Bromocriptine therapy for the treatment of invasive prolactinoma: the single institute experience

What to report in sellar tumor MRI? A nationwide survey among German pituitary surgeons, radiation oncologists, and endocrinologists

PURPOSE

While MRI has become the imaging modality of choice in the diagnosis of sellar tumors, no systematic attempt has yet been made to align radiological reporting of findings with the information needed by the various medical disciplines dealing with these patients. Therefore, we aimed to determine the prevailing preferences in this regard through a nationwide expert survey.

METHODS

First, an interdisciplinary literature-based catalog of potential reporting elements for sellar tumor MRI examinations was created. Subsequently, a web-based survey regarding the clinical relevance of these items was conducted among board certified members of the German Society of Neurosurgery, German Society of Radiation Oncology, and the Pituitary Working Group of the German Society of Endocrinology.

RESULTS

A total of 95 experts (40 neurosurgeons, 28 radiation oncologists, and 27 endocrinologists) completed the survey. The description of the exact tumor location, size, and involvement of the anatomic structures adjacent to the sella turcica (optic chiasm, cavernous sinus, and skull base), occlusive hydrocephalus, relationship to the pituitary gland and infundibulum, and certain structural characteristics of the mass (cyst formation, hemorrhage, and necrosis) was rated most important (> 75% agreement). In contrast, the characterization of anatomic features of the nasal cavity and sphenoid sinus as well as the findings of advanced MRI techniques (e.g., perfusion and diffusion imaging) was considered relevant by less than 50% of respondents.

CONCLUSION

To optimally address the information needs of the interdisciplinary treatment team, MRI reports of sellar masses should primarily focus on the accurate description of tumor location, size, internal structure, and involvement of adjacent anatomic compartments.

Are dopamine agonists still the first-choice treatment for prolactinoma in the era of endoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

For prolactinoma patients, dopamine agonists (DAs) are indicated as the first-line treatment and surgery is an adjunctive choice. However, with the development of surgical technique and equipment, the effect of surgery has improved. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of surgery versus DAs in patients with different types of prolactinomas.

Methods

A systematic search of literature using Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trial databases was conducted until July 12, 2019. Prolactinoma patients treated with DAs (bromocriptine or cabergoline) or surgery (microscopic or endoscopic surgery) were included. Outcomes included the biochemical cure rate, recurrence rate, prolactin level, improvement rates of symptoms, and incidence rates of complications. A random-effects model was used to pool the extracted data. Qualitative comparisons were conducted instead of quantitative comparison.

Results

DAs were better than surgery in terms of the biochemical cure rate (0.78 versus 0.66), but surgery had a much lower recurrence rate (0.19 versus 0.57). Full advantages were not demonstrated in improvement rates of symptoms and incidence rates of complications with both treatment options. In microprolactinoma patients, the biochemical cure rate of endoscopic surgery was equal to the average cure rate of DAs (0.86 versus 0.86) and it surpassed the biochemical cure rate of bromocriptine (0.86 versus 0.76). In macroprolactinoma patients, endoscopic surgery was slightly higher than bromocriptine (0.66 versus 0.64) in terms of the biochemical cure rate.

Conclusion

For patients with clear indications or contraindications for surgery, choosing surgery or DAs accordingly is unequivocal. However, for patients with clinical equipoise, such as surgery, especially endoscopic surgery, in microprolactinoma and macroprolactinoma patients, we suggest that neurosurgeons and endocrinologists conduct high-quality clinical trials to address the clinical equipoise quantitatively.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41016-022-00277-1.

A scoping review to understand the indications, effectiveness, and limitations of cabergoline in radiological and biochemical remission of prolactinomas

Cabergoline has long been used in the medical management of prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas. However, there is contradicting and inadequate evidence on the efficacy of cabergoline in achieving radiological and biochemical remission in prolactinoma. This article presents scoping review of evidence in cabergoline achieving radiological and biochemical remission in cases of prolactinoma. We have used a recommended scoping review methodology to map and summarize existing research evidence and identify knowledge gaps. The review process was conducted according to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews). The selection of studies was based on the criteria defined. Essential information such as reference details, study characteristics, topics of interest, main findings, and the study author's conclusion are presented in text and tables. With the study selection process, eight publications were finally included-one systematic review and meta-analysis, one RCT, and six primary studies. Cabergoline is effective in achieving biochemical and radiological remission in cases of prolactinoma. We identified several knowledge gaps with the scoping review and directions for future studies. Future studies, including randomized studies, will help address challenging questions associated with the management of prolactinoma.

