One-Level Versus 2-Level Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Fusion: Outcomes Up to 7 Years

Comparison of outcomes and complications between one- and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a population-based study of 410 patients

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare outcomes and patient satisfaction, and secondly to compare complication rates between one- and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical radiculopathy.

METHODS

Data from patients receiving one- or two-level ACDF for cervical radiculopathy at two institutions were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed. Patients were separated into one-level ACDF and two-level ACDF. Comparison analyses of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) comprising Visual Analogue Scale for neck pain (VAS-NP) and arm pain (VAS-AP), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and EQ-5D 3-level version (EQ-5D-3L) were performed between baseline and 1-year follow-up and between groups as well as achievement of minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in PROMs and satisfaction. Additionally, complications were compared between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 410 patients (270 one-level and 140 two-level) were included. PROMs improved significantly from baseline to 1-year follow-up (p < 0.001) in both groups. When comparing PROMs between one- and two-level ACDF, a trend towards greater improvement was observed in patients undergoing one-level ACDF, notably in EQ-5D-3L (p = 0.073). Significantly more patients in the one-level group achieved MCID in VAS-NP compared to patients in the two-level group (56% vs 44%, p = 0.025). Two hundred and ninety-six (67%) patients reported to be satisfied, but the one-level group trended to be more satisfied (70% vs. 62%). One-level ACDF further demonstrated a trend of more favourable complication profiles; however, complication rates were low in both groups. The risk of intraoperative complications was 2.4%, postoperative complications in-hospital were 1.2%, and patient-reported postoperative events post-discharge 42%.

CONCLUSIONS

One- and two-level ACDF are effective procedures for degenerative cervical nerve root compression. Yet, significantly more patients in the one-level group achieved MCID in neck pain compared to patients in the two-level group.

Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy versus anterior cervical fusion and arthroplasty: Systematic review and updated meta-analysis

Introduction

This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis that investigates the efficacy of different surgical methods for treating cervical disc herniation or cervical foraminal stenosis.

Research question

The research aimed to compare the efficacy of Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy (MI-PCF) with anterior approaches, namely Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) and Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA).

Material and methods

The study included a comprehensive review of eight articles that compared ACDF and MI-PCF, and four articles that compared CDA to MI-PCF.

Results

The results indicated no significant difference in surgical duration, hospital stay, complication rates, and reoperation rates between MI-PCF and ACDF. However, when comparing CDA with MI-PCF, it was found that CDA had a higher complication rate, while MI-PCF had a higher reoperation rate.

Discussion and conclusion

Despite these findings, the study recommends MI-PCF as the preferred surgical method for cervical radiculopathy, owing to the advancements in minimally invasive techniques. However, these findings are preliminary, and further research with longer follow-up periods and larger sample sizes is necessary to confirm these findings and to further explore the potential advantages and disadvantages of these surgical methods.

A systematic review of risk factors and adverse outcomes associated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery over the past decade

Background

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the most frequently performed cervical surgeries in the world, yet there have been several reported complications.

Objective

To determine the actual incidence of complications related to ACDF as well as any risk variables that may have been identified in earlier research.

Methods

To evaluate the origin, presentation, natural history, and management of the risks and the complications, we conducted a thorough assessment of the pertinent literature. An evaluation of clinical trials and case studies of patients who experienced one or more complications following ACDF surgery was done using a PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar search. Studies involving adult human subjects that were written in the English language and published between 2012 and 2022 were included in the search. The search yielded 79 studies meeting our criteria.

Results

The overall rates of complications were as follows: Dysphagia 7.9%, psudarthrosis 5.8%, adjacent segment disease (ASD) 8.8%, esophageal perforations (EPs) 0.5%, graft or hardware failure 2.2%, infection 0.3%, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy 1.7%, cerebrospinal fluid leak 0.8%, Horner syndrome 0.5%, hematoma 0.8%, and C5 palsy 1.9%.

Conclusion

Results showed that dysphagia was a common postoperative sequelae with bone morphogenetic protein use and a higher number of surgical levels being the major risk factors. Pseudarthrosis rates varied depending on the factors such as asymptomatic radiographic graft sinking, neck pain, or radiculopathy necessitating revision surgery. The incidence of ASD indicated no data to support anterior cervical plating as more effective than standalone ACDF. EP was rare but frequently fatal, with no correlation found between patient age, sex, body mass index, operation time, or number of levels.

Comparison between 3-level and 4level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A meta-analysis

Objective

Our objective is to estimate the clinical effectiveness of 3-level and 4-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

Methods

We conducted a thorough search in English databases. We gathered the data on surgical variables and complications to contrast the clinical effectiveness between 3-level and 4-level. We utilized RevMan 5.3 and STATA 12.0 to analyze the data.

