These boots weren't made for walking: tarsal tunnel syndrome

Ganglia-Induced Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Tarsal tunnel syndrome (TTS) is a common entrapment neuropathy that is sometimes elicited by ganglia in the tarsal tunnel.

METHODS

Between August 2020 and July 2022, we operated on 117 sides with TTS. This retrospective study examined data from 8 consecutive patients (8 sides: 5 men, 3 women; average age 67.8 years) with an extraneural ganglion in the tarsal tunnel. We investigated the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes for these patients.

RESULTS

The mass was palpable through the skin in 1 patient, detected intraoperatively in 1 patient, and visualized on MRI scanning in the other 6 patients. Symptoms involved the medial plantar nerve area (n = 5), lateral plantar nerve area (n = 1), and medial and lateral plantar nerve areas (n = 2). The interval between symptom onset and surgery ranged from 4 to 168 months. Adhesion between large (≥20 mm) ganglia and surrounding tissue and nerves was observed intraoperatively in 4 patients. Of the 8 patients, 7 underwent total ganglion resection. There were no surgery-related complications. On their last postoperative visit, 3 patients with a duration of symptoms not exceeding 10 months reported favorable outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Because ganglia eliciting TTS are often undetectable by skin palpation, imaging studies may be necessary. Early surgical intervention appears to yield favorable outcomes.

Endoscopic Ganglionectomy of the Tarsal Tunnel: A Medial Approach

A ganglion inside the tarsal tunnel can compress the tibial nerve, leading to posterior tarsal tunnel syndrome. Classically, the ganglion is resected with an open approach. This requires release of the flexor retinaculum and dissection around the tibial neurovascular bundle, which may induce fibrosis around the tibial nerve. Endoscopic resection of a tarsal tunnel ganglion via a posterior approach has been reported. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe the medial approach of endoscopic ganglionectomy of the tarsal tunnel. This is indicated for tarsal tunnel ganglia compressing the tibial nerve and extending to the flexor retinaculum. It is contraindicated if there is other pathology of the tarsal tunnel that demands open surgery; the ganglion compresses the tibial nerve from its deep side and does not extend to the flexor retinaculum; or in the presence of intraneural ganglion of the tibial nerve.

Endoscopic Resection of the Tarsal Tunnel Ganglion

The tarsal tunnel ganglion is a cause of posterior tarsal tunnel syndrome. Open resection of the ganglion calls for release of the flexor retinaculum and dissection around the tibial neurovascular bundle. This can induce fibrosis around the tibial nerve. We report the technique of endoscopic resection of the tarsal tunnel ganglion. It is indicated for tarsal tunnel ganglia arising from the adjacent joints or tendon sheaths and compressing the tibial nerve from its deep side. It is contraindicated if there is other pathology of the tarsal tunnel that demands open surgery; if the ganglion compresses the tibial nerve from its superficial side, which calls for a different endoscopic approach using the ganglion portal; or if an intraneural ganglion of the tibial nerve is present. The purpose of this technical note is to describe a minimally invasive approach for endoscopic resection of the tarsal tunnel ganglion.

Clinical utility of tibial motor and sensory nerve conduction studies with motor recording from the flexor hallucis brevis: a methodological and reliability study

Background

Standard tibial motor nerve conduction measures are established with recording from the abductor hallucis. This technique is often technically challenging and clinicians have difficulty interpreting the information particularly in the short segment needed to assess focal tibial nerve entrapment at the medial ankle as occurs in posterior tarsal tunnel syndrome. The flexor hallucis brevis (FHB) has been described as an alternative site for recording tibial nerve function in those with posterior tarsal tunnel syndrome. Normative data has not been established for this technique. This pilot study describes the technique in detail. In addition we provide reference values for medial and lateral plantar orthodromic sensory measures and assessed intrarater reliability for all measures.

Methods

Eighty healthy female participants took part, and 39 returned for serial testing at 4 time points. Mean values ± SD were recorded for nerve conduction measures, and coefficient of variation as well as intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated.

Results

Motor latency, amplitude and velocity values for the FHB were 4.1 ± 0.9 msec, 8.0 ± 3.0 mV and 45.6 ± 3.4 m/s, respectively. Sensory latencies, amplitudes, and velocities, respectively, were 2.8 ± 0.3 msec, 26.7 ± 10.1 μV, and 41.4 ± 3.5 m/s for the medial plantar nerve and 3.2 ± 0.5 msec, 13.3 ± 4.7 μV, and 44.3 ± 4.0 msec for the lateral plantar nerve. All values demonstrated significant ICC values (P ≤ 0.007).

Conclusion

Motor recording from the FHB provides technically clear waveforms that allow for an improved ability to assess tibial nerve function in the short segments used to assess tarsal tunnel syndrome. The reported means will begin to establish normal values for this technique.