Extracorporeal shock wave therapy does not improve hypertensive nephropathy

Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (LI-ESWT) in Renal Diseases: A Review of Animal and Human Studies

Background

Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (LI-ESWT) has been suggested as a treatment for vascular diseases such as ischemic heart disease, diabetic foot ulcers, and erectile dysfunction. Primarily, LI-ESWT is known for its ability to stimulate angiogenesis and activation of stem cells in target tissues. Application of LI-ESWT in chronic progressive renal diseases is a novel area. The aim of the present review was to summarize available data on the effects of LI-ESWT used in the setting of renal diseases.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases for relevant studies. Our review included the results from preclinical animal experiments and clinical research.

Results

Eleven animal studies and one clinical study were included in the review. In the animal studies, LI-ESWT was used for the treatment of hypertensive nephropathy (n=1), diabetic nephropathy (n=1), or various types of ischemic renal injury (ie, artery occlusion, reperfusion injury) (n=9). The clinical study was conducted in a single-arm cohort as a Phase 1 study with patients having diabetic nephropathy. In animal studies, the application of LI-ESWT was associated with several effects: LI-ESWT led to increased VEGF and endothelial cell proliferation and improved vascularity and perfusion of the kidney tissue. LI-ESWT reduced renal inflammation and fibrosis. LI-ESWT caused only mild side effects in the clinical study, and, similarly, there were no signs of kidney injury after LI-ESWT in the animal studies.

Conclusion

LI-ESWT, as a non-invasive treatment, reduces the pathological manifestations (inflammation, capillary rarefaction, fibrosis, decreased perfusion) associated with certain types of renal disease. The efficacy of renal LI-ESWT needs to be confirmed in randomized clinical trials.

The Angiogenesis Inhibitor Isthmin-1 (ISM1) Is Overexpressed in Experimental Models of Glomerulopathy and Impairs the Viability of Podocytes

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a major cause of end-stage renal disease and remains without specific treatment. To identify new events during FSGS progression, we used an experimental model of FSGS associated with nephroangiosclerosis in rats injected with L-NAME (N_ω-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester). After transcriptomic analysis we focused our study on the role of Isthmin-1 (ISM1, an anti-angiogenic protein involved in endothelial cell apoptosis. We studied the renal expression of ISM1 in L-NAME rats and other models of proteinuria, particularly at the glomerular level. In the L-NAME model, withdrawal of the stimulus partially restored basal ISM1 levels, along with an improvement in renal function. In other four animal models of proteinuria, ISM1 was overexpressed and localized in podocytes while the renal function was degraded. Together these facts suggest that the glomerular expression of ISM1 correlates directly with the progression-recovery of the disease. Further in vitro experiments demonstrated that ISM1 co-localized with its receptors GRP78 and integrin αvβ5 on podocytes. Treatment of human podocytes with low doses of recombinant ISM1 decreased cell viability and induced caspase activation. Stronger ISM1 stimuli in podocytes dropped mitochondrial membrane potential and induced nuclear translocation of apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF). Our results suggest that ISM1 participates in the progression of glomerular diseases and promotes podocyte apoptosis in two different complementary ways: one caspase-dependent and one caspase-independent associated with mitochondrial destabilization.

Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in the Treatment of Nonunion in Long Bones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Nonunion is one of the most challenging problems in the field of orthopedics. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of nonunion in long bones. Methods: We conducted a search of three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) and found 646 total publications, of which 23 met our inclusion criteria. Results: Out of 1200 total long bone nonunions, 876 (73%) healed after being treated with ESWT. Hypertrophic cases achieved 3-fold higher healing rates when compared to oligotrophic or atrophic cases (p = 0.003). Metatarsal bones were the most receptive to ESWT, achieving a healing rate of 90%, followed by tibiae (75.54%), femurs (66.9%) and humeri (63.9%). Short periods between injury and treatment lead to higher healing rates (p < 0.02). Conversely, 6 months of follow-up after the treatment appears to be too brief to evaluate the full healing potential of the treatment; several studies showed that healing rates continued to increase at follow-ups beyond 6 months after the last ESWT treatment (p < 0.01). Conclusions: ESWT is a promising approach for treating nonunions. At present, a wide range of treatment protocols are used, and more research is needed to determine which protocols are the most effective.

Low-Intensity Shockwave Therapy (LI-ESWT) in Diabetic Kidney Disease: Results from an Open-Label Interventional Clinical Trial

Purpose

Treatment with low-intensity shockwave therapy (LI-ESWT) is associated with angiogenesis and is suggested as a treatment for different types of vascular diseases. It was hypothesized that LI-ESWT improves the renal filtration barrier and halts the progression of GFR decline in diabetic kidney disease (DKD) potentially through VEGF and NO formation. We present the first data on LI-ESWT in human DKD.

Methods

The study was designed as an interventional, prospective, one-arm, Phase 1 study. We investigated change in GFR and albuminuria in 28 patients with DKD treated with six sessions of LI-ESWT over three weeks. The patients were followed for six months. Urine excretion of kidney injury markers, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and nitric oxide metabolites (NOx) was studied after LI-ESWT.