Results

Finally, eight studies met inclusion criteria of this study. Our findings indicated that operation time [p for heterogeneity = 0.23, I2 = 32 %, p＜0.00001, OR = -24.93, 95%CI (-32.39,-17.49)], blood loss [p for heterogeneity = 0.33, I2 = 10 %, p＜0.00001, OR = -60.87, 95%CI (-85.43,-36.32)] and the total number of complications [p for heterogeneity = 0.36, I2 = 0 %, p = 0.004, OR = 0.37, 95%CI (0.18,0.72)] in 3-level ACDF were significantly less than in 4-level ACDF. No marked difference was found in hospital stay, revision rate, fusion rate, the number of readmissions, infection, hematoma, or pseudarthrosis between 3-level and 4-level ACDF.

Conclusions

It is easy to understand that performing 4-level needs more operation time and blood loss. No obvious discrepancy was found with regard to the subgroups of complications between the two procedures, yet 4-level procedures had a more number of complications.

Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA)/total disc replacement (TDR) vs. anterior cervical diskectomy/fusion (ACDF): A review

Background

We performed a focused review to determine the "non-inferiority", potential superiority, and relative safety/efficacy for performing cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA)/total disc replacement (TDR) in carefully selected patients vs. anterior cervical diskectomy/fusion (ACDF). Notably, CDA/TDR were devised to preserve adjacent level range of motion (ROM), reduce the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), and the need for secondary ASD surgery.

Methods

We compared the incidence of ASD, reoperations for ASD, safety/efficacy, and outcomes for cervical CDA/TDR vs. ACDF. Indications, based upon the North American Spine Society (NASS) Coverage Policy Recommendations (Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement Revised 11/2015 and other studies) included the presence of radiculopathy or myelopathy/myeloradiculopathy at 1-2 levels between C3-C7 with/without neck pain. Contraindications for CDA/TDR procedures as quoted from the NASS Recommendations (i.e. cited above) included the presence of; "Infection…", "Osteoporosis and Osteopenia", "Instability…", "Sensitivity or Allergy to Implant Materials", "Severe Spondylosis…", "Severe Facet Joint Arthropathy…", "Ankylosing Spondylitis" (AS), "Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Previous Fracture…", "Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament (OPLL)", and "Malignancy…". Other sources also included spinal stenosis and scoliosis.

Results

Cervical CDA/TDR studies in the appropriately selected patient population showed no inferiority/ occasionally superiority, reduced the incidence of ASD/need for secondary ASD surgery, and demonstrated comparable safety/efficacy vs. ACDF.

Conclusion

Cervical CDA/TDR studies performed in appropriately selected patients showed a "lack of inferiority", occasional superiority, a reduction in the incidence of ASD, and ASD reoperation rates, plus comparable safety/efficacy vs. ACDF.

Research protocol: Cervical Arthroplasty Cost Effectiveness Study (CACES): economic evaluation of anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty (ACDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) in the surgical treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease - a randomized controlled trial

Introduction

To date, there is no consensus on which anterior surgical technique is more cost-effective in treating cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). The most commonly used surgical treatment for patients with single- or multi-level symptomatic CDDD is anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF). However, new complaints of radiculopathy and/or myelopathy commonly develop at adjacent levels, also known as clinical adjacent segment pathology (CASP). The extent to which kinematics, surgery-induced fusion, natural history, and progression of disease play a role in the development of CASP remains unclear. Anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty (ACDA) is another treatment option that is thought to reduce the incidence of CASP by preserving motion in the operated segment. While ACDA is often discouraged, as the implant costs are higher while the clinical outcomes are similar to ACDF, preventing CASP might be a reason for ACDA to be a more cost-effective technique in the long term.

Methods and analysis

In this randomized controlled trial, patients will be randomized to receive ACDF or ACDA in a 1:1 ratio. Adult patients with single- or multi-level CDDD and symptoms of radiculopathy and/or myelopathy will be included. The primary outcome is cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of both techniques from a healthcare and societal perspective. Secondary objectives are the differences in clinical and radiological outcomes between the two techniques, as well as the qualitative process surrounding anterior decompression surgery. All outcomes will be measured at baseline and every 6 months until 4 years post-surgery.

Discussion

High-quality evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of both ACDA and ACDF is lacking; to date, there are no prospective trials from a societal perspective. Considering the aging of the population and the rising healthcare costs, there is an urgent need for a solid clinical cost-effectiveness trial addressing this question.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04623593. Registered on 29 September 2020.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06574-5.

Cost-effectiveness of anterior surgical decompression surgery for cervical degenerative disk disease: a systematic review of economic evaluations

PURPOSE

No clear consensus exists on which anterior surgical technique is most cost-effective for treating cervical degenerative disk disease (CDDD). One of the most common treatment options is anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF). Anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty (ACDA) was developed in an effort to reduce the incidence of clinical adjacent segment pathology and associated additional surgeries by preserving motion. This systematic review aims to evaluate the evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of anterior surgical decompression techniques used to treat radiculopathy and/or myelopathy caused by CDDD.

