Significance of biodegradable implants in case of midfacial fractures

Comparison between resorbable plates vs. titanium plates for treatment of zygomatic fractures: a systematic review with meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare resorbable plates with titanium plates for the fixation of zygomatic fractures, taking into account postoperative complications.

METHODS

This systematic review followed the guidelines of PRISMA and the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook and was registered in PROSPERO. The electronic search was performed in the Web of Science, PubMed, Virtual Health Library, and Cochrane Library databases and in the gray literature. The study selection and the data extraction were performed by three calibrated and independent researchers. The assessment of the risk of bias in the studies was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for clinical trials. Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager Software version 5.3, using the Peto's Odds Ratios (PORs), and when I² > 30, the random effect model was used. The evaluation of the quality of the evidence was carried out through GRADE.

RESULTS

A total of 2651 studies were screened and only nine were included; 7 of which were used for quantitative assessment. The follow-up time for patients ranged from 6 months to 5 years. All studies showed a low risk of bias in the "incomplete outcome data" domain. The need for plate removal (POR: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.81, I² = 0%) and dehiscence (POR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.63, I² = not applied) was lower for the group of patients who used resorbable plates than for titanium plates.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in the occurrence of infection, diplopia, or paresthesia between the fixation methods. Resorbable plates showed better postoperative clinical performance.

[Alveoloplasty and the use of osteosynthesis material in the cleft lip palate]

OBJECTIVES

To compare the results of secondary alveoloplasty performed in one Hospital when osteosynthesis material was used and when the bone graft does not require this material, and relating them to factors such as gender and age.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted from the years 2014 to 2019 in this Hospital on the selected patients who met the inclusion criteria. Two periods of ages, period A: ages between 5-12 years (mixed secondary alveoloplasty) and period B: greater than 12 years (late secondary alveoloplasty). Autologous bone from the iliac crest or parietal calotte was used for the bone graft. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group I: patients with alveoloplasties that required osteosynthesis material. Group II: patients who did not require osteosynthesis material. Parameters evaluated: the success criteria for alveoloplasty were assessed according to the clinical parameters described by Precious. Alveoloplasty was successful if they met all the criteria of Precious in the year of intervention. Postoperative complications in both groups were evaluated. The statistical analysis was performed using the exact Fisher test for qualitative variables.

RESULTS

Alveoloplasty was successful in 89.4% of patients in group I, while it was 90.3% in group II. Alveoloplasty was successful in 87.5% of females compared to 91.17% of males. The intervention was a success in 91.48% of patients in group A, compared to 66.6% in group B. The osteosynthesis material in two patients of group I was not degraded in the annual assessment. There were no significant differences in any of the comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of osteosynthesis material does not alter the integration of the bone graft in patients that undergo alveoloplasty. Factors such as gender or age do not influence the results of the interventions.

Enhanced radiographic visualization of resorbable foils for orbital floor reconstruction: A proof of principle

PURPOSE

Despite the advantages and broad applications of alloplastic resorbable implants, postoperative radiological control is challenging due to its radiolucency. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the radiographic visibility of newly developed materials for orbital floor reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The radiographic visibility of four different material combinations consisting of poly-(L-lactic acid)/poly-glycolic acid (PLLA/PGA) or poly(D,L-lactic acid) (PDLLA) enriched with magnesium (Mg), hydroxyapatite (HA) or β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) with various layers of thicknesses (0.3, 0.6, and 1 mm), surgically placed above the orbital floor of a human head specimen, was evaluated using computed tomography (CT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). The visibility was rated on a scale of 0-10 in CT/CBCT and by Hounsfield Units in CT for each subject.

RESULTS

All of the materials were clearly detectable in CT scans. Visibility was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the standard soft tissue window (mean score: 7.3, ranging from 2 to 10) in comparison to the standard bone window (mean score: 5.2, ranging from 1 to 10). In CBCT (mean score: 3.3, ranging from 0 to 7), there was significantly lower but still sufficient visibility of the materials compared to the CT soft tissue window (p < 0.001) and CT bone window (p < 0.001). Comparing the different materials' visibility among the group of same layer thicknesses with each other, in the majority of cases, PDLLA enriched with β-TCP appeared to be most visible in both CT and CBCT.

