The biological variation of insulin resistance markers: data from the European Biological Variation Study (EuBIVAS)

OBJECTIVES

An insulin resistant state is characteristic of patients with type 2 diabetes, polycystic ovary syndrome, and metabolic syndrome. Identification of insulin resistance (IR) is most readily achievable using formulae combining plasma insulin and glucose results. In this study, we have used data from the European Biological Variation Study (EuBIVAS) to examine the biological variability (BV) of IR using the Homeostasis Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) and the Quantitative Insulin sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI).

METHODS

Ninety EuBIVAS non-diabetic subjects (52F, 38M) from five countries had fasting HOMA-IR and QUICKI calculated from plasma glucose and insulin samples collected concurrently on 10 weekly occasions. The within-subject (CVI) and between-subject (CVG) BV estimates with 95 % CIs were obtained by CV-ANOVA after analysis of trends, variance homogeneity and outlier removal.

RESULTS

The CVI of HOMA-IR was 26.7 % (95 % CI 25.5-28.3), driven largely by variability in plasma insulin and the CVI for QUICKI was 4.1 % (95 % CI 3.9-4.3), reflecting this formula's logarithmic transformation of glucose and insulin values. No differences in values or BV components were observed between subgroups of men or women below and above 50 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The EuBIVAS, by utilising a rigorous experimental protocol, has produced robust BV estimates for two of the most commonly used markers of insulin resistance in non-diabetic subjects. This has shown that HOMA-IR, in particular, is highly variable in the same individual which limits the value of single measurements.

Biological Variation Data in Triathletes for Metabolism and Growth-Related Biomarkers Included in the Athlete Biological Passport

BACKGROUND

When using biological variation (BV) data, BV estimates need to be robust and representative. High-endurance athletes represent a population under special physiological conditions, which could influence BV estimates. Our study aimed to estimate BV in athletes for metabolism and growth-related biomarkers involved in the Athlete Biological Passport (ABP), by 2 different statistical models.

METHODS

Thirty triathletes were sampled monthly for 11 months. The samples were analyzed for human growth hormone (hGH), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), insulin, and N-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (P-III-NP) by immunoassay. Bayesian and ANOVA methods were applied to estimate within-subject (CVI) and between-subject BV.

RESULTS

CVI estimates ranged from 7.8% for IGFBP-3 to 27.0% for insulin, when derived by the Bayesian method. The 2 models gave similar results, except for P-III-NP. Data were heterogeneously distributed for P-III-NP for the overall population and in females for IGF-1 and IGFBP-3. BV components were not estimated for hGH due to lack of steady state. The index of individuality was below 0.6 for all measurands, except for insulin.

CONCLUSIONS

In an athlete population, to apply a common CVI for insulin would be appropriate, but for IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 gender-specific estimates should be applied. P-III-NP data were heterogeneously distributed and using a mean CVI may not be representative for the population. The high degree of individuality for IGF-1, IGFBP-3, and P-III-NP makes them good candidates to be interpreted through reference change values and the ABP.

Biological variation in the estimated glomerular filtration rate of healthy individuals within 24 h calculated using 2021CKD-EPI equations

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Use the MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) and 2021 CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) equation void of race coefficients (CKD-EPICrea, CKD-EPICys-C, and CKD-EPICrea+Cys-C) to estimate the BV (Biological variation) of eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate) within 24 h in a healthy population to help explain future studies using eGFR in the context of a known BV.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected from 30 healthy subjects at six time points within 24 h. Serum creatinine (S-Crea) and serum cystatin C (S-Cys-C) were measured, and the BV of eGFR was calculated. Outlier and variance homogeneity analyses were performed, followed by CV-ANOVA on trend-corrected data.

RESULTS

The eGFR CVI for the four equations (MDRD, CKD-EPICrea, CKD-EPICys-C, and CKD-EPICrea+Cys-C) were 8.39% (7.50-9.51%), 3.90% (3.49-4.42%), 6.58% (5.88-7.46%), and 5.03% (4.50-5.71%), respectively. The corresponding II and RCVpos/neg values were 0.69, 0.48, 0.51, and 0.31, and (29.30%, - 22.66%), (12.69%, - 11.2 6%), (20.97%, - 17.33%), and (15.88%, - 13.70%), respectively; RCVpos /neg of eGFR was highest in the MDRD equation and lowest in the CKD-EPI Crea equation. Additionally, the RCVpos/neg values of the individual was highest in the MDRD equation and lowest in the CKD-EPICrea+Cys-C equation; they are (56.51%, - 36.11%) and (5.01%, - 4.77%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We present data on the 24 h BV eGFR of the 2021 CKD-EPI equations. The presence of BV has impact on the interpretation of GFR results, affecting CKD disease grading. The RCVpos/neg differences were large among the individuals. When using eGFRs based on the MDRD and CKD-EPI equations, it is necessary to combine RCVpos/neg values before interpreting the results.

