Prognostic Value of Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Isovolumic relaxation intraventricular pressure difference predicts elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in patients with coronary artery disease

Current guideline for evaluating diastolic function requires multiple parameters to identify patients with elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP). However, the intermediate result still exists and may cause LVEDP undetermined. Previous studies have shown intraventricular pressure difference (IVPDs) are required for normal LV filling, but the relationship between IVPDs and LVEDP is unknown. In this study, we analyzed the relationship between IVPDs and LVEDP in 54 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). LVEDP was prospectively measured at the time of coronary intervention and LVEDP > 15 mmHg was considered as elevated LV filling pressure. Simultaneous echocardiographic data was collected prior to the intervention. The relative intraventricular pressure was calculated using the vector flow mapping method. The IVPD was defined as the pressure difference from the apex to the base of LV. From 54 patients presenting with CAD, elevated LVEDP occurred in 30(55.6%). To analyze the changing trend of IVPD with LVEDP, CAD patients were further divided into group I with normal LVEDP (12.7 ± 3.1 mmHg) and group II with elevated LVEDP (26.0 ± 7.2 mmHg). In early diastole, both isovolumic relaxation period and rapid filling period showed decreased IVPD in CAD patients, but only the reduction in isovolumic relaxation period (IVPD-IVR) was statistical different between patients with elevated LVEDP and normal LVEDP (1.03 ± 0.42 mmHg vs. 2.25 ± 1.21 mmHg, p < 0.01). IVPD-IVR had the best correlation with LVEDP (r=-0.499, p < 0.01) among IVPDs. Lower IVPD-IVR was associated with higher risk of elevated LVEDP. Evaluating IVPD-IVR might improve the diagnostic algorithm for predicting elevated LVEDP.

Noninvasive assessment of myocardial work during left ventricular isovolumic relaxation in patients with diastolic dysfunction

BACKGROUND

This study aims to investigate the value of myocardial work (MW) parameters during the isovolumic relaxation (IVR) period in patients with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD).

METHODS

This study prospectively recruited 448 patients with risks for LVDD and 95 healthy subjects. An additional 42 patients with invasive measurements of left ventricular (LV) diastolic function were prospectively included. The MW parameters during IVR were noninvasively measured using EchoPAC.

RESULTS

The total myocardial work during IVR (MW_IVR), myocardial constructive work during IVR (MCW_IVR), myocardial wasted work during IVR (MWW_IVR), and myocardial work efficiency during IVR (MWE_IVR) of these patients were 122.5 ± 60.1 mmHg%, 85.7 ± 47.8 mmHg%, 36.7 ± 30.6 mmHg%, and 69.4 ± 17.8%, respectively. The MW during IVR was significantly different between patients and healthy subjects. For patients, MWE_IVR and MCW_IVR were significantly correlated with the LV E/e' ratio and left atrial volume index, MWE_IVR exhibited a significant correlation with the maximal rate of decrease in LV pressure (dp/dt per min) and tau, and the MWE_IVR corrected by IVRT also exhibited a significant correlation with tau.

CONCLUSIONS

MW during IVR significantly changes in patients with risks for LVDD, and is correlated to LV conventional diastolic indices, including dp/dt min and tau. Noninvasive MW during IVR may be a promising tool to evaluate the LV diastolic function.

Left atrial volume index to left ventricular ejection fraction ratio predicted major adverse cardiovascular event in ST-Elevated myocardial infarction patients during 8 years of follow-up

Objective:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusion:

Elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure is associated with increased risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

