Is Transoral Surgery Still a Relevant Procedure in Atlantoaxial Instability?

The retropharyngeal reduction plate for atlantoaxial dislocation: a finite element analysis

Objective: To investigate the biomechanical properties of the retropharyngeal reduction plate by comparing the traditional posterior pedicle screw-rod fixation by finite element analysis. Methods: Two three-dimensional finite element digital models of the retropharyngeal reduction plate and posterior pedicle screw-rod fixation were constructed and validated based on the DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) data from C1 to C4. The biomechanical finite element analysis values of two internal fixations were measured and calculated under different conditions, including flexion, extension, bending, and rotation. Results: In addition to the backward extension, there was no significant difference in the maximum von Mises stress between the retropharyngeal reduction plate and posterior pedicle screw fixation under other movement conditions. The retropharyngeal reduction plate has a more uniform distribution under different conditions, such as flexion, extension, bending, and rotation. The stress tolerance of the two internal fixations was basically consistent in flexion, extension, left bending, and right bending. Conclusion: The retropharyngeal reduction plate has a relatively good biomechanical stability without obvious stress concentration under different movement conditions. It shows potential as a fixation option for the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation.

Extraoral anterior approach for the treatment of os odontoideum: illustrative case

BACKGROUND

Os odontoideum is typically treated with instrumented fusion through a posterior cervical approach. When this approach fails, limited options for revision are available. Occipitocervical fusion and transoral anterior fusions have been utilized in the past but are associated with high morbidity and complications.

OBSERVATIONS

Here the authors report a case of os odontoideum that was treated with an anterior cervical extraoral approach after failed posterior instrumented fusion. They discuss the challenges that can be encountered with the failure of fusion and the limited options when it comes to approach and fixation of os odontoideum.

LESSONS

To the authors' knowledge and based on a review of the literature, this case represents the first use of an anterior extraoral prevascular approach to the high cervical spine to address os odontoideum. They demonstrate that this approach can be utilized as a reasonable alternative to transoral surgery and should be considered in cases where additional or alternative fixation is desired without the morbidity and complications associated with occipitocervical fusion or a transoral approach, especially in a younger patient population.

The clinical validity of atlantoaxial joint inclination angle and reduction index for atlantoaxial dislocation

Objective

Atlantoaxial dislocation patients with neurological defects require surgery. Sometimes, release surgery is necessary for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation to further achieve reduction. Whether release surgery is essential relies on the surgeon's experience and lacks objective reference criteria. To evaluate the value of atlantoaxial joint inclination angle (AAJI) in sagittal and coronal planes and reduction index (RI) in the surgical approach selection for atlantoaxial dislocation.

Methods

Retrospectively analyzed 87 cases (42 males and 45 females, 9-89 years) of atlantoaxial dislocation from January 2011 to November 2020. In addition, 40 individuals without atlantoaxial dislocation were selected as the control group. Imaging parameters were compared between the two groups. According to surgical methods, the experiment group was divided into two groups including Group A(release surgery group) and Group B (conventional operation group). The parameters were measured based on CT and x-ray. The relevant imaging parameters and clinical scores, including the AAJI in sagittal and coronal planes, the atlas-dens interval (ADI) before and after traction, the RI, and JOA scores were measured and analyzed.

Results

The sagittal and coronal atlantoaxial joint inclination angles(SAAJI and CAAJI) in the control group were 7.91 ± 0.42(L), 7.99 ± 0.39°(R), 12.92 ± 0.41°(L), 12.97 ± 0.37°(R), in A were 28.94 ± 1.46°(L), 28.57 ± 1.55°(R), 27.41 ± 1.29°(L), 27.84 ± 1.55°(R), and in B were 16.16 ± 0.95°(L), 16.80 ± 1.00°(R), 24.60 ± 0.84°(L), 24.92 ± 0.93°(R) respectively. Statistical analysis showed that there was a statistical difference in the SAAJI between the control group and the experiment group (P < 0.01), as well as between groups A and B (P < 0.01). The RI in groups A and B was 27.78 ± 1.46% and 48.60 ± 1.22% respectively, and there was also a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.01). There was negative correlation between SAAJI and RI.

