Is the Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors a Predisposing Factor for Pyogenic Liver Abscesses?

Does the Use of Gastric-Acid Suppressants Increase the Risk of Peritonitis in Patients Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis? A Meta-Analysis

Gastric-acid suppressants (GASs) are commonly prescribed to patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis for various gastrointestinal disorders. However, long-term GAS use has been linked with the risk of enteric peritonitis in this patient population. To assess the association between the enteric peritonitis risk and GAS use in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis for end-stage renal disease, we conducted a systematic search for relevant articles published until December 2023 in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. We included 11 articles on the association between GAS use and enteric peritonitis risk in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. We calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using fixed and random-effects models to obtain overall effect estimates. We also explored potential sources of heterogeneity through subgroup analyses. We qualitatively analyzed data from 11 studies (n = 1993 participants), out of which, nine studies were included in meta-analysis. The overall results revealed a significant association between the enteric peritonitis risk and the use of GASs (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.26-2.05; p < 0.00001). The analysis of study design subgroups showed a significant association in retrospective cohort studies (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.42-2.03; p < 0.00001) but not in case-control studies. Histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) use was significantly associated with enteric peritonitis (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.05-2.11, p = 0.03), whereas proton pump inhibitor use was not (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.72-1.77, p = 0.28). Our findings suggest a significant association between the development of enteric peritonitis and GAS use in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. However, the observed heterogeneity in study characteristics warrants caution in interpreting the results.

The impact of proton pump inhibitors in liver diseases and the effects on the liver

In this systematic and comprehensive overview, we aimed to evaluate the impact of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on chronic liver diseases, especially on cirrhosis. A manual and comprehensive search of the PubMed database was conducted to obtain relevant literatures. PPIs altered the composition and function of the intestinal microflora and might lead to small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and bacterial translocation, which were associated with adverse effects in liver diseases. They might increase the risk of hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, infections, and are related to an increased mortality in cirrhosis. PPIs might lead to an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, although the mechanism is unknown, and the results are controversial. PPIs also had an impact on the direct-acting antiviral regimen in patients with chronic hepatitis C. They were associated with an increased risk of liver abscess and increased mortality. Additionally, PPIs might lead to metabolic risk events, such as liver steatosis and weight gain. PPIs are associated with several adverse outcomes in liver diseases. Cautious use of PPIs is recommended and clinicians should be aware of the indications for their use in patients with liver diseases.

A case of pheochromocytoma associated with liver abscess and intestinal pseudo-obstruction

Pheochromocytomas can present with various symptoms. Nonspecific manifestations of pheochromocytoma include intestinal pseudo-obstruction and weight loss. Here, we present a case of pheochromocytoma in which prolonged intestinal pseudo-obstruction due to excess catecholamines was one of the factors leading to the development of a liver abscess. An 18-year-old male patient with a history of status epilepticus and severe intellectual disability was transferred to our hospital for a thorough examination of fever and constipation that had lasted for 2 months. When admitted to our hospital, he had fever, and his body mass index was 9.5 kg/m². Upon comprehensive examination of the patient's fever, the blood culture was found positive for Bacteroides. Computed tomography showed findings of intestinal pseudo-obstruction and a low density region in the liver that indicated a liver abscess. Imaging studies also revealed a right adrenal mass and endocrinological test showed elevated plasma norepinephrine and urine normetanephrine levels. In addition, the right adrenal mass showed uptake on ¹²³I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy. These findings led to a definite diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. The patient was eventually diagnosed with a pheochromocytoma coexisting with a liver abscess. After treating the liver abscess with antibiotics and ultrasound-guided drainage, an adrenalectomy was performed. The pathological findings were consistent with pheochromocytoma. Postoperatively, the catecholamine excess normalized and intestinal pseudo-obstruction and weight loss improved. We suspected that prolonged intestinal pseudo-obstruction resulted in bacterial translocation and development of a liver abscess. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a pheochromocytoma associated with a liver abscess. Moreover, the clinical presentation of this patient was unusual for pheochromocytoma, as the patient did not have typical symptoms such as hypertension or tachycardia, but rather presented with constipation, intestinal pseudo-obstruction, and weight loss. This case provides valuable insight regarding the impact of catecholamine excess on the intestinal tract and body weight.