The correlation between pharyngeal residue, penetration/aspiration and nutritional modality: a cross-sectional study in patients with neurogenic dysphagia

The discriminant ability of the Eating Assessment tool-10 to detect swallowing efficiency in neurogenic dysphagia

PURPOSE

Neurogenic dysphagia causes complications such as malnutrition, dehydration, and aspiration pneumonia. Therefore, early detection with clinically valid tools is essential. This study aimed to investigate the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) ability to detect swallowing efficiency at three different consistencies in neurogenic dysphagia.

METHODS

One hundred twelve patients with neurogenic dysphagia (74 males and 38 females, mean ± SD age 61.83 ± 9.72 years) were included in the study. A Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) was performed in the clinic following EAT-10 to assess swallowing efficacy at International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) consistencies of 0, 3, and 7. The swallowing efficiency of the patients was assessed using the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS). Area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity values were calculated to evaluate the ability of EAT-10 to discriminate between participants with and without residue and between participants with and without moderate-to-severe residue.

RESULTS

The EAT-10 significantly detected participants with and without residues for three IDDSI consistent: for IDDSI 0 residue in the vallecula and pyriform sinus (cutoff score ≥ 14, p < 0.001), for IDDSI 3 residue in the vallecula and pyriform sinus (cutoff score ≥ 13, p < 0.001), for IDDSI 7 residue in the vallecula and pyriform sinus (respectively, cutoff score ≥ 13, cutoff score ≥ 14, p < 0.001). Additionally, the EAT-10 significantly detected those with and without moderate-to-severe residue.

CONCLUSIONS

The EAT-10, frequently used in swallowing clinics, can determine swallowing efficiency in individuals with neurogenic dysphagia. Additionally, it has the power to detect moderate-to-severe pharyngeal residue.

A deep learning approach to dysphagia-aspiration detecting algorithm through pre- and post-swallowing voice changes

Introduction

This study aimed to identify differences in voice characteristics and changes between patients with dysphagia-aspiration and healthy individuals using a deep learning model, with a focus on under-researched areas of pre- and post-swallowing voice changes in patients with dysphagia. We hypothesized that these variations may be due to weakened muscles and blocked airways in patients with dysphagia.

Methods

A prospective cohort study was conducted on 198 participants aged >40 years at the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from October 2021 to February 2023. Pre- and post-swallowing voice data of the participants were converted to a 64-kbps mp3 format, and all voice data were trimmed to a length of 2 s. The data were divided for 10-fold cross-validation and stored in HDF5 format with anonymized IDs and labels for the normal and aspiration groups. During preprocessing, the data were converted to Mel spectrograms, and the EfficientAT model was modified using the final layer of MobileNetV3 to effectively detect voice changes and analyze pre- and post-swallowing voices. This enabled the model to probabilistically categorize new patient voices as normal or aspirated.

Results

In a study of the machine-learning model for aspiration detection, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values were analyzed across sexes under different configurations. The average AUC values for males ranged from 0.8117 to 0.8319, with the best performance achieved at a learning rate of 3.00e-5 and a batch size of 16. The average AUC values for females improved from 0.6975 to 0.7331, with the best performance observed at a learning rate of 5.00e-5 and a batch size of 32. As there were fewer female participants, a combined model was developed to maintain the sex balance. In the combined model, the average AUC values ranged from 0.7746 to 0.7997, and optimal performance was achieved at a learning rate of 3.00e-5 and a batch size of 16.

Conclusion

This study evaluated a voice analysis-based program to detect pre- and post-swallowing changes in patients with dysphagia, potentially aiding in real-time monitoring. Such a system can provide healthcare professionals with daily insights into the conditions of patients, allowing for personalized interventions.

Clinical Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05149976.

