Hybrid debranching technique for aortic arch replacement

Best surgical option for arch extension of type B dissection: the endovascular approach

Despite advances in surgical techniques and postoperative management, the in-hospital mortality rate for patients undergoing conventional open surgical repair for type B dissections is still significant. In light of this, the less invasive surgical procedure for acute type B aortic dissections, defined as thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), was developed. Despite some controversy, the use of TEVAR for the management of type B aortic dissections has become commonplace. Generally, the main entry tear in type B aortic dissection is located in the vicinity of the orifice of the left subclavian artery (LSA). The proximal landing zone in the aortic arch must be secured as long as the aim of TEVAR for type B dissection is primary entry closure. This requires hybrid surgery that includes the use of open surgical procedures, such as debranching for revascularization of cervical branches. Despite the presence of challenging anatomic conditions in the aortic arch, hybrid repair has evolved as an increasingly viable alternative, and promising early and long-term results have been reported. As the next step, fenestrated and branched TEVAR techniques have recently been reported with satisfactory early results. In the coming years, there will be intense competition to develop the devices themselves, improve delivery systems, and supplement devices with auxiliary functions. Thus there is high expectations for the next generation and how they will improve and advance treatment methods of TEVAR for type B aortic dissections.

EACTS day in the new EACTS House

There is no doubt that the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is a success story. In 2011, we celebrated the 25th anniversary of this professional organization. In 2012, we will celebrate the 25th anniversary of the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. In addition, two other journals have been initiated, Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery and the Multimedia Manual of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, and all of them can be accessed through CTSnet (www.ctsnet.org). The most recent development was the birth of EACTS House, and it was to celebrate the official opening of EACTS House on 10 February 2011, that we held the second Strategic meeting, 'EACTS in the Future'. On this occasion, the EACTS council and delegates of the EACTS Domains (Domain of Thoracic Disease, Domain of Vascular Disease, Domain of Congenital Cardiac Disease and Domain of Adult Cardiac Disease) came together with representative thoracic and cardio-vascular surgeons from North America, Asia and BRICS countries as well as senior managers from industry in order to decide where to go from there. As a basis for starting the discussions, a sector analysis of the activities of the Department of Cardio-Vascular Surgery at CHUV in Lausanne, Switzerland was performed in order to identify the trends in the activities of our group of surgeons by pulling the consolidated data for the period running from 1 January 1995 to 31 December 2010. Interestingly enough, the most frequent procedures like coronary artery bypass graft and valve repair/replacement did not increase despite a growing programme. In our setting, the compensation came mainly from vascular surgery and mechanical circulatory support. These data have to be put in perspective by the reports provided by the EACTS domain chairs in order to identify the challenges and opportunities for the future development of our specialties.