Identification of macrotroponin T: findings from a case report and non-reproducible troponin T results

Role of Antitroponin Antibodies and Macrotroponin in the Clinical Interpretation of Cardiac Troponin

Cardiac troponin is extensively used as a biomarker in modern medicine due to its diagnostic capability for myocardial injury, as well as its predictive and prognostic value for cardiac diseases. However, heterophile antibodies, antitroponin antibodies, and macrotroponin complexes can be observed both in seemingly healthy individuals and patients with cardiac diseases, potentially leading to false positive or disproportionate elevation of cTn (cardiac troponin) assay results and introducing discrepancies in clinical interpretations with impact on medical management. In this review article, we describe the possible mechanisms of cTn release and the sources of variations in the assessment of circulating cTn levels. We also explore the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying antitroponin antibody development and discuss the influence exerted by macrotroponin complexes on the results of immunoassays. Additionally, we explore approaches to detect these complexes by presenting various clinical scenarios encountered in routine clinical practice. Finally, unsolved questions about the development, prevalence, and clinical significance of cardiac autoantibodies are discussed.

Practical approaches to the detection of macrotroponin

INTRODUCTION

Macrotroponin is increasingly recognised as a cause of confusion in interpreting high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTnI) results. In this study, we sought to evaluate two practical approaches to detecting macrotroponin. These two approaches are PEG precipitation and SVM (support vector machine) analysis to classify discrepancies between hs-cTn assays.

METHOD

Residual serum and heparin plasma specimens (n = 483) with initially elevated hs-cTnI from hospital and community laboratories were retested on multiple hs-cTn platforms before and after PEG precipitation and Protein A immunoglobulin depletion. SVM analysis was conducted to identify a linear equation that best discriminated specimens with macrotroponin using a combination of results from two different hs-cTn assays.

FINDINGS

The diagnostic performance of PEG precipitation was carried out using Protein A immunoglobulin depletion as the reference comparator. When a cutoff residual activity after PEG precipitation of ≤ 20% was used, this threshold carried a high specificity of 92% (confidence interval 83-98%; n = 189) using the Siemens hs-cTnI Vista assay and 95% specificity (86%-98%; n = 242) using the Abbott hs-cTnI Architect assay. SVM analysis generated a linear equation identifying macrotroponin specimens from results obtained on two hs-cTn assays. This approach can be highly specific, comparable to PEG precipitation when certain assay combinations and concentrations are used.

CONCLUSION

We describe and identify practical alternatives to detecting macrotroponin. These approaches can be optimised for high specificity, reducing the need for more complex laboratory methods.

Circulating Biomarkers for Monitoring Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Children

Most commonly diagnosed cancer pathologies in the pediatric population comprise leukemias and cancers of the nervous system. The percentage of cancer survivors increased from approximatively 50% to 80% thanks to improvements in medical treatments and the introduction of new chemotherapies. However, as a consequence, heart disease has become the main cause of death in the children due to the cardiotoxicity induced by chemotherapy treatments. The use of different cardiovascular biomarkers, complementing data obtained from electrocardiogram, echocardiography cardiac imaging, and evaluation of clinical symptoms, is considered a routine in clinical diagnosis, prognosis, risk stratification, and differential diagnosis. Cardiac troponin and natriuretic peptides are the best-validated biomarkers broadly accepted in clinical practice for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome and heart failure, although many other biomarkers are used and several potential markers are currently under study and possibly will play a more prominent role in the future. Several studies have shown how the measurement of cardiac troponin (cTn) can be used for the early detection of heart damage in oncological patients treated with potentially cardiotoxic chemotherapeutic drugs. The advent of high sensitive methods (hs-cTnI or hs-cTnT) further improved the effectiveness of risk stratification and monitoring during treatment cycles.

Unexpected high troponin T and I values in a child with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and acute chest pain: a case report

Background

Elevated troponin T (cTnT) and/or troponin I (cTnI) can be ascribed to multiple causes, mostly resulting from cardiac tissue damage and in lesser numbers resulting from non-cardiac related causes. The presence of macrotroponins is easily overlooked, with potentially negative consequences.

Case summary

This case report presents a case study of a 12-year-old child known to have MYH7 gene-associated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with acute chest pain combined with an unexpected high cTnT and cTnI. A cardiac cause was deemed unlikely after additional investigation, as these showed no abnormalities. After consulting a laboratory specialist, it could be concluded that the high cTnT and cTnI were a result of macrotroponin complexes, a protein complex consisting of circulating protein and endogenous autoantibodies against that protein, resulting in elevated values with misguiding and uncertain clinical significance.

Discussion

Awareness of the existence of macrotroponins could have prevented costly diagnostics and prolonged hospital admission with grave psychological impact, especially in children.

Antibody-mediated interferences affecting cardiac troponin assays: recommendations from the IFCC Committee on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Biomarkers

The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry Committee on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Biomarkers (IFCC C-CB) provides educational documents to facilitate the interpretation and use of cardiac biomarkers in clinical laboratories and practice. Our aim is to improve the understanding of certain key analytical and clinical aspects of cardiac biomarkers and how these may interplay. Measurements of cardiac troponin (cTn) have a prominent place in the clinical work-up of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. It is therefore important that clinical laboratories know how to recognize and assess analytical issues. Two emerging analytical issues resulting in falsely high cTn concentrations, often several fold higher than the upper reference limit (URL), are antibody-mediated assay interference due to long-lived cTn-antibody complexes, called macrotroponin, and crosslinking antibodies that are frequently referred to as heterophilic antibodies. We provide an overview of antibody-mediated cTn assay interference and provide recommendations on how to confirm the interference and interpret the results.

