Low Complication Rate of Anterior Lumbar Spine Surgery in an Ambulatory Surgery Center

Ambulatory Lumbar Fusion: A Systematic Review of Perioperative Protocols, Patient Selection Criteria, and Outcomes

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

The primary purpose was to propose patient selection criteria and perioperative best practices that can serve as a starting point for an ambulatory lumbar fusion program. The secondary purpose was to review patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after ambulatory lumbar fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND

As healthcare costs rise, there is an increasing emphasis on cost saving strategies (i.e. outpatient/ambulatory surgeries). Lumbar fusion procedures remain a largely inpatient surgery. Early studies have shown that fusion procedures can be safely preformed in an outpatient setting but no review has summarized these findings and best practices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched. The following data were collected: (1) study design; (2) number of participants; (3) patient population; (4) procedure types; (5) procedure setting; (6) inclusion criteria; (7) protocols; (8) adverse events; (9) PROs; and (10) associations between patient/surgical factors, setting, and outcomes.

RESULTS

The search yielded 20 publications. The following selection criteria for ambulatory lumbar fusion were identified: age below 70, minimal comorbidities, low/normal body mass index, no tobacco use, and no opioid use. The perioperative protocol can include a multimodal analgesic regimen. The patient should be observed for at least three hours after surgery. The patient should not be discharged without an alertness check and a neurological examination. Patients experienced significant improvements in PROs after ambulatory lumbar fusion; similarly, when compared to an inpatient group, ambulatory lumbar fusion patients experienced a comparable or superior improvement in PROs.

CONCLUSION

There are two critical issues surrounding ambulatory lumbar fusion: (1) Who is the ideal patient, and (2) What needs to be done to enable expedited discharge? We believe this review will provide a foundation to assist surgeons in making decisions regarding the performance of lumbar fusion on an ambulatory basis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Assessment of Spine Patient Preferences for the Location of Surgery Between a Hospital and an Ambulatory Surgical Center in the Time of COVID-19: An Analysis of Patient Surveys

Introduction There has been a recent increase in the number of spinal procedures that can be performed in ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs). Studies have found that patients who undergo procedures at ASCs tend to have lower complication rates following procedures, including lower infection rates. Furthermore, ASCs offer significantly lower costs of procedures to patients and health insurance companies as compared to the costs of procedures performed in a hospital. Despite precautions and screening in place by ASCs, patients may be hesitant to undergo procedures outside of the hospital. Conversely, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has created hesitancy for many to go to the hospital for care due to the presence of COVID patients.  Objective To assess patient preferences in the location of elective spine procedures between ASCs and hospitals, the authors conducted a survey of spine surgery candidates in a single practice. Methods A survey measuring patient age, vaccination status, fear of contracting COVID-19, and preference of surgery location was given to spinal surgery candidates at a single practice between fall 2021 and winter 2022. Statistical differences between the means of response groups were measured by a two-sample Z-score test. Results A total of 58 surveys were completed by patients. No difference in preference was observed by age. A difference was observed between genders, with 66% of females preferring ASCs to 40% of males (α=0.03). Patients with a fear of contracting COVID-19 preferred to have their procedure performed in an ASC. No difference was observed in location due to vaccination status, but unvaccinated patients had a significantly lower fear of contracting COVID-19 (α=0.02). Conclusion The differences in patient preferences have no clear cause, highlighting the need for better patient education in regard to the risks and benefits of each location of surgery. The fear of contracting COVID-19 on the day of surgery appears to be more ideological than rational for unvaccinated patients, who had less fear of contracting COVID-19 than vaccinated patients, despite being more likely to contract COVID-19 than vaccinated patients.

Advanced Technologies for Outpatient Lumbar Fusion: Barriers and Opportunities

BACKGROUND

In recent years, there has been increasing interest in outpatient spine surgery. Minimally invasive techniques have created an opportunity for ambulatory lumbar fusion, and these techniques increasingly involve advanced technologies such as navigation and robotics.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the barriers, advantages, and future predictions for such technology in the context of outpatient lumbar fusions.

METHODS

This is a narrative review of studies examining the advantages, limitations, and cost-effectiveness of navigation and spinal robotics in conjunction with the outcomes and costs of outpatient lumbar fusion.

RESULTS

Outpatient lumbar fusion is a growing trend with ample evidence of its safety, favorable patient outcomes, and cost savings. Navigation and spinal robotics are associated with improved instrumentation accuracy and fewer complications, and the long-term cost savings can make these technologies financially practical in the outpatient setting. Future capabilities with robotics will only increase their value.

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced technologies such as navigation and robotics are strategic long-term investments in the context of outpatient lumbar fusion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The favorable outcomes and costs associated with navigation and robotics will be relevant to any spine surgeon interested in developing an outpatient lumbar fusion program.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5

Factors Affecting Postoperative Length of Stay in Patients Undergoing Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

BACKGROUND

With hospital leaders and policy makers increasingly seeking ways to improve resource use, there has been heightened interest in reducing hospital length of stay (LOS) and performing spine procedures on an outpatient basis. We aimed to determine which risk factors correlated with prolonged LOS after anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF).

METHODS

Medical records for patients who underwent ALIF were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into those who had extended (≥3 days) versus nonextended (<3 days) LOS, and patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and preoperative medications were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate regression were then used to determine preoperative risk factors for extended LOS.

RESULTS

A total of 166 patients were included (mean age, 48.7 years). Medical comorbidities included hypertension (31.9%), diabetes (8.4%), and obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m²) (48.8%). LOS was not extended in 121 patients and extended in 45. Mean LOS was 2.2 days (95% confidence interval, 1.9-2.5). On multivariate logistic analysis, age ≥65 years (P = 0.001), preoperative benzodiazepine use (P = 0.014), 12-item Short Form mental component score (P = 0.008), estimated blood loss (P = 0.015), time to mobilization (P < 0.001), and total operative time (P = 0.020) were independent predictors for extended LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

As attempts are made to perform more spine procedure in ambulatory surgical centers, strict patient selection criteria are all critical in making this possible. Our results suggest that age, preoperative benzodiazepine use, higher intraoperative blood loss, delayed mobilization, and lower 12-item Short Form mental component score were correlated with increased LOS. Therefore, inpatient ALIF may be more suitable for patients with these risk factors.