Establishment of the intelligent verification criteria for a routine urinalysis analyzer in a multi-center study

Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Urinalysis: Is the Future Already Here?

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising and transformative tool in the field of urinalysis, offering substantial potential for advancements in disease diagnosis and the development of predictive models for monitoring medical treatment responses.

CONTENT

Through an extensive examination of relevant literature, this narrative review illustrates the significance and applicability of AI models across the diverse application area of urinalysis. It encompasses automated urine test strip and sediment analysis, urinary tract infection screening, and the interpretation of complex biochemical signatures in urine, including the utilization of cutting-edge techniques such as mass spectrometry and molecular-based profiles.

SUMMARY

Retrospective studies consistently demonstrate good performance of AI models in urinalysis, showcasing their potential to revolutionize clinical practice. However, to comprehensively evaluate the real clinical value and efficacy of AI models, large-scale prospective studies are essential. Such studies hold the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy, improve patient outcomes, and optimize medical treatment strategies. By bridging the gap between research and clinical implementation, AI can reshape the landscape of urinalysis, paving the way for more personalized and effective patient care.

Pitfalls in the diagnosis of hematuria

Detection of hemoglobin (Hb) and red blood cells in urine (hematuria) is characterized by a large number of pitfalls. Clinicians and laboratory specialists must be aware of these pitfalls since they often lead to medical overconsumption or incorrect diagnosis. Pre-analytical issues (use of vacuum tubes or urine tubes containing preservatives) can affect test results. In routine clinical laboratories, hematuria can be assayed using either chemical (test strips) or particle-counting techniques. In cases of doubtful results, Munchausen syndrome or adulteration of the urine specimen should be excluded. Pigmenturia (caused by the presence of dyes, urinary metabolites such as porphyrins and homogentisic acid, and certain drugs in the urine) can be easily confused with hematuria. The peroxidase activity (test strip) can be positively affected by the presence of non-Hb peroxidases (e.g. myoglobin, semen peroxidases, bacterial, and vegetable peroxidases). Urinary pH, haptoglobin concentration, and urine osmolality may affect specific peroxidase activity. The implementation of expert systems may be helpful in detecting preanalytical and analytical errors in the assessment of hematuria. Correcting for dilution using osmolality, density, or conductivity may be useful for heavily concentrated or diluted urine samples.

Combination of UC-3500 and UF-5000 as a quick and effective method to exclude bacterial urinary tract infection

BACKGROUND

Our study aims to evaluate the performance of the combination of Sysmex urine dry chemistry analyzer UC-3500 and urine particle analyzer UF-5000 in screening bacterial urinary tract infection (UTI).

METHODS

We analyzed 2000 urine specimens from patients with suspected UTI by using a urine dry chemistry analyzer (UC-3500) and a fully automated sediment analyzer (UF-5000). After being tested by the instrument, all specimens were sent to our clinical microbiology laboratory for culture. In addition, 600 urine specimens were selected to evaluate the accuracy of the six screening strategies established in this study.

RESULTS

The consistency of UF-5000 bacterial classification and bacterial culture was fair (Kappa = 0.339). The counts of WBC and BACT elevated with sequential group designs (P < 0.001). The cut-off value of WBC was 32.20/μL for males (AUC, 0.942, 95%CI, 0.930-0.955) and 39.15/μL for females (AUC, 0.931, 95%CI, 0.914-0.948). The sensitivity and specificity of WBC were relatively higher than those of BACT. Strategy④ and Strategy⑥ in all six strategies had a good negative predictive value (NPV) which was 98.73%.

CONCLUSION

UF-5000 bacterial classification cannot be used as a practical reference. 32.20/μL (male) and 39.15/μL (female) for WBC as well as 22.35/μL (male) and 127.25/μL (female) for BACT were used as cut-off values to effectively determine whether UTI occurs. WBC, BACT and LEU joint screening programs were suitable to rapidly and effectively exclude bacterial UTI.

Leukocyte Esterase Strip Quantitative Detection Based on RGB Photometry is a Probable Method to Diagnose Periprosthetic Joint Infection: An Exploratory Study

OBJECTIVE

Leucocyte esterase (LE) strip test is the most rapid, convenient, and cheap method to diagnose chronic periprosthesis joint infection (PJI). However, the determination of LE strip mainly relies on colorimetric method with strong subjectivity, which leads to low diagnostic accuracy. Therefore, we try to convert LE strip images into digital data through the RGB photometric system to achieve objective diagnosis. This method will greatly improve the accuracy of LE strip detection and diagnosis of PJI.

