Osteointegration of an Uncemented Modular Revision Stem Implanted during revision Hip Surgery

Clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty with tapered fluted modular or non-modular stems: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to systematically evaluate clinical outcomes of tapered fluted stems, either monoblock or modular, in revision total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science and Cochrane databases were systematically searched by 2 researchers. Clinical studies reporting primarily on survival and re-revision rates, and secondarily on subsidence, dislocation, intraoperative fractures, periprosthetic fractures and infection were included. 2 investigators assessed the quality of the studies.

RESULTS

46 studies were included in this review, reporting on 4601 stem revisions. The pooled re-revision rate was 5.1% and long-term survival ranged from 75% to 98.5%. No differences were observed between monoblock and modular stems regarding re-revision rate, dislocation rate, periprosthetic fracture rate or infection rates. Monoblock stems exhibited more subsidence and modular stems displayed more intraoperative fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfactory results can be obtained with the use of tapered fluted end-bearing stems. Monoblock stems offer the same clinical results as modular stems.

Modular tapered conical revision stem in hip revision surgery: mid- term results

Background

The aim of this paper is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of a fluted tapered modular distal-fixation stem at medium to long-term follow-up. The hypothesis of this investigation was to verify if the use of this implant design may have provided potential advantages in femoral revisions and post-traumatic instances where the restoration of the anatomy was the prime concern.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 62 cases of femoral revision surgeries, performed in Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB bone defects between January 2001 and December 2011 with a mean follow-up of 8.5 ± 1.5 years (range 5.1–15.9 years) where a modular fluted stem was used. The clinical assessment was performed with the Harris Hip Score (HHS), and the radiographic evaluation was carried in order to assess the stability of the femoral component. Intra-operative and postoperative complications were recorded, and the rates of complications and revisions for any cause were determined.

Results

Mean HHS improved 35.4 points from the preoperative assessment. Radiographic evaluation showed a stable stem anchorage in 90.3% of the cases at the last follow-up. Five (8%) implants required additional surgery. Neither breakage of the stem nor loosening of the taper junction were recorded. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 89.4% (CI: 88.8–90%) for any complication and 92.3% (CI: 91.8–92.7%) according to revision for any causes at 81 months follow-up.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that this stem design is a reliable option in cases of complex femoral bone defects, as well as in cases with high functional deficiencies, with promising survivorship.

Double-tapered conical taper in primary and revision surgery: rationale and short-term follow-up

BACKGROUND:

The new double-conical tapered stem is a novel cementless modular system, which is indicated for both primary and revision surgeries. It has been designed with different angles at the proximal (5°) and distal sections (1° 36') in order to obtain optimal fixation by proximal and distal fit and fill of the femoral canal.

AIM:

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of primary and revision hip surgery with the new double-conical stem.

METHODS:

61 stems were implanted (December 2013 to September 2016) in 42 cases of primary and in 19 cases of revision surgery. The mean age of patients was 64.7 (17-94; standard deviation [SD] 21.9) years.

RESULTS:

The mean body mass index of the patients was 24.6 (17-34.6). In 3 cases of developmental dysplasia of the hip we performed femoral shortening osteotomy. The mean follow-up was 26 (8-40) months. 3 patients died due to causes unrelated to surgery. Postoperative complications included 3 hip dislocations, 2 infections and 1 case of stem explant for metastatic tumour. For all other cases, at the last follow-up radiographs showed no loosening, no radiolucent lines nor subsidence. The mean Harris Hip Score significantly improved from 45 (range 35-58) preoperatively to 87 (range 75-94). Leg length discrepancy was found in 10% of cases but never >1 cm.

CONCLUSIONS:

Radiographic analysis showed the bone-stem contact full at 2 levels of taper. The double-tapered prosthetic stem can therefore be usefully employed both in primary and in revision surgeries.