The Role of Dopamine Agonists in Pituitary Adenomas

Dopamine agonist therapy is the primary therapy for prolactin-secreting adenomas and usually results in normoprolactinemia, eugonadism, and tumor reduction. Cabergoline is superior to bromocriptine with regard to efficacy and tolerance. Withdrawal of cabergoline can be attempted in patients with normal prolactin levels on low doses of medication and evidence of radiographic tumor involution. Dopamine agonists have been used off label in patients with acromegaly, Cushing disease, and nonfunctioning adenomas. A trial of cabergoline monotherapy can be effective in patients with biochemically mild acromegaly. Cabergoline combination with somatostatin receptor ligands or pegvisomant improves insulin-like growth factor level 1 in majority of patients.

Controversial issues in the management of hyperprolactinemia and prolactinomas - An overview by the Neuroendocrinology Department of the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Prolactinomas are the most common pituitary adenomas (approximately 40% of cases), and they represent an important cause of hypogonadism and infertility in both sexes. The magnitude of prolactin (PRL) elevation can be useful in determining the etiology of hyperprolactinemia. Indeed, PRL levels > 250 ng/mL are highly suggestive of the presence of a prolactinoma. In contrast, most patients with stalk dysfunction, drug-induced hyperprolactinemia or systemic diseases present with PRL levels < 100 ng/mL. However, exceptions to these rules are not rare. On the other hand, among patients with macroprolactinomas (MACs), artificially low PRL levels may result from the so-called "hook effect". Patients harboring cystic MACs may also present with a mild PRL elevation. The screening for macroprolactin is mostly indicated for asymptomatic patients and those with apparent idiopathic hyperprolactinemia. Dopamine agonists (DAs) are the treatment of choice for prolactinomas, particularly cabergoline, which is more effective and better tolerated than bromocriptine. After 2 years of successful treatment, DA withdrawal should be considered in all cases of microprolactinomas and in selected cases of MACs. In this publication, the goal of the Neuroendocrinology Department of the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM) is to provide a review of the diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia and prolactinomas, emphasizing controversial issues regarding these topics. This review is based on data published in the literature and the authors' experience.

[Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea in primary treatment of large and giant prolactinomas with dopamine agonists]

At present, pharmacological therapy of prolactinomas with dopamine agonists (DAs) is considered the treatment of choice. In most cases, giant prolactinomas respond to treatment with dopamine agonists and decrease in size during the first months of the treatment. One of the rare but dangerous complications of conservative treatment of prolactinomas with invasive growth is cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We present a retrospective analysis of 15 patients with macropropactinomas who underwent surgery for cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea developed due to primary therapy with dopamine agonists at the Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute (BNI) in the period between 2005 and 2015. All patients had large and giant tumors (according to the classification adopted at the BNI). When cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea was detected, patients were hospitalized to the BNI for examination, detection of a CSF fistula, reconstruction of a defect, and resection (if possible) of the tumor.

RESULTS

In the period between 2005 and 2015, 15 patients (8 males and 7 females) with prolactinomas of a large and giant size at the onset of conservative therapy underwent surgery for cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea at the BNI. All patients underwent transnasal reconstruction of a skull base defect, with 13 out of 15 patients undergoing simultaneous resection of the tumor. After tumor resection, reconstruction was performed using auto-fat, fascia, and glue (in 8 cases). In the remaining cases, apart from auto-fat, fascia, and glue, a mucoperiosteal flap and auto-bone were used. Fourteen patients were followe-up. In 13 cases, there was no relapse of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea after skull base reconstruction. In 1 case, there was a relapse of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea.

CONCLUSION

Conservative treatment of patients with giant prolactinomas should be performed under regular control of ENT doctors and neurosurgeons for timely detection and surgical treatment of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea.

Update on prolactinomas. Part 1: Clinical manifestations and diagnostic challenges

The authors provide an update on the clinical manifestations and diagnostic challenges of prolactinomas. Prolactinomas are the most common pituitary adenoma seen in clinical practice. Secondary causes of hyperprolactinemia should be ruled out by assessment of the clinical history, including current medications, physical examination, pregnancy test, routine biochemical analysis with a thyroid function test, and neuroimaging, before a confirmatory diagnosis of prolactinoma is made. Prolactinomas are associated with endocrine dysfunction, affecting gonadal function and causing neurological deficits due to mass effect. The progress in elucidating the pathogenesis of prolactinomas and advances in diagnostic methods, including more sensitive diagnostic hormone assays and neuroimaging, have enriched the current diagnostic approach and management. Making the correct diagnosis is crucial to implementing the appropriate therapy. Dopamine agonist therapy remains the first line of treatment for prolactinomas, as it is effective in normalizing serum prolactin levels and reducing tumor size. Surgery is typically indicated for patients who are resistant to medical therapy or intolerant of its adverse side effects, or for those experiencing progressive neurological deficits. Nevertheless, curative surgical resection as a primary mode of treatment for smaller prolactinomas has recently gained attention as an alternative to lifelong dopamine agonist treatment.