Accumulation of identical T cell clones in the right and left lobes of the thyroid gland in patients with Graves' disease: analysis of T cell clonotype in vivo

The conservative physiology of the immune system. A non-metaphoric approach to immunological activity

Historically, immunology emerged as a biomedical science, concerned with host defense and production of anti-infectious vaccines. In the late 50s, selective theories were proposed and from then on, immunology has been based in a close association with the neo-Darwinian principles, such as random generation of variants (lymphocyte clones), selection by extrinsic factors (antigens)—and, more generally, on genetic determinism and functionalism. This association has had major consequences: (1) immunological jargon is full of “cognitive” metaphors, founded in the idea of “foreignness”; (2) the immune system is described with a random clonal origin, coupled to selection by random encounters; and (3) physiological events are virtually absent from immunological descriptions. In the present manuscript, we apply systemic notions to bring forth an explanation including systemic mechanisms able to generate immunological phenomena. We replace “randomness plus selection” and the notion of foreignness by a history of structural changes which are determined by the coherences of the system internal architecture at any given moment. The importance of this systemic way of seeing is that it explicitly attends to the organization that defines the immune system, within which it is possible to describe the conservative physiology of the immune system. Understanding immune physiology in a systemic way of seeing also suggests mechanisms underlying the origin of immunopathogeny and therefore suggests new insights to therapeutic approaches. However, if seriously acknowledged, this systemic/historic approach to immunology goes along with a global conceptual change which modifies virtually everything in the domain of biology, as suggested by Maturana.

T-cell-mediated immunity in thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy

Thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) is considered to be an autoimmune inflammatory disorder of the extraocular muscles and the orbital fat/connective tissue. Recent studies analyzing T cells infiltrating retrobulbar tissues generated important insights into the immunopathogenesis of TAO. The present review focuses on advances in our understanding of mechanisms responsible for the autoimmune inflammation in TAO, especially T cell migration to the inflammatory site, T cell activation by autoantigens and costimulatory signals and their cytokine profile. The elucidation of these processes might lead to the development of novel therapeutic strategies directed against autoreactive T cells.

Analysis of accumulated T cell clonotypes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accumulated T cell clonotypes in peripheral blood (PB) samples obtained at various times, and the accumulated T cell clonotypes in a PB sample and in an affected kidney, from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were obtained at 2-4 different times from each of 5 SLE patients, with or without flare-up of the disease; in addition, a biopsied kidney tissue sample was obtained from 1 of the patients. RNA was extracted from each sample and complementary DNA was prepared. Genes that encode the variable region of T cell receptor (TCR) B chains (BV) of 3 BV families, 5S1, 8, and 14, were amplified by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and the PCR products were cloned for sequencing.

RESULTS

A total of 877 cloned TCR genes was detected in the PBMC samples and the kidney sample. Oligoclonal T cell expansion was detected in 34 of the 36 PCR-amplified BV samples from PBMC (amplification of 3 BV families in 2-4 samples from 5 patients). The composition of clonally expanded T cell clonotypes was relatively stable in the patients with inactive SLE. In contrast, the composition of clonotypes in the PB changed drastically after the patient experienced the active phase of the disease. T cell clonotypes that had accumulated in the kidney appeared to be restricted and distinct from those that had accumulated in the PB of the same patient.

CONCLUSION

Different T cell clonotypes expand at different times and at different sites in patients with active SLE. The sensitizing antigens may change over the course of the disease and may be different at each site.