Epilepsy surgery in pediatric intractable epilepsy with destructive encephalopathy

Parents' and children's decision-making and experiences in pediatric epilepsy surgery

BACKGROUND

In pediatric epilepsy surgery, little research has been conducted on parents' decision-making for or against surgery, their satisfaction with the surgical outcome, as well as their children's personal experiences with the process.

OBJECTIVE

This study explores (1) factors that may influence parents' decision-making, (2) factors associated with their postoperative satisfaction, and (3) their children's involvement in decision-making and their experiences with epilepsy surgery.

METHODS

Self-developed questionnaires were provided to parents and their children in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. Clinical and psychosocial differences between parents who decided for or against surgery, as well as associations between postoperative factors and the parents' satisfaction were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-one questionnaires (42 parent and nine patient questionnaires) were evaluated. Parents who decided for epilepsy surgery reported significantly more frequently to have received a good medical consultation and a consistent recommendation. They made significantly less use of information websites, internet forums, and patient organizations. Their children were classified as more intelligent and resisted surgery less. Most of the parents were satisfied with the surgical outcome (83%). Parents were significantly more satisfied when their children had fewer medication side effects, their memory or concentration had improved, their character or behavior had changed in a positive direction, or when their children were more independent or less excluded. They were also significantly more content when they had more free time to themselves and their professional situation or their relationship with their children, friends, or other family members had improved. However, no significant association was found between parental satisfaction and reduced number of medications or improved seizure outcome. Although the children were reported to have been minimally involved in the decision-making process, they were satisfied with their involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

A good medical consultation that involves the children and considers the family's living conditions is a crucial factor for parents' decision-making on pediatric epilepsy surgery. For parents' satisfaction, a positive change in their child's character or behavior and an improved psychosocial situation of the family are more important than postoperative seizure frequency or number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Therefore, the medical consultation should not only focus on clinical factors, but also point out psychosocial and behavioral changes that may occur after the surgical treatment.

Resective surgery combined with corpus callosotomy for children with non-focal lesional Lennox-Gastaut syndrome

BACKGROUND

The first prospective trial for resective surgery combined with corpus callosotomy (CCT) was performed to investigate the outcomes of the combined surgery in children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) without focal lesion on brain MRI.

METHODS

This study enrolled 68 children with LGS and without focal lesion on brain MRI, of which 25 received medicine (medicine group) and 43 underwent surgery (surgery group), including 20 with exclusively resective surgery (exclusively resection subgroup) and 23 with resective surgery combined with CCT (combined CCT subgroup). All patients were followed for 3-5 years.

RESULTS

Significant differences in seizure control were observed between the medicine group and the exclusively resection subgroup and combined CCT subgroup at the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year follow-ups. There was a trend that the children with resection combined with CCT had better seizure control than those with exclusively resection at the three follow-ups, but this could not be verified by the statistical method used. Furthermore, significant differences were not observed in seizure control between children with different MRI findings, age at surgery, or pathology in the surgery group. The percentage of long-term seizure-free did not remain as high as the percentage of early stage seizure-free at 1-year follow-up. However, the children with combined CCT surgery demonstrated more postoperative improvement than the children with resective surgery alone based on the mean QOL score (10.78 vs. 5.75, p = 0.0152) and full-scale IQ (7.91 vs. 4.55, p = 0.0446).

CONCLUSIONS

Resective surgery combined with CCT can provide favorable seizure control and obvious improvements in QOL and IQ in children with LGS. This combined approach can be performed in carefully selected LGS children without focal lesions and can localize the epileptogenic zone following a comprehensive preoperative evaluation.

Conceptualizing lennox-gastaut syndrome as a secondary network epilepsy

Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) is a category of severe, disabling epilepsy, characterized by frequent, treatment-resistant seizures, and cognitive impairment. Electroencephalography (EEG) shows characteristic generalized epileptic activity that is similar in those with lesional, genetic, or unknown causes, suggesting a common underlying mechanism. The condition typically begins in young children, leaving many severely disabled with recurring seizures throughout their adult life. Scalp EEG of the tonic seizures of LGS is characterized by a diffuse high-voltage slow transient evolving into generalized low-voltage fast activity, likely reflecting sustained fast neuronal firing over a wide cortical area. The typical interictal discharges (runs of slow spike-and-wave and bursts of generalized paroxysmal fast activity) also have a “generalized” electrical field, suggesting widespread cortical involvement. Recent brain mapping studies have begun to reveal which cortical and subcortical regions are active during these “generalized” discharges. In this critical review, we examine findings from neuroimaging studies of LGS and place these in the context of the electrical and clinical features of the syndrome. We suggest that LGS can be conceptualized as “secondary network epilepsy,” where the epileptic activity is expressed through large-scale brain networks, particularly the attention and default-mode networks. Cortical lesions, when present, appear to chronically interact with these networks to produce network instability rather than triggering each individual epileptic discharge. LGS can be considered as “secondary” network epilepsy because the epileptic manifestations of the disorder reflect the networks being driven, rather than the specific initiating process. In this review, we begin with a summation of the clinical manifestations of LGS and what this has revealed about the underlying etiology of the condition. We then undertake a systematic review of the functional neuroimaging literature in LGS, which leads us to conclude that LGS can best be conceptualized as “secondary network epilepsy.”