Association of Potentially Inappropriate Medications With All-Cause Mortality in the Elderly Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Patients: Importance of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Prescription

Prognostic impact of polypharmacy and discharge medications in octogenarians and nonagenarian patients with acute heart failure

With the increasing frequency of heart failure (HF) in elderly patients, polypharmacy has become a major concern owing to its adverse outcomes. However, reports on the clinical impact of polypharmacy and discharge medications in hospitalized super-aged patients with acute HF are rare. Data from 682 patients aged 80 years or older, hospitalized for treating acute HF, were analyzed. We recorded the number of medications at discharge and classified them into three groups: HF, non-HF cardiovascular, and non-cardiovascular medications. We investigated the correlation of polypharmacy, defined as daily administration of 10 or more medications at discharge, and the use of discharge medications with post-discharge prognosis. Polypharmacy was recorded in 24.3% of enrolled patients. Polypharmacy was not an independent predictor of all-cause mortality, the incidence of cardiac-related death, or HF-associated rehospitalization; however, the number of non-cardiovascular medications, multiple usage of potentially inappropriate medications, use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and doses of loop diuretics were associated with poor prognosis. Polypharmacy was significantly associated with higher mortality in patients with Barthel index ≥ 60 at discharge; hence, physical function at discharge was useful for the stratification of prognostic impacts of polypharmacy. The current study demonstrated that polypharmacy was not essentially associated with poor prognosis in super-aged patients with acute HF. Appropriate medications that consider the patient's physical function, rather than polypharmacy itself, are important for the management of HF.

Definition of Polypharmacy in Heart Failure: A Scoping Review of the Literature

Patients with heart failure (HF) have a high prevalence of polypharmacy, which can lead to drug interactions, cognitive impairment, and medication non-compliance. However, the definition of polypharmacy in these patients is still inconsistent. The aim of this scoping review was to find the most common definition of polypharmacy in HF patients. We conducted a scoping review searching Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane using terms including polypharmacy, HF and deprescribing, which resulted in 7,949 articles. Articles without a definition of polypharmacy in HF patients and articles which included patients < 18 years of age were excluded; only 59 articles were included. Of the 59 articles, 49% (n = 29) were retrospective, 20% (n = 12) were prospective, 10% (n = 6) were cross-sectional, and 27% (n = 16) were review articles. Twenty percent (n = 12) of the articles focused on HF with reduced ejection fraction, 10% (n = 6) focused on HF with preserved ejection fraction and 69% (n = 41) articles either focused on both diagnoses or did not clarify the specific type of HF. The most common cutoff for polypharmacy in HF was five medications (59%, n = 35). There was no consensus regarding the inclusion or exclusion of over-the-counter medications, supplements, or vitamins. Some newer studies used a cutoff of 10 medications (14%, n = 8), and this may be a more practical and meaningful definition for HF patients.

Underuse of heart failure medications and poor long-term prognosis in chronic heart failure patients with polypharmacy - A report from the CHART-2 study

Background

In patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), comorbidities are often managed with multiple medications, characterized by polypharmacy, leading to increased risk of potentially inappropriate medication and adverse effects.

Methods

We studied 4,876 consecutive patients with CHF (Stage C/D, age 69.0 ± 12.3 years) in the CHART-2 study to evaluate the association among polypharmacy, underuse of HF medications, and all-cause death. Polypharmacy was defined as the daily use of ≥ 8 medications for the survival classification and regression tree analysis.

Results

The average number of medications was 10 in the polypharmacy group and 5 in the non-polypharmacy group, respectively. Over a median of 8.3 (4.1-11.7) years, the incidence rate of all-cause death was significantly higher in the polypharmacy group (n = 2,108) than in the non-polypharmacy group (57.3 % vs. 40.6 %; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.34 (95 %CI, 1.22-1.48), P < 0.001), even in age < 55 years (26.6 % vs. 14.3 %; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.61 (95 %CI, 1.04-2.50), P = 0.033). In patients with polypharmacy, those without renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RAS-I) and/or beta-blockers (N = 1,023) were associated with increased incidence of all-cause death as compared with those with both medications (aHR 1.18; 95 %CI 1.04-1.35, P = 0.012).

Conclusions

Polypharmacy was associated with poor long-term prognosis, even in younger patients with CHF. Among 4,876 patients with CHF, 1023 (20.9%) with polypharmacy and underuse of RAS-I and/or beta-blocker were associated with increased risk of all-cause death.