A Tool for the Assessment of Swallowing Safety and Efficiency in Adults: Turkish Adaptation of Boston Residue and Clearance Scale

The objective of this study was to create a Turkish language adaptation of the Boston Residue and Clearance Scale (BRACS), a validated and reliable tool. The BRACS scale was first translated into Turkish and a Turkish version was subsequently developed. Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing (FEES) was administered to collect data from 25 dysphagic patients who were hospitalized after a stroke. The recorded films were subjected to editing procedures to ensure their appropriateness for the assessment of swallowing disorders and were then dispatched to a panel of five speech and language therapists for evaluation using the adaptation of the BRACS instrument. The scoring by the experts was evaluated using both explanatory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Convergent validity, item reliability, and construct (composite) reliability were measured by calculating the average variance extracted (AVE) values. For the 12 location items, EFA revealed 3 main latent factors: the laryngeal vestibule and the oropharynx and hypopharynx. The Turkish BRACS had excellent inter-rater reliability (Krippendorff's alpha coefficient values ranged from 0.93 to 0.95) and high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.88 to 0.93). Inter-rater ICCs for the first and second sessions were 0.83 and 0.85, respectively. CFA showed that all fitted criteria reached acceptable or perfect fit levels. The findings indicated that the proposed factor structure was validated. The AVE values are between 0.61 and 0.73 which was taken as evidence of convergent validity. The Turkish adaptation of the BRACS tool demonstrates both reliablity and validity, rendering it a useful and credible tool for assessing residual severity, particularly in clinical settings.

Swallowing kinematics and submental muscles activation during a newly designed maneuver called Mouth Open Swallowing Maneuver: A comparative study

The aim of this study was to design a new maneuver called the Mouth Open Swallowing Maneuver (MOSM), and to compare swallowing kinematics and submental muscles activation (SMA) between MOSM and two current approaches used in dysphagia rehabilitation. Fifty healthy volunteers were asked to perform three repetitions of dry swallowing (DS) (control task), the MOSM, the Mendelsohn Maneuver (MM), and the Tongue-Hold Maneuver (THM) during videofluoroscopic swallowing study accompanied with simultaneous SMA recording. Swallowing kinematics were measured by frame-by-frame analysis on hyolaryngeal movement using ImageJ. Swallowing with maximum hyolaryngeal movement and SMA during these tasks was used for comparative analysis. Vertical movement of the hyoid during the MOSM was significantly greater than those observed during the DS and the THM (p<0.001, p<0.001). Horizontal movement of the hyoid during DS and the THM was significantly greater than that observed during the MM (p = 0.001, p = 0.001). Vertical movement of the larynx during the MOSM was significantly greater than those observed during DS, MM, and THM (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between tasks in horizontal movement of the larynx (p = 0.785). SMA during the THM was significantly greater than that observed during MOSM (p = 0.002). No significant difference was found between other tasks in terms of SMA (p>0.05). The MOSM as a newly designed maneuver was significantly superior to other maneuvers in increasing vertical hyolaryngeal movement. The THM has as much effect on hyolaryngeal movement as the MM. In this study, the MOSM was shown to be effective in increasing hyolaryngeal movement. ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS); the clinical trial registration number (NCT05579041).

Pharyngeal Residue Scoring in Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: Reliability Comparison and Applicability Among Different Scales

Several scales to assess pharyngeal residue in Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) are currently available. The study aimed to compare the reliability and the applicability in real clinical practice among four rating scales: the Pooling Score (P-SCORE), the Boston Residue and Clearance Scale (BRACS), the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS), and the Residue Ordinal Rating Scale (RORS). Twenty-five FEES videos were evaluated four times, once for each scale, by four speech and language pathologists. To test intra-rater reliability, the same raters re-assessed the videos two weeks apart. To test the applicability, raters recorded the time required to complete each assessment and the perceived difficulty/ease on a visual-analog scale (VAS). The intra-rater and the inter-rater reliability were calculated with Cohen's weighted Kappa and the Fleiss weighted Kappa, respectively. Time and perceived difficulty/ease scores were compared. The intra-rater reliability analysis showed almost perfect agreement for YPRSRS (k = 0.91) and RORS (k = 0.83) and substantial agreement for P-SCORE (k = 0.76) and BRACS (k = 0.74). Pairwise comparison showed no significant differences among the scales. The inter-rater reliability for the YPRSRS (k = 0.78) was significantly higher than P-SCORE (k = 0.52, p < 0.001), BRACS (k = 0.56, p < 0.001), and RORS (k = 0.65, p = 0.005). The BRACS required the longest time (p < 0.001) and was perceived as the most difficult scale (p < 0.001). The RORS was perceived as the easiest scale (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the YPRSRS showed the highest reliability, while raters perceived the RORS as the easiest to score. These results will allow clinicians to consciously choose which scale to use in clinical practice.

