Management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Time to next treatment in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia initiating first-line ibrutinib or acalabrutinib

Aim: To investigate real-world time to next treatment in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia initiating first-line (1L) ibrutinib or acalabrutinib. Materials & methods: US specialty pharmacy electronic medical records (21/11/2018-30/4/2022) were used; patients initiated 1L on/after 21/11/2019 (acalabrutinib approval). Results: Among 710 patients receiving ibrutinib, 5.9% initiated next treatment (mean time to initiation = 9.2 months); among 373 patients receiving acalabrutinib, 7.5% initiated next treatment (mean time to initiation = 5.9 months). Adjusting for baseline characteristics, acalabrutinib-treated patients were 89% more likely to initiate next treatment (hazard ratio = 1.89; p = 0.016). Conclusion: This study addresses a need for real-world comparative effectiveness between 1L ibrutinib and acalabrutinib and shows that next treatment (a clinically meaningful measure for real-world progression) occurred less frequently with 1L ibrutinib.

A prognostic signature for lung adenocarcinoma by five genes associated with chemotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is one of the most common subtypes of lung cancer. Finding prognostic biomarkers is helpful in stratifying LUAD patients with different prognosis.

METHODS

We explored the correlation of LUAD prognosis and genes associated with chemotherapy in LUAD and obtained data of LUAD patients from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. Drug sensitivity data were acquired from the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) database. Differential and enrichment analyses were used to screen the target genes utilizing limma and "clusterProfiler" packages. Then univariate and LASSO Cox analyses were used to select the prognosis-related genes. Survival analysis was used to estimate the overall survival (OS) of different groups.

RESULTS

Twenty-three differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened between LUAD samples and healthy samples, and BTK, FGFR2, PIM2, CHEK1, and CDK1 were selected to construct a prognostic signature. The OS of patients in the high-risk group (risk score higher than 0.69) was worse than that in the low-risk group (risk score lower than 0.69).

CONCLUSION

The risk score model constructed by five genes is a potential prognostic biomarker for LUAD patients.

Effect of Ibrutinib on Hmphocytic Leukemia: a Single-Center Experience

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND

In the era of novel agents, Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors have changed the dynamics of treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia. However, small studies have shown conflicting results regarding the additive humoral dysfunction with their use.

METHODS

We prospectively compared vaccine responses in patients on ibrutinib (n = 10) with matched controls (n = 16) and analyzed whether a protein-based (tetanus-diphtheria toxoid) or a carbohydrate (Pneumovax) moiety will result in an improved immunological response.

RESULTS

An appropriate serological response in IgG titers for diphtheria was seen in 40% of patients on ibrutinib and 31% of patients in the control group. About 30% of patients on ibrutinib and 44% of patients in the control group had an adequate response to tetanus toxoid. None of the patients on ibrutinib mounted an adequate response to Pneumovax, while 31% of patients in the control arm responded appropriately. These differences in the results were considered insignificant as all p values were greater than the cut-off of 0.05.

CONCLUSION

Our study did not show significant detrimental vaccine responses with ibrutinib and calls for larger multicenter studies to elucidate long-term effects, especially in patients with prior exposure to anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies.

Time to Next Treatment, Health Care Resource Utilization, and Costs Associated with Ibrutinib Use Among U.S. Veterans with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma: A Real-World Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) is the most common adult leukemia, accounting for ≈ 37% of all leukemias in the United States. Limited real-word evidence is available on the outcomes of ibrutinib use among previously untreated patients in the U.S. Veterans Health Administration (VHA) population diagnosed with CLL/SLL.

OBJECTIVES

To (a) evaluate time to next treatment (TTNT) among U.S. veterans with CLL/SLL who initiated ibrutinib versus chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) in first line (1L) and 1L ibrutinib versus ibrutinib in later lines (2L+) and (b) compare health care resource utilization (HRU) and costs between the 1L ibrutinib and CIT cohorts.

METHODS

Adults with CLL/SLL and claims for 1L single-agent ibrutinib or CIT (index date = first prescription claim date) were included from Veterans Health Administration Data (April 1, 2013-March 31, 2018). A subset of the CIT 1L cohort with evidence of ibrutinib in 2L/3L was defined as the ibrutinib 2L+ cohort. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate TTNT, and generalized linear models were used to determine all-cause per patient per month (PPPM) HRU and costs during 1L among propensity score-matched (PSM) cohorts.

