Pilot Study for Considering Subthalamic Nucleus Anatomy during Stimulation Using Directional Leads

Directional deep brain stimulation in the management of Parkinson's disease: efficacy and constraints-an analytical appraisal

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a widely employed treatment for Parkinson's disease. However, conventional DBS utilizing ring-shaped leads can often result in undesirable side effects by stimulating nearby brain structures, thus limiting its effectiveness. To address this issue, a novel DBS electrode was developed to allow for directional stimulation, avoiding neighboring structures. This literature review aims to analyze the disparities between conventional and directional DBS and discuss the benefits and limitations associated with this innovative electrode design, focusing on the stimulation-induced side effects it can or cannot mitigate. A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, and EBSCO databases using the Boolean search criteria: "Deep brain stimulation" AND "Parkinson" AND "Directional." Following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, the selected articles were downloaded for full-text reading. Subsequently, the results were organized and analyzed to compose this article. Numerous studies have demonstrated that directional DBS effectively reduces side effects associated with brain stimulation, prevents the stimulation of non-targeted structures, and expands the therapeutic window, among other advantages. However, it has been observed that directional DBS may be more challenging to program and requires higher energy consumption. Furthermore, there is a lack of standardization among different manufacturers of directional DBS electrodes. Various stimulation-induced side effects, including dysarthria, dyskinesia, paresthesias, and symptoms of pyramidal tract activation, have been shown to be mitigated with the use of directional DBS. Moreover, directional electrodes offer a wider therapeutic window and a reduced incidence of undesired effects, requiring the same or lower minimum current for symptom relief compared to conventional DBS. The utilization of directional leads in DBS offers numerous advantages over conventional electrodes without significant drawbacks for patients undergoing directional DBS therapy.

Three-dimensional gait analysis of the effect of directional steering on gait in patients with Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an option to treat advanced Parkinson's Disease (PD), but can cause gait disturbance due to stimulation side efffects. This study aims to evaluate the objective effect of directional current steering by DBS on gait performance in PD, utilizing a three-dimensional gait analysis system.

METHODS

Eleven patients diagnosed with PD and were implanted with directional lead were recruited. The direction of the pyramidal tract (identified by the directional mode screening) was set as 0°. Patients performed the six-meter-walk test and the time up-and-go (TUG) test while an analysis system recorded gait parameters utilizing a three-dimensional motion capture camera. The gait parameters were measured for the baseline, the directional steering at eight angles (0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, 180°, 225°, 270°, and 315°), and the conventional ring mode with 1, 2, and 3 mA. Pulse width and frequency were fixed. Placebo stimulation (0 mA) was used for a control.

RESULTS

Eleven patients completed the study. No significant difference were observed between gait parameters during the directional, baseline, placebo, or ring modes during the six-meter-walk test (p > 0.05). During the TUG test, stride length was significantly different between 0° and other directions (p < 0.001), but no significant differences were observed for the other gait parameters. Stride width was non-significantly narrower in the direction of 0°.

CONCLUSION

Controlling stimulation using directional steering may improve gait in patients with PD, while avoiding pyramidal side effects.

Globus pallidus internus versus subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for isolated dystonia: A 3-year follow-up

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery targeting the globus pallidus internus (GPi) or the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is widely used in medication-refractory dystonia. However, evidence regarding target selection considering various symptoms remains limited. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of these two targets in patients with isolated dystonia.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated 71 consecutive patients (GPi-DBS group, n = 32; STN-DBS group, n = 39) with isolated dystonia. Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale scores and quality of life were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 6, 12, and 36 months postoperatively. Cognition and mental status were assessed preoperatively and at 36 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Targeting the STN (STN-DBS) yielded effects within 1 month (65% vs. 44%; p = 0.0076) and was superior at 1 year (70% vs. 51%; p = 0.0112) and 3 years (74% vs. 59%; p = 0.0138). For individual symptoms, STN-DBS was preferable for eye involvement (81% vs. 56%; p = 0.0255), whereas targeting the GPi (GPi-DBS) was better for axis symptoms, especially for the trunk (82% vs. 94%; p = 0.015). STN-DBS was also favorable for generalized dystonia at 36-month follow-up (p = 0.04) and required less electrical energy (p < 0.0001). Disability, quality of life, and depression and anxiety measures were also improved. Neither target influenced cognition.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that the GPi and STN are safe and effective targets for isolated dystonia. The STN has the benefits of fast action and low battery consumption, and is superior for ocular dystonia and generalized dystonia, while the GPi is better for trunk involvement. These findings may offer guidance for future DBS target selection for different types of dystonia.

Surgical Strategy for Directional Deep Brain Stimulation

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established treatment for drug-resistant involuntary movements. However, the conventional quadripole cylindrical lead creates electrical fields in all directions, and the resulting spread to adjacent eloquent structures may induce unintended effects. Novel directional leads have therefore been designed to allow directional stimulation (DS). Directional leads have the advantage of widening the therapeutic window (TW), compensating for slight misplacement of the lead and requiring less electrical power to provide the same effect as a cylindrical lead. Conversely, the increase in the number of contacts from four to eight and the addition of directional elements has made stimulation programming more complex. For these reasons, new treatment strategies are required to allow effective directional DBS. During lead implantation, the directional segment should be placed in a "sweet spot," and the orientation of the directional segment is important for programming. Trial-and-error testing of a large number of contacts is unnecessary, and efficient and systematic execution of the programmed procedure is desirable. Recent improvements in imaging technologies have enabled image-guided programming. In the future, optimal stimulations are expected to be programmed by directional recording of local field potentials.

