[Evaluation of a DC pulsed magnetic tracking system in neurosurgical navigation: technique, accuracies, and influencing factors]

[Application of intraoperative electromagnetic frameless navigation in transcranial and endoscopic neurosurgical interventions]

The paper summarizes the experience in using a system of electromagnetic intraoperative frameless navigation in various neurosurgical pathologies of the brain. The electromagnetic navigation technique was used for 102 operations in 98 patients, including 36 transnasal endoscopic interventions. There were no intraoprtative and postoperative complications associated with the use of the system. In the process of using the system, factors influencing the accuracy of navigation and requiring additional control by the surgeon were identified.

PURPOSE

The study purpose was to evaluate the use of electromagnetic navigation in surgical treatment of patients with various brain lesions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The system of electromagnetic navigation was used for 102 operations in 98 patients (42 males and 56 females, including 18 children; median age, 34.8 years (min, 2.2 years; max, 69 years)) in the period from December 2012 to December 2016. In 36 patients, the system was used for endoscopic interventions. In 19 patients, electromagnetic navigation was used in combination with neurophysiological monitoring.

RESULTS

In our series of cases, the frameless electromagnetic navigation system was used in 66 transcranial operations. The mean error of navigation was 1.9±0.5 mm. In 5 cases, we used the data of preoperative functional MRI (fMRI) and tractography for navigation. At the same time, in all 7 operations with simultaneous direct stimulation of the cortex, there was interference and significant high-frequency noise, which distorted the electrophysiological data. A navigation error of more than 3 mm was associated with the use of neuroimaging data with an increment of more than 3 mm, image artifacts from the head locks, high rate of patient registration, inconsequence of touching points on the patient's head, and unsatisfactory fixation to the skin or subsequent displacement of a non-invasive localizer of the patient. In none of the cases, there was a significant effect of standard metal surgical tools (clamps, tweezers, aspirators) located near the patient's head on the navigation system. In two cases, the use of massive retractors located near the patient's localizer caused noise in the localizer and navigation errors of more than 10 mm due to significant distortions of the electromagnetic field. Thirty-six transnasal endoscopic interventions were performed using the electromagnetic frameless navigation system. The mean navigation error was 2.5±0.8 mm.

CONCLUSION

In general, electromagnetic navigation is an accurate, safe, and effective technique that can be used in surgical treatment of patients with various brain lesions. The mean navigation error in our series of cases was 1.9±0.5 mm for transcranial surgery and 2.5±0.8 mm for endoscopic surgery. Electromagnetic navigation can be used for different, both transcranial and endoscopic, neurosurgical interventions. Electromagnetic navigation is most convenient for interventions that do not require fixation of the patient's head, in particular for CSF shunting procedures, drainage of various space-occupying lesions (cysts, hematomas, and abscesses), and optimization of the size and selection of options for craniotomy. In repeated interventions, disruption of the normal anatomical relationships and landmarks necessitates application of neuronavigation systems in almost mandatory manner. The use of electromagnetic navigation does not limit application of the entire range of necessary intraoperative neurophysiological examinations at appropriate surgical stages. Succession in application of neuronavigation should be used to get adequate test results.

Resection of Motor Eloquent Metastases Aided by Preoperative nTMS-Based Motor Maps-Comparison of Two Observational Cohorts

Introduction

Preoperative mapping of motor areas with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) has been shown to improve surgical outcomes for peri-Rolandic lesions and, in particular, for gliomas. However, the impact of this technique on surgical outcomes for peri-Rolandic metastatic lesions is yet unknown.

Objective

To investigate the impact of nTMS on surgical outcomes for peri-Rolandic metastatic lesions, various clinical parameters were analyzed in our international study group.

Methods

Two prospectively enrolled cohorts were compared by investigating patients receiving preoperative nTMS (2010–2015; 120 patients) and patients who did not receive preoperative nTMS (2006–2015; 130 patients). Tumor location, pathology, size, and preoperative deficits were comparable.