RESULTS

After PSM, 614 patients were included in each of the 1L ibrutinib and 1L CIT cohorts, and 149 were included in each of the 1L ibrutinib and 2L+ ibrutinib cohorts. The 1L ibrutinib cohort had significantly longer TTNT compared with each of the 1L CIT and 2L+ ibrutinib cohorts (P <0.0001 and P =0.0001, respectively) and was less likely to have a next line of treatment than the CIT 1L cohort (HR = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.42-0.65; P < 0.0001) and the 2L+ ibrutinib cohort (HR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.22-0.69; P = 0.0012). The 1L ibrutinib cohort had significantly fewer inpatient visits (rate ratio [RR] = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.28-0.52; P ≤ 0.05) and outpatient visits PPPM (RR =0.72; 95% CI = 0.68-0.77; P ≤ 0.5) compared with the CIT 1L cohort. Additionally, the 1L ibrutinib cohort had $7,308 significantly lower monthly medical costs (95% CI = -$9,892 to -$4,895; P ≤ 0.05) versus the 1L CIT cohort, resulting in comparable monthly total health care cost (medical and pharmacy) between real-world 1L patients treated by ibrutinib and CIT (-$2,160; 95% CI = -$4,840-$347; P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate that among U.S. veterans with CLL/SLL, 1L ibrutinib use was associated with significantly longer TTNT versus that of 1L CIT. Similarly, early treatment with ibrutinib was associated with longer TTNT as compared to ibrutinib use in later lines of therapy. Moreover, 1L ibrutinib was associated with lower HRU and medical costs compared with 1L CIT, completely offsetting the higher pharmacy costs related to 1L ibrutinib treatment.

DISCLOSURES

This research was sponsored by Janssen Scientific Affairs. The analyses were performed by STATinMED Research. Huang is an employee of Janssen Scientific Affairs and may own company stock. Sundaram was an employee of Janssen Scientific Affairs at the time this study was conducted. Borra and Janjan are employees of STATinMED Research, a paid consultant to the study sponsor. Wang, Li, and Shrestha were employees of STATinMED Research at the time this study was conducted.

Updated results from the phase 3 HELIOS study of ibrutinib, bendamustine, and rituximab in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma

We report follow-up results from the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 HELIOS trial of ibrutinib+bendamustine and rituximab (BR) for previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) without deletion 17p. Overall, 578 patients were randomized 1:1 to either ibrutinib (420 mg daily) or placebo, in combination with 6 cycles of BR, followed by ibrutinib or placebo alone. Median follow-up was 34.8 months (range: 0.1-45.8). Investigator-assessed median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached for ibrutinib+BR, versus 14.3 months for placebo+BR (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI], 0.206 [0.159-0.265]; P < 0.0001); 36-month PFS rates were 68.0% versus 13.9%, respectively. The results are consistent with the primary analysis findings (HR = 0.203, as assessed by independent review committee, with 17-month median follow-up). Median overall survival was not reached in either arm; HR (95% CI) for ibrutinib+BR versus placebo: 0.652 (0.454-0.935; P = 0.019). Minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative response rates were 26.3% for ibrutinib+BR and 6.2% for placebo+BR (P < 0.0001). Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (including grades 3-4) were generally consistent with the initial HELIOS report. These long-term data support improved survival outcomes and deepening responses with ibrutinib+BR compared with BR in relapsed CLL/SLL.

SENP2 exerts an anti‑tumor effect on chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells through the inhibition of the Notch and NF‑κB signaling pathways

