Portal vein arterialization as a salvage procedure in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: a systematic review

Portal Vein Arterialization as a Lifesaving Strategy for Hepatic Artery Injury in Robotic Hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Robotic vascular resection and reconstruction is a challenging procedure. Portal vein arterialization (PVA) can offer an efficient solution in those cases in which the hepatic artery cannot be reconstructed.1.Can J Surg 64:e173-e182;2.The Paul Brousse Hospital Experience. HPB (Oxford) 16:723-738;3.J Am Coll Surg 207:e1-6; PVA increases oxygen supply to the remaining part of the liver, promotes liver regeneration, and prevents liver failure.Majlesara A, Golriz M, Ramouz A, et al. Portal vein arterialization as a salvage method in advanced hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. Br J Surg. 2024;111. In this multimedia article, we describe a patient who was treated with PVA for a robotic hepatic artery injury during robotic left-liver-first anterior radical modular orthotopic right hemihepatectomy (Rob-Larmorth).5.Ann Surg Oncol 31:5636-5637 METHODS: A 52-year-old male patient was admitted with epigastric pain. Further imaging showed intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma involving the root of the right anterior branch of the portal vein. Following multidisciplinary consultation, surgical resection was recommended as the primary approach. The robotic technique was chosen in this operation, with preoperative anticipation of needing Rob-Larmorth. Unfortunately, the left hepatic artery sustained unintended damage during skeletonization of the duodenal ligaments. Anastomosis could not be performed due to severe damage to the distal end intima. We utilized PVA technology to anastomose the hepatic artery to the portal vein. Finally, Rob-Larmorth and PVA were successfully performed.

RESULTS

The surgery took 490 min and the estimated blood loss was approximately 300 mL. No blood transfusion was performed. Postoperatively, the patient recovered smoothly without liver failure, although percutaneous drainage was required due to bile leakage. Pathological examination revealed moderately to poorly differentiated bile duct cell carcinoma (T2N0M0, stage II). No recurrence was observed during the 12-month follow-up.

DISCUSSION

PVA can be an effective solution when no other revascularization options are available. Implementing PVA as a bridging procedure increases oxygen delivery to the remnant liver, facilitating regeneration and reducing the risk of liver failure. The development of arterial collaterals is a significant concern for individuals undergoing PVA. Complications reported after PVA include early shunt thrombosis, portal hypertension, and a notable 90-day mortality rate.1.Can J Surg 64:e173-e182 However, Majlesara and colleagues found no evidence of postoperative liver damage associated with PVA. They also reported low morbidity rates and no associated mortality for both one- and two-stage embolization of the arterioportal shunt.Majlesara A, Golriz M, Ramouz A, et al. Portal vein arterialization as a salvage method in advanced hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. Br J Surg. 2024;111.

CONCLUSIONS

PVA can offer an effective solution when hepatic artery reconstruction is not feasible.

Postoperative Management of Portal Vein Arterialization: An Interdisciplinary Institutional Approach

Portal vein arterialization (PVA) is a surgical procedure that plays a crucial role in hepatic vascular salvage when hepatic artery flow restoration remains elusive. Dedicated diagnostic vascular imaging and the timely management of PVA shunts are paramount to preventing complications, such as portal hypertension and thrombosis. Regrettably, a lack of standardized postoperative management protocols for PVA has increased morbidity and mortality rates post-procedure. In response to this challenge, we developed a PVA standard operating procedure (SOP) tailored to the needs of interventional radiologists. This SOP is designed to harmonize postoperative care, fostering scientific comparability across cases. This concise brief report aims to offer radiologists valuable insights into the PVA technique and considerations for post-PVA care and foster effective interdisciplinary collaboration.

Portal vein arterialization in 25 liver transplant recipients: A Latin American single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Portal vein arterialization (PVA) has been used in liver transplantation (LT) to maximize oxygen delivery when arterial circulation is compromised or has been used as an alternative reperfusion technique for complex portal vein thrombosis (PVT). The effect of PVA on portal perfusion and primary graft dysfunction (PGD) has not been assessed.

AIM

To examine the outcomes of patients who required PVA in correlation with their LT procedure.

METHODS

All patients receiving PVA and LT at the Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota between 2011 and 2022 were analyzed. To account for the time-sensitive effects of graft perfusion, patients were classified into two groups: prereperfusion (pre-PVA), if the arterioportal anastomosis was performed before graft revascularization, and postreperfusion (post-PVA), if PVA was performed afterward. The pre-PVA rationale contemplated poor portal hemodynamics, severe vascular steal, or PVT. Post-PVA was considered if graft hypoperfusion became evident. Conservative interventions were attempted before PVA.

