The effect of water immersion and acute hypercapnia on ventilatory sensitivity and cerebrovascular reactivity

The independent effects of hydrostatic pressure and hypercapnic breathing during water immersion on ventilatory sensitivity and cerebrovascular reactivity

Head-out water immersion (HOWI) induces ventilatory and hemodynamic changes, which may be a result of hydrostatic pressure, augmented arterial CO2 tension, or a combination of both. We hypothesized that the hydrostatic pressure and elevated CO2 tension that occur during HOWI will contribute to an augmented ventilatory sensitivity to CO2 and an attenuated cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2 during water immersion. Twelve subjects [age: 24 ± 3 yr, body mass index (BMI): 25 ± 3 kg/m2] completed HOWI, waist water immersion with CO2 (WWI + CO2), and WWI, where a rebreathing test was conducted at baseline, 10, 30, and 60 min, and postimmersion. End-tidal pressure of carbon dioxide ([Formula: see text]), minute ventilation, expired gases, blood pressure, heart rate, and middle cerebral artery blood velocity were recorded continuously. [Formula: see text] increased throughout all visits (P ≤ 0.011), was similar during HOWI and WWI + CO2 (P ≥ 0.264), and was greater during WWI + CO2 versus WWI at 10, 30, and 60 min (P < 0.001). When HOWI vs. WWI + CO2 were compared, the change in ventilatory sensitivity to CO2 was different at 10 (0.59 ± 0.34 vs. 0.06 ± 0.23 L/min/mmHg; P < 0.001), 30 (0.58 ± 0.46 vs. 0.15 ± 0.25 L/min/mmHg; P < 0.001), and 60 min (0.63 ± 0.45 vs. 0.16 ± 0.34 L/min/mmHg; P < 0.001), whereas there were no differences between conditions for cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2 (P ≥ 0.163). When WWI + CO2 versus WWI were compared, ventilatory sensitivity to CO2 was not different between conditions (P ≥ 0.642), whereas the change in cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2 was different at 30 min (-0.56 ± 0.38 vs. -0.30 ± 0.25 cm/s/mmHg; P = 0.010). These data indicate that during HOWI, ventilatory sensitivity to CO2 increases due to the hydrostatic pressure, whereas cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2 decreases due to the combined effects of immersion.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Although not fully elucidated, the ventilatory and hemodynamic alterations during water immersion appear to be a result of the combined effects of immersion (i.e., elevated [Formula: see text], central hypervolemia, increased cerebral perfusion, increased work of breathing, etc.). Our findings demonstrate that an augmented ventilatory sensitivity to CO2 during immersion may be due to the hydrostatic pressure across the chest wall, whereas an attenuated cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2 may be due to the combined effects of immersion.

Cool head-out water immersion does not alter cerebrovascular reactivity to hypercapnia despite elevated middle cerebral artery blood velocity: A pilot study

Episodic increases in cerebral blood flow (CBF) are thought to contribute to improved cerebrovascular function and health. Head-out water immersion (HOWI) may be a useful modality to increase CBF secondary to the hydrostatic pressure placed on the body. However, it is unclear whether water temperatures common to the general public elicit similar cerebrovascular responses. We tested the hypothesis that mean middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAvmean) and cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2 (CVRCO2) would be higher during an acute bout of thermoneutral (TN; 35°C) vs. cool (COOL; 25°C) HOWI. Ten healthy participants (age: 23±3 y; 4 women) completed two randomized HOWI visits. Right MCAvmean, end-tidal CO2 (PETCO2) mean arterial pressure (MAP), and MCA conductance (MCAvmean/MAP) were continuously recorded. CVRCO2 was assessed using a stepped hypercapnia protocol before (PRE), at 30 minutes of HOWI (HOWI), immediately after HOWI (POST-1), and 45 minutes after HOWI (POST-2). Absolute values are reported as mean ± SD. MCAvmean, PETCO2, MAP, and CVRCO2 were not different between conditions at any timepoint (all P≥0.17). In COOL, MCAvmean increased from PRE (61±9 cm/s) during HOWI (68±11 cm/s), at POST-1 (69±11 cm/s), and POST-2 (72±8 cm/s) (all P<0.01), and in TN from PRE to POST-1 (66±13 vs. 71±14 cm/s; P = 0.05). PETCO2 did not change over time in either condition. In COOL, MAP increased from PRE (85±5 mmHg) during HOWI (101±4 mmHg), at POST-1 (97±7 mmHg), and POST-2 (96±9 mmHg), and in TN from PRE (88±5 mmHg) at HOWI (98±7 mmHg) and POST-1 (99±8 mmHg) (all P<0.01). In COOL, CVRCO2 increased from PRE to HOWI (1.66±0.55 vs. 1.92±0.52 cm/s/mmHg; P = 0.04). MCA conductance was not different between or within conditions. These data indicate that 30 minutes of cool HOWI augments MCAvmean and that the increase in MCAvmean persists beyond cool HOWI. However, cool HOWI does not alter CVRCO2 in healthy young adults.