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is one of the most often diagnosed hematological malignant tumors in the Western world and a type of inert B-cell lymphoma that commonly attacks the elderly. Small ubiquitin related modifier (SUMO)-specific protease 2 (SENP2) can act as a suppressor in various types of cancer by regulating the stability of β-catenin to affect the Notch signaling pathway; however, it has a low expression level in CLL cells. In this study, we firstly used western blot analysis and RT-qPCR to detect the protein and mRNA expression levels of SENP2 in the peripheral blood of patients with CLL and healthy volunteers. Secondly, we overexpressed or knocked down the expression of SENP2 in CLL cells and then determined the cell invasive and chemotactic ability in a Transwell assay and chemotaxis assay. We examined the sensitivity of the cells to cytarabine and dexamethasone via a CCK-8 assay and determined the cell apoptotic condition and the expression of the Notch signaling pathway using flow cytometry and western blot analysis. The results demonstrated that the patients with CLL had relatively low expression levels of SENP2. The overexpression of SENP2 in the CLL cells decreased their invasive and proliferative ability, as well as their chemotactic response and enhanced their sensitivity to cytarabine and dexamethasone, while it promoted cell apoptosis. The silencing of SENP2 in the CLL cells generally produced the opposite results. We thus hypothesized that the overexpression of SENP2 downregulated β-catenin expression, thus inhibiting the Notch signaling pathway in CLL cells. Moreover, the nuclear factor (NF)-κB signaling pathway was also regulated by the overexpression of SENP2. On the whole, the findings of this study indicate tha SENP2 can act as a tumor suppressor in CLL cells, and may thus prove to be a novel target for CLL treatment in clinical practice.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia with proliferation centers in bone marrow is associated with younger age at initial presentation, complex karyotype, and TP53 disruption

The presence of expanded proliferation centers (PCs) in lymph nodes involved by chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma has been associated with adverse clinical outcomes, but the frequency and significance of PCs in bone marrow (BM) remain unclear. The study group included 36 patients with BM involvement by CLL in which PCs were present. We compared this group with 110 randomly selected BM samples involved by CLL without morphologically discernable PCs. Patients with PCs in BM were younger (median age, 53 years [range,18-71 years] versus 58 years [range, 31-82 years]; P = .007), more frequently experienced B symptoms (27.8% versus 8.2%, P = .0076), more often had Rai stage IV disease (30.6% versus 17.3%, P = .02) and higher serum lactate dehydrogenase (P = .0037) and β₂-microglobulin (P = .0001) levels, and lower hemoglobin (P = .026) and platelet counts (P = .0422). TP53 alterations were more common in patients with PCs in BM (45.4% versus 18.7%; P = .0049), as was a complex karyotype (26.4% versus 9%; P = .019). There were no significant differences in the frequency of ZAP70 or CD38 positivity or IGHV mutation status. The median time to first treatment was shorter in patients with PCs in BM (7 months versus 19 months, P = .047), and the frequency of Richter syndrome was higher (14% versus 4%, P = .041). Patients with PCs in BM had significantly shorter overall survival compared with the control group (median, 249.3 months versus undefined; P = .0241). These data suggest that identification of PCs in BM samples involved by CLL is associated with adverse prognostic features.

Clinical impact of recurrently mutated genes on lymphoma diagnostics: state-of-the-art and beyond

Similar to the inherent clinical heterogeneity of most, if not all, lymphoma entities, the genetic landscape of these tumors is markedly complex in the majority of cases, with a rapidly growing list of recurrently mutated genes discovered in recent years by next-generation sequencing technology. Whilst a few genes have been implied to have diagnostic, prognostic and even predictive impact, most gene mutations still require rigorous validation in larger, preferably prospective patient series, to scrutinize their potential role in lymphoma diagnostics and patient management. In selected entities, a predominantly mutated gene is identified in almost all cases (e.g. Waldenström's macroglobulinemia/lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma and hairy-cell leukemia), while for the vast majority of lymphomas a quite diverse mutation pattern is observed, with a limited number of frequently mutated genes followed by a seemingly endless tail of genes with mutations at a low frequency. Herein, the European Expert Group on NGS-based Diagnostics in Lymphomas (EGNL) summarizes the current status of this ever-evolving field, and, based on the present evidence level, segregates mutations into the following categories: i) immediate impact on treatment decisions, ii) diagnostic impact, iii) prognostic impact, iv) potential clinical impact in the near future, or v) should only be considered for research purposes. In the coming years, coordinated efforts aiming to apply targeted next-generation sequencing in large patient series will be needed in order to elucidate if a particular gene mutation will have an immediate impact on the lymphoma classification, and ultimately aid clinical decision making.

