Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion

Role of non-pulmonary vein triggers in persistent atrial fibrillation

Pulmonary vein isolation is an well-established treatment strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF), and it is especially effective for patients with paroxysmal AF. However, the success rate is limited for patients with persistent AF, because non-pulmonary vein triggers which increase AF recurrence are frequently found in these patients. The major non-pulmonary vein triggers are from the left atrial posterior wall, left atrial appendage, ligament of Marshall, coronary sinus, superior vena cava, and crista terminalis, but other atrial sites can also generate AF triggers. All these sites have been known to contain atrial myocytes with potential arrhythmogenic electrical activity. The prevalence and clinical characteristics of these non-pulmonary vein triggers are well studied; however, the clinical outcome of catheter ablation for persistent AF is still unclear. Here, we reviewed the current ablation strategies for persistent AF and the clinical implications of major non-pulmonary vein triggers.

Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Originating From the Inferior Vena Cava: A Case Report and Literature Review

Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia, but atrial fibrillation originating in the inferior vena cava is extremely rare. Here, we present a case of a 51-year-old woman with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, who was admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University and underwent radiofrequency ablation. The atrial fibrillation persisted despite pulmonary vein isolation. The inferior vena cava was then identified not only as a trigger but also as the driver to maintain atrial fibrillation, and tachycardia terminated successfully by discharging at the inferior vena cava. Furthermore, we performed a literature review of five previous case reports on this subject.

The Long-Term Outcomes of Ablation With Vein of Marshall Ethanol Infusion vs. Ablation Alone in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis

Background

The long-term outcomes of ablation with vein of Marshall ethanol infusion (VOM-ABL) compared with ablation alone in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains elusive. We aimed to explore whether VOM-ABL showed better long-term benefits and screen the potential determinants of outcome impact of VOM-ABL procedure.

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to 1st September 2021. Studies comparing the long-term (one-year or longer) outcomes between VOM-ABL and ablation alone were included. Subgroup analysis identified potential determinants for VOM-ABL procedure.

Results

Compared with ablation alone, VOM-ABL was associated with a significantly higher rate of long-term freedom from AF/AT (risk ratio [RR], 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12–1.47; p = 0.00) and successful mitral isthmus (MI) block (RR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.16–1.99; p = 0.00), whereas, there was no significant difference in pericardial effusion, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), and all-cause death. Subgroup analysis identified two significant treatment-covariate interactions: one was ablation strategy subgroup (pulmonary vein isolation plus linear and/or substrate ablation [PVI+]; RR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.27–1.56 vs. PVI; RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.92–1.19, p = 0.00 for interaction) for freedom from AF/AT, while the other was VOM-ABL group sample size subgroup (≥ 100; RR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.24–3.17 vs. <100; RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.10–1.30, p = 0.04 for interaction) for MI block.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis demonstrates that VOM-ABL has superior efficacy and comparable safety over ablation alone in AF patients with long-term follow-up. Moreover, PVI+ and VOM-ABL group sample size ≥ 100 may be associated with a great impact on freedom from AF/AT and MI block, respectively.