Evaluation of Post-Swallow Residue with Visual Analysis of Swallowing Efficiency and Safety in Patients with Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease

Objectives: Dysphagia is common in idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) and is associated with impairments in both swallowing safety and swallowing efficiency. The goals of this study were to define post-swallow residue patterns in people with IPD and describe pathophysiological endoscopic findings affecting residue accumulation. Methods: This was a prospective single-blinded cross-sectional cohort study of patients with the diagnosis of IPD recruited from a Movement Disorder Clinic. Clinical variables included patient age, cognitive function, and measures of disease severity, and laryngoscopic examinations with a flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) were completed for each patient. Visual Analysis of Swallowing Efficiency and Safety (VASES) was used to analyze FEES. Post-swallow residue outcomes and non-residue endoscopic outcomes including the Bowing index, Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) score, premature leakage, and build-up phenomenon were evaluated. Multiple regression models were used to evaluate factors affecting the residue at different anatomic levels. Results: Overall 53 patients completed the study. The multiple regression analyses showed a relation between (1) the presence of residue at the level of oropharynx and epiglottis with premature leakage, (2) the presence of residue at the level of the laryngeal vestibule and vocal folds with build-up phenomenon, and (3) the presence of residue at the level of the hypopharynx, laryngeal vestibule, and subglottis with airway invasion. Conclusion: Residue pattern during FEES is associated with specific swallow dysfunctions in IPD. Using residue localization and quantification may be a helpful tool in assessing the impact of targeted swallowing interventions in patients with IPD and dysphagia.

Relationship Between Pharyngeal Residues Assessed by Bolus Residue Scale or Normalized Residue Ratio SCALE and Risk of Aspiration in Head and Neck Cancer Who Underwent Videofluoroscopy

Dysphagia affects 60-75% of patients treated for head and neck cancer (HNC). We aimed to evaluate the association between residue severity and airway invasion severity using a videofluoroscopic swallowing study and identify risk factors for poor penetration-aspiration outcomes in patients with dysphagia treated for HNC. Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) was used to assess airway invasion severity, while residue severity was assessed using both the Bolus Residue Scale (BRS) for residue location and the Normalized Residue Ratio Scale (NRRS) for residue amount. Relevant covariates were adjusted in the logistic regression models to account for potential confounding. Significantly higher abnormal PAS was reported for increased piriform sinus NRRS (NRRSp) [odds ratio (OR), 4.81; p = 0.042] with liquid swallowing and increased BRS value (OR, 1.52; p = 0.014) for semi-liquid swallowing in multivariate analysis. Tumor location, older age, and poorer Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) were significant factors for abnormal PAS in both texture swallowings. After adjusting for confounding factors (sex, age, and FOIS score), NRRS model in liquid swallowing (area under the curve [AUC], 0.83; standard error = 0.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75, 0.91) and BRS in semi-liquid swallowing (AUC, 0.83; SE = 0.04; 95% CI: 0.76, 0.91) predicted abnormal PAS. The results indicate that while assessing residue and swallowing aspiration in patients with HNC, it is important to consider age, tumor location, and functional swallowing status. The good predictability of abnormal PAS with BRS and NRRS indicated that residue location and amount were both related to the aspiration event in patients with HNC.

