B-Type Natriuretic Peptide: A Predictor for Mortality, Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay, and Hospital Length of Stay in Patients With Resolving Sepsis

Brain natriuretic peptide as a predictive marker of mortality in sepsis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Early identification of patients with sepsis at high risk of death remains a challenge, and whether brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) has a prognostic effect on patients with sepsis is controversial. Here, we clarified the prognostic value of BNP and NT-proBNP and sought to establish suitable cutoff values and intervals.

METHODS

We searched five databases to identify studies that met the inclusion criteria. The primary outcomes were the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), area under the curve (AUC), and corresponding 95% credible interval (95% CI) of BNP and NT-proBNP. The secondary outcomes were the sensitivity and specificity of BNP or NT-proBNP in subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

Forty-seven studies were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity of NT-proBNP (0.77 [0.68, 0.84]) was weaker than that of BNP (0.82 [0.76, 0.87]), the pooled specificity of NT-proBNP (0.70 [0.60, 0.77]) was less than that of BNP (0.77 [0.71, 0.82]), and the AUC of BNP (0.87 [0.83-0.89]) was greater than that of NT-proBNP (0.80 (0.76-0.83]). The results of the subgroup analysis showed that the cutoff range of 400-800 pg/mL for BNP had high sensitivity (0.86 [0.74-0.98]) and specificity (0.87 [0.81-0.93]) and was probably the most appropriate cutoff range.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated levels of BNP and NT-proBNP were significantly related to the mortality of patients with sepsis and had a moderate prognostic value in predicting the mortality of patients with sepsis. In addition, our meta-analysis preliminarily established appropriate cutoff values for BNP and NT-proBNP.

Establishment of a mortality risk nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality of sepsis: cohort study from a Chinese single center

Objective

To establish a mortality risk nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in the Chinese population.

Methods

Data were obtained from the medical records of sepsis patients enrolled at the Affiliated Huadu Hospital, Southern Medical University, between 2019 and 2021. A total of 696 sepsis patients were initially included in our research, and 582 cases were finally enrolled after screening and divided into the survival group (n = 400) and the non-survival group (n = 182) according to the incidence of mortality during hospitalization. Twenty-eight potential sepsis-related risk factors for mortality were identified. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used to optimize variable selection by running cyclic coordinate descent with k-fold (tenfold in this case) cross-validation. We used binary logistic regression to build a model for predicting mortality from the variables based on LASSO regression selection. Binary logistic regression was used to establish a nomogram based on independent mortality risk factors. To validate the prediction accuracy of the nomogram, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, decision curve analysis (DCA) and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis were employed. Eventually, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration curve were used for nomogram calibration.

Results

LASSO regression identified a total of ten factors, namely, chronic heart disease (CHD), lymphocyte count (LYMP), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), red blood cell distribution width (RDW), C reactive protein (CRP), Procalcitonin (PCT), lactic acid, prothrombin time (PT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total bilirubin (Tbil), interleukin-6 (IL6), that were incorporated into the multivariable analysis. Finally, a nomogram including CHD, LYMP, NLR, RDW, lactic acid, PT, CRP, PCT, Tbil, ALT, and IL6 was established by multivariable logistic regression. The ROC curves of the nomogram in the training and validation sets were 0.9836 and 0.9502, respectively. DCA showed that the nomogram could be applied clinically if the risk threshold was between 29.52 and 99.61% in the training set and between 31.32 and 98.49% in the testing set. RCS showed that when the value of independent risk factors from the predicted model exceeded the median, the mortality hazard ratio increased sharply. The results of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (χ2 = 0.1901, df = 2, p = 0.9091) and the calibration curves of the training and validation sets showed good agreement with the actual results, which indicated good stability of the model.

Conclusion

Our nomogram, including CHD, LYMP, NLR, RDW, lactic acid, PT, CRP, PCT, Tbil, ALT, and IL6, exhibits good performance for predicting mortality risk in adult sepsis patients.

[Natriuretic peptides in intensive care medicine]

Natriuretic peptides must be interpreted in their clinical context, especially in intensive care medicine. This overview presents the diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic significance of B‑type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N‑terminal pro B‑type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients with cardiac dysfunction, kidney failure, sepsis, pulmonary embolism, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), and weaning from a respirator.

