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was implemented for health-related quality of life analysis. Patients were assessed preoperatively and at regular postoperative intervals: 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months, as well as 2 years.

RESULTS

Operated levels were L3-L4 (5.5%), L4-L5 (69.1%), and L5-S1 (25.4%). No major perioperative complications were observed. All patients successfully reached the end of follow-up at 2 years. Both visual analog scale scores (lower limb and low back pain) showed clinically and statistically significant improvement at 6 weeks postoperatively, with subsequent minor improvement and stabilization. All recorded SF-36 parameters demonstrated major clinical amelioration at 6 weeks, with subsequent minor but constant statistically significant improvement until the end of follow-up. Comparative evaluation of the SF-36 revealed that the physical function, bodily pain, role-emotional, and mental health parameters showed quantitatively greater improvement in comparison with rest indices.

CONCLUSION

PTED constitutes a feasible and effective technique for surgical management of LDH in athletes, providing favorable outcomes in terms of postoperative pain and health-related quality of life. Proper performance of technique for specific cases of L5-S1 LDH may be more challenging, and these cases should be evaluated selectively for suitability for this procedure.

A comparative study of L4-L5-S1 and L5-S1 vertebral fusion in high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis

Introduction:

One of the most common types of spinal diseases is spondylolisthesis, which in advanced cases requires surgical intervention. This study aimed to compare the results of L4-L5-S1 and L5-S1 vertebral fusion treatment in high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis.

Methods:

A study design that randomized controlled trial. A total of 70 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for the treatment of spondylolisthesis at Al-Zahra Hospital in Isfahan, Iran, were evaluated from July 2020 to February 2021 (35 patients underwent L4-L5-S1 and 35 received L5-S1 vertebral fusion treatment). The radicular and low back pain (LBP) intensity (Vanguard Australian Shares), blood loss, wound infection, reduction, and quality of life (SF-12 scores) were quantified before the surgery, 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery in two groups.

Results:

Patients involved in the two groups had similar baseline demographic characteristics. The percent slip in L4-L5-S1 and L5-S1 group, respectively, postoperative 81.11% and 57.89%, P = 0.0001. Intraoperative blood loss and postoperative were higher in the L4-L5-S1 group when compared to the L5-S1 group (P < 0.05). The wound infection rate of the L4-L5-S1 group was similar to that of the L5-S1 group (8.6% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.303). There was no difference in radicular and LBP intensity, SF-12 scores among patients with L4-L5-S1 and L5-S1 groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusion:

Both L4-L5-S1 and L5-S1 were equally beneficial in improving short-term functional outcomes for patients with high grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis. However, L4-L5-S1 was associated with statistically significant higher incidences of blood loss, but it was accompanied by a better reduction. Therefore, caution should be exercised when considering L4-L5-S1.

An Elite Triathlete with High-grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis Treated by Lumbar Decompression Surgery without Fusion

The patient was a 48-year-old female recreational triathlete who had been experiencing mild low back pain since high school. She had recently developed right leg pain and had gradually worsening difficulty in running. She preferred to undergo spinal surgery without fusion so that she could return to triathlons as soon as possible, and she was referred to our hospital. Plain radiographs showed Meyerding grade 3 isthmic spondylolisthesis at L5 and a slipped L5 vertebral body. Selective nerve root block at L5 relieved the right leg pain temporarily. The final diagnosis was right L5 radiculopathy due to compression by the ragged edge of the L5 pars defect from the posterior side and by the upside-down foraminal stenosis at L5–S1. An L4–L5 partial laminectomy was performed with resection of the ragged edge and one-third of the caudal pedicle at L5. Adequate decompression was achieved by exposing the L5 spinal nerve root from the branch portion to the outside of the L5 pedicle. The right leg pain disappeared postoperatively and she returned to participating in triathlons. One year after surgery, there was slight radiographic progression of the slip in 5 mm; however, there had been no recurrence of the right leg pain. Several studies have reported excellent outcomes after decompression surgery in patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis. To our knowledge, this is the first report of successful lumbar decompression surgery without fusion for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in a triathlete, although in short-term results.

Endoscopic Spine Surgery in Athletes: Case Series and Review of Literature

BACKGROUND

Degenerative spine disease is common in athletes and can progress to requiring surgical intervention. Traditional open surgical techniques necessitate prolonged recovery time and time away from play. Newly developed endoscopic surgical techniques may promote faster healing and recovery, and increased return to play. The goal of this paper is to summarize the current evidence in return to play after spine surgery and to present our series of 3 athletes who underwent endoscopic spine surgery.

METHODS

A complete search of all PubMed indexed articles pertaining to spine surgery in athletes was conducted. This was supplemented by a 3-patient case series of our own endoscopic spine experience in athletes.

RESULTS

There are no current widely accepted guidelines for return to play after spinal surgery. The best evidence available cites a return to play of 81% at 5.2-8.7 months after traditional open and minimally invasive surgery, and endoscopic surgery produces an average 88% return to play rate at 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Although return to play can vary widely, case-based evidence as well as biomechanical principles support endoscopic spine surgery as a viable surgical modality for the treatment of spinal pathologies in athletes.