Parathyroid hormone response to tracheal intubation in hyperparathyroid patients and normal subjects

Effect of general anesthesia and intubation on parathyroid levels in normal patients and those with hyperparathyroidism

BACKGROUND

Induction of general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation may precipitate parathyroid hormone (PTH) elevation in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (HPT). The purposes of this study were to revisit this observation and to study its impact in healthy patients.

METHODS

Patients with primary HPT who underwent parathyroidectomy were retrospectively studied. The PTH was sampled and compared: before, immediately after general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation, and 15 minutes after parathyroidectomy. Healthy adults who underwent elective operations were prospectively studied. The PTH was sampled before general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation, immediately after, and 15 minutes later.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients, aged 28-89 years (mean 60.1 ± 13 years), were retrospectively studied. The PTH was significantly elevated after general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation (P = .014). Fifty patients, aged 21-86 years (mean 54 ± 15 years), were prospectively studied. The PTH elevation after general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation was not significant.

CONCLUSION

General anesthesia and endotracheal intubation causes an immediate, steep, and significant PTH elevation in patients with primary HPT but only a minor change in healthy adults. The difference may be attributed to an impaired adrenergic response in patients with primary HPT.

Serum intact-parathyroid hormone level following total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To evaluate short-term parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

119 Caucasian postmenopausal women aged 49 to 81 (mean, 69.8) years who underwent TKA for end-stage knee osteoarthritis were included. Serum levels of intact-PTH, calcium, phosphorus, and creatinine were evaluated pre- and post-operatively (on days -1 and 7). Creatinine clearance was also calculated.

RESULTS

In 67 of the patients, serum intact-PTH levels decreased after TKA; this sample proportion was not significant (p=0.82). In 16 of the patients, such levels elevated abnormally (above normal range). In the remaining 36 patients, such levels elevated within the normal range. Therefore, the mean serum intact- PTH level of all patients increased slightly after TKA (45.4 vs. 45.3, p=0.162). The serum intact-PTH level did not correlate to body weight (r=-0.045, p=0.624), patient age (r=-0.061, p=0.508), serum creatinine level (r=0.084, p=0.366), and clearance of creatinine (r=-0.037, p=0.692).

CONCLUSION

In most postmenopausal women, the serum intact-PTH level decreased moderately following TKA, but in some, the level was abnormally elevated. This may interfere the prosthesis incorporation process.

Effects of propofol on intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism undergoing parathyroidectomy: a randomized control trial

PURPOSE

Serial measurements of parathyroid hormone (PTH) serum concentrations aid parathyroidectomy surgery. There are concerns that propofol may increase PTH concentrations and/or interfere with PTH assays. The primary purpose of this study is to determine the effects of propofol on PTH concentrations in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and to determine its effect on PTH assays.

METHODS

Thirty patients with primary hyperparathyroidism were assigned randomly to induction and maintenance with either propofol or sevoflurane. Blood samples for PTH assays were obtained pre-induction, immediately after induction, ten minutes after induction, and after excision of parathyroid adenoma. The primary endpoint was the PTH concentration at ten minutes after induction. This endpoint was compared between groups using analysis of covariance adjusting for pre-induction PTH. An in vitro study was performed with four different pools of PTH concentrations that were spiked with increasing concentrations of propofol. Serum PTH was measured in duplicate in each sample and analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance.

RESULTS

At ten minutes after induction, PTH concentrations did not differ significantly between groups (least square mean difference -7.0 pg·mL(-1); 95% confidence interval, -34.2 to +20.2). The PTH level in vitro did not change significantly with increasing propofol concentrations.

DISCUSSION

Parathyroid hormone concentrations in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism were not affected by the type of anesthesia (propofol vs sevoflurane). Furthermore, propofol was found not to interfere with PTH assays at clinically relevant concentrations. There is no evidence to support the avoidance of a propofol anesthetic for parathyroid surgery.