Conclusions

The SAAJI and RI can be used as objective imaging indexes to evaluate the reducibility of atlantoaxial dislocation. And these parameters could further guide the selection of surgery methods. When the RI is smaller than 48.60% and SAAJI is bigger than 28.94°, anterior release may be required.

Biomechanical comparison of anterior axis-atlanto-occipital transarticular fixation and anterior atlantoaxial transarticular fixation after odontoidectomy: A finite element analysis

Background: Anterior axis-atlanto-occipital transarticular fixation (AAOF) and anterior atlanto-axial transarticular fixation (AAF) are two common anterior screw fixation techniques after odontoidectomy, but the biomechanical discrepancies between them remain unknown. Objectives: To investigate the biomechanical properties of craniovertebral junction (CVJ) after odontoidectomy, with AAOF or AAF. Methods: A validated finite element model of the intact occipital-cervical spine (from occiput to T1) was modified to investigate biomechanical changes, resulting from odontoidectomy, odontoidectomy with AAOF, and odontoidectomy with AAF. Results: After odontoidectomy, the range of motion (ROM) at C1-C2 increased in all loading directions, and the ROM at the Occiput-C1 elevated by 66.2%, 57.5%, and 41.7% in extension, lateral bending, and torsion, respectively. For fixation models, the ROM at the C1-C2 junction was observably reduced after odontoidectomy with AAOF and odontoidectomy with AAF. In addition, at the Occiput-C1, the ROM of odontoidectomy with AAOF model was notably lower than the normal model in extension (94.9%), flexion (97.6%), lateral bending (91.8%), and torsion (96.4%). But compared with the normal model, in the odontoidectomy with AAF model, the ROM of the Occiput-C1 increased by 52.2%, -0.1%, 92.1%, and 34.2% in extension, lateral bending, and torsion, respectively. Moreover, there were no distinctive differences in the stress at the screw-bone interface or the C2-C3 intervertebral disc between the two fixation systems. Conclusion: AAOF can maintain CVJ stability at the Occiput-C1 after odontoidectomy, but AAF cannot. Thus, for patients with pre-existing atlanto-occipital joint instability, AAOF is more suitable than AAF in the choice of anterior fixation techniques.

Os odontoideum: A comprehensive review

Os odontoideum (OO) is a rare craniocervical anomaly that is characterized by a round ossicle separated from the C2 vertebral body. With a controversial etiology and unknown prevalence in the population, OO may be asymptomatic or present in patients with myelopathic and neurological symptoms. In this literature review, we aimed to investigate epidemiology, embryology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and the role of diagnostic radiography in OO. By providing an overview of different management strategies, surgical complications, and postoperative considerations for OO, our findings may guide neurosurgeons in providing proper diagnosis and treatment for OO patients. A literature review was conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases. A search using the query "os odontoideum" yielded 4319 results, of which 112 articles were chosen and analyzed for insights on factors such as etiology, clinical presentation, and management of OO. The presentation of OO varies widely from asymptomatic cases to severe neurological deficits. Asymptomatic patients can be managed either conservatively or surgically, while symptomatic patients should undergo operative stabilization. Although multiple studies show different techniques for surgical management involving posterior fusion, the diversity of such cases illustrates how treatment must be tailored to the individual patient to prevent complications. Conflicting studies and the paucity of current literature on OO highlight poor comprehension of the condition. Further understanding of the natural history of OO is critical to form evidence-based guidelines for the management of OO patients. More large-center studies are thus needed to promote accurate management of OO patients with optimal outcomes.