Prognostic Role of Contraindicated Drugs in Hospitalized Patients with Decompensated Heart Failure

Due to the ageing population, patients often present to the hospital with a high burden of comorbidities and polypharmacy. For patients admitted with decompensated heart failure (HF), the evidence on the effects of contraindicated drugs on long-term mortality is scarce. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of contraindicated medications on outcomes of patients admitted with decompensated HF. We analyzed all consecutive patients from the National Heart Failure Audit admitted to two tertiary centers with acutely decompensated HF between April 2020 and October 2021. We included medication classes listed as contraindicated (class III) in the most recent European and American guidelines on the management of HF. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcome measure was overall mortality. Overall, 716 patients admitted with acute HF were included. One-fifth (n = 156, 21.8%) were on at least one contraindicated medication at admission. The prevalence of comorbidities was comparable between medication groups. During hospitalization, the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (29% versus 9%, P = 0.013). On multivariable analyses, NSAID use was independently associated with worse in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio, 6.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.61-25.5; P = 0.005). However, other contraindicated medications were not associated with adverse outcomes. Postdischarge, the use of erythropoietin during admission was associated with increased mortality (54% versus 31%, P = 0.031). NSAID use is associated with increased in-hospital mortality for patients admitted with acute HF. However, inpatient use of other contraindicated medications was not associated with adverse in-hospital outcomes. Further studies are needed to confirm these results in larger and prospective cohorts. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is associated with a worse in-hospital mortality in patients with decompensated heart failure. The prognostic role of other contraindicated medications remains still uncertain.

Development of a model predicting cardiac events in heart failure patients with decreased renal function: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate and multiple medications affect the prognosis of patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). However, in ADHF patients with decreased renal function, there have been no reports on prognostic factors, including medication data, or models for predicting cardiac events.

AIM

To develop a model including medication data to predict cardiac events in ADHF patients with decreased renal function.

METHOD

This retrospective cohort study included 443 first-time admitted ADHF patients with decreased renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m² at discharge) in the Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital. The primary outcome was cardiac events within one year after discharge, defined as the composite of HF readmission, HF mortality, and cardiovascular mortality. The model for predicting cardiac events was developed using predictive factors extracted by multivariable analysis. The cardiac events curves were visualized using the Kaplan-Meier method and estimated using a log-rank test.

RESULTS

The incidence of cardiac events within one year after discharge was 20.1%. By multivariable analysis, we observed that atrial fibrillation, weight loss < 5%, brain natriuretic peptide ≥ 200 pg/mL, polypharmacy, and beta-blockers use below target dosage were significantly associated with an increased risk of cardiac events. The developed model, the cardiac events rate in the high-risk group was significantly higher than in the low-risk group (41.0 vs. 9.2%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The developed model for predicting cardiac events will be useful in decision-making to support appropriate early management of ADHF patients with decreased renal function.

Hyperpolypharmacy is a predictor of mortality after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation

Background

The prevalence of (hyper)polypharmacy in patients on left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support and its effect on clinical outcomeis unknown. Therefore, we aimed to determine the prevalence of (hyper)polypharmacy in LVAD patients and evaluate its association with mortality and complications.

Materials and methods

210 patients aged ≥40 years who received a primary LVAD implantation between 2011 and 2019 were included for analysis. Polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy were defined as the concomitant use of 5-9 and ≥10 medications at discharge after LVAD implantation, respectively. Cause specific cox regression was used to assess the association of ≥10 medications with mortality, cardiac arrhythmia, driveline infection and major bleeding.

Results

The median age of the patients was 57.5 years, and 35.7 % were female. The average number of discharge medications was 8.8 ± 2.3 per patient. The prevalence of patients with 5-9 medications and ≥10 medications was 62.9 % and 34.8 %, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 948 days (interquartile range 874 days). The prescription of ≥10 medications was significantly associated with a higher risk of mortality (HR 2.03; 95 % CI 1.15-3.6, p-value 0.02) adjusted for sex, age, comorbidity and stratified for device type. The prescription of ≥10 medications was not associated with a higher risk of major bleeding, cardiac arrhythmia or driveline infection.

Conclusions

(Hyper)polypharmacy is highly prevalent in LVAD patients and is independently associated with a higher risk of mortality. Future research is needed to assess the efficacy of individual risk-benefit profiling of (cardiovascular) medication to ensure appropriate polypharmacy and to decrease negative health outcomes.

Physicians’ Knowledge, Altitudes, and Perceived Barriers of Inappropriate Prescribing for Older Patients in Shanghai, China

Background: Inappropriate medication use is common around the world, particularly among older patients, and, despite potentially being preventable, often leads to adverse clinical and economic outcomes. However, there is a dearth of information regarding this prominent issue in China.

Objectives: To evaluate the extent to which the physician can correctly identify potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) in older patients and to understand physicians’ attitudes towards improving PIM knowledge.

Methods: An online, cross-sectional survey was conducted anonymously among practicing physicians in China from November through December 2020. Knowledge of PIM was accessed using seven clinical vignettes covering a wide variety of therapeutic areas. Source of information and perceived barriers regarding PIM were also evaluated. We performed the ordinary least square regression analysis to understand the potential factors related to physicians’ knowledge of PIM.

