Distinct Prognostic Factors of Ground Glass Opacity and Pure-Solid Lesion in Pathological Stage I Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma

Prediction of the pathological subtypes by intraoperative frozen section for patients with cT1N0M0 invasive lung adenocarcinoma (ECTOP-1015): a prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the intraoperative frozen section (FS) in determining the pathological subtypes among patients diagnosed with cT1N0M0 invasive lung adenocarcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, multicenter (seven centers in China) clinical trial of Eastern Cooperative Thoracic Oncology Projects (ECTOP-1015). Patients with cT1N0M0 invasive lung adenocarcinoma were enrolled in the study. Pathological images obtained from FS and final pathology (FP) were reviewed by at least two pathologists. The primary endpoint was the concordance between FS and FP diagnoses. The interobserver agreement for identifying pathological subtypes on FS was evaluated among three pathologists.

RESULTS

A total of 935 patients were enrolled. The best sensitivity of diagnosing the predominant subtype was 78.2% in the evaluation of the acinar pattern. The presence of an acinar pattern diagnosed by FS was an independent factor for the concordance between FS and FP ( P =0.007, 95% confidence interval: 2.332-4.736). Patients with tumor size >2 cm measured by pathology showed a better concordance rate for the predominant subtype (81.6% vs. 74.6%, P =0.023). The presence of radiological ground glass opacity component did not affect the diagnosis accuracy of FS for the predominant subtype (concordance rate: 76.4% vs. 75.2%, P =0.687). Patients with ground glass opacity component showed better accuracy of the identification in the presence of lepidic pattern-predominant adenocarcinoma (82.1% vs. 71.0%, P =0.026). Substantial agreement between the FS diagnosis from three pathologists for the predominant pathological pattern was revealed with κ=0.846.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest prospective trial evaluating FS diagnosing pathological subtype in cT1N0M0 invasive lung adenocarcinoma. A favorable concordance in the assessment of the pathological subtypes between FS and FP was observed, indicating the feasibility of utilizing accurate intraoperative pathological diagnoses from FS in guiding surgical strategies. A combination of radiology could improve the precision of FS.

CTR > 0.7 predicts the subgroup of lung adenocarcinomas ≤ 2 cm at risk of poor outcome treated by sublobar resection compared to lobar resection

BACKGROUND

A standard surgical procedure for patients with small early-stage lung adenocarcinomas remains unknown. Hence, we aim in this study to assess the clinical utility of the consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) when treating patients with small (2 cm) early stage lung cancers.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 298 sublobar resection and 266 lobar resection recipients for early stage lung adenocarcinoma ≤ 2 cm was assembled from the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between 2016 and 2019. To compare survival rates among the different groups, Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated, and the log-rank test was used. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was constructed utilizing variables that were significant in univariate analysis of survival.

RESULTS

In the study, 564 patients were included, with 298 patients (52.8%) undergoing sublobar resection and 266 patients (47.2%) undergoing lobar resection. Regarding survival results, there was no significant difference in the 5-year overall survival (OS, P = 0.674) and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS, P = 0.253) between the two groups. Cox regression analyses showed that CTR ≥ 0.75(P < 0.001), age > 56 years (P = 0.007), and sublobar resection(P = 0.001) could predict worse survival. After examining survival results based on CTR categorization, we segmented the individuals into three categories: CTR<0.7, 0.7 ≤ CTR<1, and CTR = 1.The lobar resection groups had more favorable clinical outcomes than the sublobar resection groups in both the 0.7 ≤ CTR < 1(RFS: P < 0.001, OS: P = 0.001) and CTR = 1(RFS: P = 0.001, OS: P = 0.125). However, for patients with 0 ≤ CTR < 0.7, no difference in either RFS or OS was found between the lobar resection and sublobar resection groups, all of which had no positive events. Patients with a CTR between 0.7 and 1 who underwent lobar resection had similar 5-year RFS and OS rates compared to those with a CTR between 0 and 0.7 who underwent sublobar resection (100% vs. 100%). Nevertheless, a CTR of 1 following lobar resection resulted in notably reduced RFS and OS when compared to a CTR between 0.7 and 1 following lobar resection (P = 0.005 and P = 0.016, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Lobar resection is associated with better long-term survival outcomes than sublobar resection for small lung adenocarcinomas ≤ 2 cm and CTR ≥ 0.7.

Recent Advancements in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review

Introduction: Lung cancer remains a global health concern, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprising the majority of cases. Early detection of lung cancer has led to an increased number of cases identified in the earlier stages of NSCLC. This required the revaluation of the NSCLC treatment approaches for early stage NSCLC. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search using multiple databases to identify relevant studies on treatment modalities for early stage NSCLC. Inclusion criteria prioritized, but were not limited to, clinical trials and meta-analyses on surgical approaches to early stage NSCLC conducted from 2021 onwards. Discussion: Minimally invasive approaches, such as VATS and RATS, along with lung resection techniques, including sublobar resection, have emerged as treatments for early stage NSCLC. Ground-glass opacities (GGOs) have shown prognostic significance, especially when analyzing the consolidation/tumor ratio (CTR). There have also been updates on managing GGOs, including the non-surgical approaches, the extent of lung resection indicated, and the level of lymphadenectomy required. Conclusions: The management of early stage NSCLC requires a further assessment of treatment strategies. This includes understanding the required extent of surgical resection, interpreting the significance of GGOs (specifically GGOs with a high CTR), and evaluating the efficacy of alternative therapies. Customized treatment involving surgical and non-surgical interventions is essential for advancing patient care.