Perceptual and Ventilatory Responses to Hypercapnia in Athletes and Sedentary Individuals

Purpose

Hypercapnic chemosensitivity traditionally captures the ventilatory response to elevated pressures of carbon dioxide in the blood. However, hypercapnia also contributes to subjective breathing perceptions, and previously we demonstrated a closer matching of perception to changes in ventilation in athletes compared to controls. Here we investigated any potential underlying hypercapnic chemosensitivity differences between groups, and explored whether these measures relate to ventilatory and perceptual responses during exercise as well as trait levels of affect.

Methods

A hypercapnic challenge, incremental maximal exercise test and affective questionnaires were completed by 20 endurance athletes and 20 age-/sex-matched sedentary controls. The hypercapnic challenge involved elevating end-tidal PCO₂ by 0.8% (6.1 mmHg) and 1.5% (11.2 mmHg) for 3 min each (randomised), with constant end-tidal oxygen. Ventilatory and perceptual responses to hypercapnia were compared between groups, and within each group the relationships between hypercapnic chemosensitivity (slope analyses) and exercising ventilation and perceptions were calculated using Spearman’s non-parametric correlations.

Results

While absolute ventilation differences during hypercapnia and exercise were observed, no group differences were found across hypercapnic chemosensitivity (slope) measures. Correlation analyses revealed the anxiety hypercapnic response was related to maximal exercise anxiety, but only in sedentary individuals.

Conclusion

Ventilatory and perceptual hypercapnic chemosensitivity do not differ between athletes and sedentary individuals. However, ventilatory and anxiety hypercapnic chemosensitivities were related to ventilatory and anxiety responses during exercise in untrained individuals only. Athletes may employ additional strategies during exercise to reduce the influence of chemosensitivity on ventilatory and perceptual responses.

Hot head-out water immersion does not acutely alter dynamic cerebral autoregulation or cerebrovascular reactivity to hypercapnia

Recurring hot head-out water immersion (HOWI) enhances peripheral vascular function and cerebral blood velocity during non-immersion conditions. However, it is unknown if an acute bout of hot HOWI alters cerebrovascular function. Using two experimental studies, we tested the hypotheses that dynamic cerebral autoregulation (dCA) and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) are improved during an acute bout of hot (HOT; 39 °C) vs. thermoneutral (TN; 35 °C) HOWI. Eighteen healthy participants (eight females) completed the dCA study, and 14 participants (6 females) completed the CVR study. Both studies consisted of two randomized (TNdCA vs. HOTdCA; TNCVR vs. HOTCVR) 45minute HOWI visits. Middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAvmean) was continuously recorded. dCA was assessed using a respiratory impedance device and analyzed via transfer gain and phase in the low-frequency band. CVR was assessed using stepped hypercapnia. Assessments were completed PRE and 30 minutes into HOWI. Values are reported as a change (Δ) from PRE (mean ± SD). There were no differences at PRE for either study. ΔMCAvmean was greater in TNdCA (TNdCA: 4 ± 4 vs. HOTdCA: -3 ± 5 cm/s; P < 0.01) and TNCVR (TNCVR: 5 ± 4 vs. HOTCVR: -1 ± 6 cm/s; P < 0.01) during HOWI. ΔGain was greater in HOTdCA during HOWI (TNdCA: -0.09 ± 0.15 vs. HOTdCA: 0.10 ± 0.17 cm/s/mmHg; P = 0.04). ΔPhase (P > 0.84) and ΔCVR (P > 0.94) were not different between conditions. These data indicate that hot and thermoneutral water immersion do not acutely alter cerebrovascular function in healthy, young adults.