Results

The nTMS group showed a lower rate of residual tumor on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (odds ratio 0.3025; 95% confidence interval 0.1356–0.6749). On long-term follow-up, surgery-related paresis was decreased in the nTMS group (nTMS vs. non-nTMS; improved: 30.8 vs. 13.1%, unchanged: 65.8 vs. 73.8%, worse: 3.4 vs. 13.1% of patients; p = 0.0002). Moreover, the nTMS group received smaller craniotomies (nTMS: 16.7 ± 8.6 cm² vs. non-nTMS: 25.0 ± 17.1 cm²; p < 0.0001). Surgical time differed significantly between the two groups (nTMS: 128.8 ± 49.4 min vs. non-nTMS: 158.0 ± 65.8 min; p = 0.0002).

Conclusion

This non-randomized study suggests that preoperative motor mapping by nTMS may improve the treatment of patients undergoing surgical resection of metastases in peri-Rolandic regions. These findings suggest that further evaluation with a prospective, randomized trial may be warranted.

Combined noninvasive language mapping by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional MRI and its comparison with direct cortical stimulation

OBJECT

Repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is now increasingly used for preoperative language mapping in patients with lesions in language-related areas of the brain. Yet its correlation with intraoperative direct cortical stimulation (DCS) has to be improved. To increase rTMS's specificity and positive predictive value, the authors aim to provide thresholds for rTMS's positive language areas. Moreover, they propose a protocol for combining rTMS with functional MRI (fMRI) to combine the strength of both methods.

METHODS

The authors performed multimodal language mapping in 35 patients with left-sided perisylvian lesions by using rTMS, fMRI, and DCS. The rTMS mappings were conducted with a picture-to-trigger interval (PTI, time between stimulus presentation and stimulation onset) of either 0 or 300 msec. The error rates (ERs; that is, the number of errors per number of stimulations) were calculated for each region of the cortical parcellation system (CPS). Subsequently, the rTMS mappings were analyzed through different error rate thresholds (ERT; that is, the ER at which a CPS region was defined as language positive in terms of rTMS), and the 2-out-of-3 rule (a stimulation site was defined as language positive in terms of rTMS if at least 2 out of 3 stimulations caused an error). As a second step, the authors combined the results of fMRI and rTMS in a predefined protocol of combined noninvasive mapping. To validate this noninvasive protocol, they correlated its results to DCS during awake surgery.

RESULTS

The analysis by different rTMS ERTs obtained the highest correlation regarding sensitivity and a low rate of false positives for the ERTs of 15%, 20%, 25%, and the 2-out-of-3 rule. However, when comparing the combined fMRI and rTMS results with DCS, the authors observed an overall specificity of 83%, a positive predictive value of 51%, a sensitivity of 98%, and a negative predictive value of 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with fMRI, rTMS is a more sensitive but less specific tool for preoperative language mapping than DCS. Moreover, rTMS is most reliable when using ERTs of 15%, 20%, 25%, or the 2-out-of-3 rule and a PTI of 0 msec. Furthermore, the combination of fMRI and rTMS leads to a higher correlation to DCS than both techniques alone, and the presented protocols for combined noninvasive language mapping might play a supportive role in the language-mapping assessment prior to the gold-standard intraoperative DCS.