Prognostic implication of consolidation-to-tumor ratio in early lung adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cross-sectional study

Background

The threshold value of consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) for distinguishing between ground-glass opacity (GGO)-predominant and solid-predominant ground-glass nodules (GGNs) needs to be clarified, as the lack of clarity has caused the prognostic implications to remain ambiguous. This study aimed to determine the threshold value of CTR for distinguishing between GGO-predominant GGNs and solid-predominant GGNs and elucidate the prognostic implications of the solid-predominant GGNs categorized by CTR on c-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma.

Methods

Between January 2016 and October 2018, 764 c-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma cases were assembled from the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Of the 764 lesions, 515 (67.4%) were nodules with a GGO component, and 249 (32.6%) were solid nodules (SNs) on thin-section computed tomography (CT). We evaluated the correlation of the 3-dimensional (3D) consolidation component volume ratio with CTR based on the coefficient of determination, r. After receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of 515 GGNs, we defined the nodule with CTR >0.750 as solid-predominant GGN and the nodule with CTR ≤0.750 as GGO-predominant GGN. Subsequently, the prognosis of 439 patients who had follow-up registration was evaluated. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was employed to compare survival rates among different groups. Cox proportional hazard regression models were applied to evaluate the independent risk factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Results

Among 764 patients, 515 (67.4%) were nodules with a GGO component, and 249 (32.6%) were SNs on thin-section CT. For 515 GGNs, the 3D consolidation component volume ratio correlated well with CTR (r=0.888). CTR tended to be slightly larger than the 3D consolidation component volume ratio. A 3D consolidation component volume ratio >50% was best predicted by CTR >0.750, followed by CTR >0.549. CTR >0.750 and CTR >0.549 predicted 3D consolidation component volume ratio >50% with 85% and 99.2% sensitivity and 91.6% and 57.2% specificity, respectively. The 5-year RFS and overall survival (OS) of patients with 0.750< CTR <1 were worse than those of patients with 0≤ CTR ≤0.750 (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively) but better than those of patients with CTR =1 (P=0.002 and P=0.03, respectively). Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) >2.1 [hazard ratio (HR) =12.516, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.729-90.598], CTR >0.750 (HR =13.934, 95% CI: 3.341-58.123), larger consolidation component size with diameter more than 20 mm (HR =1.855, 95% CI: 1.242-2.770), poorly differentiated (HR =1.622, 95% CI: 1.056-2.491), lymph node metastasis (HR =2.473, 95% CI: 1.601-3.821), and sublobar resection (HR =2.596, 95% CI: 1.701-3.962) could predict the poor prognosis. Patients with 0≤ CTR ≤0.750 receiving sublobar resection had prognoses comparable to those receiving lobar resection, whether the tumor size ≤2 cm or consolidation component size ≤3 cm. Lobar resection was superior to sublobar resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ≤2 cm with CTR >0.750.

Conclusions

Compared to CTR =0.5, the 2-dimensional (2D) CTR =0.750 found using the 3D consolidation component volume ratio as the gold standard better differentiated between solid-predominant GGNs and GGO-predominant GGNs. CTR >0.750 was an independent risk factor associated with the poor prognosis of patients with c-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma. Sublobar resection should be cautiously adopted in GGNs with 0.750< CTR ≤1.

The predictive value of modified-DeepSurv in overall survivals of patients with lung cancer

The traditional prognostic model may induce the possibility of incorrect assessment of mortality risk under the assumption of linearity. It is urgent to develop a non-linearity precise prognostic model for achieving personalized medicine in lung cancer. In our study, we develop and validate a prognostic model "Modified-DeepSurv" for patients with lung carcinoma based on deep learning and evaluate its value for prognosis, while Cox proportional hazard regression was used to develop another model "CPH." The C-index of the Modified-DeepSurv and CPH was 0.956 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.946-0.974) and 0.836 (95% CI: 0.774-0.896), respectively, in the training cohort, while the C-index of the Modified-DeepSurv and CPH was 0.932 (95%CI: 0.908-0.964) and 0.777 (95%CI: 0.633-0.919), respectively, in the test dataset. The Modified-DeepSurv model visualization was realized by a user-friendly graphic interface. Modified-DeepSurv can effectively predict the survival of lung cancer patients and is superior to the conventional CPH model.

Advances in diagnosis and prediction for aggression of pure solid T1 lung cancer

A growing number of early-stage lung cancers presenting as malignant pulmonary nodules have been diagnosed because of the increased adoption of low-dose spiral computed tomography. But pure solid T1 lung cancer with ≤3 cm in the greatest dimension is not always at an early stage, despite its small size. This type of cancer can be highly aggressive and is associated with pathological involvement, metastasis, postoperative relapse, and even death. However, it is easily misdiagnosed or delay diagnosed in clinics and thus poses a serious threat to human health. The percentage of nodal or extrathoracic metastases has been reported to be >20% in T1 lung cancer. As such, understanding and identifying the aggressive characteristics of pure solid T1 lung cancer is crucial for prevention, diagnosis, and therapeutic strategies, and beneficial to improving the prognosis. With the widespread of lung cancer screening, these highly invasive pure solid T1 lung cancer will become the main advanced lung cancer in future. However, there is limited information regarding precision medicine on how to identify these "early-stage" aggressive lung cancers. To provide clinicians with new insights into early recognition and intervention of the highly invasive pure solid T1 lung cancer, this review summarizes its clinical characteristics, imaging, pathology, gene alterations, immune microenvironment, multi-omics, and current techniques for diagnosis and prediction.