Transoral Odontoidectomy - Our Experience in A Limited-Resource Setup

BACKGROUND

Although posterior procedures are used for most cases of basilar invagination, transoral decompression is an important tool in complex deformities with severe degeneration and neural compression.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent transoral odontoidectomy for basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation at the neurosurgical unit of Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar between June 2016 and January 2022 were retrospectively included. Preoperative and postoperative neurological, clinical, and radiological parameters were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

Of the 33 patients included in this study, 22 were men and 11 were women. The mean age was 23.4 years ±8.4 years (mean ± standard deviation). The most common presenting symptoms were gait abnormalities and neck pain. A total of 28 patients were treated for the first time, while 5 patients had prior posterior fusion. The mean distance of the tip of the dens above the chamberlain line was 8.9 ± 4.2 mm, while the mean anterior atlantodental interval was 6.5 ± 2.1 mm. Seven patients had an anomalous course of vertebral artery on at least one side. A total of 28 patients improved significantly, while 5 patients did not improve at the follow-up. The mean follow-up was 8.5 months ±6.3 (mean ± standard deviation). The mean Nurick and Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scores improved postoperatively (P < 0.05). Three patients underwent reoperation including one with vertebral artery injury. Three patients underwent tracheostomy.

CONCLUSIONS

With proper patient selection, transoral odontoidectomy can be safely performed in a limited-resource setting.

An Unusual Chordoma of the Odontoid Process: A Case Report and Literature Review

The aim of this study is to present a rare case of chordoma in the odontoid process in which the tumor involved the odontoid process and compressed the spinal cord at the craniocervical junction. We report on the effectiveness and successful outcome of anterior microscopic tumor resection combined with posterior occipitocervical fixation and review the current standard treatment. A 39-year-old man presented with sudden dyspnea and quadriparesis caused by an unknown tumor compression at C2. Radiographic examination revealed a large destructive mass at C2 and heterogeneous enhancement. The patient received urgent surgical intervention by microscopic-assisted anterior tumor resection and posterior spinal fixation from the occiput to the C5 level. The pathohistologic reports for cytokeratins, epithelial membrane antigen, and S-100 protein were positive. The final diagnosis was chordoma of the odontoid process. At the 2-year follow-up, the patient's condition had improved, and a postoperative MRI showed no indication of tumor regrowth. Chordoma of the odontoid process or C2 body is very rare. The current standard management is wide tumor resection to prevent recurrence. The combined approach of anterior tumor resection with microscopic assistance and posterior stabilization of the occiput to C5 is the optimal treatment for this condition.

Retropharyngeal Reduction Plate for Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Cadaveric Test and Morphometric Trajectory Analysis

Objective

To evaluate the placement feasibility and safety of the newly designed retropharyngeal reduction plate by cadaveric test and to perform morphometric trajectory analysis.

Methods

The five cadaveric specimens with intact atlantoaxial joint were enrolled in this study. They were used for simulating the placement process and evaluating the placement feasibility of the retropharyngeal reduction plate. The atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) of five cadaveric specimens were obtained by proper external force after dissecting ligaments. The retropharyngeal reduction plate was placed on atlantoaxial joint of cadaveric specimens. The X‐ray and three‐dimensional (3D) spiral CT were used for evaluating the placement safety of retropharyngeal reduction plate. The DICOM data was obtained after 3D spiral CT scanning for the morphometric trajectory analysis.

Results

The reduction plates were successfully placed on the atlantoaxial joint of five cadaveric specimens through the retropharyngeal approach, respectively. The X‐ray and 3D spiral CT showed the accurate screw implantation and satisfying plate placement. The length of the left/right atlas screw trajectory (L/RAT) was, respectively, 1.73 ± 0.01 cm (LAT) and 1.71 ± 0.02 cm (RAT). The length of odontoid screw trajectory (OST) was 1.38 ± 0.02 cm. The length of the left/right axis screw trajectory (L/RAXT) was, respectively, 1.67 ± 0.02 cm (LAXT) and 1.67 ± 0.01 cm (RAXT). There was no statistical significance between left side and right side in terms of AT and AXT (P > 0.05). The angles of atlas screw trajectory angle (ASTA), axis screw trajectory angle (AXSTA), and odontoid screw trajectory angle (OSTA) were 38.04° ± 2.03°, 56.92° ± 2.66°, and 34.78° ± 2.87°, respectively.

Conclusion

The cadaveric test showed that the retropharyngeal reduction plate is feasible to place on the atlantoaxial joint, which is also a safe treatment choice for atlantoaxial dislocation. The meticulous preoperative planning of screw trajectory based on individual differences was also vital to using this technique.