Comparison of three methods for determining anti-thyrotropin receptor antibodies (TRAb) for diagnosis of Graves' disease: a clinical validation

Comparison of two different TSH-receptor antibody assays: A clinical practice study

Background

Graves' disease (GD) is caused by the production of TSH-receptor (TSHR) stimulating auto-antibodies. Over the years various TSHR-antibody (TRAb) detection assays have been developed. Most clinical laboratories use competitive TSH-binding inhibitory immunoglobulin (TBII) assays, which measure the total amount of stimulating and blocking auto-antibodies. Selective detection of TSHR stimulating auto-antibodies (TSI) was previously only possible with functional cell-based bioassays. However, more recently an automated bridge-based binding assay to more specifically measure TSI has become available. The aim of our study was to compare the third-generation automated competitive immunoassay (TBII) with the automated bridge immunoassay (TSI) in clinical practice in an academic thyroid expert center.

Methods

A retrospective study in 356 patients with Graves' disease, Graves orbitopathy (GO), and other (thyroid) disease treated in an academic thyroid center was performed. All samples were analyzed for TBII and TSI. For both assays, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PVV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic odds ratios were calculated using different cut-offs for negativity.

Results

Using the provided cut-off, the overall sensitivity appeared similar between TBII and TSI, but TSI showed higher overall specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic odds ratio. Using two or three times the cut-off for negativity resulted in a decrease in sensitivity, but an increase in specificity and PPV, which was most pronounced for the TBII-assay. Analysis in a subgroup of newly diagnosed treatment naïve GD/GO patients also revealed overall favorable results for the TSI-assay. Increasing the cut-off for negativity resulted in increased specificity for both assays, with similar results using two or three times the cut-off. Most patients with concordant positive results for TBII and TSI suffered from GD or GD + GO (n = 110, 95.6 %), while patients negative for both TBII and TSI mostly suffered from other (thyroid) disease (n = 143, 77.3 %). From patients with positive TBII but negative TSI only 42.1 % had GD/GO (n = 16), whereas 57.9 % (n = 22) had other (thyroid) disease. In contrast, 88.9 % of patients with positive TSI but negative TBII had GD/GO (n = 16), whereas 11.1 % (n = 2) had other (thyroid) disease.

Conclusion

In our academic thyroid center, the diagnostic performance of the TSI-assay outperformed the TBII-assay. Using a higher cut-off value for negativity can be helpful in assessing clinical relevance.

Stability of TSH receptor antibody concentrations and comparability of its immunoassays

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Graves' Disease (GD) is an autoimmune form of hyperthyroidism where autoantibodies are directed against the TSH-receptor (TSH-receptor antibodies; TRAb). GD is suspected if TRAb concentrations are above a pre-specified cut-off value. TRAb concentrations are measured using immunoassays. This study aimed to compare the performance of the recently implemented Alinity immunoassay to the KRYPTOR and Cobas TRAb immunoassays.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Left-over serum samples in which TRAb concentrations were measured (KRYPTOR) were used. First, TRAb stability at -20 °C for four to six years and up to five freeze-thaw cycles were assessed. Second, TRAb measurements (n = 436) were repeated using the Alinity and Cobas immunoassay and results (scored as positive/negative based on cut-off value) were compared.

RESULTS

TRAb results were stable over five years and up to five freeze-thaw cycles. When comparing immunoassays, 86.2% of the results were similar. Total discrepancy differed between the immunoassays (5.4% Cobas vs Alinity, 8.8% Alinity vs KRYPTOR, 13.3 % Cobas vs KRYPTOR). The KRYPTOR immunoassay showed more negative TRAb results than Cobas and Alinity.

CONCLUSION

The Alinity immunoassay showed comparable TRAb results, even though slightly more positive results compared to the KRYPTORand slightly more negative results compared to the Cobas immunoassay were seen.