The combination therapy with bromocriptine and cyproheptadine in patients with acromegaly

Use of H-1 Antihistamine in Dermatology: More than Itch and Urticaria Control: A Systematic Review

H-1 antihistamines are commonly used in dermatological practice for itch and urticaria control. The widespread expression of H-1 receptor on different cells in the skin and various biologic functions of H-1 antihistamines indicate the possible treatment potentials of H-1 antihistamines in dermatology. A literature search was performed on PubMed and Embase, targeting articles reporting use of antihistamine for purposes other than itch and urticaria control in dermatological practice. Several off-label usages of antihistamines were identified, including alopecia, acne, Darier disease, eosinophilic dermatoses, paraneoplastic dermatoses, psoriasis, lichen nitidus, radiation dermatitis, skin dysesthesia, and cutaneous malignancies. Additional benefits were observed when H-1 antihistamines were used either alone or in combination with other therapeutic modalities. Although various novel uses of H-1 antihistamines have been uncovered, the evidence level of most included studies is weak. Further randomized control trials are warranted to better evaluate the efficacy and dosage of H-1 antihistamine for dermatological disorders.

Growth hormone receptor antagonists: discovery, development, and use in patients with acromegaly

An understanding of the events that occur during GH receptor (GHR) signaling has facilitated the development of a GHR antagonist (pegvisomant) for use in humans. This molecule has been designed to compete with native GH for the GHR and to prevent its proper or functional dimerization-a process that is critical for GH signal transduction and IGF-I synthesis and secretion. Clinical trials in patients with acromegaly show GHR blockade to be an exciting new mode of therapy for this condition, and pegvisomant may have a therapeutic role in diseases, such as diabetes and malignancy, in which abnormalities of the GH/IGF-I axis have been observed. This review charts the discovery and development of GHR antagonists and details the experience gained in patients with acromegaly.

Current status and future opportunities for controlling acromegaly

Growth-hormone (GH) secreting adenomas, including acromegaly, account for approximately one-sixth of all pituitary adenomas and are associated with mortality rates at least twice that of the general population. The ultimate goal of therapy for acromegaly is normalization of morbidity and mortality rates achieved through removal or reduction of the tumor mass and normalization of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels. Previously published efficacy results of current treatment modalities (surgery, conventional radiation, and medical therapy with dopamine agonists and somatostatin analogs) are often difficult to compare because of the different criteria used to define cure (some of which are now considered inadequate). For each of these modalities, pooled data from a series of acromegaly studies were reviewed for rates of IGF-I normalization, a currently accepted definition of cure. The results showed overall cure rates of approximately 10% for bromocriptine, 34% for cabergoline, 36% for conventional radiation, 50-90% for surgery for microadenomas and less than 50% for macroadenomas, and 54-66% for octreotide. These cure rates based on IGF-I normalization are generally less than those reported for cure based solely on GH levels. Novel new therapies for acromegaly include the somatostatin analog, lanreotide, Gamma Knife radiosurgery, and pegvisomant, the first in its class of new GH receptor antagonists. Although it does not appear that Gamma Knife radiosurgery results in significantly higher cure rates or fewer complications, it does provide a notable improvement in delivery compared with conventional radiation. Early studies have reported IGF-I normalization in 48% of lanreotide-treated patients and up to 97% of pegvisomant-treated.

Medical therapy for acromegaly

Both somatostatin analogues, which bind to the somatostatin receptor subtypes 2 and 5, and dopamine agonists, which are specific for the D2 receptor, have been used to treat acromegaly. Each of these classes of drugs contains several compounds that vary in duration of action, efficacy, and side effect profile. Although somatostatin analogues reduce GH levels and alleviate symptoms in most patients and restore IGF-1 levels to normal in 60% to 65% of patients, tumor shrinkage is limited to 40% of patients. evidence in the literature supports the use of these medications as secondary therapy in patients with acromegaly who have had surgery and who continue to have elevated GH levels (above 2 ng/mL during an oral glucose tolerance test) with or without IGF-1 concentrations that are above the upper limit of normal for age. In addition, medical therapy indicated in patients who refuse surgery and in patients who are poor surgical candidates. The controversial question is whether medical therapy should be an option for primary treatment of the acromegalic patient. Currently, ther are no data from prospective randomized trials comparing the effects of surgery versus somatostatin analogues as first-line therapy for for newly diagnosed acromegalic patients. Limited data from nonrandomized studies demonstrate that somatostatin analogues are effective long-term in suppressing GH and reducing IGF-1 into the normal range in approximately two-thirds of patients who have never undergone previous treatment. It is still the consensus that patients with GH-secreting microadenomas should undergo surgical resection, because the likelihood of complete cure by an experience neurosurgeon is high, at least 70% or greater. Successful surgical treatment has the advantage of completely removing the tumor in contrast to medical therapy, which rarely produces shrinkage greater than 50% despite the fact that IGF-1 and GH levels may be normal. In patients with macroadenomas of a size and location that suggest that the chance of complete resection is 40% or less, primary treatment with a somatostatin analogue should be considered as one option in the initial management of the patient. Another option in such an individual would be surgical debulking followed by medical therapy, because it is theoretically possible that biochemical cure with medical therapy after surgical debulking might be achieved with lower doses. The cost-effectiveness of these approaches has not yet been determined. Once the decision has been made to begin medical therapy, a choice must be made between dopamine agonists and somatostatin analogues. Most evidence suggests that somatostatin analogues are more effective than dopamine agonists and therefore would be the therapy of choice. In select patients, dopamine agonists, particularly the long-acting agonist cabergoline, may be preferred initially if the patient is unwilling to take injections or if the GH elevations are relatively modest (< 10 ng/mL). Biochemical cure should be assessed by measurement of GH (which can be performed 2 hours after an octreotide injection) and IGF-1 concentrations. The goal of treatment include reduction of of GH below 2 ng/mL and reduction of IGF-1 into the normal range. In patients who do not reach these goals, the dose or frequency of injection of the somatostatin analogue or both should be increased. If such measures are unsuccessful, a dopamine agonist may be added to the medical regimen because some studies suggest that combination therapy may be more effective in select cases than octreotide therapy alone. If such measures are still unsuccessful, other options should be considered, including surgery, pituitary radiation, and medical treatment with investigational drugs.