METHODS

The search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, EconLit, NHS-EED and the Cochrane Library. Studies were included if healthcare costs and utility or effectivity measurements were mentioned.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies were included out of the 1327 identified studies. In 9 of the 13 studies directly comparing ACDA and ACDF, ACDA was the most cost-effective technique, with an incremental cost effectiveness ratio ranging from $2.900/QALY to $98.475/QALY. There was great heterogeneity between the costs of due to different in- and exclusion criteria of costs and charges, cost perspective, baseline characteristics, and calculation methods. The methodological quality of the included studies was moderate.

CONCLUSION

The majority of studies report ACDA to be a more cost-effective technique in comparison with ACDF. The lack of uniform literature impedes any solid conclusions to be drawn. There is a need for high-quality cost-effectiveness research and uniformity in the conduct, design and reporting of economic evaluations concerning the treatment of CDDD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO Registration: CRD42020207553 (04.10.2020).

Radiological and Clinical Outcomes after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) with an Innovative 3D Printed Cellular Titanium Cage Filled with Vertebral Bone Marrow

Objectives

To assess the clinical and radiological outcomes after ACDF with 3D printed cellular titanium cages filled with bone marrow and to compare the clinical and radiological results with the current scientific literature.

Methods

ACDF was performed monosegmentally under standardized conditions. X-rays were analyzed to determine the range of motion, fusion rates, and subsidence preoperatively and 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Clinical outcome measurements included neck disability index (NDI), visual analogue scale (VAS) for brachialgia and cervicalgia, and patient satisfaction.

Results

18 patients were included in the study. The mean RoM decreased from 7.7° ± 2.6 preoperatively to 1.7° ± 1.1° after 3 months and 1.8° ± 1.2° 12 months after surgery. The fusion rates were at 94.4% after 3 and 12 months. The mean subsidence was 0.9 mm ± 0.5 mm 3 months postoperatively and 1.1 mm ± 0.5 mm 12 months after surgery. The mean NDI improved significantly from preoperatively to 12 months postoperatively (34.6 ± 6.2 and 3.4 ± 4.1, respectively). The VAS-neck also showed a large improvement from 5.8 ± 2.2 before and 1.3 ± 1.4 12 months after surgery, as did the VAS-arm (6.4 ± 1.5 and 0.9 ± 1.6, respectively). Patient satisfaction was high throughout the follow-up period.

Conclusion

ACDF with a 3D printed titanium cage resulted in fast fusion without pathological subsidence. In comparison to other cage materials such as PEEK, the 3D printed titanium cage was noninferior in regard to its fusion rate and clinical results.

Clinical outcomes following one-, two-, three-, and four-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a national database study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common surgical procedure. There is markedly less data on outcomes after three- and four-level cases than one- and two-level cases.

PURPOSE

To compare perioperative 90-day adverse events and 5-year reoperation rates between isolated one-, two-, three-, and four-level ACDF cases.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective review of a large national database.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Overall, 97,081 patients undergoing ACDF were identified, of which one-level cases were 42,382 (43.7%), two-level cases were 24,055 (24.8%), three-level cases were 28,293 (29.1%), and four-level cases were 2,361 (2.4%).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Ninety-day adverse events and 5-year reoperation rates.

METHODS

The 2010 to Q1 2020 PearlDiver database was queried to identify patients who underwent elective ACDF for degenerative pathology without corpectomy or concomitant posterior procedures. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare outcomes of subcohorts with varying number of levels addressed by ACDF.

RESULTS

Of the 97,081 cases identified, patient characteristics and complication rates differed between the cohorts defined by levels treated. Univariate analyses revealed statistically different rates of 90-day any, serious, and minor adverse event rates between the groups, but the differences were all less than 2.5%. Readmission rates were statistically different by 2.9%, dysphagia by 3.2%, and prolonged length of stay by 6.3%.By multivariate analyses, three-level ACDF cases were not found to have greater 90-day adverse outcomes than two-level cases. Four-level ACDF cases were found to have significantly greater odds ratios of readmission, dysphagia, and prolonged length of stay (relative to one-level cases, OR 1.28, 1.63, and 1.97, respectively) but not other 90-day adverse events. Reoperation rates at five years for one-, two-, three-, and four-level cases were 13.0%, 13.5%, 15.0%, and 22.1%, respectively (log-rank p<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study represents one of the largest comparative studies of patients undergoing one-, two-, three-, and four-level ACDF. While odds of 90-day adverse events were not greater for three- versus two-level cases, four-level cases had several that were higher odds than one-level cases. Reoperation and dysphagia rates were higher for four-level cases than lesser levels. While these outcomes were found to be acceptable, they should help guide hospital planning and patient counseling.

