Risk Factors of Venous Thromboembolism in Sudanese Pregnant Women

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the major causes of pregnancy-related mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to determine the frequency of factor V Leiden (FVL) and prothrombin G20210A polymorphisms and measure the plasma levels of protein C (PC), protein S (PS) and antithrombin (AT) in pregnant women with VTE and healthy pregnant women. This prospective case-control study determined the frequencies of FVL G1691A and prothrombin G20210A polymorphisms and measured the plasma levels of PC, PS and AT in 198 pregnant women with VTE and 198 healthy pregnant women. Allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (ASPCR) was used to detect the FVL G1691A polymorphisms and prothrombin G20210A gene mutations. The FVL G1691A polymorphism and prothrombin G20210A gene mutations were detected only in pregnant women with VTE, with frequencies of 4.0 and 0.5%, respectively. The highest frequency of FVL G1691A polymorphism was observed in patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and positively associated with contraceptive use and termination. Pregnant women with VTE had significantly lower levels of PC, PS and AT than those of controls. In conclusion, among the VTE cases, FVL G1691A polymorphism and PC, PS and AT deficiencies were the most common findings in patients presenting with DVT. Antithrombin deficiency was more common than PC and PS deficiencies. Contraceptive use, high body mass index (BMI) and termination correlated strongly with FVL G1691A polymorphism and PC and PS deficiencies in patients with VTE.

Hereditary thrombophilia and recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY QUESTION

Is there an association between hereditary thrombophilia in pregnant women and risk of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Pregnant women with hereditary thrombophilia have an increased risk of RPL, especially for pregnant women with the G1691A mutation of the factor V Leiden (FVL) gene, the G20210A mutation of the prothrombin gene (PGM), and deficiency of protein S (PS).

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Prior studies have suggested that pregnant women with hereditary thrombophilia have a higher risk of RPL, however, the results are inconsistent; furthermore, a complete overview is missing. This lack of information is an obstacle to the risk assessment of RPL in pregnant women with hereditary thrombophilia. A comprehensive meta-analysis on the relation between hereditary thrombophilia and the risk of RPL is needed.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using observational studies published in English before 1 April 2020 to evaluate the relation between hereditary thrombophilia and risk of RPL.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Relevant studies were identified from PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE searches and complemented with perusal of bibliographies of retrieved articles. The exposure of interest was hereditary thrombophilia, including FVL mutation, PGM, deficiency of antithrombin (AT), deficiency of protein C (PC), and deficiency of PS. The overall risk estimates were pooled using random effects models. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were carried out to explore possible sources of heterogeneity and assess the robustness of the results.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

A total of 89 studies involving 30 254 individuals were included. Results showed that women with FVL mutation (odds ratio (OR): 2.44, 95% CI: 1.96-3.03), PGM (OR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.61-2.68), or deficiency of PS (OR: 3.45, 95% CI: 1.15-10.35) had higher risks of developing RPL. Compared with the reference group, there was no observed relation between a deficiency in AT or PC and RPL (all P > 0.05). Heterogeneity in the risk estimates of RPL was partially explained by geographic region, definitions of RPL, types of RPL, and controlled confounders. Sensitivity analyses validated the robustness of the findings.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Only 39 of the included studies controlled for one or more confounders, and the heterogeneity across all included studies was high. Based on the data available, we cannot determine whether this association is confounded by other potential risk factors of RPL.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This systematic review and meta-analysis show a possible association between hereditary thrombophilia and an increased risk of RPL, suggesting that testing for hereditary thrombophilia should be considered in individuals with RPL.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The study was funded by the Hunan Provincial Key Research and Development Program (Grant number: 2018SK2062) and National Natural Science Foundation Program (Grant number: 81973137). There are no conflicts of interest.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Targeted next-generation sequencing reveals novel and known variants of thrombophilia associated genes in Saudi patients with venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Thrombophilia is a substantial source of indisposition and mortality in several countries, including Arab populations. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) with or without pulmonary embolism (PE) is the prevalent clinical manifestation of thrombophilia. While many genetic risk factors for DVT are known, almost all associated with hemostasis, many genetic factors remain unexplained. Nowadays, Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) offers a potential solution that allows several candidate genes to be analyzed simultaneously at a reasonable expense.

METHODS

We performed variant screening in the thrombophilia associated genes in Factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation-negative patients using Ion Torrent Next-generation sequencing (NGS). Ion AmpliSeq panel for 18 genes was designed. Twenty-nine unrelated patients with idiopathic VTE were recruited for NGS.