Results: A total of 597 study participants were included in the analysis. More than half of them had never heard of any screening tool for PIMs (n = 328, 54.9%) and the most frequently acknowledged tool was the China PIM Criteria (n = 259, 43.4%). For the seven clinical vignettes testing physicians’ knowledge on the medications that should be generally avoided in older patients, the mean score was 2.91 points out of 7 (SD: 1.32), with the median score of three points (IQR: 2–4). Only one-third of the respondents were feeling confident when prescribing for older patients (n = 255, 35.08%). Package inserts have been used as the major source of PIM information (always, n = 177, 29.65%; frequently, n = 286, 47.91%). Perceived barriers to appropriate prescribing include polypharmacy (n = 460, 77.05%), lack of formal education on prescribing for the older patients (n = 428, 71.69%).

Conclusion: In this online survey evaluating physicians’ ability to detect PIM for older patients, approximately 40% of PIM were recognized, suggesting an insufficient level of knowledge about appropriate prescribing.

An Up-to-Date Article Regarding Particularities of Drug Treatment in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure

Since the prevalence of heart failure (HF) increases with age, HF is now one of the most common reasons for the hospitalization of elderly people. Although the treatment strategies and overall outcomes of HF patients have improved over time, hospitalization and mortality rates remain elevated, especially in developed countries where populations are aging. Therefore, this paper is intended to be a valuable multidisciplinary source of information for both doctors (cardiologists and general physicians) and pharmacists in order to decrease the morbidity and mortality of heart failure patients. We address several aspects regarding pharmacological treatment (including new approaches in HF treatment strategies [sacubitril/valsartan combination and sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors]), as well as the particularities of patients (age-induced changes and sex differences) and treatment (pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes in drugs; cardiorenal syndrome). The article also highlights several drugs and food supplements that may worsen the prognosis of HF patients and discusses some potential drug-drug interactions, their consequences and recommendations for health care providers, as well as the risks of adverse drug reactions and treatment discontinuation, as an interdisciplinary approach to treatment is essential for HF patients.

Polypharmacy definition and prevalence in heart failure: a systematic review

Polypharmacy and heart failure are becoming increasingly common due to an ageing population and the rise of multimorbidity. Treating heart failure necessitates prescribing of multiple medications, in-line with national and international guidelines predisposing patients to polypharmacy. This review aims to identify how polypharmacy has been defined among heart failure patients in the literature, whether a standard definition in relation to heart failure could be identified and to describe the prevalence. The Healthcare Database Advanced Search (HDAS) was used to search EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, Cinahl and PsychInfo from inception until March 2021. Articles were included of any design, in patients ≥ 18 years old, with a diagnosis of heart failure; that explicitly define and measure polypharmacy. Data were thereafter extracted and described using a narrative synthesis approach. A total of 7522 articles were identified with 22 meeting the inclusion criteria. No standard definition of polypharmacy was identified. The most common definition was that of " ≥ 5 medications." Polypharmacy prevalence was high in heart failure populations, ranging from 17.2 to 99%. Missing or heterogeneous methods for defining heart failure and poor patient cohort characterisation limited the impact of most studies. Polypharmacy, most commonly defined as ≥ 5 medications, is highly prevalent in the heart failure population. There is a need for an internationally agreed definition of polypharmacy, allowing accurate review of polypharmacy issues. Whether an arbitrary numerical cut-off is a suitable definition, rather than medication appropriateness, remains unclear. Further studies are necessary to understand the relationship between polypharmacy with specific types of heart failure and related comorbidities.

Acute heart failure in elderly patients: a review of invasive and non-invasive management

Acute heart failure (AHF) is a major cause of unplanned hospitalisations in the elderly and is associated with high mortality. Its prevalence has grown in the last years due to population aging and longer life expectancy of chronic heart failure patients. Although international societies have provided guidelines for the management of AHF in the general population, scientific evidence for geriatric patients is often lacking, as these are underrepresented in clinical trials. Elderly have a different risk profile with more comorbidities, disability, and frailty, leading to increased morbidity, longer recovery time, higher readmission rates, and higher mortality. Furthermore, therapeutic options are often limited, due to unfeasibility of invasive strategies, mechanical circulatory support and cardiac transplantation. Thus, the in-hospital management of AHF should be tailored to each patient's clinical situation, cardiopulmonary condition and geriatric assessment. Palliative care should be considered in some cases, in order to avoid unnecessary diagnostics and/or treatments. After discharge, a strict follow-up through outpatient clinic or telemedicine is can improve quality of life and reduce rehospitalisation rates. The aim of this review is to offer an insight on current literature and provide a clinically oriented, patient-tailored approach regarding assessment, treatment and follow-up of elderly patients admitted for AHF.