Therapeutic Dilemmas in Mixed Septic-Cardiogenic Shock

Sepsis is an increasing cause of decompensation in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Sepsis and decompensated heart failure results in a mixed septic-cardiogenic shock that poses several therapeutic dilemmas: Rapid fluid resuscitation is the cornerstone of sepsis management, while loop diuretics are the main stay of decompensated heart failure treatment. Whether inotropic therapy with dobutamine or inodilators improves microvascular alterations remains unsettled in sepsis. When to resume loop diuretic therapy in patients with sepsis and decompensated heart failure is unclear. In the absence of relevant guidelines, we review vasopressor therapy, the timing and volume of fluid resuscitation, and the need for inotropic therapy in patients who, with sepsis and decompensated heart failure, present with a mixed septic-cardiogenic shock.

N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with sepsis

This study aims to evaluate the role of cardiac enzymes N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and cardiac troponin-I (CTnI) as predictors of outcomes in patients with sepsis.78 cases with a diagnosis of sepsis were enrolled over a 2-year period. Baseline demographic, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II (APACHE-II), Simplified Acute Physiology Score-II (SAPS-II), hematologic and biochemical parameters were noted. Serum NT-proBNP and CTnI were evaluated at 24 and 72 hours of admission along with echocardiography. Patients were prospectively followed up until death or discharge.Mean APACHE-II score was 19.8±9.6 and SAPS-II was 44.8±17.2. Survival rate in the study was 47.5% (36 of 78 patients). NT-proBNP was significantly higher in non-survivors with values over 4300 pg/mL at 24 hours and 5229 pg/mL at 72 hours associated with poor outcomes (p<0.05). CTnI was higher among non-survivors than in survivors, but the difference was not significant. APACHE-II score combined with NT-proBNP predicted a poor outcome in 51.2% cases compared with 14.6% cases with APACHE-II alone (p<0.05), while SAPS-II combined with NT-proBNP predicted a poor outcome in 53.6% cases as compared with 9.6% cases with SAPS-II alone (p<0.05). SAPS-II greater than 45 and NT-proBNP values at 72 hours were independent predictors of mortality in patients with sepsis.NT-proBNP is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with sepsis and its combination with APACHE-II and SAPS-II improves the predictive values of the scoring systems.

The Predictive Value of N-Terminal Probrain Natriuretic Peptide for Infection in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Background: Infections increase the risk of poor outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, predicting patients at a high risk of developing infection remains unclear. Moreover, the value of N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) for predicting infection is still unknown. Thus, we aimed to assess the relationship between NT-proBNP and the following development of infection, and clinical adverse outcomes in patients with STEMI undergoing PCI.

Methods: STEMI patients undergoing PCI were consecutively enrolled from January 2010 to July 2016 and divided into groups according to baseline NT-proBNP levels: tertiles T1 (<988 pg/mL), T2 (988–3520 pg/mL), and T3 (≥3520 pg/mL). The primary endpoint was infection during hospitalization.

Results: A total of 182 (27%) patients developed in-hospital infection. The incidence of infection increased from T1 to T3 (10.5, 17.7, and 54.5%, P < 0.001). NT-proBNP was an independent risk factor (adjusted odds ratio = 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.12–1.73, P = 0.003) and presented accurately predicting infection (area under curve = 0.774). Multivariate cox analysis showed that NT-proBNP was a significant risk factor for major adverse clinical events (MACE) at follow-up (adjusted HR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.61–2.29, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The baseline NT-proBNP level has a good predictive value for infection and MACE in STEMI patients undergoing PCI.

The Levels of Lactate, Troponin, and N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Are Predictors of Mortality in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND Serum lactate, troponin, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) have been proposed to be useful prognostic indicators in patients with sepsis and septic shock. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive ability of these biomarkers and assess how their prognostic utility may be improved by using them in combination. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective review of the medical records of 1242 patients with sepsis and septic shock who were admitted to the Richmond University Medical Center between June 1, 2018, and June 1, 2019, was carried out; 427 patients met the study criteria and were included in the study. The primary outcome measures included 30-day mortality, APACHE II scores, length of hospital stay, and admission to the Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU). RESULTS High levels of lactate (>4 mmol/L), troponin (>0.45 ng/mL), and NT-proBNP (>8000 pg/mL) were independent predictors of 30-day mortality, with an adjusted odds ratio of mortality being 3.19 times, 2.13 times, and 2.5 times higher, respectively, compared with corresponding reference groups, at 95% confidence intervals. Elevated levels of lactate, troponin, and NT-proBNP were associated with 9.12 points, 7.70 points, and 8.88 points in higher APACHE II scores, respectively. Only elevated troponin levels were predictive of a longer length of hospital stay. In contrast, elevated lactate and troponin were associated with an increased chance of admission to the MICU. CONCLUSIONS Elevated levels of serum lactate, troponin, and NT-proBNP are independent predictors of mortality and higher APACHE II scores in patients with sepsis and septic shock.

