Improved Right Ventricular Systolic Function After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure

The Effect of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Right Ventricular Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Right ventricular (RV) failure is an important predicting factor regarding overall and event-free survival regardless of baseline left ventricular (LV) function in patients with severe heart failure (HF). Previous studies have indicated that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves LV and RV reverse remodeling in patients with systolic dyssynchrony within the left ventricle. However, there is conflicting evidence regarding the role of CRT in RV function. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the implications of CRT on RV function indices. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using the MedLine and EMBASE databases and the Cochrane Library from their inception until 18 March 2024. Eligible were studies providing information on RV function indices, both at baseline and after CRT. Evidence was summarized using random-effects meta-analytic models. Results: In total, 30 studies were deemed eligible. CRT resulted in a significant improvement in right ventricular fractional area change (mean difference (MD) 5.11%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.83 to 7.39), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE, MD 1.63 mm, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.16), and myocardial systolic excursion velocity (MD 1.85 cm/s, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.47) as well as a significant decrease in pulmonary artery systolic pressure (MD -6.24 mmHg, 95% CI -8.32 to -4.16). A non-significant effect was observed on TAPSE to PASP ratio and right ventricular global longitudinal strain. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis demonstrates that CRT is associated with a significant improvement in echocardiographic parameters of RV function. Further investigation is necessary to elucidate how these changes, both independently and in conjunction with LV improvement, impact patients' long-term prognosis, and to identify the specific patient populations expected to derive the greatest benefit.

Long-term outcomes from upgrade to cardiac resynchronisation therapy in ischaemic versus non-ischaemic heart disease

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) can be necessary in patients with chronic heart failure, who have already been provided with transvenous cardiac implantable electrical devices. Upgrade procedures revealed controversial results, while long-term outcomes regarding underlying Ischaemic- (ICM) or Non-Ischaemic heart disease (NICM) have yet to be described.

METHODS

The Mannheim Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Registry (MARACANA) was designed as a retrospective observational single-centre registry, including all CRT implantations from 2013-2021 (n = 459). CRT upgrades (n = 136) were retrospectively grouped to either ICM (n = 84) or NICM (n = 52) and compared for New York Heart Association classification (NYHA), paced QRS-width, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and other heart failure modification aspects in the long-term (59.3 ± 5 months).

RESULTS

Baseline-characteristics including paced QRS-width, upgrade indications or NYHA-classification were comparable for both groups (group comparison p>.05). The CRT upgrade improved NYHA (ICM: 2.98 ± 0.4 to 2.29 ± 0.7, NICM: 2.94 ± 0.5 to 2.08 ± 0.5) and the LVEF (ICM: 27.2 ± 6.6 to 38.25 ± 8.8, NICM: 30.2 ± 9.4 to 38.7 ± 13.8%) after five years, irrespective of underlying heart disease (each group p < .05, group comparison p>.05). Only ICM revealed significant improvements in TAPSE (15.9 ± 4.1 to 18.9 ± 4.1 mm) and narrowing of the paced QRS-width (185.4 ± 29 to 147.2 ± 16.3 ms) after five years (each p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Upgrade to CRT might improve heart failure symptoms and left-ventricular systolic function in the long-term, irrespective of underlying ischaemic or non-ischaemic heart disease.