Deep brain stimulation programming strategies: segmented leads, independent current sources, and future technology

Introduction: Advances in neuromodulation and deep brain stimulation (DBS) technologies have facilitated opportunities for improved clinical benefit and side effect management. However, new technologies have added complexity to clinic-based DBS programming.Areas covered: In this article, we review basic basal ganglia physiology, proposed mechanisms of action and technical aspects of DBS. We discuss novel DBS technologies for movement disorders including the role of advanced imaging software, lead design, IPG design, novel programming techniques including directional stimulation and coordinated reset neuromodulation. Additional topics include the use of potential biomarkers, such as local field potentials, electrocorticography, and adaptive stimulation. We will also discuss future directions including optogenetically inspired DBS.Expert opinion: The introduction of DBS for the management of movement disorders has expanded treatment options. In parallel with our improved understanding of brain physiology and neuroanatomy, new technologies have emerged to address challenges associated with neuromodulation, including variable effectiveness, side-effects, and programming complexity. Advanced functional neuroanatomy, improved imaging, real-time neurophysiology, improved electrode designs, and novel programming techniques have collectively been driving improvements in DBS outcomes.

Do directional deep brain stimulation leads rotate after implantation?

BACKGROUND

The two middle contacts of directional leads (d-leads) for deep brain stimulation are split into three segments, allowing current steering toward desired axial directions. To facilitate programming, their final orientation needs to be reliably determined. However, it is currently unclear whether d-leads rotate after implantation. Our objective was to assess the degree of d-lead rotation after implantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed d-lead orientation on intraoperative X-rays, postoperative CT scans (latencies to surgery: 108-189 min postoperatively), and rotational fluoroscopies (4-9 days postoperatively) for a consecutive series of 32 implanted d-leads. For five d-leads, a CT scan with a mean follow-up of 57 days (range 28-182) was available. All d-leads were implanted with the marker facing anterior and the intention to hit an "iron sight" (ISi) on the X-ray, indicating anterior orientation (i.e., 0° ± 6°).

RESULTS

In nine d-leads, an ISi was visible on the final X-ray; median orientation was 1.5° (range 0.5-6.0°) at the first follow-up CT, confirming anterior orientation. In d-leads without ISi or where ISi was not evaluable, the median rotation was 15.5° (9.5-35.0°) and 26.5° (5.5-62.0°), respectively. The orientation of the initial CT was comparable with the orientation determined by the postoperative rotational fluoroscopy and second CT in all d-lead groups.

CONCLUSION

D-lead orientation does not change within the first week after implantation. We provide first indications that d-lead orientation remains stable for several weeks after surgery. Determination of lead orientation using marker-based X-ray alone seems too imprecise; adding the ISi method can increase determination of intraoperative orientation.

Deep-Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor and Other Tremor Syndromes: A Narrative Review of Current Targets and Clinical Outcomes

Tremor is a prevalent symptom associated with multiple conditions, including essential tremor (ET), Parkinson's disease (PD), multiple sclerosis (MS), stroke and trauma. The surgical management of tremor evolved from stereotactic lesions to deep-brain stimulation (DBS), which allowed safe and reversible interference with specific neural networks. This paper reviews the current literature on DBS for tremor, starting with a detailed discussion of current tremor targets (ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus (Vim), prelemniscal radiations (Raprl), caudal zona incerta (Zi), thalamus (Vo) and subthalamic nucleus (STN)) and continuing with a discussion of results obtained when performing DBS in the various aforementioned tremor syndromes. Future directions for DBS research are then briefly discussed.

Stimulation-Induced Dyskinesia After Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients With Meige Syndrome

OBJECTIVES

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) is increasingly used to treat Meige syndrome (MS) and markedly improves symptoms. Stimulation-induced dyskinesia (SID), which adversely affects surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction, may, however, occur in some patients. This study attempts to explore possible causes of SID.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospectively collected clinical data on 32 patients who underwent STN-DBS between October 2016 and April 2019 were analyzed. Clinical outcomes were assessed pre- and post-surgery, using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scale (BFMDRS). Patients were divided into a dyskinesia group and a non-dyskinesia group, according to whether or not they experienced persistent SID during follow-up. The coordinates of the active contacts were calculated from post-operative computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, using the inter-commissural line as a reference. At final follow-up, the main stimulatory parameters for further study included pulse width, voltage, and frequency.

RESULTS

At final follow-up (mean = 16.3 ± 7.2 months), MS patients had improved BFMDRS total scores compared with pre-surgical scores (mean improvement = 79.0%, p < 0.0001). The mean improvement in BFMDRS total scores in the dyskinesia (n = 10) and non-dyskinesia (n = 22) groups were 81.6 ± 8.8% and 77.9 ± 14.2%, respectively. The mean minimum voltage to induce dyskinesia was 1.7 ± 0.3 V. The programmed parameters of both groups were similar. When compared with the non-dyskinesia group, active stimulatory contact coordinates in the dyskinesia group were inferior (mean left side: z = -2.3 ± 1.7 mm vs. z = -1.2 ± 1.5 mm; p = 0.0282; mean right side: z = -2.7 ± 1.9 mm vs. z = -2.3 ± 1.7 mm; p = 0.0256). The x and y coordinates were similar.

CONCLUSION

STN-DBS is an effective intervention for MS, providing marked improvements in clinical symptoms; SID may, however occur in the subsequent programming control process. Comparing patients with/without dyskinesia, the active contacts were located closer to the inferior part of the STN in patients with dyskinesia, which may provide an explanation for the dyskinesia.