RESULTS

A total of 25 cases were identified: 15 before and 10 after graft reperfusion. Pre-PVA patients were more affected by diabetes, decompensated cirrhosis, impaired portal vein (PV) hemodynamics, and PVT. PGD was less common after pre-PVA (20.0% vs 60.0%) (P = 0.041). Those who developed PGD had a smaller increase in PV velocity (25.00 cm/s vs 73.42 cm/s) (P = 0.036) and flow (1.31 L/min vs 3.34 L/min) (P = 0.136) after arterialization. Nine patients required PVA closure (median time: 62 d). Pre-PVA and non-PGD cases had better survival rates than their counterparts (56.09 months vs 22.77 months and 54.15 months vs 31.91 months, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This is the largest report presenting PVA in LT. Results suggest that pre-PVA provides better graft perfusion than post-PVA. Graft hyperperfusion could play a protective role against PGD.

Controlled flow reduction of an iliacoportal shunt graft for portal vein arterialization in a pediatric patient

Portal vein arterialization is a rarely used, temporary surgical salvage solution to prevent biliary and hepatic ischemia and necrosis in acute liver de-arterialization. However, it can induce portal hypertension, causing increased morbidity and mortality. We report the case of a 5-year-old girl with portal hypertension and right ventricle volume overload following the creation of an iliacoportal shunt graft for portal vein arterialization due to vessel-adhering neuroblastoma. Partial shunt graft closure was accomplished by placing a stent graft in an hourglass configuration via the right femoral artery using two slender-sheaths in a line with the second more distal than the first. Subsequently, the patient's symptoms of right ventricle volume overload and portal hypertension decreased. In conclusion, endovascular reduction of elevated portal blood flow after portal vein arterialization is feasible, even in pediatric patients.

Portal vein arterialization: a possibility in cholangiocarcinomas infiltrating the right hepatic artery?

Portal vein arterialization (PVA) in advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an emerging field of study too little explored despite its potential oncological results. Still to this day, advanced CCA, including peri-hilar (pCCA) and distal (dCCA) CCA, represents a surgical challenge. At diagnosis, CCA is typically associated with extensive infiltration of hilar structures often requiring extended liver and vascular resections that lead to technically complex biliary reconstructions and vascular anastomosis. The rationale behind such radical surgery is to ensure complete tumor resection, with negative margins at final pathology, which remains the only potential curative option. In this scenario, we report a case of advanced CCA, originating from the cysto-choledocal junction, encasing the extrahepatic course of the right hepatic artery (RHA) in which right PVA was carried out to obtain free tumor margins. Considering the technical impossibility to perform a right trisectionectomy due to inadequate future remnant liver (FRL) volume, PVA represented a turning point in the surgical planning of the case. The encouraging postoperative clinical outcomes suggest that PVA should be considered as a valid rescue option to preserve liver inflow in case of locally aggressive HPB malignancies that require extensive resection of the hepatic artery or its branches. This surgical technique can offer an efficient solution in those cases in which the RHA cannot be reconstructed due to its caliber or due to an early subdivision into the right sectorial branches.

Does Arterialization of Portal Vein Have Any Effects in Large-for-Size Liver Transplantation? Hemodynamic, Histological, and Biomolecular Experimental Studies

BACKGROUND

In pediatric liver transplantation, the optimal size of the transplanted liver ranges between 0.8% and 4.0% of the recipient's weight. Sometimes, the graft weight exceeds this upper limit, characterizing the large-for-size condition potentially associated with reduced blood flow and worsening of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Therefore, it would be beneficial to increase the portal flow through arterialization of the portal vein. Materials and methods: Fifteen pigs underwent large-for-size liver transplants. They were divided into two groups: control (CTRL 6 animals - conventional technique) and arterialization - a shunt was established between the portal vein and the splenic artery (ART 9 animals). Hemodynamic, biochemical, histological, and molecular variables were compared. Results: Arterialization resulted in a significant increase in portal vein pressure but no changes in other hemodynamic variables, as shown in the analysis of variance. It was observed lower ALT values (p = 0.007), with no differences regarding the values of blood pH and lactate (p = 0.54 and p = 0.699 respectively) or histological variables (edema, steatosis, inflammation, necrosis, and IRI - p = 1.0, p = 0.943, p = 0.174, p = 0.832, p = 0.662, respectively). The molecular studies showed significantly increased expression of IL6 after 3 hours of reperfusion (p = 0.048) and decreased expression of ICAM immediately after reperfusion (p = 0.03). The regression analysis suggested a positive influence of portal flow and pressure on biochemical parameters. Conclusion: Arterialization of the portal vein showed no histological, biochemical, or molecular benefits in large-for-size transplantation.