Comparative effects of water- and land-based combined exercise training in hypertensive older adults

OBJECTIVES

A randomized controlled trial was designed to compare water- and land-based combined (aerobic and resistance) exercise training programs on cardiometabolic parameters, functional fitness, and quality-of-life (QoL) in hypertensive older adults.

METHODS

Fifty-three participants were divided into three groups: 1) land-based exercise group (LET, n=17), 2) water-based exercise group (WET, n=16), and 3) control group (CON, n=20). All programs comprised of a 12-week supervised training program (three 1-hr sessions per week), followed by a 12-week self-supervised training program. Blood pressure (BP), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), total nitrite/nitrate (NOx-), malondialdehyde (MDA), high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), blood lipids, functional fitness, and QoL were assessed before and after each period.

RESULTS

Following the supervised period, systolic BP, rate-pressure product, GPx, NOx-, MDA, hs-CRP concentrations, physical and psychological domains, and overall QoL significantly improved in both training groups. Only the WET improved LDL-C and lipoprotein combine index. Meanwhile, the 30s chair-stand test and 2-min step test improved only in the LET. Succeeding the self-supervised period, systolic BP and NOx- concentration significantly improved in both training groups. Notwithstanding, the 30s chair-standing and arm curl tests improved only in the LET.

CONCLUSIONS

Both training programs rendered ameliorated systolic BP, antioxidant capacity and inflammation, muscular strength, aerobic endurance and QoL with a higher progression in the LET. Nevertheless, metabolic variables were greater improved in the WET. Additionally, due to greater exercise participation, the WET program may be a useful tool in motivating hypertensive older adults to continuously exercise on their own.

Carotid body chemosensitivity at 1.6 ATA breathing air versus 100% oxygen

Hyperoxia reduces the ventilatory response to hypercapnia by suppressing carotid body (CB) activation. This effect may contribute to CO₂ retention during underwater diving due to the high arterial O₂ content associated with hyperbaria. We tested the hypothesis that CB chemosensitivity to hypercapnia and hypoxia is attenuated during hyperbaria. Ten subjects completed two, 4-h dry dives at 1.6 atmosphere absolute (ATA) breathing either 21% O₂ (Air) or 100% O₂ (100% O₂). CB chemosensitivity was assessed using brief hypercapnic ventilatory response ([Formula: see text]) and hypoxic ventilatory response ([Formula: see text]) tests predive, 75 and 155 min into the dives, and 15 and 55 min postdive. End-tidal CO₂ pressure increased during the dive at 75 and 155 min [Air: +9 (SD 4) mmHg and +8 (SD 4) mmHg versus 100% O₂: +6 (SD 4) mmHg and +5 (SD 3) mmHg; all P < 0.01] and was higher while breathing Air (P < 0.01). [Formula: see text] was unchanged during the dive (P = 0.73) and was not different between conditions (P = 0.47). However, [Formula: see text] was attenuated from predive during the dive at 155 min breathing Air [-0.035 (SD 0.037) L·min·mmHg^-1; P = 0.02] and at both time points while breathing 100% O₂ [-0.035 (SD 0.052) L·min·mmHg^-1 and -0.034 (SD 0.064) L·min·mmHg^-1; P = 0.02 and P = 0.02, respectively]. These data indicate that the CB chemoreceptors do not appear to contribute to CO₂ retention in hyperbaria.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrate that carotid body chemosensitivity to brief exposures of hypercapnia was unchanged during a 4-h dive in a dry hyperbaric chamber at 1.6 ATA regardless of breathing gas condition [i.e., air (21% O₂) versus 100% oxygen]. Therefore, it appears that an attenuation of carotid body chemosensitivity to hypercapnia does not contribute to CO₂ retention in hyperbaria.