METHODS

From January 2021 to September 2021, 46 patients with suspected PJI after total hip and knee arthroplasty underwent diagnostic joint puncture. After effective joint fluid samples were harvested, they were divided into original fluid and centrifuged fluid for LE strip detection. Real-time images of LE strip were taken at 90 s, 3 min, 5 min, 10 min, and 15 min after sampling, and their brightness (Y) was obtained after they were input into an RGB photometric system. Grouping was based on centrifugation, infection, and time points, and then the differences in brightness among groups were compared. The correlation between LE strip image brightness and WBC count was evaluated. Student t-test was used for the parametric data and chi-square test for qualitative data. Simple linear regression was utilized to analyze the correlation between brightness and WBC count in each group.

RESULTS

Included were 19 cases of PJI and 27 Non-PJI subjects diagnosed against ICM2018 diagnostic criteria. The brightness was lower in the PJI group than in Non-PJI group (p < 0.05). The brightness of the uncentrifuged group was lower than that of the centrifuged group (p < 0.05). Irrespective of centrifugation or infection, the brightness of LE strip decreased with the exposure time after sampling. The brightness of LE strip was correlated with WBC count at different time points, with the correlation being strongest 5 min after sampling (R² (5 min) = 0.86, p < 0.0001). The correlation between LE strip brightness and WBC count was also found in the centrifugation group, with the correlation being most robust 15 min after sampling (R² (15 min) = 0.73, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

A remarkable correlation was found between LE strip brightness and the WBC count. It is feasible to directly quantify LE strip image on a RGB photometer to achieve quantitative detection of LE strip to diagnose PJI.

Sysmex UN2000 detection of protein/creatinine ratio and of renal tubular epithelial cells can be used for screening lupus nephritis

OBJECTIVES

This study is aimed to evaluate if automated urine sediment analysis UN2000 can be used to screen lupus nephritis.

METHODS

UN2000 was used to examine 160 urine samples from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and 124 urine samples from Lupus nephritis. The result of protein/creatinine ratio(P/C) and renal tubular epithelial cells (RTEC) were evaluated. With biochemical analysis and microscopic examination as the gold standard, the Kappa consistency test was used to analyze the accuracy of P/C and RTEC. Analysis was to evaluate the accuracy of P/C single item or RTEC single item and both screening lupusnephritis.

RESULTS

The consistency of P/C and the gold standard, and that of RTEC and the gold standard are respectively strong and good (0.858 vs. 0.673). The specificity, positive predictive value, and coincidence were the highest when P/C ≥ 2 + was set as the only screening standard for lupus nephritis. When the standard was selected between P/C ≥ 2 + or RTEC > 2.8 cells/µl, the sensitivity and negative predictive value were the highest.

CONCLUSION

UN 2000 can be used to screen lupus nephritis by detecting P/C and RTEC.

Improving clinical performance of urine sediment analysis by implementation of intelligent verification criteria

OBJECTIVES

Urinary test strip and sediment analysis integrated with intelligent verification criteria can help to select samples that need manual review. This study aimed to evaluate the improvement in the diagnostic performance of combined urinary test strip and urinary sediment analysis using intelligent verification criteria on the latest generation automated test strip and urinary fluoresce flow cytometry (UFFC) analysers.

METHODS

Urine test strip and sediment analysis were performed using the Sysmex UC-3500 and UF-5000 (Kobe, Japan) on 828 urinary samples at the clinical laboratory of the Ghent University Hospital. The results were compared to manual microscopy using phase-contrast microscopy as a reference. After the application of the intelligent verification criteria, we determined whether the diagnostic performance of urine sediment analysis could be improved.

RESULTS

Application of intelligent verification criteria resulted in an increase in specificity from 88.5 to 96.8% and from 88.2 to 94.9% for red blood cells and white blood cells, respectively. Implementing review rules for renal tubular epithelial cells and pathological casts increased the specificity from 66.7 to 74.2% and from 96.2 to 100.0%, respectively; and improved the diagnostic performance of urinary crystals and atypical cells.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of review rules improved the diagnostic performance of UFFC, thereby increasing the reliability and quality of urine sediment results.

The development of autoverification system of lymphocyte subset assays on the flow cytometry platform

OBJECTIVES

Peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets are important parameters for monitoring immune status; however, lymphocyte subset detection is time-consuming and error-prone. This study aimed to explore a highly efficient and clinically useful autoverification system for lymphocyte subset assays performed on the flow cytometry platform.