Late complication of cervical disc arthroplasty: heterotopic ossification causing myelopathy after 10 years. Illustrative case

BACKGROUND

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a well-documented complication of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), although it rarely causes adverse clinical effects. Despite high-grade HO possibly limiting segmental mobility, it is reportedly seldom associated with symptoms.

OBSERVATIONS

The authors report a case of a 46-year-old male patient who underwent hybrid CDA and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for 3-level cervical disc herniation that caused myeloradiculopathy. The surgery was successful; the patient experienced nearly complete recovery postoperatively. The follow-up images, including computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans, showed satisfactory decompression at the indexed levels without residual osteophytes or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. However, 10 years later, the patient presented with symptomatic compressive myelopathy caused by severe HO that prompted a secondary surgery.

LESSONS

Although it is generally reported in the literature that HO is clinically innocuous, in this patient, it gradually and progressively developed and caused myelopathy, requiring a secondary surgery. Symptomatic HO can be expected over time, and patients with a high risk of HO deserve long-term follow-up after CDA. Further investigations are warranted to corroborate these risk factors, including multilevel calcified disc herniation, severe spondylosis, and suboptimal placement of the device during primary CDA surgery.

Comparison Between Three- and Four-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Patient-Reported and Radiographic Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

We compared the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes after 3- and 4-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in a retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Patients who had undergone primary 3- or 4-level ACDF were retrospectively identified. The demographic data and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected through a review of the medical records. PROM surveys were administered preoperatively for baseline measurements and at 1 year postoperatively. The surveys included the Neck Disability Index, 12-item short-form physical component summary, 12-item short-form mental component summary, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for neck and arm pain. The cervical sagittal alignment parameters included C2-C7 lordosis, segmental lordosis, the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and the T1 slope. Multivariate regression models were used to compare the changes in the PROMs and radiographic measurements over time between 3- and 4-level ACDF. Correlation coefficients were calculated to compare the delta scores for the PROMs and radiographic measurements.

RESULTS

The VAS scores for neck and arm pain had significantly improved from baseline in both cohorts. Only the 3-level group showed significant improvements perioperatively in the Neck Disability Index and 12-item short-form physical component summary. No significant differences were found in the improvement in clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. The pooled results demonstrated a significant negative correlation between the perioperative changes in segmental lordosis and VAS scores for arm pain. A significant negative correlation was also found between the perioperative changes in the SVA and 12-item short-form mental component summary and VAS scores for neck pain. C2-C7 lordosis significantly increased postoperatively only in the 3-level ACDF group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing both 3- and 4-level ACDF experienced significant clinical improvement without significant differences between the 2 groups. The radiographic measures of segmental lordosis and SVA also correlated with the changes in clinical outcomes.

A Validation of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for Cervical Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate depressive symptoms as measured by the PHQ-9 survey and correlated them with scores from the SF-12 and VR-12 Mental Component Summary (MCS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

With the rising incidence of depression and the need to identify modifiable risk factors before surgery, it is increasingly important to screen for preoperative depressive symptoms in spine surgery. Although the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) has favorable characteristics as a depressive symptom screening instrument, it has not been evaluated within cervical spine surgery.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained surgical registry was reviewed for patients undergoing single or multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or cervical disc replacement (CDR) from March 2016 until May 2019. Included patients underwent a procedure for degenerative spinal pathology. We collected demographic, baseline, and perioperative variables. The mean scores for postoperative PHQ-9, Short Form-12 (SF-12), and Veterans RAND-12 (VR-12) surveys were calculated, and an average change between preoperative and postoperative scores. Scatterplots depicted the association of SF-12 MCS and VR-12 MCS with PHQ-9. We evaluated the relationship of PHQ-9 with SF-12 MCS and VR-12 MCS scores by calculating a Pearson correlation coefficient and time-independent partial correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-two patients underwent single or multilevel level cervical spine surgery (ACDF: 73% and CDR: 27%). The average age was 42.4 and 39% were female. Compared to preoperative scores, significant increases were observed among postoperative PHQ-9, SF-12, and VR-12 MCS surveys (P ≤ 0.001). We observed strong correlations between SF-12 and VR-12 MCS with PHQ-9 scores for both assessed correlations.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing ACDF or CDR demonstrated significant improvement with PHQ-9, SF-12 MCS, and VR-12 MCS instruments. PHQ-9 scores strongly correlated with SF-12 MCS and VR-12 MCS. Our findings indicate PHQ-9 is a valid tool to evaluate pre and postsurgical depressive symptoms.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.