Visual Functions After Photorefractive Keratectomy

The relationship between anterior corneal aberrations and contrast sensitivity in conventional LASIK

PURPOSE

To evaluate the changes of anterior corneal aberrations before and after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and to assess the correlation between contrast sensitivity and anterior corneal aberrations.

METHODS

Right eyes of 51 patients including 6 males and 45 females undergoing conventional LASIK from September 2000 to July 2003 were enrolled. The calculation of anterior corneal aberrations before and after LASIK was obtained by analyzing the corneal topography from TMS-1 by using VOL-CT Version 6.23 software. Contrast sensitivity was measured after LASIK with an MCT 8000 under daytime and nighttime settings and with glare conditions. The differences of the Zernike coefficients and root mean square (RMS) of anterior corneal aberrations before and after LASIK were analyzed. The changes of contrast sensitivity at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cpd were added separately for daytime and nighttime contrast sensitivity with and without glare after LASIK and were correlated with the changes of anterior corneal aberrations.

RESULTS

Vertical coma, RMS of coma-like RMS of spherical-like, RMS of trefoil-like and RMS of higher-order anterior corneal aberrations increased significantly after LASIK surgery. There were no significant correlations between the changes of anterior corneal aberrations and the changes of contrast sensitivity at daytime and nighttime, with and without glare. Contrast sensitivity at daytime and nighttime decreased at each spatial frequency after LASIK.

CONCLUSIONS

LASIK surgery induces changes of the anterior corneal aberrations. However, changes in anterior corneal aberrations did not correlate with the changes of contrast sensitivity at daytime and nighttime, with and without glare.

Comparison of Subjective Visual Acuity With Visual Acuity Predicted From C-scan Topography

PURPOSE

To compare the capability of objective measures of visual acuity (potential visual acuity from C-scan) to predict subjective visual acuity (best spectacle-corrected visual acuity [BSCVA]).

METHODS

Patients with BSCVA > or = 20/20 were enrolled in four groups (Group 1: normal [33 eyes]; Group 2: < -7.00 D myopia [43 eyes]; Group 3: > or = -7.00 D myopia [28 eyes]; Group 4: At least 1 month after LASIK [93 eyes]). Videokeratography was performed with the ray tracing Technomed C-scan. The potential visual acuity from C-scan was obtained with pupils undilated and intact precorneal tear films. All visual acuity was recorded in logMAR, and the significance of differences between acuities was assessed with a one-way ANOVA test.

RESULTS

The potential visual acuity from C-scan ray tracing of normal and myopic eyes in response to both photopic and mesopic stimuli did not differ. In a given eye, the potential visual acuity from C-scan ray tracing was better than BSCVA, and the difference was statistically significant. Although the potential visual acuity from C-scan of postoperative LASIK eyes in response to photopic stimuli was the same, it decreased under mesopic conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Potential visual acuity from C-scan overestimates subjective visual acuity due to the inadequate assumptions in ray tracing or individual retinal resolution ability. In addition, the potential visual acuity from C-scan ray tracing varies with pupil diameter in different illumination.