METHODS

A total of 94,402 lymphocyte subset test results were collected. To establish the limited-range rules, 80,427 results were first used (69,135 T lymphocyte subset tests and 11,292 NK, B, T lymphocyte tests), of which 15,000 T lymphocyte subset tests from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected patients were used to set customized limited-range rules for HIV infected patients. Subsequently, 13,975 results were used for historical data validation and online test validation.

RESULTS

Three key autoverification rules were established, including limited-range, delta-check, and logical rules. Guidelines for addressing the issues that trigger these rules were summarized. The historical data during the validation phase showed that the total autoverification passing rate of lymphocyte subset assays was 69.65% (6,941/9,966), with a 67.93% (5,268/7,755) passing rate for T lymphocyte subset tests and 75.67% (1,673/2,211) for NK, B, T lymphocyte tests. For online test validation, the total autoverification passing rate was 75.26% (3,017/4,009), with 73.23% (2,191/2,992) for the T lymphocyte subset test and 81.22% (826/1,017) for the NK, B, T lymphocyte test. The turnaround time (TAT) was reduced from 228 to 167 min using the autoverification system.

CONCLUSIONS

The autoverification system based on the laboratory information system for lymphocyte subset assays reduced TAT and the number of error reports and helped in the identification of abnormal cell populations that may offer clues for clinical interventions.

[Association of neonatal blood calcium levels with perinatal factors and neonatal urinary calcium levels measured by an intelligent urine test system]

OBJECTIVE

To study the association of neonatal blood calcium levels with perinatal factors and neonatal urinary calcium levels measured by an intelligent urine test system.

METHODS

The medical data of 96 full-term singleton neonates with mild diseases were collected by a cross-sectional survey, who were hospitalized in the Department of Neonatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, from June to August 2018. Urinary calcium levels measured by an intelligent urine test system, total blood calcium levels, ionized calcium levels, and the mother's calcium and vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy were recorded.

RESULTS

Compared with the group without vitamin D supplementation for the mother (17 neonates), the group with vitamin D supplementation for the mother (79 neonates) had significantly higher levels of total blood calcium and ionized calcium (P < 0.05).The group with both vitamin D and calcium supplementation for the mother (68 neonates) had significantly higher levels of ionized calcium than controls (28 neonate) (P=0.05). There was no significant difference in the levels of total blood calcium and ionized calcium between the group with calcium supplementation for the mother (74 neonates) and the group without calcium supplementation for the mother (22 neonates) (P > 0.05). The hypothermia group (5 neonates) had a significantly lower level of total blood calcium than the normal body temperature group (91 neonates) (P < 0.05). There was a significantly positive correlation between the maternal blood total calcium level and the neonatal blood total calcium and ionized calcium levels (r=0.881 and 0.703 respectively; P < 0.05). The neonatal urinary calcium level measured by the intelligent urine test system was significantly correlated with the blood ionized calcium level (r=0.526, P=0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy can increase the blood levels of total calcium and ionized calcium in neonates, and calcium supplementation alone cannot increase the blood levels of total calcium or ionized calcium in neonates. Hypothermia in neonates might cause the reduction in blood calcium levels. The urinary calcium level measured by the intelligent urine test system is positively correlated with the blood level of ionized calcium.

What Is the Optimal Timing for Reading the Leukocyte Esterase Strip for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection?

BACKGROUND

The leucocyte esterase (LE) strip test often is used to diagnose periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). In accordance with the manufacturer's directions, the LE strip test result is read 3 minutes after exposing it to joint fluid, but this has not been supported by robust research. Moreover, we have noted that the results of the LE strip test might change over time, and our previous studies have found that centrifugation causes the results of the LE strip test to degrade. Still, there is no evidence-based recommendation as to when to read the LE strip test to maximize diagnostic accuracy, in general, and the best reading times for the LE strip test before and after centrifugation need to be determined separately, in particular.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the optimal timing for reading LE strip test results before centrifugation to diagnose PJI? (2) What is the optimal timing for reading LE strip test results after centrifugation to diagnose PJI?