RESULTS

We were able to identify 19 variants (1 novel and 18 previously reported) in 10 out of 18 targeted genes. Pathogenic variants were identified in 22 patients demonstrating mutation detection rates of 76%. Previously reported variants in the F5, MTHFR, PROS1, PROC, F8, F9, SERPINA10, SERPIND1, and HRG genes were recognized in 21 patients. More than one variant in the targeted genes was detected in some of the patients with VTE. We identified SERPINA10 recurrent variant p.(R88*) in seven patients representing 32% of VTE cases. Additionally, we report one novel variant c.356G > T, p.(G119V) in the F7 gene, considered to be pathogenic in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Our studies finding illustrates the ability of targeted next-generation sequencing to uncover uncommon/unknown genetic variants that may predispose to thrombophilia. The finding of the novel variant in the F7 gene extends the spectrum of variants affecting thrombosis. While a comparatively small number of subjects have been included in our cohort, the findings summarize the possible genetic features of thrombophilia.

Association of venous thromboembolism and myocardial infarction with Factor V Leiden and Factor II gene mutations among Libyan patients

Factor V Leiden G1691A (FVL) and Factor II prothrombin G20210A (PGM) mutations are the leading causes of thrombophilia. In this study, we have investigated the prevalence of the FVL G1691A and PGM G20210A single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) among Libyan deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and myocardial infarction (MI) patients. SNP genotyping was performed using high-resolution melt analysis (HRM) and DNA sequencing. Biochemical parameters conducted on 112 males and 93 females showed no significant difference in means between the control group and the deep vein thrombosis and myocardial infarction groups. For Factor V Leiden, 40 samples were genotyped. Of the 40 samples, 6 (15.0%) of them were heterozygous and no one was homozygous. As for Factor II SNP, 59 samples were genotyped and only 2 (3.3%) were heterozygous. All the heterozygous samples showed 100% concordance between the HRM-PCR and DNA sequence analysis. Our study showed, for the first time, that both the FVL and PGM mutations are present among Libyan DVT and MI patients and that the FVL mutation is significantly associated with DVT but not with MI. However, our results do not support the association of PGM G20210A mutation with DVT or MI.

Factor V Leiden 1691G > A mutation and the risk of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL): systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Although numerous replication case-control studies have attempted to determine the association between Factor V Leiden (FVL) 1691G > A mutation and susceptibility to Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL), there have been confliction among the results of various ethnic groups. To address this limitation, here we implemented first meta-analysis to provide with consistent conclusion of the association between FVL 1691G > A mutation and RPL risk.

Methods

After a systematic literature search, pooled odds ratio (OR) and their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the strength of the association. Additionally, meta-regression analyses were performed to find potential source of heterogeneity.

Results

In this meta-analysis, 62 studies, containing 10,410 cases and 9406 controls, were included in quantitative analysis. Overall population analysis revealed a significant positive association in the dominant (OR = 2.15, 95% CI = 1.84-2.50, P < 0.001), over-dominant (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.61-2.19, P < 0.001), allelic (OR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.79-2.35, P < 0.001), and heterozygote (OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.68-2.30, P < 0.001) models. Moreover, a significant association of dominant (OR = 3.04, 95% CI = 2.04-4.54, P < 0.001), over-dominant (OR = 2.65, 95% CI = 1.74-4.05, P < 0.001), and heterozygote (OR = 2.67, 95% CI = 1.81-4.22, P < 0.001) models was found in the Iranian population. The subgroup analysis indicated strong significant association in Asian, European, Africa population, and case-control studies but not in South Americans and cohort studies.

Conclusion

The FVL 1691G > A mutation and the risk of RPL confers a genetic contributing factor in increasing the risk of RPL, particularly in Iranians, except for South Americans.

Comparison between thrombophilic gene polymorphisms among high risk patients

Introduction. The purpose of this study was to compare the role of the thrombophilic variants among two groups of high risk patients with vascular disorders and recurrent pregnancy loss.

Methods. 200 patients, including 76 with thrombotic accidents and 124 with two or more idiopathic recurrent miscarriage during the first trimester, were tested for the presence of Factor V (F V) Leiden G1691A, Factor II (F II) G20210A, plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI) 4G/5G, and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphisms using Real time polymerase chain reaction (RT – PCR) in the Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Varna, Bulgaria between June 2016 and May 2019. Frequencies of thrombophilic gene polymorphisms were compared among the two populations and to the expected genotype frequencies.

Results. Individuals with a history of vascular disorders had a significantly higher frequency of F V Leiden variant compared to women with recurrent miscariage. There was no statistical difference between the analyzed patients for the other three thrombophilic polymorphisms. The allelic frequencies and the expected genotype frequencies of the F V, F II and MTHFR polymorphisms were calculated according to Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The percentages of the homozygotes for F V and F II were higher than expected in the two groups of patients. For the MTHFR there was no difference.

Conclusion. F V Leiden remains the strongest risk factor for vascular disorders and recurrent pregnancy loss. Screening for this variant should be recommended to patients with thrombotic accidents and women with repeated miscarriage. The role of F II, PAI and MTHFR remains controversial.