Methods for analyzing positive cardiac troponin assay interference

OBJECTIVES

The cardiac damage biomarkers cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and troponin I (cTnI) are used to identify patients with myocardial infarction (MI). To make the correct clinical decisions it is important to identify false positive results due to troponin assay interference. Often interferences are caused by high-molecular weight immunocomplexes called macrotroponin that may result in false troponin elevations because of delayed troponin clearance, or heterophilic antibodies that crosslink troponin assay antibodies and generate troponin-independent signals.

DESIGN & METHODS

We describe and compare four methods for cTnI assay interference analysis using a protein G spin column method, gel filtration chromatography and two versions of a sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation for cTnI assay interference analysis on five patients with confirmed cTnI interference and one MI patient without cTnI interference from our troponin interference referral center.

RESULTS

The protein G spin column method had a high between run variability but was still able to identify all five patients with cTnI interference. The sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation methods and the gel filtration method had simlar performancec and correctly identified the immunocomplexes that caused the cTnI interference.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience is that these methods are sufficient to safely confirm or exclude positive cTnI assay interference.

Not T too! False elevations in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-TnT) following specimen transport

Though false elevations attributed to preanalytical specimen handling have been widely reported for Troponin I (TnI), Troponin T (TnT) has appeared more robust to falsely elevated Tn. We describe reproducible false elevations in high sensitivity TnT (hs-TnT) in specimens after courier transport in plasma separator tubes (PST) off-site for testing. Hs-TnT was measured under 5 different conditions: 1) at collection location (N=24); 2) after transport upright in racks (N=66); 3) after transport with no control over tube agitation (N=69); 4) on transported aliquots (N=84); or 5) immediately after transport with no control over tube agitation (N=16), followed by keeping the specimen upright and re-measuring at 1hr, 2hr, 4hr, and 20-24hrs (N=6). To assess the degree of discrepancy, plasma from the original PST was aliquotted, re-centrifuged, potential debris removed, and hs-TnT re-measured. 43% of PST specimens collected offsite and transported with no control over tube agitation had clinically significant false elevations of hs-TnT which subsequently decreased following aliquotting and re-centrifugation (median decrease =9.9ng/L). Onsite testing or transported aliquots demonstrated no discrepancy. After being kept upright, discrepant specimens were not different from re-centrifuged aliquots by 4hrs (p=0.6141, repeated measures ANOVA with Dunn's multiple comparisons). Clinically significant false elevations of hs-TnT occurred in approximately 40% of separated PSTs that were transported in containers where specimens are transported with no control over tube agitation. This interference does not occur if plasma is aliquoted or if hs-TnT is tested at the collection site. In order to prevent these false elevations, and their potential patient impact on the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, specimens for hs-TnT measurement should be aliquoted at the collection location prior to transport.

Effect of Macrotroponin in a Cohort of Community Patients with Elevated Cardiac Troponin

BACKGROUND

Macrotroponin is an important cause of discrepancy between current high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays, however, its clinical significance is unclear. This study examined the effects of macrotroponin and repeat testing by different hs-cTnI assays in a cohort of community patients with elevated hs-cTnI.

METHODS

The first residual serum specimen from each patient in the community admitted to hospital with elevated hs-cTnI (Siemens hs-cTnI Centaur) was retested after immunoglobulin depletion and by 5 other hs-cTn assays. Low recovery of cTnI (<40%) following immunoglobulin depletion was considered as macrotroponin. A retrospective chart review was performed for these participants. Investigator-adjudicated diagnosis served as the reference standard.

RESULTS

In our cohort of community patients with elevated troponin (n = 188), participants with macrotroponin (n = 99) often had a multifactorial or indeterminate myocardial injury (56% vs 25%) and were less likely to have acute coronary syndrome (9% vs 28%). On repeat testing of cTn on other platforms, better diagnostic performance (c-statistics) for ischemic and non-ischemic cardiac causes was observed on the Beckman Access hs-cTnI (0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.81) or the Abbott hs-cTnI Architect (0.75; CI 0.68-0.82) compared to the Siemens hs-cTnI Vista (0.62; CI 0.54-0.70; P < 0.05). This could be attributed to differences in assay reactivity for macrotroponin. Interestingly, better diagnostic performance was observed in patients without macrotroponin. Although a small number of deaths occurred (n = 16), participants with macrotroponin had better overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In the low-risk setting, the presence of macrotroponin was clinically associated with multifactorial or indeterminate causes of troponin elevation.

Storage conditions, sample integrity, interferences, and a decision tool for investigating unusual high-sensitivity cardiac troponin results

The current definition of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays is laboratory-based and their analytical attributes and characteristics have drawn significant attention in the literature at least partly due to the lower concentration cut-offs and changes in concentrations (i.e., deltas) employed in different algorithms and pathways to manage patient care. We propose that pre-analytical conditions such as sample type, storage conditions, and other interferences may also have a significant impact on hs-cTn concentrations and clinical management. The purpose of this literature review is to provide a summary of important pre-analytical and interference studies affecting hs-cTn concentrations. A breakdown of the literature for the major diagnostic companies providing core laboratory instrumentation (i.e., Abbott, Beckman, Ortho, Roche, and Siemens) is also provided. Finally, three cases are highlighted where knowledge of pre-analytical factors aids the hs-cTn clinically discordant investigations. This review highlights the importance of pre-analytical variables, especially storage condition, sample handling, and blood tubes used (i.e., sample type) when interpreting hs-cTn assays. Additional studies are needed to further elaborate on pre-analytical variables (i.e., centrifugation, sample type, stability) and interferences for all hs-cTn assays in clinical use, as knowledge of these variables may aid in hs-cTn clinically discordant investigations.