The use of videofluoroscopy (VFS) and fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in the investigation of oropharyngeal dysphagia in stroke patients: A narrative review

OBJECTIVES

Patients with suspected acute stroke require rapid assessment of swallowing on admission. If aspiration is suspected, this takes the form of specialist assessment, using either videofluoroscopy (VFS) or fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). The review aim was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of each method in stroke patients. Literature was collected from the databases Scopus, Web of Science and Medline, and articles included in the review were published within the last 10 years, in the English language.

KEY FINDINGS

Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.29-0.33 and 0.96-1.0 for VFS, respectively, and 0.37-1.0 and 0.65-0.87 for FEES, respectively, depending on the type of bolus utilised. VFS is the current gold-standard for the investigation of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD), however, radiation dose and patient transport implications mean FEES may be preferred. FEES has limitations including 'whiteout' and the invasive nature of the endoscope. The NICE guidelines do not recommend a definitive protocol specifically in stroke patients. This suggests further research may be required to determine the most effective method.

CONCLUSION

FEES is a beneficial first line examination, providing limited invasiveness, and administering a high level of patient suitability, without using ionising radiation. VFS could potentially be useful following FEES to secure full visualisation, ensuring an aspiration event is not missed during FEES.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Use of FEES as the first line test rather than VFS, ensures radiation dose is as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP). Ongoing research to ensure protocols follow current best practice can help ensure accurate management of oropharyngeal dysphagia in stroke patients.

Validity and reliability of the Italian translation of the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale

Objective

In the dysphagic patient, pharyngeal residues (PR) are associated with aspiration and poor quality of life. The assessment of PR using validated scales during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) is crucial for rehabilitation. This study aims to validate and test the reliability of the Italian version of the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (IT-YPRSRS). The effects of training and experience in FEES on the scale were also determined.

Methods

The original YPRSRS was translated into Italian according to standardised guidelines. Thirty FEES images were selected after consensus and proposed to 22 naive raters who were asked to assess the severity of PR in each image. Raters were divided into two subgroups by years of experience at FEES, and randomly by training. Construct validity, inter-rater, and intra-rater reliability were assessed by kappa statistics.

Results

IT-YPRSRS showed substantial to almost perfect agreement (kappa > 0.75) in validity and reliability for both the overall sample (660 ratings), and valleculae/pyriform sinus sites (330 ratings each). No significant differences emerged between groups considering years of experience, and variable differences were observed by training.

Conclusions

The IT-YPRSRS demonstrated excellent validity and reliability in identifying location and severity of PR.

Reliability and Validity of Non-Instrumental Clinical Assessments for Adults with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Systematic Review

This systematic review on non-instrumental clinical assessment in adult oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) provides an overview of published measures with reported reliability and validity. In alignment with PRISMA, four databases (CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and PubMed) were searched, resulting in a total of 16 measures and 32 psychometric studies included. The included measures assessed any aspect of swallowing, consisted of at least one specific subscale relating to swallowing, were developed by clinical observation, targeted adults, and were developed in English. The included psychometric studies focused on adults, reported on measures for OD-related conditions, described non-instrumental clinical assessments, reported on validity or reliability, and were published in English. Methodological quality was assessed using the standard quality assessment QualSyst. Most measures targeted only restricted subdomains within the conceptual framework of non-instrumental clinical assessments. Across the 16 measures, hypothesis testing and reliability were the most reported psychometrics, whilst structural validity and content validity were the least reported. Overall, data on the reliability and validity of the included measures proved incomplete and frequently did not meet current psychometric standards. Future research should focus on the development of comprehensive non-instrumental clinical assessments for adults with OD using contemporary psychometric research methods.