CONCLUSION

The incorporation of radiopaque elements to PLLA/PGA and PDLLA polymers is a promising strategy to improve their visibility in CT and CBCT. Our data suggest that the reconstruction of the orbital floor with these new materials could provide an advantageous postoperative radiographic control.

Cochlear implant fixation using resorbable mesh

In this article we describe a new method of cochlear implant receiver-stimulator fixation using a resorbable poly (D,L) lactic acid mesh. We conducted a retrospective case review at a tertiary referral center; 10 pediatric and 4 adult patients had undergone cochlear implantation during the period from February to October 2008. Resorbable poly (D,L) lactic acid mesh and pins were used for fixation of the cochlear implant receiver stimulator. The receiver stimulator was assessed for stability/migration, and the scalp flap/incision were evaluated for allergic reactions, infections, and healing problems. With an average follow-up of 17.2 months, no patients had migration of the receiver stimulator, and there was no evidence of infection, wound dehiscence, or allergic reaction. Early results indicate that fixation of a cochlear implant receiver stimulator using resorbable mesh is well tolerated and provides good stability without device migration. Resorbable mesh fixation of the receiver stimulator is a reasonable alternative technique for cochlear implantation.

[Implant materials for the internal fixation of midfacial fractures]

The material used for osteosynthesis plays a crucial role in the management of facial fractures. Plates need to be flexible enough to be bent and should not be palpable through the skin, while ensuring stable fixation und adequate biocompatibility. Although stainless steel was initially the material of choice, titanium has become the standard material due to its superior biocompatibility. While the explantation of titanium plates and screws appears unnecessary in general, it should be considered in cases of dislocation, cosmetic concerns, pain and infection. Due to their limited initial stability and a potential increase in local complications, resorbable materials based on polymeric lactose are used with caution in midfacial fractures in adults. Our own retrospective study comparing the postoperative complications after fixation of lateral midfacial fractures with titanium and resorbable systems demonstrated a low complication rate for both systems (7-8%) and no statistically significant difference between the two. The appropriate material for fixation should be selected based on the localization and severity of the fracture, the experience of the surgeon as well as on the age and overall condition of the patient.

Imaging of maxillofacial trauma: Evolutions and emerging revolutions

The aim of diagnostic imaging for maxillofacial trauma is to provide additional information that can positively influence medical or surgical patient management. Current advances in diagnostic imaging have come from the confluence of 3 driving forces: (1) the demand from clinicians to enhance and expand their diagnostic abilities; (2) the development of new theoretical concepts by basic scientists; and (3) the application of concepts by engineers and manufacturers to provide increasingly sophisticated imaging capabilities. The role of imaging within the health care environment is, however, also buffeted by the complex, sometimes competing, interactions of external social, political, economic, and technological pressures at the national, regional, and local levels. The purposes of this review are to provide a perspective on current imaging modalities used for maxillofacial trauma and to provide an insight into the influences, both technologic and external, on future developments and applications.

Fixation of zygomatic fractures with a biodegradable copolymer osteosynthesis system: short- and long-term results

Biodegradable osteosynthesis devices can be viewed as addition to, not yet replacement for conventional metal osteosynthesis materials. In a series of 65 patients with zygomatic fractures, a short-term complication/sequelae rate of 22.8% and a long-term complication rate of 9.4% were recorded. Lactosorb plates, panels and screws were the only devices used for osteosynthesis. All complications associated with the biodegradable material could be considered minor and were resolved by the use of minor surgical procedures or conservative measures. The results of this study indicate that treatment of zygomatic fractures with biodegradable osteosynthesis material has no major long-term adverse effects beyond the total material resorption time.