Time to clinical response in sepsis associated with an algorithm for blood-culture pathogen identification using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectroscopy

PURPOSE

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) can be aided by using rapid diagnostics (RDT). However, there are limited data evaluating the impact of ASPs and RDT on sepsis outcomes in the setting of the new Sepsis-3 guidelines. This study evaluates the impact of a low-resource method for ASPs with RDT on sepsis outcomes.

METHODS

This was a prospective, quasi-experimental study with a retrospective double pretest. Patients ≥ 18 years old with sepsis and concurrent bacteremia or fungemia were included; patients who were pregnant, had polymicrobial septicemia or who were transferred from an outside hospital were excluded. In the first pretest (O1), polymerase chain reaction was used to identify Staphylococcal species from positive blood cultures, and traditional laboratory techniques were used to identify other species. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectroscopy and FilmArray were implemented in the second pretest (O2), and twice daily blood culture review was implemented in the posttest (O3).

RESULTS

A total of 394 patients (157 in O1, 176 in O2, 61 in O3) were enrolled. Clinical response was 73.2%, 83.5%, and 88.5% in O1, O2, and O3, respectively, p = 0.013. By Cox regression, the O3 was associated with improved time to clinical response (hazard ratio, 1.388; 95% confidence interval, 1.004-1.919) as compared with O1. Mortality, hospital length of stay, and intensive care unit length of stay were unchanged between groups.

CONCLUSION

Twice-daily blood culture review may be useful for implementing rapid diagnostics within low-resource ASPs. Further research is needed to identify the optimal method of blood culture follow-up within low-resource settings.

The role of natriuretic peptides in the management, outcomes and prognosis of sepsis and septic shock

Sepsis continues to be a leading public health burden in the United States and worldwide. With the increasing use of advanced laboratory technology, there is a renewed interest in the use of biomarkers in sepsis to aid in more precise and targeted decision-making. Natriuretic peptides have been increasingly recognized to play a role outside of heart failure. They are commonly elevated among critically ill patients in the setting of cardiopulmonary dysfunction and may play a role in identifying patients with sepsis and septic shock. There are limited data on the role of these biomarkers in the diagnosis, management, outcomes and prognosis of septic patients. This review seeks to describe the role of natriuretic peptides in fluid resuscitation, diagnosis of ventricular dysfunction and outcomes and the prognosis of patients with sepsis. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) have been noted to be associated with left ventricular systolic and diastolic and right ventricular dysfunction in patients with septic cardiomyopathy. BNP/NT-proBNP may predict fluid responsiveness, and trends of these peptides may play a role in fluid resuscitation. Despite suggestions of a correlation with mortality, the role of BNP in mortality outcomes and prognosis during sepsis needs further evaluation.

The utility of brain natriuretic peptides in septic shock as markers for mortality and cardiac dysfunction: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review evaluating the utility of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) as biomarkers in adult patients with septic shock.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pubmed/Medline databases were searched from inception to November 2018 using the search terms: (septic[Title/Abstract] AND shock[Title/Abstract]) AND bnp[Title/Abstract]) and (septic[Title/Abstract]) AND shock[Title/Abstract]) AND natriuretic[Title/Abstract]). No restriction was applied regarding date of publication. Comparative observational studies evaluating BNP and NT-proBNP in patients with septic shock aged ≥18 years were eligible for inclusion. Bibliographies from the extracted articles were also reviewed to identify additional relevant publications.

RESULTS

In total, 46 studies met all eligibility criteria and were included. A strong body of literature has demonstrated that in patients with septic shock, increased values of BNP and NT-proBNP are associated with increased mortality. An increase from baseline BNP values has also been associated with increased mortality, whereas decreases from baseline values are not related to worse outcome. Brain natriuretic peptides have also been associated with cardiac dysfunction in patients with sepsis. Moreover, BNP values have been found to be significantly elevated in septic shock, regardless of cardiac dysfunction, and have been used to distinguish between septic and cardiogenic shock. Furthermore, BNP and NT-proBNP are significantly increased in patients with septic shock, compared to patients with sepsis and severe sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

BNP and NT-proBNP appear to be reliable predictors of outcome in septic shock.