Obstetric Ultrasound Simulator With Task-Based Training and Assessment

The increasing use of point-of-care (POC) ultrasound presents a challenge in providing efficient training to POC ultrasound users for whom formal training is not readily available. In response to this need, we developed an affordable compact laptop-based obstetric ultrasound training simulator. It offers a realistic scanning experience, task-based training, and performance assessment. The position and orientation of the sham transducer are tracked with 5 DoF on an abdomen-sized scan surface with the shape of a cylindrical segment. On the simulator, user interface is rendered a virtual torso whose body surface models the abdomen of the pregnant scan subject. A virtual transducer scans the virtual torso by following the sham transducer movements on the scan surface. A given 3-D training image volume is generated by combining several overlapping 3-D ultrasound sweeps acquired from the pregnant scan subject using a Markov random field-based approach. Obstetric ultrasound training is completed through a series of tasks, guided by the simulator and focused on three aspects: basic medical ultrasound, orientation to obstetric space, and fetal biometry. The scanning performance is automatically evaluated by comparing user-identified anatomical landmarks with reference landmarks preinserted by sonographers. The simulator renders 2-D ultrasound images in real time with 30 frames/s or higher with good image quality; the training procedure follows standard obstetric ultrasound protocol. Thus, for learners without access to formal sonography programs, the simulator is intended to provide structured training in basic obstetrics ultrasound.

Changing the clinical course of glioma patients by preoperative motor mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic brain stimulation

Background

Mapping of the motor cortex by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) can be used for preoperative planning in brain tumor patients. Just recently, it has been proven to actually change outcomes by increasing the rate of gross total resection (GTR) and by reducing the surgery-related rate of paresis significantly in cohorts of patients suffering from different entities of intracranial lesions. Yet, we also need data that shows whether these changes also lead to a changed clinical course, and can also be achieved specifically in high-grade glioma (HGG) patients.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled 70 patients with supratentorial motor eloquently located HGG undergoing preoperative nTMS (2010–2014) and matched these patients with 70 HGG patients who did not undergo preoperative nTMS (2007–2010).

Results

On average, the overall size of the craniotomy was significantly smaller for nTMS patients when compared to the non-nTMS group (nTMS: 25.3 ± 9.7 cm²; non-nTMS: 30.8 ± 13.2 cm²; p = 0.0058). Furthermore, residual tumor tissue (nTMS: 34.3%; non-nTMS: 54.3%; p = 0.0172) and unexpected tumor residuals (nTMS: 15.7%; non-nTMS: 32.9%; p = 0.0180) were less frequent in nTMS patients. Regarding the further clinical course, median inpatient stay was 12 days for the nTMS and 14 days for the non-nTMS group (nTMS: CI 10.5 – 13.5 days; non-nTMS: CI 11.6 – 16.4 days; p = 0.0446). 60.0% of patients of the nTMS group and 54.3% of patients of the non-nTMS group were eligible for postoperative chemotherapy (OR 1.2630, CI 0.6458 – 2.4710, p = 0.4945), while 67.1% of nTMS patients and 48.6% of non-nTMS patients received radiotherapy (OR 2.1640, CI 1.0910 – 4.2910, p = 0.0261). Moreover, 3, 6, and 9 months survival was significantly better in the nTMS group (p = 0.0298, p = 0.0015, and p = 0.0167).

Conclusions

With the limitations of this study in mind, our data show that HGG patients might benefit from preoperative nTMS mapping.

Preoperative motor mapping by navigated transcranial magnetic brain stimulation improves outcome for motor eloquent lesions

BACKGROUND

Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) has been proven to influence surgical indication and planning. Yet there is still no clear evidence how these additional preoperative functional data influence the clinical course and outcome. Thus, this study aimed to compare patients with motor eloquently located supratentorial lesions investigated with or without preoperative nTMS in terms of clinical outcome parameters.

METHODS

A prospectively enrolled cohort of 100 patients with supratentorial lesions located in motor eloquent areas was investigated by preoperative nTMS (2010-2013) and matched with a control of 100 patients who were operated on without nTMS data (2006-2010) by a matched pair analysis.

RESULTS

Patients in the nTMS group showed a significantly lower rate of residual tumor on postoperative MRI (OR 0.3828; 95% CI 0.2062-0.7107). Twelve percent of patients in the nTMS and 1% of patients in the non-nTMS group improved while 75% and 81% of the nTMS and non-nTMS groups, respectively, remained unchanged and 13% and 18% of patients in the nTMS and non-nTMS groups, respectively, deteriorated in postoperative motor function on long-term follow-up (P = .0057). Moreover, the nTMS group showed smaller craniotomies (nTMS 22.4 ± 8.3 cm(2); non-nTMS 26.7 ± 11.3 cm(2); P = .0023).

