Correlation of computed tomography densitometry and pathological grading of emphysema with the variation of respiratory function after lobectomy for lung cancer

Quantative computerized tomography assessment of lung density as a predictor of postoperative pulmonary morbidity in patients with lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the pulmonary reserve of the patients via preoperative quantitative computerized tomography (CT) and to determine if these preoperative quantitative measurements could predict the postoperative pulmonary morbidity.

METHODS

Fifty patients with lung cancer who underwent lobectomy/segmentectomy were included in the study. Preoperative quantitative CT scans and pulmonary function tests data were evaluated retrospectively. We compare these measurements with postoperative morbidity.

RESULTS

There were 32 males and 18 females with a mean age of 54.4±13.9 years. Mean total density was -790.6±73.4 HU. The volume of emphysematous lung was (<-900 HU) 885.2±1,378.4 cm(3). Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (r=-0.494, P=0.02) and diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO) (r=-0.643, P<0.001) were found to be correlate with the volume of emphysematous lung. Furthermore FEV1 (r=0.59, P<0.001) and DLCO (r=0.48, P<0.001) were also found to be correlate with mean lung density. Postoperative pulmonary morbidity was significantly higher in patients with lower lung density (P<0.001), larger volume of emphysema (P<0.001) and lower DLCO (P=0.039). A cut-off point of -787.5 HU for lung density showed 86.96% sensitivity and 81.48% specificity for predicting the pulmonary morbidity (kappa =-0.68, P<0.001). Additionally a cut-off point of 5.41% for emphysematous volume showed 84.00% sensitivity and 80.00% specificity for predicting the pulmonary morbidity (kappa =0.64, P<0.001). According to logistic regression analyses emphysematous volume >5.41% (P=0.014) and lung density <-787.5 HU (P=0.009) were independent prognostic factors associated with postoperative pulmonary morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the patients with a lower lung density than -787.5 HU and a higher volume of emphysema than 5.41% were found to be at increased risk for developing postoperative pulmonary morbidity. More stringent precautions should be taken in those patients that were found to be at high risk to avoid pulmonary complications.

Quantitative assessment of emphysematous parenchyma using multidetector-row computed tomography in patients scheduled for endobronchial treatment with one-way valves†

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the role of volume quantitative assessment using multidetector-row computed tomography to select patients scheduled for endobronchial one-way valves treatment.

METHODS

Twenty-five consecutive patients (15 with heterogeneous emphysema and 10 with giant emphysematous bulla) undergoing endobronchial valves treatment were enrolled. All patients were studied pre- and postoperatively with standard pulmonary functional tests and quantitative volume assessment of target lobe and entire lung. Emphysematous parenchyma was obtained applying density thresholds of -1.024/-950 Hounsfield units. Among different subtype of patients, we evaluated: (i) the differences between preoperative versus postoperative data; (ii) the correlation between functional and volumetric quantification changes and (iii) the critical threshold value of volumetric quantification of the target lobe in close association with clinical effects.

RESULTS

Among heterogeneous emphysematous and giant emphysematous bulla patients, a significant improvement of flow-expiratory volume in 1 s (from 36.9 ± 15.3 to 43.9 ± 10.4; P = 0.01; and from 35.8 ± 6.0 to 47.5 ± 7.9; P < 0.0001, respectively); and of forced vital capacity (from 41.9 ± 5.9 to 47.3 ± 9.3; P = 0.0009 and from 40.7 ± 5.9 to 48.8 ± 4.9; P = 0.0002, respectively); and a significant reduction of residual volume (from 185 ± 14 to 157 ± 14.7; P = 0.005; and from 196 ± 13.5 to 137 ± 21; P < 0.0001, respectively) and of total lung volume (from 166.7 ± 13 to 137 ± 18 ; P = 0.0003, and from 169 ± 15 to 134 ± 18; P < 0.0001, respectively) were seen after treatment. The volumetric measurements showed a reduction of volume of the treated lobe among heterogeneous emphysematous patients (from 1448 ± 204 to 1076 ± 364; P = 0.0008); and in those with giant emphysematous bulla (from 1668 ± 140 to 864 ± 199; P < 0.0001). The entire lung and target lobe volume changes were inversely correlated with change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s in patients with heterogeneous emphysematous (r = -0.7; P = 0.0006; and r = -0.7; P = 0.0009, respectively) and giant emphysematous bulla (r = -0.8; P = 0.001; and r = -0.7; P = 0.009, respectively). Among patients with heterogenous emphysematous and giant emphysematous bulla, the value of sensitivity and specificity were 66.6 and 83%, respectively (for a volumetric qunatification >1.5239), and of 60 and 100%, respectively (for a volumetric qunatification >1.762).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that the volumetric quantification adds further informations to the routine evaluation for optimizing the selection of patients scheduled for endobronchial valve treatment.