METHODS

This study was a prospective diagnostic trial. In all, 120 patients who were scheduled for revision arthroplasty and had signs of infection underwent joint aspiration in the outpatient operating room between July 2018 and July 2019 and were enrolled in this single-center study. For inclusion, patients must have had a diagnosis of PJI or nonPJI, valid synovial fluid samples, and must not have received antibiotics within 2 weeks before arthrocentesis. As such, 36 patients were excluded; 84 patients were included for analysis, and all 84 patients agreed to participate. The 2018 International Consensus Meeting Criteria (ICM 2018) was used for the classification of 49 patients with PJI (score ≥ 6) and 35 without PJI (score ≤ 2). The classification was used as the standard against which the different timings for reading LE strips were compared. All patients without PJI were followed for more than 1 year, during which they did not report the occurrence of PJI. All patients were graded against the diagnostic criteria regardless of their LE strip test results. In 83 patients, one drop of synovial fluid (50 μL) was applied to LE strips before and after centrifugation, and in one patient (without PJI), the sample was not centrifuged because the sample volume was less than 1.5 mL. The results of the strip test were read on an automated colorimeter. Starting from 1 minute after centrifugation, these strips were automatically read once every minute, 15 times (over a period of 16 minutes), and the results were independently recorded by two observers. Results were rated as negative, ±, 1+, and 2+ upon the machine reading. Grade 2+ (dark purple) was used as the threshold for a positive result. An investigator who was blinded to the study performed the statistics. Optimal timing for reading the LE strip before and after centrifugation was determined by using receiver operative characteristic (ROC) analysis. The specificity, sensitivity, and positive predictive and negative predictive values were calculated for key timepoints.

RESULTS

Before centrifugation, the area under the curve was the highest when the results were read at 5 minutes (0.90 [95% CI 0.83 to 0.98]; sensitivity 0.88 [95% CI 0.75 to 0.95]; specificity 0.89 [95% CI 0.72 to 0.96]). After centrifugation, the area under the curve was the highest when the results were read at 10 minutes (0.92 [95% CI 0.86 to 0.98]; sensitivity 0.65 [95% CI 0.50 to 0.78]; specificity 0.97 [95% CI 0.83 to 1.00]).

CONCLUSION

The LE strip test results are affected by time and centrifugation. For samples without centrifugation, we found that 5 minutes after application was the best time to read LE strips. We cannot deny the use of centrifuges because this is an effective way to solve the sample-mingling problem at present. We recommend 10 minutes postapplication as the most appropriate time to read LE strips after centrifugation. Multicenter and large-sample size studies are warranted to further verify our conclusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, diagnostic study.

Application of leukocyte esterase strip test in the screening of periprosthetic joint infections and prospects of high-precision strips

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents one of the most challenging complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Despite the availability of a variety of diagnostic techniques, the diagnosis of PJI remains a challenge due to the lack of well-established diagnostic criteria. The leucocyte esterase (LE) strips test has been proved to be a valuable diagnostic tool for PJI, and its weight in PJI diagnostic criteria has gradually increased. Characterized by its convenience, speed and immediacy, leucocyte esterase strips test has a prospect of broad application in PJI diagnosis. Admittedly, the leucocyte esterase strips test has some limitations, such as imprecision and liability to interference. Thanks to the application of new technologies, such as machine reading, quantitative detection and artificial intelligence, the LE strips test is expected to overcome the limitations and improve its accuracy.

General position of Croatian medical biochemistry laboratories on autovalidation: survey of the Working Group for Post-analytics of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine

Introduction

Autovalidation (AV) is an algorithm based on predefined rules designed, among others, to automate and standardize the postanalytical phase of laboratory work. The aim of this study was to examine the overall opinion of Croatian medical biochemistry laboratories regarding various aspects of AV.

Material and methods

This retrospective study is an analysis of the responses of a survey about AV comprised of 18 questions, as part of Module 10 (“Postanalytical phase of laboratory testing”) of national External Quality Assessment program, administered by the Croatian Centre for Quality Assessment in Laboratory Medicine. Results were reported as percentages of total number of participants in survey or as proportions of observed data if the overall number of data was <100.

Results

121 laboratories responded to the survey, of which 76% do not use AV, while 11% of laboratories use AV in routine laboratory work. 16/29 laboratories implemented semi-automated AV for general biochemistry (7/29), haematology (5/29), and coagulation (4/29) tests. Analytical measurement ranges, critical values, flags from analysers, interference indices and delta check were the most commonly used rules in the algorithm. 12/29 laboratories performed validation of AV with less than 500 samples (8/29). 7/13 laboratories report the percentage of AV being 20-50%, while 10/13 answered that introduction of AV significantly reduced turnaround time (TAT) (for 20 - 25%), especially for biochemistry tests.

Conclusions

Despite of its numerous benefits (i.e. shorter TAT, less manual validation, standardization of the postanalytical phase), only a small number of Croatian laboratories use AV.