Evaluation of Objective and Subjective Swallowing Outcomes in Patients with Dysphagia Treated for Head and Neck Cancer

We evaluated objective and subjective swallowing function outcomes in patients with dysphagia treated for head and neck cancer (HNC) and identified risk factors for poor swallowing outcomes. Patients undergoing videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSS) between January 2016 and March 2021 were divided into four groups according to primary tumor sites; post-treatment dysphagia was assessed. The penetration–aspiration scale (PAS) and bolus residue scale (BRS) were used to objectively assess swallowing function through VFSS. The Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) was used for subjective analyses of swallowing statuses. To account for potential confounding, important covariates were adjusted for in logistic regression models. Oropharyngeal tumors were significantly more likely to have poor PAS and BRS scores than oral cavity tumors, and the patients with nasopharyngeal tumors were significantly less likely to have poor FOIS scores. Old age, having multiple HNCs, and a history of radiotherapy were associated with an increased odds of poor PAS scores (for all types of swallows), poor BRS scores (for semiliquid and solid swallows), and poor FOIS scores, respectively. This indicates using only subjective assessments may not allow for accurate evaluations of swallowing function in patients treated for HNC. Using both objective and subjective assessments may allow for comprehensive evaluations.

Respiratory Muscle Training Reduces Respiratory Complications and Improves Swallowing Function After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if respiratory muscle training is capable of reducing the occurrence of respiratory complications and improving dysphagia (swallowing or cough function) after stroke?

DESIGN

Systematic review of randomized control trials based on the Cochrane guidelines.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients (> 18 years old) were diagnosed with stroke.

INTERVENTION

Respiratory muscle training aimed at increasing respiratory muscles' strength by using the threshold resistance trainer or flow-oriented resistance trainer.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Respiratory complications, swallowing and cough function.

RESULTS

Eleven trials (n=523 participants) were included . Respiratory muscle training reduced the risk of respiratory complications (RR0.51, 95%CI 0.28 to 0.93, I² = 0%,P=0.03, ARD =0.068, NNT=14.71) compared with no/sham respiratory intervention. It also decreased the liquid type PAS scores by 0.81 (95% CI -1.19 to -0.43, I² = 39%, P<0.0001). There was no significant association between respiratory muscle training and FOIS scores, cough function:increased FOIS scores by 0.47 (95%CI -0.45 to 1.39, I² = 55%, P=0.32), decreased PECF-VC by 18.70 L/min (95%CI -59.74 to 22.33, I² = 19%, P=0.37) and increased PECF-RC by 0.05 L/min (95% CI -40.78 to 40.87 I2 = 0%, P=1.00) .

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis provided evidence that respiratory muscle training is effective in reducing the risk of respiratory complications, and improving dysphagia by reducing penetration or aspiration during swallowing liquid bolus after stroke. However, there was no sufficient evidence to determine that respiratory muscle training improves cough function. Additional multi-center studies using larger patient cohorts are required to validate and support these findings. Furthermore, long-term follow-up studies should be performed to measure outcomes, at the same time avoiding bias due to confounding factors such as heterogeneity of the etiologies of dysphagia.

Correlations between bedside and instrumental endoscopic parameters in determining severity of dysphagia: an integrated clinical evaluation of safety and efficiency

Interaction between bedside and endoscopic parameters is of great interest in the management of patients with swallowing disorders. Our aim is to document if and how bedside parameters correlate with severity using endoscopic assessment. 556 consecutive patients (318 M/238 F, mean age 65.56 ± 10.36 years, range 18-91), were evaluated in our Swallowing Centre during 2008. All underwent bedside evaluation and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), considering the pooling score (p-score) and the pooling sensation, collaboration and age score (p-SCA score) to express criteria of clinical severity of dysphagia. The correlation between the two tests (Spearman correlation coefficient) and their agreement to classify severity (Cohen’s kappa) was defined. After dichotomisation (cut-off: no risk/any kind of risk of aspiration), values of sensitivity and specificity were obtained after comparison with FEES results (gold standard). A close and significant correlation between the p-score and p-SCA score was found (rho = 0.88; p < 0.001). The agreement among scores in attributing the categories of risk is moderate (Cohen’s Kappa = 0.46; p < 0.001).The p-score had a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 60%, while the p-SCA score has a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 40%. Our results suggest that including even a few parameter from bedside evaluation to an endoscopic score, the level of severity expressed by the latter, decreases. The evaluation of patients with swallowing disorders should consider as many elements as possible, deriving from non-instrumental and instrumental evaluation (integrated clinical evaluation).