Results

There were no significant changes in GFR and albuminuria up to six months after LI-ESWT compared to baseline. Urine VEGF was transiently reduced one month after LI-ESWT, but there were no other significant changes in urine VEGF or NOx after LI-ESWT. Secondary analysis showed that NOx increased after LI-ESWT in patients who had low levels of NOx at baseline. Kidney injury marker trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) increased acutely after the first session of LI-ESWT indicating transient endothelial repair. Other markers of kidney injury were stable in relation to LI-ESWT.

Conclusion

LI-ESWT treatment did not significantly improve kidney function and albumin excretion. It is concluded that LI-ESWT is not harmful. A randomized blinded study should be performed to clarify whether adjunctive treatment with LI-ESWT is superior to standard treatment of DKD.

The Basic Science Behind Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Scoping Review of Pre-Clinical Studies

INTRODUCTION

Despite recent promising clinical results, the underlying mechanism of action of low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (Li-ESWT) for erectile dysfunction (ED) is mostly unclear and currently under investigation.

AIM

To systematically identify and evaluate evidence regarding the basic science behind Li-ESWT for ED, discuss and propose a putative mechanism of action, address the limitations, and imply insights for further investigation in the field.

METHODS

Using Cochrane's methodologic recommendations on scoping studies and systematic reviews, we conducted a systematic scoping review of the literature on experimental research regarding Li-ESWT for ED and other pathologic conditions. The initial systematic search was carried between January and November 2017, with 2 additional searches in April and August 2018. All studies that applied shockwave treatment at an energy flux density >0.25 mJ/mm² were excluded from the final analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

We primarily aimed to clarify the biological responses in erectile tissue after Li-ESWT that could lead to improvement in erectile function.

RESULTS

59 publications were selected for inclusion in this study. 15 experimental research articles were identified on Li-ESWT for ED and 44 on Li-ESWT for other pathologic conditions. Li-ESWT for ED seems to improve erectile function possibly through stimulation of mechanosensors, inducing the activation of neoangiogenesis processes, recruitment and activation of progenitor cells, improving microcirculation, nerve regeneration, remodeling of erectile tissue, and reducing inflammatory and cellular stress responses.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Improving our understanding of the mechanism of action of Li-ESWT for ED can help us improve our study designs, as well as suggest new avenues of investigation.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

A common limitation in all these studies is the heterogeneity of the shockwave treatment application and protocol.

CONCLUSION

Li-ESWT for ED, based on current experimental studies, seems to improve erectile function by inducing angiogenesis and reversing pathologic processes in erectile tissue. These studies provide preliminary insights, but no definitive answers, and many questions remain unanswered regarding the mechanism of action, as well as the ideal treatment protocol. Sokolakis I, Dimitriadis F, Teo P, et al. The Basic Science Behind Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Scoping Review of Pre-Clinical Studies. J Sex Med 2019;16:168-194.

A novel bimodal approach for treating atrophic bone non-unions with extracorporeal shockwaves and autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplant

We propose a novel approach for the treatment of atrophic bone non-unions via parallel applications of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and an autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplant. The hypothesis resides on the potentiality of shock waves (SWs) to act as a tool for manipulating the patient's mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). In addition to the conventional physical stimulus achieved by delivering SWs at the site of non-union to stimulate the well-known trophic effects on bone tissue, a series of concomitant ESWT would be administered in tandem at a bone marrow donor site, such as the iliac crest, to precondition resident bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) in vivo, priming resident MSCs by enlarging and conditioning their population prior to bone marrow aspiration. The resulting sample could then be treated to further augment cell concentration and injected, under fluoroscopic control, into the non-union site through a percutaneous approach.

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy does not improve hypertensive nephropathy

Low-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy (SWT) has been shown to improve myocardial dysfunction, hind limb ischemia, erectile function, and to facilitate cell therapy and healing process. These therapeutic effects were mainly due to promoting angiogenesis. Since chronic kidney diseases are characterized by renal fibrosis and capillaries rarefaction, they may benefit from a proangiogenic treatment. The objective of our study was to determine whether SWT could ameliorate renal repair and favor angiogenesis in L-NAME-induced hypertensive nephropathy in rats. SWT was started when proteinuria exceeded 1 g/mmol of creatinine and 1 week after L-NAME removal. SWT consisted of implying 0.09 mJ/mm(2) (400 shots), 3 times per week. After 4 weeks of SWT, blood pressure, renal function and urinary protein excretion did not differ between treated (LN + SWT) and untreated rats (LN). Histological lesions including glomerulosclerosis and arteriolosclerosis scores, tubular dilatation and interstitial fibrosis were similar in both groups. In addition, peritubular capillaries and eNOS, VEGF, VEGF-R, SDF-1 gene expressions did not increase in SWT-treated compared to untreated animals. No procedural complications or adverse effects were observed in control (C + SWT) and hypertensive rats (LN + SWT). These results suggest that extracorporeal kidney shock wave therapy does not induce angiogenesis and does not improve renal function and structure, at least in the model of hypertensive nephropathy although the treatment is well tolerated.