CONCLUSIONS

This work increases the level of evidence for preoperative motor mapping by nTMS for rolandic lesions in a group comparison study. We therefore strongly advocate nTMS to become increasingly used for these lesions. However, a randomized trial on the comparison with the gold standard of intraoperative mapping seems mandatory.

[Electromagnetic navigation of transpedicular punctures: more precise than the standard?]

AIM

Before clinical implementation of an approved electromagnetic tracking system (CAPPA IRAD EMT) an experimental trial was performed to investigate the accuracy of the system and its safety in application for transpedicular vertebral punctures in comparison to the classical fluoroscopic method.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 110 transpedicular punctures were performed bilaterally using 11 vertebrae of 5 realistic artificial phantoms and 1 pedicle was punctured with the conventional technique using c-arm fluoroscopy and the other with the electromagnetic tracking system. As a target a radiopaque non-ferromagnetic marker was implanted bilaterally in the anterior wall of the vertebrae. For evaluation of the precision the distance from the end of the puncture to the target and the gradual deviation of the actual channel from the ideal trajectory were assessed in three-dimensional computer tomography. Calculations and statistical analysis were performed according to the Wilcoxon test by means of SPSS 16.0.1 for Windows.

RESULTS

The mean distance from the target was 6.6 mm (± 3.9 mm standard deviation SD) with electromagnetic navigation compared to 3.2 mm (± 2.8 mm SD) with fluoroscopic assistance and the mean aberration from the ideal trajectory was 18.4° (± 4.6° SD) compared to 6.5° (± 3.5° SD), respectively. The difference of accuracy was highly significant regarding both parameters (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The minimum requirement for accuracy of transpedicular punctures could not be achieved with electromagnetic navigation. Unless proven otherwise, the lack of accuracy is attributed to unstable referencing. Despite evidence of successful employment for soft tissue punctures the system cannot currently be recommended for osseous applications of the spine.

Practical assessment of preoperative functional mapping techniques: navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging

Preoperative brain mapping is vital to improve the outcome of patients with tumors located in eloquent areas. While functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) remains the most commonly used preoperative mapping technique, navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) has recently been proposed as a new preoperative method for the clinical and surgical management of such patients. This study aims at evaluating the impact of nTMS as a routine examination and its ultimate contribution to patient outcome. We performed a preliminary prospective study on eight patients harboring a cerebral lesion in eloquent motor areas. Each patient underwent preoperative cortical brain mapping via both fMRI and nTMS; then, we assessed the reliability of both methods by comparing them with intraoperative mapping by direct cortical stimulation (DCS). This study suggests that nTMS was more accurate than fMRI in detecting the true cortical motor area when compared with DCS data, with a mean of deviation ± confidence interval (CI) of 8.47 ± 4.6 mm between nTMS and DCS and of 12.9 ± 5.7 mm between fMRI and DCS (p < 0.05). The results indicated that within the limits of our statistical sample, nTMS was found to be a useful, reliable, and non-invasive option for preoperative planning as well as for the identification of the motor strip; in addition, it usually has short processing times and is very well tolerated by patients, thereby increasing their compliance and possibly improving surgical outcome.

Utility of presurgical navigated transcranial magnetic brain stimulation for the resection of tumors in eloquent motor areas

Object

Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is a newly evolving technique. Despite its supposed purpose (for example, preoperative central region mapping), little is known about its accuracy compared with established modalities like direct cortical stimulation (DCS) and functional MR (fMR) imaging. Against this background, the authors performed the current study to compare the accuracy of nTMS with DCS and fMR imaging.