Unchanged cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity and hypercapnic ventilatory response during strict head-down tilt bed rest in a mild hypercapnic environment

KEY POINTS

Carbon dioxide levels are mildly elevated on the International Space Station and it is unknown whether this chronic exposure causes physiological changes to astronauts. We combined ∼4 mmHg ambient P C O 2 with the strict head-down tilt bed rest model of spaceflight and this led to the development of optic disc oedema in one-half of the subjects. We demonstrate no change in arterialized P C O 2 , cerebrovascular reactivity to CO₂ or the hypercapnic ventilatory response. Our data suggest that the mild hypercapnic environment does not contribute to the development of spaceflight associated neuro-ocular syndrome.

ABSTRACT

Chronically elevated carbon dioxide (CO₂ ) levels can occur in confined spaces such as the International Space Station. Using the spaceflight analogue 30 days of strict 6° head-down tilt bed rest (HDTBR) in a mild hypercapnic environment ( P C O 2 = ∼4 mmHg), we investigated arterialized P C O 2 , cerebrovascular reactivity and the hypercapnic ventilatory response in 11 healthy subjects (five females) before, on days 1, 9, 15 and 30 of bed rest (BR), and 6 and 13 days after HDTBR. During all HDTBR time points, arterialized P C O 2 was not significantly different from the pre-HDTBR measured in the 6° HDT posture, with a mean (95% confidence interval) increase of 1.2 mmHg (-0.2 to 2.5 mmHg, P = 0.122) on day 30 of HDTBR. Respiratory acidosis was never detected, although a mild metabolic alkalosis developed on day 30 of HDTBR by a mean (95% confidence interval) pH change of 0.032 (0.022-0.043; P < 0.001), which remained elevated by 0.021 (0.011-0.031; P < 0.001) 6 days after HDTBR. Arterialized pH returned to pre-HDTBR levels 13 days after BR with a change of -0.001 (-0.009 to 0.007; P = 0.991). Compared to pre-HDTBR, cerebrovascular reactivity during and after HDTBR did not change. Baseline ventilation, ventilatory recruitment threshold and the slope of the ventilatory response were similar between pre-HDTBR and all other time points. Taken together, these data suggest that the mildly increased ambient P C O 2 combined with 30 days of strict 6° HDTBR did not change arterialized P C O 2 levels. Therefore, the experimental conditions were not sufficient to elicit a detectable physiological response.

Swimming-related effects on cerebrovascular and cognitive function

Both acute and regular exercise influence vascular and cognitive function. Upright aquatic exercise increases mean middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAvmean ) and has been suggested as favorable for cerebrovascular adaptations. However, MCAvmean has not been reported during swimming. Thus, we examined the cerebrovascular and cognitive effects of swimming. Ten land-based athletes (22 ± 5 years) and eight swimmers (19 ± 1 years) completed three cognitive tasks and four conditions that were used to independently and collectively delineate the swimming-related factors (i.e., posture, immersion, CO2 retention [end-tidal CO2 ; PETCO2 ], and motor involvement). Measurements of MCAvmean and PETCO2 were taken throughout each condition. Prone posture increased MCAvmean by 11% (P < 0.01 vs. upright land). Water immersion independently increased MCAvmean when upright (12%; P < 0.01) but not prone (P = 0.76). The consequent rise in PETCO2 during head-out, breast-stroke swimming (50% heart rate range) independently increased MCAvmean by 14% (P < 0.01), while the motor involvement of swimming per se did not significantly change MCAvmean (P = 0.32). While accounting for sex, swimmers had ~17% lower MCAvmean during all rest conditions (P ≤ 0.05). However, in a subset of participants, both groups had similar internal carotid artery diameters (P = 0.99) and velocities (P = 0.97). Water immersion per se did not alter cognition (P ≥ 0.15), but 20 min of moderate-intensity swimming improved visuomotor performance by 4% (P = 0.03), regardless of athlete group (P = 0.12). In conclusion, breast-stroke swimming increased MCAvmean mostly due to postural and PETCO2 effects, with minimal contributions from water immersion or motor activity. Lastly, swimming improved cognitive functioning acutely, regardless of athlete group. Future research should explore the chronic effects of swimming on cerebrovascular function and cognition, particularly in aging.