Organ preservation and oncological outcomes in early laryngeal cancer: a propensity score-based study

Latin American Consensus on the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is well known as a serious health problem worldwide, especially in low-income countries or those with limited resources, such as most countries in Latin America. International guidelines cannot always be applied to a population from a large region with specific conditions. This study established a Latin American guideline for care of patients with head and neck cancer and presented evidence of HNSCC management considering availability and oncologic benefit. A panel composed of 41 head and neck cancer experts systematically worked according to a modified Delphi process on (1) document compilation of evidence-based answers to different questions contextualized by resource availability and oncologic benefit regarding Latin America (region of limited resources and/or without access to all necessary health care system infrastructure), (2) revision of the answers and the classification of levels of evidence and degrees of recommendations of all recommendations, (3) validation of the consensus through two rounds of online surveys, and (4) manuscript composition. The consensus consists of 12 sections: Head and neck cancer staging, Histopathologic evaluation of head and neck cancer, Head and neck surgery-oral cavity, Clinical oncology-oral cavity, Head and neck surgery-oropharynx, Clinical oncology-oropharynx, Head and neck surgery-larynx, Head and neck surgery-larynx/hypopharynx, Clinical oncology-larynx/hypopharynx, Clinical oncology-recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer, Head and neck surgery-reconstruction and rehabilitation, and Radiation therapy. The present consensus established 48 recommendations on HNSCC patient care considering the availability of resources and focusing on oncologic benefit. These recommendations could also be used to formulate strategies in other regions like Latin America countries.

Functional or radical surgical treatment of laryngeal chondrosarcoma, analysis of survival and prognostic factors: A REFCOR and NetSarc-ResOs multicenter study of 74 cases

INTRODUCTION

Laryngeal chondrosarcoma (LCS) is a rare tumor of slow evolution whose treatment is poorly codified. For a long time, a radical treatment by total laryngectomy (TL) was proposed. More recent studies tend to propose a conservative surgical approach of the larynx. The objective of this study was to compare the overall survival (OS) of total laryngectomized patients (TL+) versus non-laryngectomized patients (TL-). The secondary objectives were to analyse the reoperation free survival (RFS), the total laryngectomy free survival (TLFS) and to identify the preoperative factors leading surgeons to propose TL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected incident cases from the REFCOR and NetSarc-ResOs multicenter databases between March 1997 and June 2021 was conducted. A propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare the OS of TL+ and TL-patients.

RESULTS

74 patients were included. After propensity score, the 5-year OS of TL+ and TL-patients was comparable (100 %, p = 1). The 5-year RFS rate was 69.2 % (95 % CI [57.5-83.4]) and the 5-year TLFS was 61.7 % (95 % CI [50.4-75.5]). Cricoid involvement greater than 50 % (HR 3.58; IC 95 % [1.61-7.92] p < 0.001), an ASA score of 3 or 4 (HR 5.07; IC 95 % [1.64-15.67] p = 0.009) and involvement of several cartilages (HR 5.26; IC 95 % [1.17-23.6] p = 0.04) are prognostic factors for TL. Dyspnea caused by the tumour is a prognostic factor for reoperation (HR 2.59; IC 95 % [1.04-6.45] p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that conservative treatment should be considered as first-line treatment for laryngeal chondrosarcoma.

Overview of glottic laryngeal cancer treatment recommendation changes in the NCCN guidelines from 2011 to 2022

BACKGROUND

The treatment of glottic cancer remains challenging, especially with regard to morbidity reduction and larynx preservation rates. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has published guidelines to aid decision-making about this treatment according to the tumor site, clinical stage, and patient medical status.

AIM

The present review was conducted to identify changes in the NCCN guidelines for glottic cancer treatment made between 2011 and 2022 and to describe the published evidence concerning glottic cancer treatment and oncological outcomes in the same time period.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Clinical practice guidelines for head and neck cancer published from 2011 up to 2022 were obtained from the NCCN website (www.NCCN.org). Data on glottic cancer treatment recommendations were extracted, and descriptive analysis was performed. In addition, a review of literature registered in the PubMed database was performed to obtain data on glottic cancer management protocols and treatment outcomes from randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses published from 2011 to 2022. In total, 24 NCCN guidelines and updates and 68 relevant studies included in the PubMed database were identified. The main guideline changes made pertained to surgical and systemic therapies, the consideration of adverse features, and new options for the treatment of metastatic disease at initial presentation. Early-stage glottic cancer received the most research attention, with transoral endoscopic laser surgery and radiotherapy assessed and compared as the main treatment modalities. Reported associations between treatment types and survival rates for this stage of glottic cancer appear to be similar, but functional outcomes can be highly compromised.

CONCLUSION

NCCN panel members provide updated recommendations based on currently accepted treatment approaches for glottic cancer, constantly reviewing new surgical and non-surgical techniques. The guidelines support decision-making about glottic cancer treatment that should be individualized and prioritize patients' quality of life, functionality, and preferences.

Establishment of prognostic nomogram for T1N0M0 glottic squamous cell carcinoma: an SEER database analysis

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to construct prognostic models for OS and CSS in patients with T1N0M0 glottic SCC. In addition, we used PSM to re-assess the effect of surgery alone and radiation alone.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was searched for patients with confirmed T1N0M0 glottic SCC. Patients with complete data were randomly divided into the training and the validation cohort (7:3), Cox-regression analysis was performed to identified significant predictors of OS and CSS. PSM was used to mimic randomized controlled the trials. Kaplan-Meier survival method and log-rank tests were utilized for survival analysis.

RESULTS

A total 1827 patients met the inclusion criteria. Survival analysis indicated that the patients who underwent the primary site surgery had a better OS (P = 0.002) and CSS (P = 0.008), compared with non-surgery patients. Cox-regression analysis proved that age, marital status, T1 stages, surgery, radiation, sequential treatments, and chemotherapy had significant effects on OS. While age, marital status, histologic grade, surgery, radiation, sequential treatments, and chemotherapy were substantially associated with CSS. Patients who received primary site surgery had a better OS and CSS, compared with non-surgical patients. Patients receiving radiation had a better CSS than non-radiation patients. However, patients who received sequential treatments or chemotherapy had a worse OS and CSS, compared with controlled groups. Predictive nomogram models were established to predict patients' prognosis with good consistency between the actual observation and the nomogram prediction. Before PSM, patients who underwent surgery alone had a better OS and CSS than those who received radiation alone. After PSM, patients receiving surgery still had a better OS than those receiving radiation. However, there were no statistically significant differences in CSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Nomogram models were developed to predict OS and CSS in patients with T1N0M0 glottic SCC. Primary site surgery could definitely increase OS and CSS, while radiation could significantly increase CSS. Using PSM, surgery alone could significantly enhance OS, as compared to radiation alone. Chemotherapy should not be recommended for early glottic carcinoma.