A Systematic Review of Published Algorithms for Selecting an Inhaled Delivery System in COPD

Consideration and Assessment of Patient Factors When Selecting an Inhaled Delivery System in COPD

Because guidelines and strategies for pharmacologic treatment of COPD focus on specific classes of inhaled medications, there is an unmet need for information to guide health care professionals for selecting an inhaled medication delivery system that matches the unique characteristics of individual patients. This article provides guidance for selecting an inhaled medication delivery system based on three "key" patient factors: cognitive function, manual dexterity/strength, and peak inspiratory flow. In addition, information is provided about specific tests to assess these patient factors. Cognitive impairment with an estimated prevalence of 25% among patients with COPD adversely affects patients' ability to correctly use a handheld device. To our knowledge, the prevalence of impaired manual dexterity/strength has not been reported in those with COPD. However, 79% of patients with COPD have reported one or more physical impediments that could influence their ability to manipulate an inhaler device. The measurement of peak inspiratory flow against the simulated resistance (PIFr) of a dry powder inhaler establishes whether the patient has the inhalation ability for creating optimal turbulent energy within the device. A suboptimal PIFr for low to medium-high resistance dry powder inhalers has been reported in 19% to 84% of stable outpatients with COPD. Health care professionals should consider cognitive function, manual dexterity/strength, and PIFr in their patients with COPD when prescribing inhaled pharmacotherapy. Impairments in these patient factors are common among those with COPD and can affect the individual's competency and effectiveness of using inhaled medications delivered by handheld devices.

Personalizing Selection of Inhaled Delivery Systems in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

It can be challenging for healthcare professionals (HCPs) to prescribe inhaled therapy for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) because of the multiple individual and combinations of inhaled medications available in numerous delivery systems. Guidance on the selection of an inhaled delivery system has received limited attention compared with the emphasis on prescribing the class of the inhaled molecule(s). Although numerous recommendations and algorithms have been proposed to guide the selection of an inhaled delivery system for patients with COPD, no specific approach has been endorsed in COPD guidelines/strategies or by professional organizations. To provide recommendations for an inhaler selection strategy at initial and follow-up appointments, we examined the impact of patient errors using handheld inhalers on clinical outcomes and performed a focused narrative review to consider patient factors (continuity of the inhaled delivery system, cognitive function, manual function/dexterity, and peak inspiratory flow) when selecting an inhaled delivery system. On the basis of these findings, five questions are proposed for HCPs to consider in the initial selection of an inhaler delivery system and three questions to consider at follow-up. We propose that HCPs consider the inhaled medication delivery system as a unit and to match appropriate medication(s) with the unique features of the delivery system to individual patient factors. Assessment of inhaler technique and adherence together with patient outcomes/satisfaction at each visit is essential to determine whether the inhaled medication delivery system is providing benefits. Continued and repeated education on device features and correct technique is warranted to optimize efficacy.

Assessment of Medication Regimen Complexity of COPD Regimens in Individuals Visiting Community Pharmacies

Purpose

Non-adherence is common and linked to poor COPD outcomes. Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI) scores affect other disease outcomes. Little is known about the implications of MRCI scores in COPD. Secondary analysis was done to calculate MRCI scores assessing relationship to symptoms, COPD severity and health literacy (HL) to identify potential interventions to optimize adherence.

Patients and Methods

Secondary analysis was conducted of cross-sectional, non-randomized survey data. Participants with self-reported COPD completed a survey of demographics, exacerbations, symptoms (COPD Assessment Test (CAT)), and self-reported COPD regimens. COPD severity was classified into Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) ABCD categories using exacerbation history and CAT. CAT scores were categorized as low (<10), high (>10) and very high (>20). A 1-year proportion of days covered (PDC) was calculated. A MRCI calculator scored regimens (primary endpoint). Published cut-off points were used to categorize MRCIs as low (≤4), medium (5-8) and high (>8) and inhaled device polypharmacy (IDP) as ≥3 devices. Risk for low HL was assessed using a Single Item Literacy Screener. Descriptive and Chi-squared statistics were used.

Results

Participants' (N = 709) PDC for 1 maintenance medicine averaged 0.43 ± 0.37; 28.7% were adherent (PDC ≥ 80%). CAT scores were very high in 54.6% and high in 35.8%. Distribution of GOLD categories were A (6%), B (35%), C (4%) and D (55%). High, medium and low MRCI were 85%, 14% and 9%, respectively. Mean devices per regimen was 2.05 ± 0.8; IDP was 28%. MRCI and IDP increased with worsening CAT scores and COPD severity per GOLD category (p<0.05), but not low HL.

Conclusion

MRCI scores for COPD regimens increased with COPD severity and symptoms. Overall adherence was low despite high symptom scores; high MRCI scores could contribute. All COPD medication classes are available in multiple devices, combinations, and daily formulations; there is potential to simplify regimens. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate if interventions minimizing MRCI scores improve adherence and COPD outcomes.

Recent advances predict a bright future for nebulizers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With the improvement in device technology and delivery methods of inhaled medications, along with development of novel compounds and recognition of the importance of personalized approach in the management of chronic airway diseases, nebulizers have not only maintained their place in the treatment hierarchy of airway disease but have also proven a vital platform for the development of new classes of drugs.

RECENT FINDINGS

This short review explores recent advances in nebulized drug delivery in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and other chronic airway diseases, emphasizing the progress in nebulizer technology, physiologic advantages of nebulized drug delivery and the high versatility of currently available and developing nebulizer-delivered pharmacotherapies.

SUMMARY

Versatility and efficiency of nebulizers allows for a broad spectrum of existing and novel therapies to be clinically studied, facilitating the progress in phenotype-targeted pharmacotherapies in the management of chronic airway diseases.