Intermittent Theta Slowings in Contralateral Side of Weakness after Sleep Deprivation on Spot EEG in Sporadic Hemiplegic Migraine

Migraine Visual Aura and Cortical Spreading Depression-Linking Mathematical Models to Empirical Evidence

This review describes the subjective experience of visual aura in migraine, outlines theoretical models of this phenomenon, and explores how these may be linked to neurochemical, electrophysiological, and psychophysical differences in sensory processing that have been reported in migraine with aura. Reaction-diffusion models have been used to model the hallucinations thought to arise from cortical spreading depolarisation and depression in migraine aura. One aim of this review is to make the underlying principles of these models accessible to a general readership. Cortical spreading depolarisation and depression in these models depends on the balance of the diffusion rate between excitation and inhibition and the occurrence of a large spike in activity to initiate spontaneous pattern formation. We review experimental evidence, including recordings of brain activity made during the aura and attack phase, self-reported triggers of migraine, and psychophysical studies of visual processing in migraine with aura, and how these might relate to mechanisms of excitability that make some people susceptible to aura. Increased cortical excitability, increased neural noise, and fluctuations in oscillatory activity across the migraine cycle are all factors that are likely to contribute to the occurrence of migraine aura. There remain many outstanding questions relating to the current limitations of both models and experimental evidence. Nevertheless, reaction-diffusion models, by providing an integrative theoretical framework, support the generation of testable experimental hypotheses to guide future research.

Interrelated Pathogenesis? Neuronal Intranuclear Inclusion Disease Combining With Hemiplegic Migraine

BACKGROUND

Neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease (NIID) is considered a heterogeneous disease because of its highly variable clinical manifestations. To date, there are no reports of NIID patients presenting with hemiplegic migraine (HM)-like headache, or of HM and NIID co-occurring as comorbidity, and the connection between these 2 seemingly unrelated clinical conditions has yet to be established.

METHOD

We present a patient with NIID who was previously diagnosed with HM. To determine the pathogenesis of HM in this NIID patient, we systematically reviewed published NIID and HM cases and cataloged them based on their clinical manifestations.

RESULT

The clinical manifestations of NIID is highly various; however, there is no case reported to date that shows HM-like symptoms or cerebral edema. All documented symptomatic HM cases show vascular dysfunction to various degrees, but none of them has been shown to be correlated with NIID.

CONCLUSION

Our patient is the first documented case in which HM and NIID occur simultaneously. Vascular dysfunctions that cause cerebral hypoperfusion and glucose hypometabolism, two of the dominant causes of symptomatic HM, may be associated with the accumulation of eosinophilic hyaline inclusions that cause NIID. However, the existence of inclusions may also alter neuronal behavior and indirectly cause cerebral hypoperfusion and glucose hypometabolism. Further research and observations are needed to examine the relationship between HM and NIID.