Perioperative instrumental swallowing evaluation in adult airway reconstruction: A retrospective observational cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Airway reconstruction for laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) encompasses several procedures. Dysphagia is a well-recognised sequela of LTS and airway surgery, however studies have employed mostly non-validated assessments post-operatively in small, heterogenous samples, perpetuating uncertainty around the contributions of LTS and its management to impaired deglutition. Consequently, considerable variation in LTS perioperative nutritional management exists. Our objective was to characterise baseline and post-operative dysphagia with instrumental assessment in an LTS cohort undergoing airway reconstruction and provide a gold-standard management framework for its management.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult airway reconstruction procedures from 2016-2020 at our quaternary centre. Patient background, LTS aetiology, procedure type, tube feeding duration, length of stay and serial Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) and International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI) scores were noted. Baseline, post-operative day one and post-stent removal Fibreoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallow (FEES) generated Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients underwent forty-six reconstructions. Baseline incidence of penetration-aspiration was considerably higher than the general population and worsened in the immediate post-operative period, however FOIS and PAS scores generally returned to baseline by discharge. Post-operative FOIS correlated negatively with tracheostomy or airway stent placement. At discharge, 80% tolerated soft or normal diet and 93% were feeding tube independent.

CONCLUSIONS

We present the largest adult airway reconstruction cohort with instrumental swallow assessment perioperatively. LTS patients have a higher incidence of underlying dysphagia but swallowing tends to return to baseline with appropriate postoperative rehabilitation. Such practice may avoid the complications, costs and morbidity of prolonged nutritional support.

Upper dysphagia in patients affected by systemic sclerosis: prevalence and features

Herein, we describe the prevalence and features of dysphagia in patients affected by systemic sclerosis (SS). We analysed the data of 19 patients obtained by administering the M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) scale that measures dysphagia symptoms and by physical assessment consisting of judging specific lip, mandible and tongue performances (scale 0-3) and diadochokinesis, respiratory and phonatory functions (scale “poor”, “fair”, “good”, “normal”) according to Robertson’s method. Subjects also underwent flexible endoscopic examination of swallowing. MDADI showed that 74% of answers were included in “mild” class of disability, 21% as “moderate” and 5% as “severe”. The performance of lips, mandible and tongue that most frequently scored 1 were the opening (52.6% for the lips and 47.4% for the mandible) and the pop of the tongue (52.7%). The percentage of compromised respiratory, phonatory and diadochokinesis tests (“poor” or “fair”) was 81%, 70.1% and 74%, respectively. Flexible endoscopic examination of swallowing revealed pharyngolaryngeal sensory deficit and signs of oropharyngeal dysphagia in more than half of cases (58% and 53%, respectively). This study highlights the presence of dysphagia in SS patients and demonstrates the importance of a multidimensional approach that includes subjective and objective evaluation to characterise specific features of swallowing alterations that have a high-impact on upper dysphagia.

Prevalence and Severity of Dysphagia Using Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study in Patients with Aspiration Pneumonia

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence and severity of dysphagia in patients diagnosed with aspiration pneumonia, with and without neurologic disorders.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of inpatients with aspiration pneumonia who underwent a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) for evaluation of dysphagia. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of neurologic disorders. The prevalence and severity of aspiration and pharyngeal residue due to dysphagia were assessed using the penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) and pharyngeal residue grade (PRG).

RESULTS

A total of 784 patients were enrolled; of these, 58.7% were males and the mean age was 76.12 ± 6.69. Penetration-aspiration-related dysphagia (PAS scores 3-8) was seen in 56.5% of all subjects, and 32.5% showed silent aspiration (PAS 8). Pharyngeal residue-related dysphagia (PRG scores 2-3) was seen in 65.2% of all patients, and the PAS and PRG were positively correlated. On dividing the subjects into two groups based on the presence of neurologic disorders, there was no significant difference in prevalence of the dysphagia between groups (PAS: p = 0.641; PRG: p = 0.872) with the proportion of silent aspiration (p = 0.720).