Major infections, secondary cancers and autoimmune diseases occur in different clinical subsets of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients

BACKGROUND

Major infections (MIs), secondary cancers (SCs) and autoimmune diseases (ADs) are the most common and relevant complications in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

METHODS

We performed a single-centre retrospective study to investigate the prevalence of the above quoted complications, the association with most important prognostic markers and their impact on survival (n = 795).

RESULTS

Almost one out of three patients experienced at least one complication and only 0.9% of the cohort developed all three complications. One hundred and twenty (20%) subjects developed SC, 98 MI (12%) and 80 AD (10%); these complications seem to occur in a mutually exclusive manner. By Kaplan-Meier analysis we estimated that after 20 years from the diagnosis SC, MI and AD occurred in 48%, 42% and 29% of patients, respectively. Furthermore, we showed that some clinical and biological markers are skewed among patients with different complications and that subjects with MI and SC had a worse prognosis than those with AD and all other patients (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals the existence of different clinical subsets of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients characterised by an increased and different risk for developing specifically MI, SC and AD.

The safety profile of monoclonal antibodies for chronic lymphocytic leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs), non-chemotherapeutic agents targeting the antigens present on chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) lymphocytes, are being implemented increasingly more often as treatment options. Areas covered: This article reviews the similarities and differences in the structure, mechanism of action, efficacy and safety profile of commercially-available MoAbs and prevents new agents potentially useful for CLL treatment. Publications in English before June 2016 were surveyed on the MEDLINE database for articles. Proceedings of the American Society of Hematology held during the last five years were also included. Expert opinion: MoAbs, especially those targeting CD20, are highly effective biological options for first-line and salvage treatment of CLL, particularly in chemoimmunotherapy, and possibly also as maintenance therapy. Treatment with MoAbs is associated with reduced risk of such adverse events as cytopenias, infections and secondary neoplasias and is generally well tolerated. Depending on antibody type, the most common adverse events are usually transient and limited to grade 1 and 2 infusion-related reactions. In addition to commercially available MoAbs, several other antibodies exist which are targeted against different antigens studied in the clinical trials.

Ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results from the COMPLEMENT 2 trial

In this multicenter, open-label, phase III study, patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) were randomized (1:1) to receive ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (OFA + FC) or FC alone; the primary endpoint being progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). Between March 2009 and January 2012, 365 patients were randomized (OFA + FC: n = 183; FC: n = 182). Median IRC-assessed PFS was 28.9 months with OFA + FC versus 18.8 months with FC (hazard ratio = 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.88; p = .0032). Grade ≥3 adverse events (≤60 days after last dose) were reported in 134 (74%) OFA + FC-treated patients compared with 123 (69%) FC-treated patients. Of these, neutropenia was the most common (89 [49%] vs. 64 [36%]). OFA + FC improved PFS with manageable safety for patients with relapsed CLL compared with FC alone, thus providing an alternative treatment option for patients with relapsed CLL.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00824265).

A phase 2, multicenter study investigating ofatumumab and bendamustine combination in patients with untreated or relapsed CLL

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the combination of ofatumumab and bendamustine in patients with previously untreated or relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Patients received IV ofatumumab (cycle 1: 300 mg day 1 and 1,000 mg day 8; cycles 2-6: 1,000 mg on day 1 every 28 days) and IV bendamustine 90 mg m(-2) (previously untreated) or 70 mg m(-2) (relapsed) on days 1 and 2 of each 28-day cycle, for up to 6 cycles. Forty-four previously untreated and 53 relapsed patients were enrolled. Median age was 62.5 years (previously untreated) and 68 years (relapsed); relapsed patients had received a median of 1 (range 1-11) prior therapy. The investigator-assessed overall response rate was 95% (43% complete response [CR]) for the previously untreated, and 74% (11% CR) for the relapsed patients. The regimen was well tolerated with 89% (previously untreated) and 85% (relapsed patients) receiving all 6 cycles. No unexpected toxicities were reported. Grade 3/4 events occurred in 57% of previously untreated, and 72% of relapsed patients. At ∼29 months' follow-up, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached for the previously untreated population, and the 28-month PFS estimate was 72.3%. The median PFS for the relapsed population was 22.5 months (95% CI: 14.0-27.3 months). The combination of ofatumumab and bendamustine was well tolerated and effective in these previously untreated or relapsed populations. Am. J. Hematol. 91:900-906, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.