Detection of EGFR, KRAS and BRAF mutations in metastatic cells from cerebrospinal fluid

Cytological Samples: An Asset for the Diagnosis and Therapeutic Management of Patients with Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer has become the leading cause of cancer death for men and women. Most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage when surgery is no longer a therapeutic option. At this stage, cytological samples are often the less invasive source for diagnosis and the determination of predictive markers. We assessed the ability of cytological samples to perform diagnosis, and to establish molecular profile and PD-L1 expression, which are essential for the therapeutic management of patients.

METHODS

We included 259 cytological samples with suspected tumor cells and assessed the ability to confirm the type of malignancy by immunocytochemistry. We summarized results of molecular testing by next generation sequencing (NGS) and PD-L1 expression from these samples. Finally, we analyzed the impact of these results in the patient management.

RESULTS

Among the 259 cytological samples, 189 concerned lung cancers. Of these, immunocytochemistry confirmed the diagnosis in 95%. Molecular testing by NGS was obtained in 93% of lung adenocarcinomas and non-small cell lung cancer. PD-L1 results were obtained in 75% of patients tested. The results obtained with cytological samples led to a therapeutic decision in 87% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Cytological samples are obtained by minimally invasive procedures and can provide enough material for the diagnosis and therapeutic management in lung cancer patients.

Biomarkers in the management of lung cancer: changing the practice of thoracic oncology

Lung cancer currently represents a leading cause of cancer death. Substantial progress achieved in the medical therapy of lung cancer during the last decade has been associated with the advent of targeted therapy, including immunotherapy. The targeted therapy has gradually shifted from drugs suppressing general mechanisms of tumor growth and progression to agents aiming at transforming mechanisms like driver mutations in a particular tumor. Knowledge of the molecular characteristics of a tumor has become an essential component of the more targeted therapeutic approach. There are specific challenges for biomarker determination in lung cancer, in particular a commonly limited size of tumor sample. Liquid biopsy is therefore of particular importance in the management of lung cancer. Laboratory medicine is an indispensable part of multidisciplinary management of lung cancer. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) has played and will continue playing a major role in updating and spreading the knowledge in the field.

Comparison between Immunocytochemistry, FISH and NGS for ALK and ROS1 Rearrangement Detection in Cytological Samples

The detection of ROS1 and ALK rearrangements is performed for advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Several techniques can be used on cytological samples, such as immunocytochemistry (ICC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and, more recently, next-generation sequencing (NGS), which is gradually becoming the gold standard. We performed a retrospective study to compare ALK and ROS1 rearrangement results from immunocytochemistry, FISH and NGS methods from 131 cytological samples. Compared to NGS, the sensitivity and specificity of ICC were 0.79 and 0.91, respectively, for ALK, and 1 and 0.87 for ROS1. Regarding FISH, the sensitivity and specificity were both at 1 for ALK and ROS1 probes. False-positive cases obtained by ICC were systematically corrected by FISH. When using ICC and FISH techniques, results are very close to NGS. The false-positive cases obtained by ICC are corrected by FISH, and the true-positive cases are confirmed. NGS has the potential to improve the detection of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements in cytological samples; however, the cost of this technique is still much higher than the sequential use of ICC and FISH.

Sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with leptomeningeal metastasis: A systematic review

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) refers to the dissemination of malignant cells in the subarachnoid space, pia, and arachnoid mater and is a severe condition associated with metastatic solid tumors. The most common solid tumor that develops into LM is lung cancer and the incidence increased in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with targetable mutations. However, tissue biopsy of LM is inaccessible, leading to the paucity of genomic profiles of LM to guide targeted treatments and explore biological mechanisms. In recent years, liquid biopsy is considered a minimally invasive and dynamic method to trace the genomic alterations of cancer cells and some studies started to perform sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in patients with LM to reveal the targeted mutations and genomic profiles. In this review, we focused on studies performed sequencing of CSF in NSCLC patients with LM and summarized the sequencing results and their commonality. As the only way to reveal the genomic landscapes of LM, our review provided evidence that sequencing of CSF is a promising management method in LM patients to dynamically guide target therapy and monitor intracranial tumor response. Furthermore, it reveals a unique genomic profile of LM including driver genes, drug-resistant mutations, and a number of copy number variations. Sequencing of CSF in LM patients seems to provide more comprehensive genomic information than we expected and the biological significance behind the genomic alternations needs further study.