CONCLUSION

In patients hospitalized for aspiration pneumonia, there was a high prevalence of dysphagia. There were no differences in the prevalence and severity of dysphagia in patients with aspiration pneumonia based on the presence or absence of a neurologic disorder. Therefore, diagnostic evaluation of dysphagia is necessary regardless of the presence of neurologic disorders.

Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Patients with Dysphagia: A Delphi-Based Consensus Study of Experts in Turkey-Part II: Rehabilitation

Dysphagia is one of the most common and important complications of stroke. It is an independent marker of poor outcome following acute stroke and it continues to be effective for many years. This consensus-based guideline is not only a good address to clinical questions in practice for the clinical management of dysphagia including management, diagnosis, follow-up, and rehabilitation methods, but also includes detailed algorithms for these topics. The recommendation paper has been written by a multidisciplinary team and offers 117 recommendations for stroke patients with dysphagia. While focusing on management principles, diagnosis, and follow-up in the 1st part (45 items), rehabilitation details were evaluated in the 2nd part (72 items).

[Application of fibreoptic endoscope evaluating of oropharyngeal swallowing in post-irradiated patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma]

Objective:The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of fibreoptic endoscopic of sallowing （FEES） in the assessment of pharyngeal dysphagia in post-irradiated patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Method:Fifty-three NPC patients with post-irradiated underwent FEES and video fluoroscopy（VF）.The results were analyzed using the Bolus Residue Scale and Rosenbek's penetration aspiration scale. Result:The agreement in the detection of penetration and aspiration between FEES and VF of liquid（κ=0.56, 95%CI 0.38-0.73） and porridge（κ=0.64, 95%CI 0.43-0.81） was "fair". The detection rates of penetration on FEES with liquid and porridge were 60% and 51%, the detection rates of aspiration on VF with liquid and porridge were 70% and 53%. There were no statistical differences. The agreement in the detection of pharyngeal residue between FEES and VF of liquid （κ=0.38, 95%CI0.12-0.62） and porridge （κ=0.66, 95%CI 0.44-0.86） was "fair". The detection rates of pharyngeal residue on FEES and VF with porridge were 43% and 45%, the difference was not statistically significant. The detection rates of pharyngeal residue on FEES and VF with liquid were 44% and 24%, and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion:FEES is an effective and valuable tool for evaluating pharyngeal dysphagia in post-irradiated patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Time as a factor during endoscopic assessment of swallowing: relevance in defining the score and severity of swallowing disorders

Time is a parameter of great interest in swallowing and can be considered in different ways to express severity during endoscopic evaluation. The objectives of this study are to evaluate how the severity of this score changes at different times of scoring and the interaction between residue persistence and airway invasion. Two experienced raters blindly evaluated 35 short clips of bolus transit that were recorded during endoscopic evaluations of 16 patients with dysphagia of differing aetiologies. The pooling score (p-score) and the Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS) were detected after the first swallowing (T1) and after the fifth dry swallow (T5). For each task, the time needed to complete the clearing of the bolus (total time: TT) was blindly determined by the two raters and compared with the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) and Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS) scales, previously detected.The inter-rater agreement between the 2 raters in scoring the p-score and PAS was good (ICC > 0.800) for T1 vs T1 and T1 vs T5, and in determining TT for each consistency (ICC > 0.9), with a Spearman’s Rho > 0.70 and > 0.90 respectively. A statistical correlation of the p-score total, TT and consistency with FOIS and DOSS was found. The p-score showed a good trade-off between sensitivity and specificity compared with the PAS aspiration and penetration scores. The time of scoring (T1 vs T5) is relevant in detecting severity of dysphagia during endoscopic evaluation. The time spent to clear residue is a useful parameter and is correlated with severity of dysphagia expressed by the p-score and with functional swallowing status in dysphagic patients. The p-score is correlated with the PAS score in detecting airway invasion.