AIMS

To study the correlation between intra-procedural left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and the development of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A single center retrospective observational study compared clinical and hemodynamic characteristics of patients who developed post-PCI CI-AKI with those did not. CI-AKI was defined as an absolute increase in serum creatinine ≥0.5 mg/dl or an increase ≥25% from baseline 48-72 h after the administration of contrast medium. Among 1301 consecutive patients who underwent PCI, 125 patients (9.6%) developed CI-AKI. The CI-AKI group had a higher average LVEDP (18.4 ± 8.7 vs 14.4 ± 6.6 mm Hg; p < .0001) and higher prevalence of elevated LVEDP (≥20 mm Hg) than those without CI-AKI (47.2% vs 23.3%, p < .0001). After adjustments, elevated LVEDP remained independently associated with CI-AKI (OR 2.21; 95% CI 1.40-3.50). LVEDP predicted the development of CI-AKI with a receiver operating characteristic area under curve (AUC) of 0.64. The association between elevated LVEDP and the risk of CI-AKI was stronger in patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF ≤ 40%) (OR = 4.08; 95% CI: 1.68-9.91) than those with preserved EF (OR = 1.69; 95% CI: 0.94-3.04) (p value for interaction = .0003). Patients who had LVEDP ≥ 20 mm Hg and LVEF ≤ 40% had a post-PCI incidence rate of developing CI-AKI of 36.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated intra-procedural LVEDP (≥20 mm Hg) is independently associated with increased risk of CI-AKI for patients undergoing cardiac catheterization and PCI, especially in the setting of reduced LVEF (≤40%).

Corrected QT Interval Prolongations in Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Background: The presence of different risk groups among patients with the non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome indicates the need for new tools to establish early diagnoses and prognostic stratifications. The role of prolonged corrected QT (QTc) intervals in myocardial ischemia has yet to be thoroughly assessed. The purpose of our study was to assess the significance of QTc prolongations during acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or unstable angina. Methods: The QTc interval was measured in 205 patients admitted with NSTEMI or unstable angina to the Coronary Care Unit of Fatemeh Zahra Hospital between 2014 and 2015. On that basis, the patients were divided into those with normal (<440 ms) and the ones with prolonged (≥440 ms) QTc intervals. Echocardiography and coronary angiography were performed within 48 to 72 hours after hospitalization. A logistic regression model was applied to assess the predictors of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Results: The mean age of the patients was 58.21±10.72 years, and men comprised 51% of the participants. Overall, a QTc interval prolongation of ≥440 ms was present in 45 subjects (21.95% of the patients), which was significantly associated with a previous myocardial infarction (MI) (P=0.024), a minimum ST depression of 1 mm in the inferior leads (P=0.006), and a maximum left ventricular ejection fraction of 35% (P=0.018). Furthermore, among the different electrocardiographic variables, only a prolonged QTc interval (OR=0.275, 95% CI=0.078-0.976; and P=0.046) was inversely associated with the left ventricular systolic function. Conclusion: Our study showed that prolonged QTc intervals can be used as a useful risk marker for identifying high-risk patients with the acute coronary syndrome.

Echo-Doppler estimation of left ventricular filling pressure: results of the multicentre EACVI Euro-Filling study

Aims

The present Euro-Filling report aimed at comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the 2009 and 2016 echocardiographic grading algorithms for predicting invasively measured left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP).

Method and results

A total of 159 patients who underwent simultaneous evaluation of echo estimates of LVFP and invasive measurements of LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) were enrolled at nine EACVI centres. Thirty-nine (25%) patients had a reduced LV ejection fraction (<50%), 77 (64%) were in NYHA ≥ II, and 85 (53%) had coronary artery disease. Sixty-four (40%) patients had elevated LVEDP (≥15 mmHg). Taken individually, all echocardiographic Doppler estimates of LVFP (E/A, E/e', left atrial volume, tricuspid regurgitation jet velocity) were marginally correlated with LVEDP. By using the 2016 recommendations, 65% of patients with normal non-invasive estimate of LVFP had normal LVEDP, while 79% of those with elevated non-invasive LVFP had elevated invasive LVEDP. By using 2009 recommendations, 68% of the patients with normal non-invasive LVFP had normal LVEDP, while 55% of those with elevated non-invasive LVFP had elevated LVEDP. The 2016 recommendations (sensitivity 75%, specificity 74%, positive predictive value 39%, negative predictive value 93%, AUC 0.78) identified slightly better patients with elevated invasive LVEDP (≥ 15 mmHg) as compared with the 2009 recommendations (sensitivity 43%, specificity 75%, positive predictive value 49%, negative predictive value 71%, AUC 0.68).

Conclusion

The present Euro-Filling study demonstrates that the new 2016 recommendations for assessing LVFP non-invasively are fairly reliable and clinically useful, as well as superior to the 2009 recommendations in estimating invasive LVEDP.