Methods

Fourteen patients with tumors in or close to the precentral gyrus were examined using nTMS for motor cortex mapping, as were 12 patients with lesions in the subcortical white matter motor tract. Moreover, preoperative fMR imaging and intraoperative mapping of the motor cortex were performed via DCS, and the outlining of the motor cortex was compared.

Results

In the 14 cases of lesions affecting the precentral gyrus, the primary motor cortex as outlined by nTMS correlated well with that delineated by intraoperative DCS mapping, with a deviation of 4.4 ± 3.4 mm between the two methods. In comparing nTMS with fMR imaging, the deviation between the two methods was much larger: 9.8 ± 8.5 mm for the upper extremity and 14.7 ± 12.4 mm for the lower extremity. In 13 of 14 cases, the surgeon admitted easier identification of the central region because of nTMS. The procedure had a subjectively positive influence on the operative results in 5 cases and was responsible for a changed resection strategy in 2 cases. One of 26 patients experienced nTMS as unpleasant; none found it painful.

Conclusions

Navigated TMS correlates well with DCS as a gold standard despite factors that are supposed to contribute to the inaccuracy of nTMS. Moreover, surgeons have found nTMS to be an additional and helpful modality during the resection of tumors affecting eloquent motor areas, as well as during preoperative planning.

Preoperative Functional Mapping for Rolandic Brain Tumor Surgery: Comparison of Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Direct Cortical Stimulation

BACKGROUND:

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is the only noninvasive method for presurgical stimulation mapping of cortical function. Recent technical advancements have significantly increased the focality and usability of the method.

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the accuracy of a 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging-navigated TMS system (nTMS) with the gold standard of direct cortical stimulation (DCS).

METHODS:

The primary motor areas of 20 patients with rolandic tumors were mapped preoperatively with nTMS at 110% of the individual resting motor threshold. Intraoperative DCS was available from 17 patients. The stimulus locations eliciting the largest electromyographic response in the target muscles (“hotspots”) were determined for both methods.

RESULTS:

The nTMS and DCS hotspots were located on the same gyrus in all cases. The mean ± SEM distance between the nTMS and DCS hotspots was 7.83 ± 1.18 mm for the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle (n = 15) and 7.07 ± 0.88 mm for the tibialis anterior muscle (n = 8). When a low number of DCS stimulations was performed, the distance between the nTMS and DCS hotspots increased substantially (r = −0.86 for APB). After the exclusion of the cases with &lt; 15 DCS APB responses, the mean ± SEM distance between the hotspots was only 4.70 ± 1.09 mm for APB (n = 8).

CONCLUSION:

Peritumoral mapping of the motor cortex by nTMS agreed well with the gold standard of DCS. Thus, nTMS is a reliable tool for preoperative mapping of motor function.

Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for preoperative functional diagnostics in brain tumor surgery

OBJECTIVE

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive method for analyzing cortical function. To utilize TMS for presurgical functional diagnostics, the magnetic impulse must be precisely targeted by stereotactically positioning the coil. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of TMS for operation planning when combined with a sensor-based electromagnetic navigation system (nTMS).

METHODS

Preoperative functional mapping with nTMS was performed in 10 patients with rolandic tumors. Intraoperative mapping was performed with the "gold standard" of direct cortical stimulation. Stimulation was performed in the same predefined 5-mm raster for both modalities, and the results were compared.

RESULTS

In regard to the 5-mm mapping raster, the centers of gravity of nTMS and direct cortical stimulation were located at the same spot in 4 cases and at neighboring spots in the remaining 6 cases. The mean distance between the tumor and the nearest motor response ("safety margin") was 7.9 mm (range, 5-15 mm; standard deviation, 3.2 mm) for nTMS and 6.6 mm (range, 0-12 mm; standard deviation, 3.4 mm) for direct cortical stimulation.

CONCLUSION

nTMS allowed for reliable, precise application of the magnetic impulse, and the peritumoral somatotopy corresponded well between the 2 modalities in all 10 cases. nTMS is a promising method for preoperative functional mapping in motor cortex tumor surgery.