Biological variation: recent development and future challenges

Biological variation (BV) data have many applications in laboratory medicine. However, these depend on the availability of relevant and robust BV data fit for purpose. BV data can be obtained through different study designs, both by experimental studies and studies utilizing previously analysed routine results derived from laboratory databases. The different BV applications include using BV data for setting analytical performance specifications, to calculate reference change values, to define the index of individuality and to establish personalized reference intervals. In this review, major achievements in the area of BV from last decade will be presented and discussed. These range from new models and approaches to derive BV data, the delivery of high-quality BV data by the highly powered European Biological Variation Study (EuBIVAS), the Biological Variation Data Critical Appraisal Checklist (BIVAC) and other standards for deriving and reporting BV data, the EFLM Biological Variation Database and new applications of BV data including personalized reference intervals and measurement uncertainty.

Comparison of four indirect (data mining) approaches to derive within-subject biological variation

OBJECTIVES

Within-subject biological variation (CV _i ) is a fundamental aspect of laboratory medicine, from interpretation of serial results, partitioning of reference intervals and setting analytical performance specifications. Four indirect (data mining) approaches in determination of CV _i were directly compared.

METHODS

Paired serial laboratory results for 5,000 patients was simulated using four parameters, d the percentage difference in the means between the pathological and non-pathological populations, CV _i the within-subject coefficient of variation for non-pathological values, f the fraction of pathological values, and e the relative increase in CV _i of the pathological distribution. These parameters resulted in a total of 128 permutations. Performance of the Expected Mean Squares method (EMS), the median method, a result ratio method with Tukey's outlier exclusion method and a modified result ratio method with Tukey's outlier exclusion were compared.

RESULTS

Within the 128 permutations examined in this study, the EMS method performed the best with 101/128 permutations falling within ±0.20 fractional error of the 'true' simulated CV _i , followed by the result ratio method with Tukey's exclusion method for 78/128 permutations. The median method grossly under-estimated the CV _i . The modified result ratio with Tukey's rule performed best overall with 114/128 permutations within allowable error.

CONCLUSIONS

This simulation study demonstrates that with careful selection of the statistical approach the influence of outliers from pathological populations can be minimised, and it is possible to recover CV _i values close to the 'true' underlying non-pathological population. This finding provides further evidence for use of routine laboratory databases in derivation of biological variation components.

Problems with estimating reference change values (critical differences)

The concept of reference change values (RCVs) for diagnosis and monitoring of diseases has become well established. Several models habe been developed, e. g. one assuming a normal distribution and another one for a log-normal distribution. RCV values calculated for some measurands with both models are compared with each other and led to similar results. A few examples led to RCV values which are not plausible for diagnostic purposes. Although statistical concepts of RCV values are well established, their clinical relevance remains questionable at least for some measurands. Studies with clinicians are required whether RCVs are of practical usefulness.

The European Biological Variation Study (EuBIVAS): a summary report

Biological variation (BV) data have many important applications in laboratory medicine. Concerns about quality of published BV data led the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) 1st Strategic Conference to indicate need for new studies to generate BV estimates of required quality. In response, the EFLM Working Group on BV delivered the multicenter European Biological Variation Study (EuBIVAS). This review summarises the EuBIVAS and its outcomes. Serum/plasma samples were taken from 91 ostensibly healthy individuals for 10 consecutive weeks at 6 European centres. Analysis was performed by Siemens ADVIA 2400 (clinical chemistry), Cobas Roche 8000, c702 and e801 (proteins and tumor markers/hormones respectively), ACL Top 750 (coagulation parameters), and IDS iSYS or DiaSorin Liaison (bone biomarkers). A strict preanalytical and analytical protocol was applied. To determine BV estimates with 95% CI, CV-ANOVA after analysis of outliers, homogeneity and trend analysis or a Bayesian model was applied. EuBIVAS has so far delivered BV estimates for 80 different measurands. Estimates for 10 measurands (Non-HDL Cholesterol, S100-β protein, neuron-specific enolase, soluble transferrin receptor, intact fibroblast growth-factor-23, uncarboxylated-unphosphorylated matrix-Gla protein, human epididymis protein-4, free, conjugated and %free prostate-specific antigen), prior to EuBIVAS, have not been available. BV data for creatinine and troponin I were obtained using two analytical methods in each case. The EuBIVAS has delivered high-quality BV data for a wide range of measurands. The BV estimates are for many measurands lower than those previously reported, having an impact on the derived analytical performance specifications and reference change values.