Thyroid stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) in Graves' disease

Thyrotrophin receptor antibody concentration and activity, several years after treatment for Graves' disease

OBJECTIVE

TSH receptor antibodies (TRAb) are responsible for autoimmune hyperthyroid disease (Graves' disease; GD) with TRAb levels tending to decrease following treatment. Measurement of TRAb activity during follow-up could prove valuable to better understand treatment effectiveness.

STUDY DESIGN

TRAb concentration and stimulating (TSAb) and blocking (TSBAb) activity of patient serum were assessed following different treatment modalities and follow-up length.

METHODS

Sixty-six subjects were recruited following treatment with carbimazole (n = 26), radioiodine (n = 27) or surgery (n = 13). TRAb, TPOAb, TgAb and GADAb were measured at a follow-up visit as well as bioassays of TSAb and TSBAb activity.

RESULTS

Forty-five per cent of all patients remained TRAb-positive for more than one year and 23% for more than 5 years after diagnosis, irrespective of treatment method. Overall, TRAb concentration fell from a median (IQR) of 6.25 (3.9-12.7) to 0.65 (0.38-3.2) U/L. Surgery conferred the largest fall in TRAb concentration from 11.4 (6.7-29) to 0.58 (0.4-1.4) U/L. Seventy per cent of TRAb-positive patients were positive for TSAb, and one patient (3%) was positive for TSBAb. TRAb and TSAb correlated well (r = 0.83). In addition, 38/66 patients were TgAb-positive, 47/66 were TPOAb-positive and 6/66 were GADAb-positive at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

TRAb levels generally decreased after treatment but persisted for over 5 years in some patients. TRAb activity was predominantly stimulatory, with only one patient demonstrating TSBAb. A large proportion of patients were TgAb/TPOAb-positive at follow-up. All treatment modalities reduced TRAb concentrations; however, surgery was most effective.

Monoclonal autoantibodies to the TSH receptor, one with stimulating activity and one with blocking activity, obtained from the same blood sample

OBJECTIVE

Patients who appear to have both stimulating and blocking TSHR autoantibodies in their sera have been described, but the two activities have not been separated and analysed. We now describe the isolation and detailed characterization of a blocking type TSHR monoclonal autoantibody and a stimulating type TSHR monoclonal autoantibody from a single sample of peripheral blood lymphocytes.

DESIGN, PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS

Two heterohybridoma cell lines secreting TSHR autoantibodies were isolated using standard techniques from the lymphocytes of a patient with hypothyroidism and high levels of TSHR autoantibodies (160 units/l by inhibition of TSH binding). The ability of the two new monoclonal antibodies (MAbs; K1-18 and K1-70) to bind to the TSHR and compete with TSH or TSHR antibody binding was analysed. Furthermore, the effects of K1-18 and K1-70 on cyclic AMP production in Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO) cells expressing the TSHR were investigated.

RESULTS

One MAb (K1-18) was a strong stimulator of cyclic AMP production in TSHR-transfected CHO cells and the other (K1-70) blocked stimulation of the TSHR by TSH, K1-18, other thyroid-stimulating MAbs and patient serum stimulating type TSHR autoantibodies. Both K1-18 (IgG1 kappa) and K1-70 (IgG1 lambda) bound to the TSHR with high affinity (0.7 x 10(10) l/mol and 4 x 10(10) l/mol, respectively), and this binding was inhibited by unlabelled K1-18 and K1-70, other thyroid-stimulating MAbs and patient serum TSHR autoantibodies with stimulating or blocking activities. V region gene analysis indicated that K1-18 and K1-70 heavy chains used the same V region germline gene but different D and J germline genes as well as having different light chains. Consequently, the two antibodies have evolved separately from different B cell clones.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides proof that a patient can produce a mixture of blocking and stimulating TSHR autoantibodies at the same time.