1
|
Romani MD, Zhang HQ, Gao QL, Liu SH, Deng A. Cervical Sagittal Alignment and Related Factor Analysis and Prediction Model in Patients Undergoing Revision Surgery After Anterior Cervical Fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2024; 32:e585-e595. [PMID: 38595101 PMCID: PMC11111316 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-23-00565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with myelopathy or radiculopathy commonly undergo anterior cervical fusion surgery (ACFS), which has a notable failure rate on occasion. The goal of this study was to compare revision and nonrevision surgery patients in cervical sagittal alignment (CSA) subsequent to ACFS; additionally, to identify the best CSA parameters for predicting clinical outcome after ACFS; and furthermore, to create an equation model to assist surgeons in making decisions on patients undergoing ACFS. METHODS The data of 99 patients with symptomatic cervical myelopathy/radiculopathy who underwent ACFS were analyzed. Patients were divided into group A (underwent revision surgery after the first surgery failed) and group B (underwent only the first surgery). We measured and analyzed both preoperative and postoperative CSA parameters, including C2 slope, T1 slope, cervical lordosis C2-C7 (CL), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (C2C7 SVA), occiput-C2 lordosis angle (C0-C2), and chin brow vertical angle, and we further computed the correlation between the CSA parameters and created a prediction model. RESULTS The (T1S-CL)-C2S mismatch differed significantly between groups A and B ([9.95 ± 9.95] 0 , [3.79 ± 6.58] 0 , P < 0.05, respectively). A significant correlation was observed between C2 slope and T1CL in group B relative to group A postoperatively (R 2 = 0.42 versus R 2 = 0.09, respectively). Compared with group B, patients in group A had significantly higher C2C7SVA values, more levels of fusion, and more smokers. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and discrimination of the model were, respectively, 73.5%, 84%, 78.8%, and 85.65%. CONCLUSION The causes of revision surgery in cervical myelopathic patients after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion/anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion are multifactorial. (T1S-CL)-C2S mismatch and high C2C7SVA are the best cervical sagittal parameters that increase the odds of revision surgery, and the effect is more enhanced when comorbidities such as smoking, low bone-mineral density, and increased levels of fusion are taken into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manini Daudi Romani
- From the Department of spine surgery and Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China (Romani, Zhang, Qi-Le Gao, Liu, Deng), and the National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China (Romani, Zhang, Qi-Le Gao, Liu, and Deng)
| | - Hong-Qi Zhang
- From the Department of spine surgery and Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China (Romani, Zhang, Qi-Le Gao, Liu, Deng), and the National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China (Romani, Zhang, Qi-Le Gao, Liu, and Deng)
| | - Qi-Le Gao
- From the Department of spine surgery and Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China (Romani, Zhang, Qi-Le Gao, Liu, Deng), and the National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China (Romani, Zhang, Qi-Le Gao, Liu, and Deng)
| | - Shao-Hua Liu
- From the Department of spine surgery and Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China (Romani, Zhang, Qi-Le Gao, Liu, Deng), and the National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China (Romani, Zhang, Qi-Le Gao, Liu, and Deng)
| | - Ang Deng
- From the Department of spine surgery and Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China (Romani, Zhang, Qi-Le Gao, Liu, Deng), and the National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China (Romani, Zhang, Qi-Le Gao, Liu, and Deng)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Relationship between smoking and postoperative complications of cervical spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2022; 12:9172. [PMID: 35654928 PMCID: PMC9163175 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13198-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
To determine whether smoking has adverse effects on postoperative complications following spine cervical surgery (PROSPERO 2021: CRD42021269648). We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science through 13 July 2021 for cohort and case–control studies that investigated the effect of smoking on postoperative complications after cervical spine surgery. Two researchers independently screened the studies and extracted data according to the selection criteria. The meta-analysis included 43 studies, including 27 case–control studies and 16 cohort studies, with 10,020 patients. Pooled estimates showed that smoking was associated with overall postoperative complications (effect estimate [ES] = 1.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.62–2.44, p < 0.0001), respiratory complications (ES = 2.70, 95% CI: 1.62–4.49, p < 0.0001), reoperation (ES = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.50–2.81, p < 0.0001), dysphagia (ES = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.06–2.10, p = 0.022), wound infection (ES = 3.21, 95% CI: 1.62–6.36, p = 0.001), and axial neck pain (ES = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.25–3.12, p = 0.003). There were no significant differences between the smoking and nonsmoking groups in terms of fusion (ES = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94–1.00, p = 0.0097), operation time (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 0.08, 95% CI: −5.54 to 5.71, p = 0.977), estimated blood loss (WMD = −5.31, 95% CI: −148.83 to 139.22, p = 0.943), length of hospital stay (WMD = 1.01, 95% CI: −2.17 to 4.20, p = 0.534), Visual Analog Scale-neck pain score (WMD = −0.19, 95% CI: −1.19 to 0.81, p = 0.707), Visual Analog Scale-arm pain score (WMD = −0.50, 95% CI: −1.53 to 0.53, p = 0.343), Neck Disability Index score (WMD = 11.46, 95% CI: −3.83 to 26.76, p = 0.142), or Japanese Orthopedic Association Scores (WMD = −1.75, 95% CI: −5.27 to 1.78, p = 0.332). Compared with nonsmokers, smokers seem to be more significantly associated with overall complications, respiratory complications, reoperation, longer hospital stay, dysphagia, wound infection and axial neck pain after cervical spine surgery. It is essential to provide timely smoking cessation advice and explanation to patients before elective cervical spine surgery.
Collapse
|